Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOh noes! MSNBC, what have you done!
Michael Steele, formerC hairman of the Republican National Committee, is subbing for Chris Matthews. What have they done with Luke Russert?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
16 replies, 3003 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oh noes! MSNBC, what have you done! (Original Post)
procon
Dec 2014
OP
Well, you know, since NBC bases their hires on DNA rather than talent, I just figured...
valerief
Dec 2014
#12
Better than after watching Fox where you have to go through level 5 hazmat decontamination.
Fred Sanders
Dec 2014
#9
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)1. Not much difference between Steele and Matthews anyway.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)2. They are putting their toe in the water...
...just to see what kind of rating a conservative might get?
doc03
(35,346 posts)3. You may be right. I can't stand Mattews anyway.
Rhiannon12866
(205,485 posts)4. I was wondering if anyone else was noticing, LOL
Michael Steele is often on as a "contributor," so I don't think we'll see much of a difference.
valerief
(53,235 posts)5. Does Luke have a son yet that's reporting for MSNBC? nt
JHB
(37,161 posts)11. Naw, the kid just writes his lines...
Oh, wait, he doesn't have a kid? Then the only other explanation would be...
valerief
(53,235 posts)12. Well, you know, since NBC bases their hires on DNA rather than talent, I just figured...
csziggy
(34,136 posts)6. My husband came in and said that Tweety had gotten a suntan!
I was watching re-runs of Castle since I detest Chris Matthews.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)7. Barely noticed the difference.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)8. Remember, msnbc is owned by Comcast, the sleaziest company in the US.
If you watch msnbc you should take a shower afterward.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)9. Better than after watching Fox where you have to go through level 5 hazmat decontamination.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)10. and an irrigation...
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,414 posts)13. This is why
I can't take anybody who says that MSNBC is a "liberal Fox News" seriously
Vinca
(50,278 posts)14. I'm no fan of Michael Steele,but when I realized Tweety was off it was like getting another present.
BumRushDaShow
(129,096 posts)15. ^^THIS^^
In the old days, Smerconish used to sub for Tweety but I noticed a couple months ago that Smerconish has a show on CNN now (something that apparently happened last spring).
jwirr
(39,215 posts)16. That won't bother my schedule - I won't watch either of them.