Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIndividual Contribution Limit in U.S. Elections Raised to $4.9 Million
TRNN reporter Thomas Hedges takes a look at two new provisions in the 2015 spending bill that drastically increase individual limits and prohibit President Obama from using executive action to shed light on dark money in campaigns.January 5,
Transcript: THOMAS HEDGES, TRNN PRODUCER: On December 16, President Obama signed the omnibus spending bill for 2015 into law, representatives immediately decried key provisions within the bill, including one provision that serves as an insurance policy for Wall Street derivatives trading.
ELIZABETH WARREN, U.S. SENATOR (D-MA): The original bill that is being incorporated into the House's spending legislation today was literally written by Citigroup lobbyists, who, quote, redrafted the legislation.
HEDGES: But one measure that didn't get as much attention was a change to individual campaign financing rules.
JAY RIESTENBERG, RESEARCH ANALYST, COMMON CAUSE: It's supposed to be in confusing, and it's inherently confusing, so people don't understand it. And that's why it was tucked away in the fourth of the last page of the sixteen hundred bill, and it was done in the middle of the night in what some people are calling a cigar-filled bathroom. And it took a while for anyone to own up to who actually wrote it, and we still actually don't know.
HEDGES: Jay Riestenberg is a research analyst at Common Cause, which is a nonpartisan government watchdog organization. It used to be that individual contributions to party organizations in any given election cycle were limited to $259,000. Now that amount is 500 percent more, standing at $1.5 million.
in full: http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=12922
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 890 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Individual Contribution Limit in U.S. Elections Raised to $4.9 Million (Original Post)
Jefferson23
Jan 2015
OP
I'm looking forward to finding out who is responsible for putting in the provision.
Jefferson23
Jan 2015
#2
It truly saddens me to know that the world we have passed onto our children is no
liberal_at_heart
Jan 2015
#3
The fight against Citizens United and then for public funded elections is the only way out. n/t
Jefferson23
Jan 2015
#5
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)1. This will serve to piss off a lot of large donors.
The built in excuse of "I've already maxed out" won't cut it any more so large donors are going to be hit up more and more.
The only people it helps are the billionaires to whom that sum is a pittance.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)2. I'm looking forward to finding out who is responsible for putting in the provision.
That is still unknown, at the moment...though not hard to guess, Republican hands.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)3. It truly saddens me to know that the world we have passed onto our children is no
longer a democracy. My children do not live in a democratic country.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)4. The best democracy money can buy
Kiss the America we knew and loved goodbye.
It's being bought by those whose only thought is greed.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)5. The fight against Citizens United and then for public funded elections is the only way out. n/t
dissentient
(861 posts)6. Damn. Because there wasn't enough corruption and sold out, bought and paid for politicians in the
system already.
This can't be good for the common people.
On the other hand, if you are a 1%-er, these times must feel like the golden age! The 2000s have been very good to the elites, and it just keeps getting better for them.