Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 10:28 AM Jan 2015

Individual Contribution Limit in U.S. Elections Raised to $4.9 Million

TRNN reporter Thomas Hedges takes a look at two new provisions in the 2015 spending bill that drastically increase individual limits and prohibit President Obama from using executive action to shed light on dark money in campaigns.

January 5,


Transcript: THOMAS HEDGES, TRNN PRODUCER: On December 16, President Obama signed the omnibus spending bill for 2015 into law, representatives immediately decried key provisions within the bill, including one provision that serves as an insurance policy for Wall Street derivatives trading.

ELIZABETH WARREN, U.S. SENATOR (D-MA): The original bill that is being incorporated into the House's spending legislation today was literally written by Citigroup lobbyists, who, quote, redrafted the legislation.

HEDGES: But one measure that didn't get as much attention was a change to individual campaign financing rules.

JAY RIESTENBERG, RESEARCH ANALYST, COMMON CAUSE: It's supposed to be in confusing, and it's inherently confusing, so people don't understand it. And that's why it was tucked away in the fourth of the last page of the sixteen hundred bill, and it was done in the middle of the night in what some people are calling a cigar-filled bathroom. And it took a while for anyone to own up to who actually wrote it, and we still actually don't know.

HEDGES: Jay Riestenberg is a research analyst at Common Cause, which is a nonpartisan government watchdog organization. It used to be that individual contributions to party organizations in any given election cycle were limited to $259,000. Now that amount is 500 percent more, standing at $1.5 million.

in full: http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=12922


6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
1. This will serve to piss off a lot of large donors.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 10:31 AM
Jan 2015

The built in excuse of "I've already maxed out" won't cut it any more so large donors are going to be hit up more and more.

The only people it helps are the billionaires to whom that sum is a pittance.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
2. I'm looking forward to finding out who is responsible for putting in the provision.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 11:00 AM
Jan 2015

That is still unknown, at the moment...though not hard to guess, Republican hands.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
3. It truly saddens me to know that the world we have passed onto our children is no
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 11:06 AM
Jan 2015

longer a democracy. My children do not live in a democratic country.

newfie11

(8,159 posts)
4. The best democracy money can buy
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 11:22 AM
Jan 2015

Kiss the America we knew and loved goodbye.
It's being bought by those whose only thought is greed.

 

dissentient

(861 posts)
6. Damn. Because there wasn't enough corruption and sold out, bought and paid for politicians in the
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:55 PM
Jan 2015

system already.

This can't be good for the common people.

On the other hand, if you are a 1%-er, these times must feel like the golden age! The 2000s have been very good to the elites, and it just keeps getting better for them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Individual Contribution L...