Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 02:27 PM Dec 2014

The Politics of Drinking Water

On January 9, 2014, American Water warned 300,000 customers in and around Charleston, West Virginia, that local tap water was no longer safe. Ten thousand gallons of 4-Methylcyclohexane Methanol (MCHM), a chemical used to clean coal, had leaked from a rusty holding tank into the Elk River, upstream of the water treatment facility. State officials warned that exposure to the licorice-scented solvent could cause “burning in throat, severe eye irritation, non-stop vomiting, trouble breathing or severe skin irritation such as skin blistering.” Given the paucity of information on MCHM’s effect on the human body, no one could predict the long-term consequences of exposure.

Within 24 hours, a mayor’s convention was cancelled, restaurants were shut down, and public schools were closed. Traffic clogged around the South Charleston Recreation Center, where the fire department distributed free cases of water, limited to one per vehicle. Its cache was depleted within hours. Bottled water supplies vanished. The National Guard delivered tanks of potable water and FEMA promised additional truckloads. When water shipments arrived at a local Wal-Mart, demand was so high that nervous employees called the cops, requesting guards to stand by while they restocked shelves.

It’s no surprise that the West Virginia leak, the more recent Duke Energy coal ash spill, or the newest BP oil rupture rile consumers. Hydration isn’t a luxury; it’s a necessity. Providing access to clean water is a fundamental measure of effective government. When water goes bad, so do political relations. After the MCHM spilled, West Virginia officials made a series of conflicting statements. Two days after Governor Earl Ray Tomblin began lifting the do-not-use order on local taps, the U.S. Center for Disease Control advised that pregnant women continue to avoid Charleston water. In response, Gov. Tomblin back-pedaled: “It’s a very complicated issue,” he said. “I’m not a scientist.”

more

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/12/the-politics-of-drinking-water/384081/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

niyad

(113,344 posts)
1. it isn't complicated, you moran. we need safe, clean water, and that water is part of the commons,
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 02:35 PM
Dec 2014

it is NOT to be privatized as some sort of commodity.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,640 posts)
2. You are so right. But tell it to Nestle...they want to take all our water ........
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 02:38 PM
Dec 2014

And sell it back to us.

niyad

(113,344 posts)
3. I know. I have been boycotting nestle for decades now, and will continue to do so.
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 02:39 PM
Dec 2014

that started with the infant formula selling in the third world.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
5. This has been an issue in the rual wells of Iowa for many years. Many people cannot drink their own
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 02:43 PM
Dec 2014

water. (In 1958 my daughter was born with a severe disability that in all likelihood it was a result of the pollution in the water in our well.)

IMO water quality need to be one of ours and the worlds top priorities.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Politics of Drinking ...