Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 03:03 PM Jan 2015

'Incomprehensible' Secrecy: Sanders Demands Release of 'secret' TPP Text - Woot! Go Bernie!

'Incomprehensible' Secrecy: Sanders Demands Release of Trade Agreement Text
Monday, January 05, 2015 * Common Dreams * by Deirdre Fulton, staff writer

'It is incomprehensible to me that the leaders of major corporate interests are actively involved in the writing of the TPP, while the elected officials of this country have little or no knowledge as to what is in it,' says senator Sanders.


With Congress on the verge of taking up the controversial, corporate-friendly Trans Pacific Partnership, U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is demanding that the chief trade representative for the United States turn over the full text of the proposed trade agreement.

"It is incomprehensible to me that the leaders of major corporate interests who stand to gain enormous financial benefits from this agreement are actively involved in the writing of the TPP while, at the same time, the elected officials of this country, representing the American people, have little or no knowledge as to what is in it," Sanders said in a letter (pdf) sent Monday to U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman. "Members of Congress must have the opportunity to read what is in the TPP and closely analyze the potential impact this free trade agreement would have on the American people long before the Senate votes to give the President fast track trade promotion authority."

"Please also explain why you think it is appropriate that the representatives of the largest financial institutions, pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, media conglomerates, and other major corporate interests not only have access to some of these documents, but are also playing a major role in developing many of the key provisions in it."
—Bernie Sanders, US Senate
Proponents of the pact, which would encompass 12 nations that represent 40 percent of the global economy, are pushing for a fast-track process that would hand over negotiating authority to President Barack Obama, who supports the deal. Critics claim the TPP poses threats to civil liberties, workers rights, public health, food safety, and global financial stability.

Sanders asked Froman to respond to his letter by January 16, 2015. If his request is denied, the senator vowed to introduce legislation that would require that the contents of any trade agreement that the U.S. is negotiating would have to be made public at the request of any member of Congress.

In addition, if Sanders' request is turned down, he asked Froman to spell out the legal basis for the denial.
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/01/05/incomprehensible-secrecy-sanders-demands-release-trade-agreement-text
75 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Incomprehensible' Secrecy: Sanders Demands Release of 'secret' TPP Text - Woot! Go Bernie! (Original Post) 99th_Monkey Jan 2015 OP
Citigroup did the same thing to this last omnibus bill. Banks own Congress. Rex Jan 2015 #1
Contact your Right Wing friends and tell them QuestionAlways Jan 2015 #61
Huge god damn problem, this TPP, must be opposed randys1 Jan 2015 #2
+a zillion 840high Jan 2015 #13
If I were a multi millionaire SamKnause Jan 2015 #3
It's hard for a millionaire to compete with a billionaire. zeemike Jan 2015 #17
And until we can remove money from politics, SamKnause Jan 2015 #21
Not at all...it would be a huge sum. zeemike Jan 2015 #38
Fast Track started in 1974. Now that corporations run the country, it needs to be abolished. djean111 Jan 2015 #4
Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government; Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #5
+100 nt 99th_Monkey Jan 2015 #7
We don't need more Snowdens, we just need the PTB to recognize failure on a large scale. Rex Jan 2015 #23
"History has tried to teach us that we can't have good government under politicians. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #24
This is why we cannot have nice things. Rex Jan 2015 #28
It's a secret! johnnyreb Jan 2015 #6
Freedom of Information Act 1966 99th_Monkey Jan 2015 #10
thumbs up! blackspade Jan 2015 #8
Thank you Bernie! Scuba Jan 2015 #9
+1 BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #18
I love Bernie but how about the "secret texts" when the recent China and Cuba agreements pampango Jan 2015 #11
That would be a false equivalency. Was there some trade deal with Iran? L0oniX Jan 2015 #15
Pampango seemingly specializes in truedelphi Jan 2015 #29
Are talks on trade deals inherently different from other types of international negotiations? pampango Jan 2015 #35
My husband's grandfather had a cattle business that was destroyed by NAFTA. Your liberal_at_heart Jan 2015 #37
FDR was the one who made international trade more liberal after WWII, not me. pampango Jan 2015 #43
International trade is a very minor part of the TPP. It's being used as a Trojan rhett o rick Jan 2015 #73
The TPP negotiation are not secret from the many corporations that are being given inside JDPriestly Jan 2015 #44
Give 'em hell, Bernie MissDeeds Jan 2015 #12
Why is he the only one? Where's our Dems? Who TF did we vote for? L0oniX Jan 2015 #14
Exactly. Really bad how Dems. don't question the secrecy. Guess they don't care. Banks rule. appalachiablue Jan 2015 #25
Maybe Bernie is free to question JEB Jan 2015 #50
That's true. What an example Bernie's integrity is for the Dems. and how corrupt our system appalachiablue Jan 2015 #51
Exactly. Phlem Jan 2015 #56
We didn't vote. That's why the Democrats are moving to the right... SomethingFishy Jan 2015 #72
Lawsuit turbinetree Jan 2015 #16
I suspect that a lawsuit would not derail TPP ... 99th_Monkey Jan 2015 #30
Thank you, Senator! Faryn Balyncd Jan 2015 #19
Who does he think he is?!? Fuddnik Jan 2015 #20
Sorry, but you still won't be able to see it after its passed, because cadaverdog Jan 2015 #27
Exactly! ybbor Jan 2015 #31
Bernie is THE MAN! Ferd Berfel Jan 2015 #22
Just another sell-out to big Duval Jan 2015 #26
When corporations get to write legislation we no longer have a democracy. liberal_at_heart Jan 2015 #32
Impossible to support a secret agreement and no US citizen should be placed in that position. n/t Jefferson23 Jan 2015 #33
It's amazing I don't see.. kacekwl Jan 2015 #34
M$M Won't touch this. 99th_Monkey Jan 2015 #41
k&r... spanone Jan 2015 #36
Bernie Sanders just needs to learn to bow to our corporate masters. Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2015 #39
knr Douglas Carpenter Jan 2015 #40
If it was good for us, they'd want us to read it. grahamhgreen Jan 2015 #42
I've been wondering about a FOI request, we can petition WH, eom whereisjustice Jan 2015 #45
K & R (n/t) bread_and_roses Jan 2015 #46
and a big K & R! Go Bernie! n/t wildbilln864 Jan 2015 #47
This is what we mean when we say Bernie onecaliberal Jan 2015 #48
Wow! Putting this on Facebook; it's blocking it! icymist Jan 2015 #49
DU's social buttons seem to be broken for the moment Recursion Jan 2015 #52
I managed to put it on FB by going to the source icymist Jan 2015 #53
Yes. They_Live Jan 2015 #54
Huge K&R! Phlem Jan 2015 #55
to quote e e cummings Thespian2 Jan 2015 #57
Like they're going to give him the "real"text. Phlem Jan 2015 #58
Well, it won't be "real" until it is "finalized" 99th_Monkey Jan 2015 #60
You know the thing is they really must have thought the coup would be silent Phlem Jan 2015 #59
Yes. Hoping We-the-People would be none the wiser 99th_Monkey Jan 2015 #63
"...the contents of any trade agreement that the U.S. is negotiating would have to be made public" jtuck004 Jan 2015 #62
K&R! Enthusiast Jan 2015 #64
One of the few with any principles and guts! TexasMommaWithAHat Jan 2015 #65
+10 ~nt~ 99th_Monkey Jan 2015 #71
K&R Give em heck Bernie and best of luck. raouldukelives Jan 2015 #66
Fear always comes before a fight. Phlem Jan 2015 #67
Goes to show… corporations shouldn't write law... MrMickeysMom Jan 2015 #68
Like the torture loss Central Scruitinizer Jan 2015 #69
I may have to vote for him . . . another_liberal Jan 2015 #70
Hopefully Bernie will be joined by all of the Democrats in demanding that this sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #74
Yep. 99th_Monkey Jan 2015 #75
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
1. Citigroup did the same thing to this last omnibus bill. Banks own Congress.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 03:06 PM
Jan 2015

They wrote what they wanted and then told the congress critters they owned to pass it. Our country is controlled by big companies that own many if not all politicians.

 

QuestionAlways

(259 posts)
61. Contact your Right Wing friends and tell them
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:38 AM
Jan 2015

this is the first step cowards the "New World Order" which they are so afraid of. Let them know this is something we can work together on, since neither of us is willing to give up national sovereignty, although for different reasons.

SamKnause

(13,108 posts)
3. If I were a multi millionaire
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 03:18 PM
Jan 2015

or billionaire, I would BUY billboards, newspapers and magazines, radio and TV stations, internet

sites, and enlist a TEAM of like minded wealthy individuals to get Senator Bernie Sanders message to the public.

There are wealthy Progressives, Socialists, and Greens.

I wish they would step up and help this country before it is totally destroyed beyond repair.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
17. It's hard for a millionaire to compete with a billionaire.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 04:51 PM
Jan 2015

Or a billionaire to compete with a group of billionaires with trillions to spend...they can overwhelm the market with adds...and squeeze your message out.
And until we remove the money from politics it will stay like that.

SamKnause

(13,108 posts)
21. And until we can remove money from politics,
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:02 PM
Jan 2015

I think my strategy would work.

Maybe you misunderstood my post ?

Wealthy Progressives, Greens, Democratic Socialist, and Socialist are not stepping up to the plate.

Are you suggesting that these groups combined could not raise a huge some of money ?

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
38. Not at all...it would be a huge sum.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 07:14 PM
Jan 2015

But it will never be as big as the whole corporate world can bring to bear against them...and they have other resources too including some government, both local and federal.

But that don't mean I am against it or don't think it would help, just don't expect it to work all by itself because they can out spend us no matter how much we raise.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
5. Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government;
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 03:22 PM
Jan 2015
Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government; that whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights.

 Thomas Jefferson

We need more Snowdens.
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
23. We don't need more Snowdens, we just need the PTB to recognize failure on a large scale.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:11 PM
Jan 2015

The system is a failure on a massive scale, the MIC is a total failure (where was all that protection on 9/11) the CIA is more interested in spying on Congress than Russia, we've let the NSA sink back into the grey matter, the POTUS is pushing for the horrible TPP to get passed when it goes against his own wishes. That is an apparent sign of a completely dysfunctional system. Not to mention corporate $COTU$, the completely soldout mainstream press, the ever increasing tensions caused by crazy men like Alex Jones and Rush. The madmen in Congress calling for a new dark ages.

We need another Thomas Jefferson.



 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
24. "History has tried to teach us that we can't have good government under politicians.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:15 PM
Jan 2015
"History has tried to teach us that we can't have good government under politicians. Now, to go and stick one at the very head of government couldn't be wise." Mark Twain
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
28. This is why we cannot have nice things.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:30 PM
Jan 2015

"I remain just one thing, and one thing only — and that is a clown. It places me on a far higher plane than any politician."

"I hope we shall abolish war and settle all differences at the conference table... I hope we shall abolish all hydrogen and atom bombs before they abolish us first." - Charlie Chaplin

johnnyreb

(915 posts)
6. It's a secret!
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 03:33 PM
Jan 2015

Secret torture, secret rendition, secret 9/11 28 Pages, secret surveillance, secret prisons, secret courts, secret laws, secret police, secret judges, secret interpretation of laws, secret list, secret hearings, secret evidence, secret fracking stuff, some other secret things, secret TPP...

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
10. Freedom of Information Act 1966
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 04:06 PM
Jan 2015

Once upon a time, demand for transparency in government was a strong public sentiment.

Today, not so much.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
9. Thank you Bernie!
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 03:46 PM
Jan 2015

Where are the Democratic Party leaders? Does anyone still doubt that they've sold us out?

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
18. +1
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 04:54 PM
Jan 2015

They are supposed to represent the people, not corporations. Bernie Sanders speaks for all of us.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
11. I love Bernie but how about the "secret texts" when the recent China and Cuba agreements
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 04:10 PM
Jan 2015

were being negotiated? Should they have been released?

Should the "secret text" in the ongoing Iran negotiations be released? Would doing so be likely to produce a better agreement or derail the negotiations?

I am all for open public talks (Woodrow Wilson had the right idea with his "open covenants, openly arrived at&quot but that is not how international negotiations seem to usually occur in the real world.

I like to think that trade reforms that Bernie would support would include enforceable labor and environmental standards that would protect American workers while helping the environment and workers in other countries.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
29. Pampango seemingly specializes in
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:53 PM
Jan 2015

False Equivalencies.

And I think it is worth pointing out how gypped the American public is by the entire situation with "trade agreements."

There should not be any such thing as trade agreements. There should be ONLY Trade Acts, which by being an act, would require a 66.7 % majority in Congress.

But since most of us are not schooled in how Congress has moved the goal posts, we the public do not know that.

So what was once a debated situation, because it was an "Act" and required a heavy duty majority, now is a merre "agreement," and requires only an 88 second discussion, and a 50% majority!!

pampango

(24,692 posts)
35. Are talks on trade deals inherently different from other types of international negotiations?
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 06:47 PM
Jan 2015

Are other countries willing to be open about trade negotiations but not nuclear or environmental or diplomatic recognition negotiations? For any international negotiation to be public all sides have to agree.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
37. My husband's grandfather had a cattle business that was destroyed by NAFTA. Your
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 06:50 PM
Jan 2015

love of international trade deals will forever be lost on me.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
43. FDR was the one who made international trade more liberal after WWII, not me.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 07:45 PM
Jan 2015

He did not want to see a return to the high-tariff, low-trade economy of the 12 republican years before he became president.

The US trades much less than any other developed country (anywhere from 1/2 to 1/3 of the trade levels in Canada, Germany, Sweden, etc.) yet we manage to blame all of our problems on trade while the unions and middle classes are much stronger.

FDR knew how to deal with the 1% and he did not do it by restricting trade but by expanding it. He dealt with our 1% by going after them directly with higher taxes and corporate regulations and supporting the rest of us with a stronger safety net and government programs.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
73. International trade is a very minor part of the TPP. It's being used as a Trojan
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 01:32 AM
Jan 2015

Horse to bring along agreements that our nation will have to live up to without the approval of the American people. Fast Track should be a warning that someone doesn't want debate on this agreement.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
44. The TPP negotiation are not secret from the many corporations that are being given inside
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 09:14 PM
Jan 2015

information on them. That is a big part of the problem.

If you read the OP, you will understand that what Bernie is objecting to is the fact that the negotiations are not being kept secret from the corporations and moneyed interests but are being kept secret from many in Congress and from the rest of the American people.

I oppose the TPP. The sneakiness of the negotiation of this treaty, allowing Wall Street and corporations in on the negotiations and shutting the American people and most members of Congress AND THEIR STAFFS out is simply wrong. Something stinks about the TPP negotiations.

Here is what Sander Levin says about the negotiations and secrecy surrounding the TPP.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026040549

He is the ranking member of the Ways and Means Committee in Congress. He opposes fast-track. I am even more opposed to the TPP than he is. I hope you will watch the video and listen to what he says. His arguments are very compelling.

Sander Levin confirms that corporations are being given more and freer, less restricted access to information about the progress and issues in the TPP negotiations than are members of Congress or their staffs.

I put that in bold because a lot of people who don't know what they are talking about don't want to believe that Obama would actually give privileged access to corporations about the TPP negotiations. Sander Levin confirms it.

That's just plain wrong. The Iran negotiations are not comparable, not the same kind of issue at all.

 

JEB

(4,748 posts)
50. Maybe Bernie is free to question
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 10:51 PM
Jan 2015

these trade agreements because he is not a Democrat. He does not rely on the Party for his campaigns.

appalachiablue

(41,146 posts)
51. That's true. What an example Bernie's integrity is for the Dems. and how corrupt our system
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 11:19 PM
Jan 2015

has become. A stat I just read here stated that in 1980 approx. $1.8 million was donated for congressional campaigns, and now it's almost half a billion. On corporate practices, there's an excellent video, via drone of a No. Carolina Pig Farm/Capo and giant cesspool on the DU Home Page. It's operated by Smithfield, purchased by the Chinese a couple years ago. Unbelievable, the filth and pollution, harming humans and the environmental to feed 7 billion people.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
72. We didn't vote. That's why the Democrats are moving to the right...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:55 PM
Jan 2015

Yeah, I actually saw that posted here today.

turbinetree

(24,703 posts)
16. Lawsuit
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 04:45 PM
Jan 2015

It is now time to file a LAWSUIT, because we the public are not being given information from our elected representatives about this issue.
This is a (small d) democracy and not a oligarpghy.





I congratulate Mr. Sanders for his diligence on this matter and others that are with him on the public getting disclosure on this trade deal

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
30. I suspect that a lawsuit would not derail TPP ...
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 06:02 PM
Jan 2015

Any lawsuit on TPP would be judicially "fast-tracked" to SCOTUS,
kind of like W's being "appointed" president was.

Not saying that's the way it should be, but damn, We the People
have been bamboozled and end-runned into the ground. We've
already lost, lost the Congressional branch, lost the Judicial branch,
and mostly lost Presidential branch on way too many fronts, including
the TPP..

I can't even begin to imagine what kind of evil these 600 mega-
corporations have cooked up for We the People and the whole
idea of democratic governance, not to mention loosing our
national sovereignty to international corporations.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
20. Who does he think he is?!?
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 04:59 PM
Jan 2015

He should have to wait until after it passes to see it, just like the rest of us!

At least that's what some people on DU tell me.

cadaverdog

(228 posts)
27. Sorry, but you still won't be able to see it after its passed, because
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:25 PM
Jan 2015

Last edited Mon Jan 5, 2015, 06:59 PM - Edit history (1)

the text states that the contents will remain "secret" for three years after it goes into effect.

I need to correct an error in the post. The sentence should correctly read:

Sorry, but you still won't be able to see it after its passed, because by agreement of all the parties to the treaty, the deliberations will remain secret for four years after it goes into effect.


I apologize for this rather egregious error. Too many cross references in my source materials. To make the correction I refered to the Jim Hightower piece I mentioned in my original post; "The Trans-Pacific Partnership is not about free trade. It's a corporate coup d'etat--against us!" I said its a must-read. Here is a little more from Jim:

Last year (2012), Obama's top trade rep, Ron Kirk, declared that locking out the people is necessary, because the deal's details would outrage Americans and spook Congress from rubber stamping it. In short, to win public approval of TPP, the Obamacans say they must keep it hidden from the public.

Gee, I wonder why Ron Kirk was replaced by Michael Froman? Probably just his school ties to Mr. Obama. Not.

must read: http://www.hightowerlowdown.org/node/3402#.VKnRVCi6zCM

ybbor

(1,554 posts)
31. Exactly!
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 06:03 PM
Jan 2015

What could he be possibly complaining about? No one knows what is in it yet. He should just let it go into effect before he jumps to these wild accusations.

Doesn't he know that Obama was elected TWICE?
(Disclosure, I voted, donated and canvassed for him both times)

kacekwl

(7,017 posts)
34. It's amazing I don't see..
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 06:12 PM
Jan 2015

a story on this every day in the hundreds of "news" channels we have. Bernie is great , would definitely vote for him.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
41. M$M Won't touch this.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 07:32 PM
Jan 2015

No way.

It's shit like this that OWS was addressing directly,
and we saw how that played out, with NYPD pigs.

onecaliberal

(32,864 posts)
48. This is what we mean when we say Bernie
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 10:39 PM
Jan 2015

Fights for what he believes in. Why is President Obama for this legislation?

icymist

(15,888 posts)
49. Wow! Putting this on Facebook; it's blocking it!
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 10:47 PM
Jan 2015

I got an 'Error. Your request cannot be processed' message!

icymist

(15,888 posts)
53. I managed to put it on FB by going to the source
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 11:46 PM
Jan 2015

and posting it that way. Thank you for the explanation.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
55. Huge K&R!
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:09 AM
Jan 2015

Go Bernie!

I'll have a whole new level respect for this man if he can pull this off before elections!

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
60. Well, it won't be "real" until it is "finalized"
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:35 AM
Jan 2015

which won't be until 5 seconds before it's "fast-tracked"
down our collective throats.

Hope & Change? Not so much.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
59. You know the thing is they really must have thought the coup would be silent
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:34 AM
Jan 2015

Last edited Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:14 PM - Edit history (1)

and no one would be the wiser.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
63. Yes. Hoping We-the-People would be none the wiser
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:23 AM
Jan 2015

We weren't supposed to even KNOW about this agreement
until 2-3 years after it had been adopted and gone into effect.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
62. "...the contents of any trade agreement that the U.S. is negotiating would have to be made public"
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:11 AM
Jan 2015

Plenty of support for this, I suspect. Let's do that part anyway.

It ought to be standard practice.

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
65. One of the few with any principles and guts!
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 10:08 AM
Jan 2015

I certainly hope he wins his battle.

Otherwise, are going to be eating cat food soon.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
66. K&R Give em heck Bernie and best of luck.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:08 PM
Jan 2015

It goes against the wishes of every person with investments in Wall St.
With so many funding the attackers against us & our fragile democracy, I fear we will never prevail.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
68. Goes to show… corporations shouldn't write law...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:31 PM
Jan 2015

That goes for ALEC, too.

In fact, I'll remind Paul Krugman to read it all before he sucks up to the same corporatist law.

Corporations are not "We the People".

 
69. Like the torture loss
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:41 PM
Jan 2015

The TPP will go through.

Unless of course we proceed to yet again tell our friends, relatives, acquaintances, and the person on the elevator to contact their representative and order them to examine this and vote for us not for the corporations.

Then we will all watch them twirl their finger aside their head and suggest a tinfoil hat.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
74. Hopefully Bernie will be joined by all of the Democrats in demanding that this
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 01:37 AM
Jan 2015

happen.

Release it to Congress and the Press so that the people of THIS country can see what they are planning. There must be some pretty awful things in there if they are working so hard to just get it passed without anyone having a chance to see what's in it.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
75. Yep.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 01:53 AM
Jan 2015

We the People have been bamboozled and end-runned into the ground.

We've already lost, lost the Congressional branch, lost the Judicial branch,
and mostly lost Presidential branch on way too many fronts, including
the TPP..

I can't even begin to imagine what kind of evil these 600 mega-corporations
have cooked up "in private" for We the People and the whole idea of democratic
governance, not to mention loosing our national sovereignty to international
corporations.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Incomprehensible' Secrec...