Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPaul Krugman: How Soaring Inequality May Lead the World Down the Path of Fascism
http://www.alternet.org/economy/paul-krugman-how-soaring-inequality-may-lead-world-down-path-fascism?akid=12646.26248.KqOWkI&rd=1&src=newsletter1029653&t=4The rising inequality problem, well established by Thomas Pikettys Capital in the 21st Century, has concentrated so much wealth in the hands of so few, while millions of others live in what Krugman poetically calls the "Valley of the despond."
...
Furthermore, the travails of workers in rich countries are, in important ways, the flip side of the gains above and below them. Competition from emerging-economy exports has surely been a factor depressing wages in wealthier nations, although probably not the dominant force. More important, soaring incomes at the top were achieved, in large part, by squeezing those below: by cutting wages, slashing benefits, crushing unions, and diverting a rising share of national resources to financial wheeling and dealing.
Worse still is the fact that no one is really speaking up for those who are left behind. Conventional parties of the so-called left are barely audible in France, Britain and the U.S. Leaders like Obama are too afraid to "challenge elite priorities, in particular the obsession with budget deficits, for fear of being considered irresponsible," Krugman writes. "And that leaves the field open for unconventional leaders some of them seriously scary who are willing to address the anger and despair of ordinary citizens."
Here is where Krugman sounds the alarm about the rise of some parties in Europe that bear an unpleasant resemblance to something the world has seen and suffered through before. The circumstances are ripe: this is the second time the world has experienced a global financial crisis, immediately followed by a protracted worldwide slump. If you guessed that the first time was 1930s Europe, then you might already be worrying right along with Krugman.
...
Furthermore, the travails of workers in rich countries are, in important ways, the flip side of the gains above and below them. Competition from emerging-economy exports has surely been a factor depressing wages in wealthier nations, although probably not the dominant force. More important, soaring incomes at the top were achieved, in large part, by squeezing those below: by cutting wages, slashing benefits, crushing unions, and diverting a rising share of national resources to financial wheeling and dealing.
Worse still is the fact that no one is really speaking up for those who are left behind. Conventional parties of the so-called left are barely audible in France, Britain and the U.S. Leaders like Obama are too afraid to "challenge elite priorities, in particular the obsession with budget deficits, for fear of being considered irresponsible," Krugman writes. "And that leaves the field open for unconventional leaders some of them seriously scary who are willing to address the anger and despair of ordinary citizens."
Here is where Krugman sounds the alarm about the rise of some parties in Europe that bear an unpleasant resemblance to something the world has seen and suffered through before. The circumstances are ripe: this is the second time the world has experienced a global financial crisis, immediately followed by a protracted worldwide slump. If you guessed that the first time was 1930s Europe, then you might already be worrying right along with Krugman.
Dr. K is right again
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 912 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Paul Krugman: How Soaring Inequality May Lead the World Down the Path of Fascism (Original Post)
ashling
Jan 2015
OP
silverweb
(16,402 posts)1. Absolutely.
[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]I've been thinking (and occasionally even saying) this for some time. Maybe some people will stop looking at me like I have three heads when I say it now.
cilla4progress
(24,777 posts)2. Please define, explain
fascism?
Thanks.
Boreal
(725 posts)3. In modern conversation
it generally means totalitarian government under a corporate-gov oligarchy.
Newsflahs to Krugman... the US and EU are already there and have been for quite some time.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)4. Huge K & R !!! - Thank You !!!
So who speaks for those left behind in this twin-peaked world? You might have expected conventional parties of the left to take a populist stance on behalf of their domestic working classes. But mostly what you get instead from leaders ranging from François Hollande of France to Ed Milliband of Britain to, yes, President Obama is awkward mumbling. (Mr. Obama has, in fact, done a lot to help working Americans, but hes remarkably bad at making his own case.)
The problem with these conventional leaders, Id argue, is that theyre afraid to challenge elite priorities, in particular the obsession with budget deficits, for fear of being considered irresponsible. And that leaves the field open for unconventional leaders some of them seriously scary who are willing to address the anger and despair of ordinary citizens.
The problem with these conventional leaders, Id argue, is that theyre afraid to challenge elite priorities, in particular the obsession with budget deficits, for fear of being considered irresponsible. And that leaves the field open for unconventional leaders some of them seriously scary who are willing to address the anger and despair of ordinary citizens.
From: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/02/opinion/paul-krugman-twin-peaks-planet.html