Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Conservatives Despise Neil deGrasse Tyson: 5 Times the Scientist Provoked Right-Wing Hissy Fits
http://www.alternet.org/belief/why-conservatives-despise-neil-degrasse-tyson-5-times-scientist-provoked-right-wing-hissy1) Gavin McInnes goes full supremacist. Gavin McInnes, the co-founder of Vice, has always been a wretched human being, but since he left the publication in 2008, hes only become even more of a hateful right-wing nut. Over the summer, he went on Fox News to issue a racist diatribe about Tyson that was extreme even by their Bill OReilly-set standards. After bizarrely denying that Tyson is an astrophysicist---which is, like Isaac Newtons birthday, an objective fact---he whined, White liberal nerds love this guy so much, he could defecate on them, and then argued that Tyson had it coming when cops harassed him in his youth because Tyson wore a huge afro and a cutoff shirt.
2) Charles C.W. Cooke unleashes the green-eyed monster. In a July piece for the National Review titled Smarter Than Thou that was little more that pretentiously worded jealous sniping, Cooke, like McInnes, denied that Tyson---and other liberal pundits and journalists who have reputations as public intellectuals---is an authentic geek. His reasoning for this was that Tyson and folks like Richard Dawkins and Rachel Maddow are attractive, accomplished, well paid, and loved. Apparently, to be considered a true intellectual on the right, it doesnt matter how many degrees you hold or scientific discoveries you make. No, the only thing that matters is if you shower so infrequently that no one will have sex with you.
3) Rich Lowry thinks that the fact that Tyson is not infallible means he is thoroughly discredited. Tyson, being a human being, makes mistakes. To scientists and other reality-based people, this isnt a big deal. All people sometimes make mistakes, but that doesnt mean that they have nothing important to say or contribute. (Which is why science is able to build on the theories of Charles Darwin or Isaac Newton even after some aspects of their original theories are proved wrong.) Tyson was caught misquoting George W. Bush a few times, which he admitted. But Rich Lowry, writing for Politico, pounced, writing, The problem is the belief of his fansencouraged by himthat science has all the answers; that anyone who believes in physics must adhere to a progressive secularism; that anyone not on board isto borrow from the accusations of Tysons defendersguilty of anti-intellectualism, climate denial and racism.
4) How dare Cosmos tell the truth about evolution! It was no big surprise that, while Tyson is an astrophysicist, his reboot of Carl Sagans legendary science show Cosmos would focus heavily on explaining evolutionary theory. After all, evolutionary theory is both an elegant theory for explaining in a televised format and it just so happens to be the one which is most confused in the public imagination by conservatives that are always trying to attack and confuse the issue. Creationists were out in force when Cosmos did its evolution episode, trotting out the same hackneyed arguments that any biologist can debunk, knowing full well that their followers have no intention of actually checking to see if biologists have debunked these talking points. It was a manuever steeped in cynicism, using a display of faux erudition in order to discourage real scientific inquiry, the exact sort of thing that Cosmos was attempting to counter with its appealing stories and cool-looking graphics.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 874 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Conservatives Despise Neil deGrasse Tyson: 5 Times the Scientist Provoked Right-Wing Hissy Fits (Original Post)
xchrom
Jan 2015
OP
Arkansas Granny
(31,525 posts)1. Anyone who offers knowledge that runs counter to their mythology
and superstitions is subject to the same treatment.
This remark says it all:
. . . knowing full well that their followers have no intention of actually checking to see if biologists have debunked these talking points. . . .
This is why the rwnj's can lie to their base about any number of subjects. They know that they won't be fact checked by the faithful.
rurallib
(62,444 posts)2. Tyson should quote FDR on this one:
"and I welcome their hate."
Skittles
(153,182 posts)3. nice to have a spokesman for reality
I've had to listen to sanctimonious crap my entire life