General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhere was the outrage when Tea Party Terrorist/Bundy Militia member Jerad Miller killed officers?
Last edited Tue Dec 23, 2014, 06:38 PM - Edit history (1)
So do FOX News and the Far-Right have blood on their hands?
Anyone? ... Anyone? ... Bueller?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)It is cruel to expect actual thinking from these people. Some might even show up in this thread
napkinz
(17,199 posts)we'll be ready to alert
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)but I don't remember the first time.
(and I hope to see it dozens of more times in the coming years ... it's like cowbell)
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)I also liked the sequel (I know, everyone says it wasn't as good, but I laughed throughout)
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)Let's hear a police union rep acknowledge that.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)All the fucker needs is a Southern accent to be perfect.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)what a terrible man!
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)I would straight up say, "I care more about my son's life than about Herr Lynch's sick opinions."
napkinz
(17,199 posts)I wish someone would ask him that.
(I know, Lynch would blame the victim.)
malaise
(269,068 posts)Have to wonder
napkinz
(17,199 posts)About the Author
Lynch was a British slave owner in the West Indies. He was invited to the colony of Virginia in 1712 to teach his methods to slave owners there. The term "lynching" is derived from his last name.
http://www.amazon.com/Willie-Lynch-Letter-Making-Slave/dp/1592323065
malaise
(269,068 posts)He was a despicable human being
napkinz
(17,199 posts)and "our" Pat Lynch is a pretty despicable person ... that over-the-top invective was really beyond the pale.
malaise
(269,068 posts)We know about Willlie Lynch in these parts. We also know Thomas Thistlewood. Martin Bashir was fired for suggesting that Lady Blah Blah Palin experience his treatment for slaves before chatting rubbish on the subject.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)nt
malaise
(269,068 posts)Douglas Hall - you'll weep
napkinz
(17,199 posts)have to go off for a while but I'll look into it
(had just done a Google search and found this ... "Thomas Thistlewood (16 March 1721 ‒ 30 November 1786) was a British citizen who migrated to western Jamaica where he became a plantation overseer and owner of land, property, and slaves. He is remembered for his diary, an important historical document chronicling the history of Jamaica and slavery during the 18th century." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Thistlewood)
I've been reading material online about him. It's Christmas Eve and all I can think about is the utter heinous suffering he inflicted on those poor souls. And that he recorded it all in a diary.
just horrible!
(I remember Bashir had left MSNBC over a remark about Palin but I didn't know the full story.)
malaise
(269,068 posts)but we often see some good people around this time of year and at other times
whathehell
(29,067 posts)which may hold some clue as to why he's ratcheting up the rhetoric.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)that's not a good sign
napkinz
(17,199 posts)Initech
(100,083 posts)It was very widely known that Jerad Miller was a follower of Infowars. Fuck that bullshit.
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)Initech
(100,083 posts)True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)He believes Obama creates hurricanes and tornadoes to prop up a FEMA conspiracy.
Initech
(100,083 posts)Are the result of Obama wanting to start a private army for the purpose of taking guns away. And he also thinks that Obama staged those mass shootings in Colorado and Connecticut.
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)Either he is legitimately mentally ill - which would fit his delusional claims - and in which case the real indictment is against the hate-driven pieces of shit who follow him.
Or he, like they, is just so full to the brim with hate that he just cannot stop himself from fabricating an entire alternate reality to justify the sheer intensity of his bigotry.
Initech
(100,083 posts)True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)Initech
(100,083 posts)True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)Miller espoused.
If you're white and "right" (wing) and you kill an officer, you are a lone wolf.
tradewinds
(260 posts)These things happen.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)nt
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)1.Blacks
2.Black Leaders
3.Liberals
4.Protesters
5.Obama
6. Everything else organic or non-organic that serves a Republican purpose.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)Muslim shooter = entire religion guilty
Black shooter = entire race guilty
White shooter = mentally troubled lone wolf
see http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025989785
world wide wally
(21,747 posts)by stating that Trevon Martin could have looked like his own kid. Never did asshat Hannity talk about how he was blatantly inciting violence toward the Feds during the Bundy confrontation.
That fucking hypocrite isn't worth the piss to be peed on if he was on fire.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Last edited Thu Dec 25, 2014, 04:22 PM - Edit history (1)
and it was posted here on DU.It's not like these JBS types are going away anytime soon. They are continuing to create more 'lone gunmen' in heart and mind. They have the Koch$s.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)could you post a link?
thanks
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Last edited Sat Dec 27, 2014, 07:00 PM - Edit history (1)
Far-Right Anti-Government Group Plans Political Takeover Of Navajo County, ArizonaSource: Right Wing Watch
Richard Mack, a former Arizona sheriff and popular Patriot movement speaker, gave a speech in Pueblo, Colorado, in which he announced that he was launching a new bid for public office.
Mack said that he would be moving to Navajo County, Arizona, to run as the county sheriff in 2016 and told the members of the Tea Party group in his audience, I need some backup and I wouldnt mind if you went there, too.
He wasnt joking. In fact, Mack is the most prominent recruit of a group that is seeking to stage a political takeover of the sprawling rural county as an experiment in creating a local government that will ignore and nullify federal laws such as federal lands restrictions and gun regulations that its leaders believe to be unconstitutional.
Mack explained the plan in a speech to this weekends I Wont Comply demonstration in Olympia, Washington, which gathered anti-government activists from around the country to protest a new state law requiring background checks on most gun purchases.
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/anti-government-patriot-movement-group-plans-political-takeover-arizona-county
to big dog:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014967415
Yes, he came to Olympia, state capitol of WA. He came to WA to protest a law the citizens passed, the sane ones, that is. The ones who would take us back to the days of Reagan and the Brady Bill, but a milder version. And these laws are made from state to state.
The one the 2nd Amendment Solution radicals wanted didn't pass although WA has plenty of RWNJs and some of those have killed people. WA is pushing back on them as shown in this revealing thread at DU with two videos.
to DonViejo:
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/10025976802
WA state actually has a strong state constitution protecting civil rights including gun rights for the most part and its own legal militia. It is not anti-gun by any means, except to the Absolutionists.
Richard Mack sounds like a member of the Bundesreich. And he really does get around, doesn't he?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Mack
Connie comes off much better than Richard, and quite liberal, so my apologies to him:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connie_Mack_III
napkinz
(17,199 posts)The media are blaming "Black Lives Matter" -- a movement that embraces peaceful protest -- for the deaths of police officers, and have been totally overlooking these dangerous right-wing militant groups who truly have BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS.
So Mack "needs some backup." Bundy needed backup too. They all need backup.
Yeah, the article says he wants to "stage a political takeover", but if that fails, we know what he and his "backup" will resort to.
(We know what backup really means: violent anti-government insurrectionists.)
--
"background checks on most gun purchases" ... they don't need no stinkin' background checks.
Oh, what the heck. It's Christmas ... a gun in every stocking!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Rand Paul is forgetful
Here are comments of what we are seeing IRL created by Koch funded ALEC laws and the media pushing the Tea Party and Libertarian view of the Second Amendment:
Hi, I'm wearing a firearm and deciding FOR YOU what constitutes "unamerican activities" while speaking into a microphone. For other examples of para-military people gathering en masse strapped with firearms while their leaders speak into microphones while deciding what constitutes patriotism, google "Gestapo rallies."
Anyone who says this man doesn't condone and advocate violence must think people are stupid. This militia man clearly stated that they would use violence, and who the hell walks around with ASSAULT WEAPONS if they don't intend to incite violence? People of Kentucky you're crazy if you vote for this RACIST SEDITIOUS IDIOT.
Is he really comparing his movement to the civil war? He does realize the "rebels" lost, right? The feds have put seditious, treasonous and fearmongering idiots down before.
Minorities shouldn't be able to force their agenda by physical violence. If there aren't enough like-minded to influence an election, they have to live with it, just like many regretably did during Bush's 8 years. These tea party people are a minority and if you talk to them personally, they don't have facts to back up their racist, delusional beliefs straight from the worst News channel.
How can Rand Paul not have noticed the weapons? Did he listen to the veiled threats by the speaker? 'a costly civil war that is imminent and sure to be forced upon us' doesn't sound like peacefulness.
Do we want a banana republic of rule by the gun, with private armies working for the plutocrats to enforce their property rights, religion and telling us where we can live, how we have to work and manage our sex lives, and tell us what we can do or say under their gunmen watching over us?
While everyone is busy talking about surveillance, and the spin being pushed by this same group, are we protected from losing our right to vote, how to manage our reproductive and sex lives, and giving all resources to those funding this?
I smell something rotten, and it's a lot more personal than phone calls or metadata. Would the mentality that would strip all these other rights from us, very private ones, stop at going after us who don't agree with them?
The 10th Amendment folks want us to live in 50 fiefdoms with human rights subject to the whims of plutocrats. In essence, they want to take away all the rights of those in those states who are not of their kind.
Paul Ryan wants to repeal the 14th Amendment with its Birthright Citizenship, Equal Protection Under the Law and Due Process. Yes, all of those were passed after the Civil War.
Tthat some are related to the Constitution and the 4th Amendment, did not protect women, minorities of any kind, or those who did not own property or have wealth, which are prerequisites for the Libertarian's Holy Grail of citizenship and political participation. They don't believe others deserve a vote.
The rights we hold dear, of labor, women, voting and others are never addressed by these zealots, except to call them as unConstitutional and calling us traitors. And increasingly, to destroy the government that is in place from that same Constitution.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023443555
napkinz
(17,199 posts)progressoid
(49,992 posts)giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)yell false flag, as they always do when one of their own goes off the rails.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)JUNE 09, 2014
Can you imagine the Fox Nation outrage if the Las Vegas shooting had been committed by, oh, say Black Panthers or Islamic jihadists? You can bet that this would be a big, fat all day lede which would contain the word "terror." But this act of domestic terror, committed by Second Amendment loving, government hating, Cliven Bundy supporting white Americans with white supremacist links is being ignored (as of 3:45 EDT) on Fox Nation, the place where real Americans can articulate the same kind of hatred shown by Jerad and Amanda Miller who draped that yellow Gadsen flag, so beloved by the Tea Party, over the bodies of the police men whom they shot!
One assumes, however, that if Fox Nation did report this, there would be a great outpouring of support for the Millers, so maybe it's better that they didn't. Wonder what Bundy fanboy Hannity will say? Once again, you can bet if this had been done by blacks or Muslims he would be fulminating about terrorism!
BTW, the Fox News website hasn't updated its story to include the video verification that Miller was at the Bundy Ranch. If you want to peak into the mind of a white, domestic terrorist, here's Miller's manifesto. Sounds a lot like the stuff you see on Fox Nation and hear at Tea Party rallies!
http://www.newshounds.us/20140609_fox_nation_ignores_las_vegas_shooting
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)made no connection whatsoever. To do so would have caused massive heart attacks among their viewership.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)Bob Roberts:
"Called into Klannitys radio show yesterday. Told the screener I wanted to talk about the Las Vegas shooting. He told me Klannitys wasnt talking about it and hung up. Thats it, not talking about it and click.
Didnt watch Faux last nite but can guarantee there was not one word of the Vegas shooting or the shooters' previous actions mentioned from 8-11. Guaranteed. Rachel covered it well from what i saw on her re-airing at midnight."
http://www.newshounds.us/20140609_fox_nation_ignores_las_vegas_shooting
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)fundie and racist terrorism.
Why is a mystery to me.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)me b zola
(19,053 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)because they would have to look in the mirror
me b zola
(19,053 posts)I think that it shows much more than hypocrisy. I believe that it in itself is evidence of the institutional bias that makes it acceptable for certain people (of color and liberal minded people in general) to be abused and all too often shot down by police. I believe that this is how the subject should be framed. Certain people have less rights than others, and the media's reporting on these issues is evidence of that.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)supports your point:
Those who rightly expressed outrage over the murder of Eric Garner were regarded by the media in many cases as thugs, rabble-rousers, police haters (failing to see the protests were not anti-police but anti-police malfeasance.)
You don't find any such negative portrayals in the media of those who rightly express outrage over the murders of Officers Liu and Ramos.
edit: in fact, those who used inflammatory rhetoric -- like Pat "blood on the hands" Lynch -- have gotten a bye.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)Your short post was perfection.
Yet we hear repeated from the media how the protests are "anti-police" when in fact people are simply demanding that citizens are not abused at the hands of the police. But the rhetoric from the media lets us know that in fact the very raising of our voices to demand justice makes us suspect.
I've seen this all happening for years now, it seems like slow motion. But sure enough we are now in a very scary and dark place. We must speak clearly and with conviction. It is not about some bad cops. It is institutional and pervasive. It is more than just the rancid police departments, it is embedded in our culture.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)justice makes us suspect."
And the tragic deaths of officers Ramos and Liu are being exploited to demonize the movement. There's an attempt to shame the protesters and silence the fight for justice.
What those on the right don't understand is that one can condemn the murders of the officers, mourn their deaths, grieve for their families, and STILL protest police brutality.
lark
(23,123 posts)honesty. One thing you always get, hypocrisy and lies. It's OK to kill bootjacketed thugs (police) if they are going against some gun nut who's stealing federal land. Cliven Bundy and RW militias aren't held accountable, even though they deliberately caused the whole thing. However, marchers, who had nothing whatsoever to do with the 2 cop killings, are held responsible for something that had nothing to do with them.
They have no shame, no caring or real sense of morality. They are despicable traitors, end of story.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)On June 8, 2014, white, anti-government, tea party supporters (Jerad and Amanda Miller) shot and killed two Las Vegas police officers. Conservative media was conspicuously silent.
On Saturday, Ismaaiyl Brinsley shot and killed NYPD officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos as they sat in their patrol car, in the Brooklyn neighborhood of Bedford-Stuyvesant. Brinsley, who had made very anti-police statements on Instagram, was later found dead of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Police spokesmen and conservative media were quick to blame the murders on the widespread protests of police killings of unarmed black males such as Michael Brown, Eric Garner, John Crawford, Tamir Rice, and others.
see http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025996500#post51
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)Chances are most of you don't know about this because it was never really reported.
This was posted on Ultra Right Wing website Infowars by convicted felon, murderer and terrorist Jared Miller about 2 years before he and his girlfriend cowardly gunned down two police officers who were having pizza.
http://planet.infowars.com/offbeat/the-police-to-kill-or-not-to-kill
He was also interviewed on local media (0:40)
and then there is Adam Kokesh.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)1. Jerad Miller shoots and kills two officers to avenge injustice, and the right-wing and the media call him a lone wolf.
2. Ismaaiyl Brinsley shoots and kills two officers to avenge injustice, and the right-wing and media blame liberalism, Mayor Bill de Blasio, President Obama, and the "Black Lives Matter" movement.
Explosive media coverage over the second; none over the first.
Got it!
hibbing
(10,098 posts)Between pictures of the idiot son, the torturer in chief, and Hannity, I need a barf bag handy.
Peace
napkinz
(17,199 posts)couldn't resist
Initech
(100,083 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)...."Bundy who?"
It's related to, "Bush who?"
napkinz
(17,199 posts)I'd rather not.
sakabatou
(42,159 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)I don't recall any outrage or explosive coverage
sakabatou
(42,159 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)why would they go insane? ... he was one of their own
napkinz
(17,199 posts)by Terrance Heath
December 23, 2014
On June 8, 2014, white, anti-government, tea party supporters shot and killed two Las Vegas police officers. Conservative media was conspicuously silent.
On Saturday, Ismaaiyl Brinsley shot and killed NYPD officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos as they sat in their patrol car, in the Brooklyn neighborhood of Bedford-Stuyvesant. Brinsley, who had made very anti-police statements on Instagram, was later found dead of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Police spokesmen and conservative media were quick to blame the murders on the widespread protests of police killings of unarmed black males such as Michael Brown, Eric Garner, John Crawford, Tamir Rice, and others.
-snip-
Never mind that President Obama called for anyone who protests these shootings and grand jury decisions to do so peacefully. Never mind that the president has said that theres no excuse for violence. The irony of a black president is that his most innocuous utterances that America still has racial problems are interpreted by conservatives as radical and anti-white. Never mind that a majority of cop killers have been white. Conservatives blame police killings of, and violence against blacks, on black lawlessness run amok. Never mind that the #BlackLivesMatter movement has condemned the murders of officers Liu and Ramos. Conservatives blame the movement collectively for the murder of officers Liu and Ramos.
This conservative penchant for collective blaming was absent on June 8, when Jerad and Amanda Miller both white shot and killed Las Vegas police officers Igor Soldo and Alyn Beck, as they had lunch at a strip mall. The couple dragged the officers bodies from their booth, draped Becks body with the yellow Gasden flag popular with the tea party movement, and pinned a note to Soldos body reading This is the beginning of the revolution. ...
Reports surfaced of Jerad Millers anti-government posts to Facebook, and Alex Jones Infowars message board including a post titled, The Police (to kill or not to kill). The Millers camped out at Cliven Bundys ranch, where Bundys militia pointed guns at sheriffs deputys and threatened to kill federal officers. Jerad Miller was even interviewed at the ranch, before being booted for his radical views.
Conservatives were less than outraged. Instead of blaming Cliven Bundy, Alex Jones, or the tea party movement, they tried to paint the Millers as radical leftists. Conservative media refused to call the Las Vegas shooting terrorism.
read more: http://www.commondreams.org/views/2014/12/23/conservative-media-and-cop-killers-different-color
maced666
(771 posts)No? Then these two cases are different. The only common core is that punk thug cowards killed police officers.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)In the first case, a movement -- "Black Lives Matter" -- has been blamed for the killer's actions.
In the second case, no group was blamed for the killer's actions, despite the fact that the killer had been part of a group -- Cliven Bundy's Militia -- that had been threatening law enforcement.
[font size="3"]--[/font]
In the first case, protesters against police brutality, Mayor Bill de Blasio, President Obama, liberals are said to have "blood on their hands."
In the second case, it was a lone wolf; the far-right that actually incited the violent act was given a pass. No one said they had "blood on their hands" when in fact they did.
[font size="3"]--[/font]
In the first case, there has been outrage and explosive media coverage.
In the second case, there was silence for the most part.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)An black male kills two officers, and groups and a movement he is no part of are to blame.
A white male kills two officers, and he's a lone wolf, despite the fact that his actions were incited by a group and movement to which he belonged.
Un-f'n-believable!
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)Somewhere in the background is the justification of white people feeling wronged: therefore of course someone declared a personal revolution and shot some cops. Guerrilla warfare is also righteous when used on behalf of white people feeling peeved: after all that's the way the Revolutionary War was fought. If a manifesto was involved, it will be treated as a holy document.
What's interesting is even other police are not invoking the loss of "their own" or "their brothers", like they are about the NY police. This is what makes their posturing over NY seem political rather than genuinely emotional.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)daredtowork
(3,732 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)daredtowork
(3,732 posts)Shouldn't someone be trying to make a citizen's arrest or calling the cops or doing something to stop the guy? I think just standing around taking pictures of an obvious assassination attempt makes them all accessories.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)the response would have been.
Arrested? I doubt he would be alive.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)KATIE HALPER
December 22, 2014
On Saturday, a lone mentally ill shooter, not from New York City and not part of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protest movement, executed two NYPD police officers, before killing himself. In June of this year, a couple who had spent time on Clive Bundys ranch executed two Las Vegas police officers, wrapped their bodies in Dont Tread on Me flags, and then shot themselves. Republicans, right wing media and police officials are blaming the NYPD murders on BLM. But why didnt they blame the murders of the Las Vegas officers on the Tea Party movement?
Obviously, the way to honor the two police officers murdered on Saturday is by exploiting their tragic murder for political purposes in a way that actually defies logic. To do this, simply blame the actions of a single lone shooter with a history of mental illness and suicide attempts on a non-violent protest movement which outrageously demands that police not kill people for the crime of being Black. Also claim that Mayor Bill de Blasio, Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama are to blame but dont bother pretending that there is any evidence for that claim because you wont find it. But if youre Ray Kelly, Rudy Giuliani, Patrick Lynch, George Pataki or Fox News, thats no big deal anyway.
When Jerad and Amanda Miller shot Las Vegas police officers Alyn Beck and Igor Soldo execution style as the two men ate pizza, the Millers said the killing was the start of the revolution and they wrapped the bodies of their victims in the Dont tread on me, flag that has come to symbolize the Tea Party Movement. The couple also Facebook-liked Operation American Spring, Alliance Defending Freedom, the National Rifle Association, The Heritage Foundation, Rand Paul 2016, Three Percenter Nation, Ron Paul, and Drudge Report. In the case of last weeks horrendous NYC police killings (1) the killer wasnt from New York or part of the BLM movement, (2) the killer also attempted to kill his girlfriend, who was not a police officer, (3) Barack Obama, Bill de Blasio, the family of Michael Brown and the family of Eric Garner condemned the murders of NYPD officers Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu. So, where were the officials tracing back this ideological murder to these organizations and sites? Surely Giuliani, Lynch, Pataki and Fox News would have to agree that the alleged causal connection between deBlasio, Obama, Holder, BLM and the NYPD deaths pales in comparison to The Tea Party movement and the Las Vegas deaths. This is especially true given that the organizers of BLM are explicitly non-violent while many of the organizations involved with the Tea Party and much of the Tea Party movement embraces violence.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/12/if-black-lives-matter-killed-nypd-officers-tea-party-killed-las-vegas-police/
Cha
(297,339 posts)Sorry I missed it!
napkinz
(17,199 posts)it's really sickening to see all these right-wing demagogues rage about the killings of the NY officers by an African-American male when they were SILENT back in June about the killings of Las Vegas officers by a white male who was a member of Cliven Bundy's milita.
Cha
(297,339 posts)their collective ass.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)let's hope for more enlightenment and peace in the new year
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Sad to say, but true.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)it's on the rise!
Cha
(297,339 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)both of these cases -- in NY and Las Vegas -- were horrific tragedies
we must never lose sight of that
for the officers and their families, especially during this time of the year when families gather to celebrate the holidays ...
napkinz
(17,199 posts)June 10, 2014
ERIC BOEHLERT
-snip-
The chilling details of Sunday's Las Vegas ambush produced public shock and intense media coverage. One major news outlet seemed to lag behind, though: Fox News.
Primetime hosts Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity both ignored the shocking cop-killer story last night, while Megyn Kelly devoted four sentences to it. (By contrast, the story covered extensively during CNN and MSNBC's primetime.) Fox talkers on Monday were still far more interested in debating the prisoner swap of Bowe Bergdahl than they were examining the political ambush in Las Vegas.
For Fox News, the Las Vegas killing spree represents a toxic mix of guns, far-right insurrectionism, tea party implications, and the Cliven Bundy ranch standoff. For Fox News, the story about right-wing gun violence and the seeds of a bloody political revolution present all kinds of problems for the channel and its outspoken hosts, some of whom have previously championed limitless gun rights, insurrectionism, the Tea Party, and racist rancher Bundy.
In the 36 hours after the shooting, Fox News tread lightly around the Las Vegas story, producing regular news updates about the crime spree. But Fox provided almost no commentary, no context, and certainly no collective blame for the executions.
And that's how Fox News deals with right-wing domestic terrorism in America, when it even bothers to acknowledge the killings and the crimes. (The channel barely covered Georgia's courthouse siege last week.) At Fox, the deadly and disturbing events are treated as isolated incidents that are mostly void of politics. And more importantly, on Fox the perpetrators are always portrayed as lone gunmen (and women) who do not represent any cultural or political movement.
read more: http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/06/10/how-fox-news-covers-right-wing-cop-killers/199651
Cha
(297,339 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)[font size="3"]Fox News' Double Standard For Right-Wing Cop Killers[/font]
December 22, 2014
ERIC BOEHLERT
The politicization surrounding the killing of two New York Police Department officers over the weekend was amazingly swift. Fox News led the right-wing media charge, immediately claiming Democratic elected officials were somehow responsible for the gun rampage, which began in Baltimore when Ismaaiyl Brinsley allegedly shot his ex-girlfriend, and extended to Brooklyn when the mentally troubled shooter assassinated two police officers, before killing himself on a city subway platform.
On Fox, hosts and guests were sure who was to blame for the tragedy; not the gunman necessarily, but political and community leaders like President Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder, Mayor Bill de Blasio and MSNBC's Al Sharpton. Why? Because the men, to varying degrees, have spoken out about the troubled relationship between law enforcement and the black community, and raised concerns about two recent high-profile cases, Michael Brown and Eric Garner, in which unarmed black men were killed, and police officers responsible were not indicted.
Against that backdrop of civil protest, former New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik told Fox News, "I personally feel that Mayor de Blasio, Sharpton and others like them, they actually have blood on their hands."
"Let's talk about the president as well," responded Fox's Jeanine Pirro, suggesting Obama and Mayor de Blasio were to blame. "The two of them have undoubtedly created racial tensions that worsens, not betters the situation for law enforcement."
Appearing on Fox News, former New York City Mayor Rudolf Giuliani insisted the message from recent Obama "propaganda" was that "everybody should hate the cops." (No such Obama "propaganda" actually exists.)
read more: http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/12/22/fox-news-double-standard-for-right-wing-cop-kil/201978
the article above goes on to look at how when right-wing nut Jerad Miller killed two cops in Vegas earlier in the year, FOX looked the other way and called Miller a lone-wolf, ignoring Miller's ties to violent far-right groups (like the Bundy militia that was threatening law enforcement).
The article concludes: "Once again, Fox paid little attention to those right-wing executions of law enforcement officers."
Cha
(297,339 posts)Response to Cha (Reply #109)
napkinz This message was self-deleted by its author.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)LIED about what the "Black Lives Matter" protesters were demonstrating against (and then attributed the deaths of the NY officers to their demonstrations) ...
see http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026009730 posted by kpete