Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
19 replies, 1267 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
19 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You Tube has "The Interview," complete movie. It's about $5. n/t (Original Post)
RKP5637
Dec 2014
OP
I do wonder about that. I had heard IT was pissed off about a layoff or something like
RKP5637
Dec 2014
#7
That's all they're paying? Everyone's time is worth minimum wage at least! . . .
Journeyman
Dec 2014
#6
and sony, a massive Japanese corporation, rakes it in via the gullible american public. nt
Javaman
Dec 2014
#12
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)1. The Invitation?
To what?
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)3. LOL, yep, it was a typo! I fixed it! Thanks! n/t
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)2. "The Interview," you mean?
I have better things to spend $5 on. Like... losing $5 in the sofa or something.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)4. Yep, typo, early eggnog! lol n/t
tularetom
(23,664 posts)5. I don't want to be complicit in what may be a cheap publicity stunt
So I won't be paying my $5.
On the other hand, I have to hand it to Sony for turning a hack by a disgruntled employee into a free advertisement for a mediocre movie.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)7. I do wonder about that. I had heard IT was pissed off about a layoff or something like
that.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)9. "IT WAS A DISGRUNTLED SONY INSIDER, OUT FOR REVENGE"
....
Marc W. Rogers, a "whitehat" hacker and security researcher at the online-traffic-optimizer CloudFlare, wrote on his personal blog that he's betting on "a disgruntled (possibly ex) employee of Sony." He notes that there were multiple ways hackers could have made money from stealing Sony's information, and a nation-state could have used its access to Sony to gain more information about the film industry. Instead, Guardians of Peace chose to dump the information in a manner that's extremely embarrassing to Sony.
....
Its clear from the hard-coded paths and passwords in the malware that whoever wrote it had extensive knowledge of Sonys internal architecture and access to key passwords. While its plausible that an attacker could have built up this knowledge over time and then used it to make the malware, Occams razor suggests the simpler explanation of an insider. It also fits with the pure revenge tact that this started out as.
This theory is supported by what people claiming to be affiliated with the Sony hackers told the Verge last month. "Sony doesn't lock their doors, physically, so we worked with other staff with similar interests to get in," a hacker going by the name "lena" said via email. "Im sorry I can't say more, safety for our team is important [sic]." The group called Sony Entertainment CEO Michael Lynton a "criminal" on Twitter, and another hacker said, "We Want equality [sic]. Sony doesn't. It's an upward battle."
A more mainstream variation on this theory is that North Korea was behind the attack, but they had help from someone affiliated with Sony. TMZ reported that multiple Sony sources said they believe this is what happened, with some suggesting "a possible link between the hackers and Sony layoffs, which included a large number of IT employees." The New York Times report that revealed the government had concluded North Korea was "centrally involved" also noted that investigators are considering the possibility that it was partially an inside job:
At Sony, investigators are looking into the possibility that the attackers had inside help. Embedded in the malicious code were the names of Sony servers and administrative credentials that allowed the malware to spread across Sonys network.
....
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/12/4-alternate-theories-on-who-hacked-sony.html
Marc W. Rogers, a "whitehat" hacker and security researcher at the online-traffic-optimizer CloudFlare, wrote on his personal blog that he's betting on "a disgruntled (possibly ex) employee of Sony." He notes that there were multiple ways hackers could have made money from stealing Sony's information, and a nation-state could have used its access to Sony to gain more information about the film industry. Instead, Guardians of Peace chose to dump the information in a manner that's extremely embarrassing to Sony.
....
Its clear from the hard-coded paths and passwords in the malware that whoever wrote it had extensive knowledge of Sonys internal architecture and access to key passwords. While its plausible that an attacker could have built up this knowledge over time and then used it to make the malware, Occams razor suggests the simpler explanation of an insider. It also fits with the pure revenge tact that this started out as.
This theory is supported by what people claiming to be affiliated with the Sony hackers told the Verge last month. "Sony doesn't lock their doors, physically, so we worked with other staff with similar interests to get in," a hacker going by the name "lena" said via email. "Im sorry I can't say more, safety for our team is important [sic]." The group called Sony Entertainment CEO Michael Lynton a "criminal" on Twitter, and another hacker said, "We Want equality [sic]. Sony doesn't. It's an upward battle."
A more mainstream variation on this theory is that North Korea was behind the attack, but they had help from someone affiliated with Sony. TMZ reported that multiple Sony sources said they believe this is what happened, with some suggesting "a possible link between the hackers and Sony layoffs, which included a large number of IT employees." The New York Times report that revealed the government had concluded North Korea was "centrally involved" also noted that investigators are considering the possibility that it was partially an inside job:
At Sony, investigators are looking into the possibility that the attackers had inside help. Embedded in the malicious code were the names of Sony servers and administrative credentials that allowed the malware to spread across Sonys network.
....
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/12/4-alternate-theories-on-who-hacked-sony.html
I'm thinking A LOT of people have been duped.
Journeyman
(15,038 posts)6. That's all they're paying? Everyone's time is worth minimum wage at least! . . .
Raine
(30,540 posts)8. They'd have to pay me $5 to waste my time watching that schlock. nt
Logical
(22,457 posts)14. LOL, another DU expert weighs in. nt
elias49
(4,259 posts)10. Wow! I found it for free.
Just saying. And wondering how YouTube can charge for it.? And how much goes back to Sony?
Logical
(22,457 posts)15. Stealing! Hooray, the american way! Shot lift me something nice today also! nt
elias49
(4,259 posts)17. Oh righteous one! I said I found it.
I'm not interested in the movie. Not into juvenile humor. Fuck off.
Logical
(22,457 posts)18. Ahhhhhh, grumpy? Temper temper! nt
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)11. I will wait until it is on DVD and available to rent
on Redbox for $1.25.
Javaman
(62,534 posts)12. and sony, a massive Japanese corporation, rakes it in via the gullible american public. nt
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)13. Yep! n/t
Logical
(22,457 posts)16. So you knowledge of the movie business has helped you determine that Sony will make more....
off this now than if they would of released it normally?
nice try.