Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 12:20 PM Dec 2014

Hillary Clinton is NOT popular among progressive grassroots Dems. But. ...

Hillary Clinton is not popular among progressive aisles and grassroots Dems .

Those everyday progressive people are the majority. Especially since the 2008 crisis witch , as devastating as it was and still is, opened the eyes of so many, in US and wordwide. No wonder why.

But. ....

But Bill and Hill are holding the Dems powerstructures and the party under rheir firm grip . That since Bill left the WH in 2001.

But HRC has the GOOD NAME. The Good Ties. And more important. The Media BESIDE her. That same industry which has already crowned her long ago. No matters what she has to offer is good or bad. Oh no. She is beyond that. She is a Clinton.

The sad thing is that she doesnt have to campaign to win. Btw will a primary be set up? We can wonder. No one enough CONNECTED TO THE GOOD FASHION THIRD WAYERS countender is showing up.

Bernie is wonderfull. But he could not turn red states to Dems. Same with Liz Warren. Is she too afraid of the Team Clinton machine to ever publicly show any ambition? We can wonder...given HRC s baggage re. her WS relationships. And Warrens dedication to stand up against that same WS.

So Hill dont need to campaign. And everyone already knows her.
She will be the nominee.
No matter what the little people who are known as voters really need . A more peaceful world. And a fairer America can wait, isnt it? ???

70 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton is NOT popular among progressive grassroots Dems. But. ... (Original Post) mylye2222 Dec 2014 OP
Ugh. That's all. n/t djean111 Dec 2014 #1
You lost me when you said she had the media... joeybee12 Dec 2014 #2
I think they're all for Clinton... Orsino Dec 2014 #5
Always the same meme. mylye2222 Dec 2014 #8
The same goes with if you are with HRC you are conserative, republican, etc Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #29
Well. othet Dems are trashed here sometimes too. mylye2222 Dec 2014 #34
Wrong on simply supporting her because she is the only alternative to Paul or Jeb, Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #37
Your train of thought seems to have left the station without me... brooklynite Dec 2014 #3
so we're back to hill belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #4
So I hope someone viable mylye2222 Dec 2014 #6
Gore? The irony is that the far left said he and Bush were the same in 2000. Metric System Dec 2014 #15
Gore was a terrible candidate... brooklynite Dec 2014 #22
Gore has personal issues. You can google them, I won't rehash that here. MADem Dec 2014 #30
MADem, you always say, with much more eloquence, what I'm thinking. Tarheel_Dem Dec 2014 #38
All true. But let's also not forget that they will lose against a Jeb Bush, and I surmise BlueCaliDem Dec 2014 #43
Those touters can tout until the trout trot upstream--it won't make a damn bit of difference. MADem Dec 2014 #46
I was talking to Hill (as she prefers her friends to call her) Capt. Obvious Dec 2014 #58
Unrec. A whole bunch of RW memes in one post. FSogol Dec 2014 #7
This person's entire purpose here is to regurgitate this stuff. onehandle Dec 2014 #17
Yup, very sad. I used to think it was due to them missing nuances in language, but FSogol Dec 2014 #26
We don't NEED red states to turn blue. PeteSelman Dec 2014 #9
Not true. She flips WV and probably AR (nt) Recursion Dec 2014 #66
If it comes down to HRC.. sendero Dec 2014 #10
Merci. Thanks for this posts. mylye2222 Dec 2014 #11
omg the hyperbole it burns - hrc is not mit romney and you dont want mit picking scotus belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #16
Yeah, when the Jeb or Mittsy Supreme Court starts churning out their interpretations of the MADem Dec 2014 #31
Or we have votes by senators which can not understand briefings and make the Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #33
She'll be the ultimate "Not As Bad" candidate hoping the Repubs run a real crazy. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2014 #12
The Clash of Titans. Act 2. mylye2222 Dec 2014 #13
"She will be the nominee." if she's elected in the primary and of course if she runs belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #14
Confirms whar I wrote above. mylye2222 Dec 2014 #18
hardly, you say she's inevitable and i say she hasnt said she was running belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #20
I think Hillary will chose to stay working with the Clinton foundation. She can do more Autumn Dec 2014 #19
Yea, I bet you would rather she work with the Clinton Foundation, will you be heartbroken Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #35
Miss Cleo!!! Is it really you? Oops guess not, you don't read minds at a distance well at all. Autumn Dec 2014 #59
Get your panties out of a twist, I did not attack you, unless you are RW. Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #61
"Yea, I bet you would rather she work with the Clinton Foundation, will you be heartbroken when she Autumn Dec 2014 #62
Fine, go your way, you are the one who started HRC stay working with the Clinton Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #63
Or so you hope. BlueCaliDem Dec 2014 #45
Fancy that indeed, I'm sure plenty of Democrats share my opinion also. Autumn Dec 2014 #60
I'm not voting for her bigwillq Dec 2014 #21
here it is people the ridiculousness of some in the democratic party belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #25
In fact the poster stated mylye2222 Dec 2014 #28
I live in CT bigwillq Dec 2014 #36
I usually throw a fit about not voting but in your case your reasoning is sound and you are not in jwirr Dec 2014 #39
Great statement from you, mylye2222 Dec 2014 #41
Unfortunately I do not have the answer. jwirr Dec 2014 #44
"why seems everyone so...afraid...to challenge her???" Because the want to WIN. BlueCaliDem Dec 2014 #47
Jeb Bush thanks you for your support. FSogol Dec 2014 #27
"We can wonder " dont u mean 'some say ' belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #23
Huge unrec and an oh please! hrmjustin Dec 2014 #24
You should have started your factually challenged ramble this way: wyldwolf Dec 2014 #32
woman in a blue dress baking cookies whistling Stand by your cheating man reddread Dec 2014 #40
It's going to be a tough race. ucrdem Dec 2014 #42
Who wouldn't be acceptable? TheKentuckian Dec 2014 #67
The chicken little threads don't scare me. mmonk Dec 2014 #48
oh yes, because now... mylye2222 Dec 2014 #50
You're welcome to your own opinions wyldwolf Dec 2014 #51
Those are FACTS. But not mine, I agree. mylye2222 Dec 2014 #53
As usual, you're confusing 'facts' with 'opinions' wyldwolf Dec 2014 #56
Because the Third Way control and media mmonk Dec 2014 #65
I don't see Hillary turning red states to Dems either. Liz Warren message to working people B Calm Dec 2014 #49
So you're saying Dems lose either way? Need a REAL dem candidate on point Dec 2014 #52
"He can't win, Bill." AtomicKitten Dec 2014 #54
it is time for a black woman… never mind that… a smart woman, to be president Agony Dec 2014 #55
We defeated her before, we'll defeat her again. True Blue Door Dec 2014 #57
The media is not "beside her." They will tear her down. joshcryer Dec 2014 #64
They are about as "beside" her as they will be for any Democrat TheKentuckian Dec 2014 #68
They always mess with the early caucuses. joshcryer Dec 2014 #70
The only people who can turn red states to blue are the voters..."Selma" shows the answer after all kelliekat44 Dec 2014 #69
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
2. You lost me when you said she had the media...
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 12:24 PM
Dec 2014

Asleep during Clinton's two terms? Yeah, the media has always been fair to her.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
5. I think they're all for Clinton...
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 12:28 PM
Dec 2014

...until she becomes the candidate, whereupon they will push the Republican.

 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
8. Always the same meme.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 12:32 PM
Dec 2014

"If you are not with HRC. ..therefore you are AUTOMATICALLY a RW supporter "

Plain manichean vision.



Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
29. The same goes with if you are with HRC you are conserative, republican, etc
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:18 PM
Dec 2014

and oh, the trashing of a Democrat on DU, lots of this to go around.

 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
34. Well. othet Dems are trashed here sometimes too.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:24 PM
Dec 2014

Bit of course they are less "popular".. so...it matters less.

And no. You can be a Clinton supporters and that doesnt mean YOU are a RWers.
Many are supporting her simply because they see her as the only alternative to a Paul or a Jeb.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
37. Wrong on simply supporting her because she is the only alternative to Paul or Jeb,
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:30 PM
Dec 2014

though this is also true, I have followed the Clintons since 1980, she has a good record and though many deny her record and claim name recognition, etc I support HRC because of her stand on the issues, life time of working for Democratic issues.
I have not found this in other potential candidates.

brooklynite

(94,594 posts)
3. Your train of thought seems to have left the station without me...
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 12:26 PM
Dec 2014

You DON'T like Hillary Clinton and you claim other progressive don't as well (nb - polling suggests a substantial portion of Democrats DO like her)

You like Warren but you acknowledge she won't run

You like Sanders but you acknowledge he can't win the General Election.

So.....?

 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
6. So I hope someone viable
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 12:28 PM
Dec 2014

who can get enough support will finally ger out and show up. Why not Gore. He is still liked. Why not someone like Pelosi. Or Boxer?

brooklynite

(94,594 posts)
22. Gore was a terrible candidate...
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:06 PM
Dec 2014

...say what you will about the Supreme Court; Gore lost ten States (including his home State of Tennessee), a win in any one would have made Florida irrelevant.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
30. Gore has personal issues. You can google them, I won't rehash that here.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:19 PM
Dec 2014

Pelosi has never expressed an iota of interest in running for POTUS, and she's SEVENTY FOUR years old. Barbara Boxer is also SEVENTY FOUR....and she's RETIRING.



None of those selections are viable. They are "getting on," they have no national fundraising footprint or ground game, and they aren't INTERESTED--otherwise, they would have piped up long before now.

We're almost in it--the clock is ticking down to the start. The starting gun will go in Spring.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
43. All true. But let's also not forget that they will lose against a Jeb Bush, and I surmise
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 02:00 PM
Dec 2014

that's exactly the reason why they're being touted "instead of" SoS Clinton by some on DU.

SoS Clinton is the ONLY Democrat who has the connections, power, money, and name recognition to defeat Jebbie...and they're - those on the Right and some on the "Left" - are terrified of her.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
46. Those touters can tout until the trout trot upstream--it won't make a damn bit of difference.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 02:04 PM
Dec 2014

Best response to anyone who touts like that is to encourage them to get out their checkbook and donate to their preferred Democrat--do it smartly, quickly and generously, now!

It'll get shoved into that candidate's PAC, and they'll transfer it to the DNC, where it will be spent on issue ads for the nominee!



Donate early and often! Put that money where that mouth is, I say!

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
58. I was talking to Hill (as she prefers her friends to call her)
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 04:27 PM
Dec 2014

about this at our latest fox hunt.

She doesn't take these "grassroots progressive activists" seriously and neither should her Hillraisers.

FSogol

(45,488 posts)
7. Unrec. A whole bunch of RW memes in one post.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 12:29 PM
Dec 2014

Multiple s for this chestnut: "Btw will a primary be set up?"



FSogol

(45,488 posts)
26. Yup, very sad. I used to think it was due to them missing nuances in language, but
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:15 PM
Dec 2014

it contains so much RW wishful thinking, it has to be intentional.

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
9. We don't NEED red states to turn blue.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 12:34 PM
Dec 2014

All we need is to hold the Obama blue states and we win. Hillary isn't turning any red states blue either.

It's a dumb argument against Sanders and Warren.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
10. If it comes down to HRC..
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 12:36 PM
Dec 2014

... vs Romney or Jeb, I absolutely don't give a rat's ass who wins because there will be no tangible difference on the issues I care about, mostly economic.

They are all warmongers, none of them ever met a bankster they didn't want to bail out and none of them give a flying fuck about the working poor in America.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
31. Yeah, when the Jeb or Mittsy Supreme Court starts churning out their interpretations of the
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:21 PM
Dec 2014

Constitution, I suspect you'll sing a very different tune.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
33. Or we have votes by senators which can not understand briefings and make the
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:21 PM
Dec 2014

right decisions, we need people who can make decisions in the best interest of the security of the US.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
12. She'll be the ultimate "Not As Bad" candidate hoping the Repubs run a real crazy.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 12:42 PM
Dec 2014

Or, Clinton II vs Bush III both claiming to be "not as bad" as the other.

 

belzabubba333

(1,237 posts)
14. "She will be the nominee." if she's elected in the primary and of course if she runs
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 12:51 PM
Dec 2014

but please continue to bash the best chance we have so far at retaining the whitehouse the cons love u for it

 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
18. Confirms whar I wrote above.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 12:59 PM
Dec 2014

"If You are Not with us...then you are Against us/with the GOP. .."...

Sounds like a Dubya statement before invading Irak. "If you are not with us you are with terrorists"

Same simple slogan.

 

belzabubba333

(1,237 posts)
20. hardly, you say she's inevitable and i say she hasnt said she was running
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:04 PM
Dec 2014

and she still has to get past the primary. actually you make it sound as if she's just going to be installed " Btw will a primary be set up?" yes it will be -

NO WHERE DID I SAY
"If You are Not with us...then you are Against us/with the GOP. .."...

Autumn

(45,106 posts)
19. I think Hillary will chose to stay working with the Clinton foundation. She can do more
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:01 PM
Dec 2014

good there than she will as President.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
35. Yea, I bet you would rather she work with the Clinton Foundation, will you be heartbroken
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:25 PM
Dec 2014

when she is president and again as the RW preached doom and gloom she make the decisions she is capable of making. RW say Obama is the worst president ever but they totally over looked 2001-2009, don't write HRC off, she is strong, very strong.

Autumn

(45,106 posts)
59. Miss Cleo!!! Is it really you? Oops guess not, you don't read minds at a distance well at all.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 05:50 PM
Dec 2014

I offered my opinion you offer a bullshit incoherent attack, try to proof read and correct your post. It's none of your business and I hate to burst your little authoritarian bubble but in 2008 I was a strong Hillary supporter, I had the pleasure of meeting her twice and talking to her on the phone a couple of times. I think she's a wonderful person. Hillary does good things, she always has but I think she would do better working for the things that have always been a priority for her as a private, powerful woman. Without the limitations of the White House. As for being heartbroken over Hillary? I'm an intelligent, grown woman, I don't get heartbroken over public figures. Especially politicians.

DU seems to be loaded with piss poor psychics these days.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
61. Get your panties out of a twist, I did not attack you, unless you are RW.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 07:19 PM
Dec 2014

Your attack will not bother me in the least, but at least get the truth before you attack others.

Autumn

(45,106 posts)
62. "Yea, I bet you would rather she work with the Clinton Foundation, will you be heartbroken when she
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 07:24 PM
Dec 2014

is president" ..That was posted by you to me, I am the you that you responded to. You bet I found it offensive and I won't reply to you again.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
63. Fine, go your way, you are the one who started HRC stay working with the Clinton
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 07:38 PM
Dec 2014

foundation and now you are offended. Life goes on.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
45. Or so you hope.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 02:03 PM
Dec 2014

By the way? The Republicans and the Koch Bros share your wishful thinking, Autumn. Fancy that.

Autumn

(45,106 posts)
60. Fancy that indeed, I'm sure plenty of Democrats share my opinion also.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 05:52 PM
Dec 2014

Smart, intelligent Democrats.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
21. I'm not voting for her
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:05 PM
Dec 2014

In the primary or the GE. But best of luck to her. I believe in the democratic process. If she wins, fine. But she'll have to do it without my vote.

 

belzabubba333

(1,237 posts)
25. here it is people the ridiculousness of some in the democratic party
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:11 PM
Dec 2014

" I believe in the democratic process."you believe in it but youre just not taking part in it. this is why dems dont get anything they pout take their ball and go home and give the field to ted cruz.

 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
28. In fact the poster stated
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:18 PM
Dec 2014

That it is BECAUSE he believes in a DEMOCRATIC peocess that he cant vote for her.

Because for some of us, like ot or not, a teue primary process is won over ideas debates and confrontation on important issues and how each contender wants to deal with it. Not on only hyoe factor and name recognition. Look . It really seems Hillary doesnt even need to talk about her tenure at State and defend it to gain approbation! !!!!

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
36. I live in CT
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:29 PM
Dec 2014

the DEM candidate will win my state. So I am free to vote for another candidate.
I have no issue with the person you will be voting for, be it Hillary or anyone else.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
39. I usually throw a fit about not voting but in your case your reasoning is sound and you are not in
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:51 PM
Dec 2014

any way deserting the party to the opposition.

My concern regarding not voting is summed up in something my dad said years ago: "If you don't vote for your party then you are voting for the other party." In your case that is not what you are doing. Yours is the only true form of protest at the voting booth. In fact you are protesting twice - the party which is the least objectionable will win and you will get to voice who you really support.

It is too bad that our election system is set up that way. But so far I have not seen a way to fix it.

I am afraid that even if Hillary decides not to run we will not have another candidate who will. Other than Bernie I have not heard anyone say they want to run against her.

 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
41. Great statement from you,
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:58 PM
Dec 2014

And your finao sentence leads to this question: Why in the past, apart from sitting veeps, every prominent Dems contenders hard viable opponents and not her? Precisely: why seems everyone so...afraid...to challenge her???

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
47. "why seems everyone so...afraid...to challenge her???" Because the want to WIN.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 02:07 PM
Dec 2014

Was that really so hard for you to comprehend?

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
24. Huge unrec and an oh please!
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:10 PM
Dec 2014

She doesn't want to campaign? Where do you see that?

Will a primary be set up? Are you kidding me!



wyldwolf

(43,867 posts)
32. You should have started your factually challenged ramble this way:
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:21 PM
Dec 2014

Hillary Clinton is not popular among SOME progressive and grassroots Dems in the netroots echo chamber

Those progressive people are NOT in the majority....

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
40. woman in a blue dress baking cookies whistling Stand by your cheating man
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:56 PM
Dec 2014

she has screwed up every chance she had, and had plenty of help from Bill.
she is perceived as EVERYTHING except what we all need from a decent President in this desperate country.
to put her against Jeb is to fail as much as you can.
a REAL Republican power wielding monster versus a lady who cant keep her husband's faith?
dream on you fools.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
42. It's going to be a tough race.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 01:59 PM
Dec 2014

HRC is not a font of inspiration to the netroots, no, but she's well-positioned to get the nomination, clearly wants the job, has good connections, and would be acceptable. Biden is also well-positioned but I can't tell how serious he is about challenging HRC so I'll wait and see what happens but at the moment it looks like Hill has the best chance of winning, and frankly that counts for a lot.

 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
50. oh yes, because now...
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 02:16 PM
Dec 2014

Expressing FACTS and OPINION witch goes against the party Third Wayers's, and corpmedias'orthodoxy is now a try to intimidate now??

 

mylye2222

(2,992 posts)
53. Those are FACTS. But not mine, I agree.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 02:57 PM
Dec 2014

Try to learn to read between the lones sometimes. It can be useful.

wyldwolf

(43,867 posts)
56. As usual, you're confusing 'facts' with 'opinions'
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 03:59 PM
Dec 2014
ev·i·dence
ˈevədəns/
noun
1.
the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.


fact noun \ˈfakt\
: something that truly exists or happens : something that has actual existence

: a true piece of information


Based on these two definitions, and the facts and evidence at hand, no one except someone truly misinformed would consider the following quotes from your as 'fact.'

Hillary Clinton is not popular among progressive aisles and grassroots Dems . Those everyday progressive people are the majority.


The outright fabrications in your OP rise to Sarah Palin levels.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
65. Because the Third Way control and media
Wed Dec 31, 2014, 06:23 AM
Dec 2014

are mistaken and their lack of representing the people has left me a gerrymandered voter. I have nothing to lose so they can no longer influence me. Hense, I will vote my conscience no matter the chances they say the candidate of my choosing is perceived of having. I'm not for Clinton.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
49. I don't see Hillary turning red states to Dems either. Liz Warren message to working people
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 02:09 PM
Dec 2014

crosses both parties!

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
54. "He can't win, Bill."
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 03:23 PM
Dec 2014

Hillary to Bill Richardson regarding Barack Obama:
"He can't win, Bill. He cannot win."
link: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/04/candidate-clint/

It would behoove Democrats to stop parroting the Clinton admonition that nobody else can win. It's bullshit, then and now.

Agony

(2,605 posts)
55. it is time for a black woman… never mind that… a smart woman, to be president
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 03:37 PM
Dec 2014

besides it would be fun to watch more exploding right winger heads.

Barbara Lee speaks for me like when she cast the lone vote against the AUMF.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
64. The media is not "beside her." They will tear her down.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 07:40 PM
Dec 2014

Just as they're starting to do already.

The media wants and needs a horse race.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
68. They are about as "beside" her as they will be for any Democrat
Wed Dec 31, 2014, 07:48 AM
Dec 2014

and won't get serious about ripping her to shreds until she has it locked up. Then you'll see some real adversity from that quarter.

She will quickly go from miles ahead and inevitable to "all hands on deck" and facing an uphill battle.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
70. They always mess with the early caucuses.
Wed Dec 31, 2014, 09:49 AM
Dec 2014

They will want Iowa or New Hampshire to go to someone else, Sanders, Warren, Reich, Webb, whoever decides to put their hat in. Indeed, if she were to not win any of those caucuses with more than a 20 point lead they will then use that to bolster the idea that she can't win against a Republican in the general.

It won't help that she'd be dropping bombs here or there with faux pas and other misworded statements which will be scrutinized to the death and chopped up and spit out 100x worse than Al Gore's message was destroyed.

They will focus on clothing, age, makeup, hairstyles, and femininity. Too feminine is weak, not feminine enough is creepy.

 

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)
69. The only people who can turn red states to blue are the voters..."Selma" shows the answer after all
Wed Dec 31, 2014, 07:54 AM
Dec 2014

these years. The evil ones must be voted out of office at the local and state levels. PERIOD!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton is NOT po...