Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Renew Deal

(81,866 posts)
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 04:41 PM Jan 2015

2015: The year the battle for Net neutrality ends

Early last year I wrote a column wherein I expanded on Cory Doctorow’s fear that we might lose the Web in 2014 and voiced a concern that we might lose the Internet itself -- or at least the Internet as we know it. Although we haven’t lost it yet, the threat is ever present.

What we saw in 2014 was posturing, ridiculous statements, and delays -- along with strong advocacy for Title II. The FCC delayed rulings on Net neutrality and the Time Warner/Comcast merger several times, and it extended the public comment periods (while still making a mess of it). However, they are poised to finally come to a decision this February.

One can only hope that 2015 will be the year we finally put this monster behind us and lay the groundwork for the next few decades of technological advancement by classifying ISPs as the common carriers they are and have been all along. Fast and loose negotiations that led to gutless “policy statements” back in 2005 and the horrible classification of ISPs as information services in 2010 don’t change those facts. This can has been kicked down the road for decades, presumably due to the revolving door of government regulators becoming industry lobbyists and vice versa, passing the buck on meaningful regulation if they cannot defeat it outright.

I suppose that extending a battle until you achieve the outcome you desire is a viable tactic, which seems to be exactly what is happening right now. I also believe the drumbeat of Net neutrality is becoming too loud for even the most entrenched and bloodsucking lobbyist to ignore. However you cut the FCC comment response, there was a massive swell of public comments in favor of strong Net neutrality regulation and Title II classification of ISPs. These were private citizens that used any one of several different methods to voice their opinion to the FCC, whereas the bulk of the Net neutrality opposition came through a single lobbying group’s efforts.
<snip>

http://www.infoworld.com/article/2862913/net-neutrality/2015-the-year-the-battle-for-net-neutrality-ends.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»2015: The year the battle...