General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy today’s high-speed rail launch is miraculous
http://www.salon.com/2015/01/06/americas_most_ambitious_infrastructure_project_of_the_century_why_todays_high_speed_rail_launch_is_miraculous/California High-Speed Rail (Credit: CAHSR Authority)
The most important kickoff in America today will not happen in Washington, where the 114th Congress begins its work. No, a far more consequential beginning takes place on the other side of the country, in modest Fresno, California, at an invitation-only ceremony on the corner of Tulare and G Streets. There, officials will break ground on Americas biggest and most ambitious infrastructure project of the century, a high-speed rail line linking San Francisco and Los Angeles that, when completed, will run at speeds of 220 miles an hour and move people between those metropolises in around two and a half hours, half the time it takes by car.
The bullet train wont begin serving Californians until the next decade, and only if the remaining funds needed for completion can be located. But its kind of a miracle that shovels ever hit the ground at all. The estimated $68 billion project defeated legal challenges, conservative grousers and even a short-sighted attack by the environmental lobby to make it this far. And if it succeeds, a nation with few recent, tangible examples of what government can actually do to improve peoples lives will finally have a cutting-edge piece of infrastructure to point to.
High-speed rail in California got started in 2008, when voters approved Proposition 1A, a $9.95 billion bond measure to begin construction. Shortly thereafter, President Obama made high-speed rail a priority in the 2009 stimulus, with $8 billion earmarked for projects throughout the country. California eventually scooped up $3.5 billion of that, after conservative governors in Ohio, Wisconsin and Florida returned their funds in 2010. Officials expected to start laying steel in September 2012 on the first segment, a 29-mile stretch from Fresno to Madera. The idea was that building in the Central Valley first would be cheaper than securing land in the pricey Bay Area or Los Angeles basin.
But lawsuits and cost overruns nearly disabled the project. Not-In-My-Backyard farm owners disputed route planning, forcing more expensive alternatives. Environmental challenges piled up. The GOP House blocked new federal dollars for the project. Conservative groups then sued the California High-Speed Rail Authority, saying their business plan did not have the required funding blueprint to cover the ballooning cost, making it illegal under the statute. A judge agreed and blocked the sale of bonds.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)mountain grammy
(26,625 posts)Denver has been building light rail for years, and it's a huge success. It would have been up and running years earlier if not for conservative opposition. You know the routine; every individual should build their own... freedom, blah, blah.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)It might be hard, it might be expensive, but we have to start working on this stuff. For the general health of our own society, do it.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Action is the best cure.
onecaliberal
(32,864 posts)The street with peace Fresno,
MatthewStLouis
(904 posts)A move in the right direction.
Our nation has such backwards priorities. Why we can't board a train this morning in St. Louis and be in LA by dinnertime is beyond me. Pathetic America. Pathetic. If all advances were left up to conservatives, you'd have to buy your own horse. Hell, we'd probably still be fighting outside our cave over who gets which bison scraps.
JayhawkSD
(3,163 posts)Actually, thats the speed promised by Prop 1A in order to get people to vote for it. In its current configuration, the average speed is projected to be about 120 mph because the train will run on the same tracks as common rail carriers part of the way.
wont begin serving Californians until the next decade
Currently planned to start 2029, if then. See note about funding.
only if the remaining funds needed for completion can be located.
Highly unlikely. The original cost was pegged at $40 billion and is now estimated by the high speed rail commission itself to be $98.5 billion to $118 billion. Other than an undetermined amount from cap and trade, none of that has currently been secured.
The funding from cap and trade is speculatively estimated to produce between $850 million and $1 billion annually, so at best that funding will require 118 years to complete the project, by which time it will be obsolete. And that is the most optimistic projection.
Environmental challenges piled up.
The project did not and does not meet state environmental standards. The commission sued in federal court and obtained federal exemptions from state environmental standards. We prove, here, that liberals (and I consider myself a liberal) are far more interested in promoting big flashy projects than they are in protecting the environment, and I find it ironic that the cap and trade funds which are produced by legislation passed for the purpose of protecting the environment, are used to fund a project which does not meet environmental standards.
Conservative groups then sued the California High-Speed Rail Authority, saying their business plan did not have the required funding blueprint to cover the ballooning cost,
Actually, the issue was that Proposition 1A contained a provision that the $9.95 billion could not be spent until a firm plan for the balance of the funding, at that time $31 billion, was in place to build the entire project. The plaintiffs claimed that such was not the case and wanted the bonds sale to be delayed until the stipulations in the proposition were met. The court agreed, as did the appeals court. The 3rd District Court of Appeal's three-judge panel reversed the decision without explaining why they did so.
As presently under construction, the high speed rail will carry people at 220 miles per hour for 29 miles from Fresno to the state prison at Corcoran. There is presently no money on hand to extend it beyond the state prison toward Bakersfield, but cap and trade money will begin flowing into the project in a couple of years, allowing about four miles of track to be built per year, so Bakersfield can expect to see service sometime during the current generation.
Auggie
(31,174 posts)In theory, it's great. In reality, the money would be better spent on improving /expanding local public transportation used for daily commutes.
Throd
(7,208 posts)Johonny
(20,852 posts)in practice we claim poverty of resources so as to never do anything for the American people.
Auggie
(31,174 posts)but that's been earmarked for the 1%.
Johonny
(20,852 posts)are the ones that put up constant legal challenges that made it more expensive. Republicanism is a disease.