Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HomerRamone

(1,112 posts)
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 06:15 PM Jan 2015

Bush's vote would have been 1.6% lower against Gore if Fox had not launched 4 years earlier

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2015/01/05/yes-watching-fox-does-make-you-more-conservative/?wpisrc=nl_wnkpm&wpmm=1

The fact that Republicans are more likely to watch Fox and Democrats to watch MSNBC is a chicken-and-egg problem. To be sure, people prefer to watch anchors and commentators whose views they already agree with, but do the channels actually make their viewers more liberal or conservative as well?

To solve this riddle, the researchers, Emory University's Gregory Martin and Stanford University's Ali Yurukoglu, took advantage of a surprising pattern among cable subscribers: People are more likely to watch any station with a lower channel number...

Fox's and MSNBC's numbers are more or less random across the country, and in towns where MSNBC has a lower a number, cable subscribers tend to be more liberal -- even compared to people who get their television through a satellite dish.

These viewers watch a few more minutes of MSNBC a week on average, but not because they agree with the hosts' politics. They're watching MSNBC because they're more conveniently placed in the line-up. The same is true of Fox.

Martin and Yurukoglu found that watching four more minutes of Fox a week makes you 0.9 percentage points more likely vote Republican, while watching MSNBC for four more minutes makes you 0.7 percentage points more likely to vote Democrat.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bush's vote would have been 1.6% lower against Gore if Fox had not launched 4 years earlier (Original Post) HomerRamone Jan 2015 OP
Just silly greytdemocrat Jan 2015 #1
The powers that be knew it was worth investing literally billions to get W in office randys1 Jan 2015 #2

randys1

(16,286 posts)
2. The powers that be knew it was worth investing literally billions to get W in office
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 06:20 PM
Jan 2015

He was capable of, and did do in the end, almost as much damage to our freedom, rights and economy as Reagan did.

The agenda was clear and very successful...

We will not recover from it, ever.

Not fully.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bush's vote would have be...