Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 03:18 AM Dec 2014

Foes of Obama's Cuba opening rewrite their Apartheid past

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/23/1353832/-Foes-of-Obama-s-Cuba-opening-rewrite-their-Apartheid-past

New polls from CBS News and the Washington Post shows the American people overwhelmingly support President Obama's decision to reestablish diplomatic relations with Cuba. That common sense consensus to end a failed Cold War policy which has outlived the Soviet Union by a generation has produced some pretty stunning responses from a furious hodge-podge of Cuban-American irredentists and hard-right ideologues. But for sheer chutzpah, none of the objections can match this whopper from National Review editor Rich Lowry:

If Cuba were a racist apartheid-style system rather than a Communist dictatorship, no one would be so eager to do business with it.


Sadly for Lowry's comical attempt at revisionist history, there was no shortage of conservatives "eager to do business" with apartheid South Africa. Among them were the National Review and President Ronald Reagan.

As Jacob Heilbrunn documented at length, the National Review was an early, vocal supporter of the Afrikaner regime and its deepening apartheid system in South Africa. In a 1960 editorial, NR declared, "the whites are entitled, we believe, to pre-eminence in South Africa." And 26 years later--at the height of the global debate over sanctions against and divestment from Boer-controlled South Africa--little had changed for William F. Buckley's rag:

To what extent is the vast majority of South African blacks intellectually and practically prepared to assume the social, economic, and political leadership in a highly industrialized country?

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Foes of Obama's Cuba opening rewrite their Apartheid past (Original Post) eridani Dec 2014 OP
Another RW con shill with no fucking clue about history spewing more lies into the lieosphere.... Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #1
Ronald Reagan and his supporters refused to oppose South African apartheid he vetoed the Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #2

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
1. Another RW con shill with no fucking clue about history spewing more lies into the lieosphere....
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 09:10 AM
Dec 2014

when will this end?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
2. Ronald Reagan and his supporters refused to oppose South African apartheid he vetoed the
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 10:04 AM
Dec 2014

sanctions and Congress had to override the veto. Reagan's Director of Communications was Pat Buchanan, an openly racist person who spoke of supremacist societies as a good thing.
"The regime of apartheid in South Africa, under which nonwhites were systematically oppressed and deprived of their rights, is remembered as one of the worst crimes against humanity of the 20th century.

Despite a growing international movement to topple apartheid in the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan maintained a close alliance with a South African government that was showing no signs of serious reform. And the Reagan administration demonized opponents of apartheid, most notably the African National Congress, as dangerous and pro-communist. Reagan even vetoed a bill to impose sanctions on South Africa, only to be overruled by Congress.

On a trip to the United States after winning the Nobel Prize in 1984, Bishop Desmond Tutu memorably declared that Reagan’s policy was ”immoral, evil and totally un-Christian.” Reagan’s record on South Africa was also marked by at least one embarrassing gaffe, when he told a radio interviewer in 1985: “They have eliminated the segregation that we once had in our own country — the type of thing where hotels and restaurants and places of entertainment and so forth were segregated — that has all been eliminated.” Of course, that was simply not true, and Reagan later walked the statement back.
http://www.salon.com/2011/02/05/ronald_reagan_apartheid_south_africa/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Foes of Obama's Cuba open...