General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMovie: The Interview
Isn't this about an assassination attempt on the current leader of North Korea?
I'm not a fan of Kim Jong-un however wouldn't a movie be illegal to produce here if it were about this same subject and our current President?
What outrage and retaliation would the U.S. have towards a foreign movie that targeted our President in a film like this?
Just wondering if there isn't a double standard here.
Archae
(46,345 posts)Just look at the "Hot Shots" movies.
Saddam Hussein was the bad guy, years before he was overthrown.
In fact, the movie even dropped bomb right in his lap.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)'Death of a President'. There was no outrage nor retaliation, just a big yawn because it's just a movie.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0853096/
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)The first amendment protects such work.
We've had movies where the president is killed, perhaps you're unaware?
SHRED
(28,136 posts)...for posting up threats against the President but it's okay to make a movie?
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Hopefully the Secret Service and the FBI do.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Iggo
(47,565 posts)bhikkhu
(10,724 posts)and killed or captured the president. Natural disasters, terrorists, aliens, white supremacists, North Koreans (in "Olympus has Fallen" most recently). Not to mention the ones where the president is an evil plot-master, or the puppet of evil plot-masters, despicably conspiring against the world somehow. Its a tired genre, and there's a shortage of acceptable villains, really.
...aren't the characters fictional?
Are there movies like this where current serving Presidents are portrayed?
I can't think of a single one where a leader here hasn't been fictionalized.
It's yet another low-brow comedy movie about the evil American intelligence apparatus hiring a number bumbling idiots to perform a dangerous mission.
rollin74
(1,990 posts)to produce here
nor should it be