Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:03 PM Jan 2015

Calling folks Uncle Toms, House Negroes, Aunt Jemima's and other similar terminology is racist.

Last edited Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:14 PM - Edit history (1)

Just to let you all know. Some people seem confused and think that it's only racist if said by a republican about a Democrat. Sorry, but that is just not true. I have no idea why SOME white liberals have the burning desire to use racist terminology when dealing or speaking of a Black Republican they don't like. I really don't.
If the GOP was calling Michelle Obama 'Aunt Jemima' and Obama 'house Negro' it would not be cool.

459 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Calling folks Uncle Toms, House Negroes, Aunt Jemima's and other similar terminology is racist. (Original Post) bravenak Jan 2015 OP
That would be disgusting for anyone to use those terms about anyone, no matter their Autumn Jan 2015 #1
Thank you. bravenak Jan 2015 #3
I think if it has to be explained that Autumn Jan 2015 #7
Probably. bravenak Jan 2015 #18
I wonder liberalmike27 Jan 2015 #197
A selfish asshole? bravenak Jan 2015 #200
Well put. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #226
If you have to explain it Aerows Jan 2015 #320
I feel like I have to try. bravenak Jan 2015 #322
Please continue to do so Aerows Jan 2015 #323
I'll give it a shot. bravenak Jan 2015 #324
I believe I know which thread you are referring to Aerows Jan 2015 #326
By "pointing out", do you mean using those terms mentioned in the OP?? 7962 Jan 2015 #413
Agreed. Enthusiastically! WillowTree Jan 2015 #2
Awesome. bravenak Jan 2015 #4
It's pretty disgusting that you HappyMe Jan 2015 #5
I have a prolific DUer that does not agree yet. bravenak Jan 2015 #6
*sigh!* HappyMe Jan 2015 #10
Perhaps this is a window to that soul ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #72
That's uncalled for. pintobean Jan 2015 #93
I have no idea whom this OP is referring to ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #133
1SBM made a suggestion, not a statement of fact. Your response is what's uncalled for. BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #141
I hope to hell not! bravenak Jan 2015 #99
Sounds like this friend of my late mom's. calimary Jan 2015 #182
Perhaps you should alert the next time you see the post, you should alert on it. mimi85 Jan 2015 #94
It had already survived. bravenak Jan 2015 #101
Is this possibly one you may be speaking of? 7962 Jan 2015 #416
Wow, no, it was somebody else and it was settled earlier. bravenak Jan 2015 #418
Preachin to the choir! I missed the Love thread; I'll look it up. 7962 Jan 2015 #420
I also do not wish people dead. bravenak Jan 2015 #422
Totally agree. pintobean Jan 2015 #8
I don't like that one either. bravenak Jan 2015 #11
I was on that jury. I think that context matters - and the context in that case el_bryanto Jan 2015 #17
George Carlin understood that well. Lucky Luciano Jan 2015 #242
Nods - and I think that was the intention of the poster. el_bryanto Jan 2015 #275
I know George Carlin is some DU God (I know practically nothing about him) but the idea that Number23 Jan 2015 #353
I don't know the bit so can't comment either el_bryanto Jan 2015 #366
I agree to an extent. But it is possible for people to point out the flaws in our society without Number23 Jan 2015 #367
The clip and a couple others. Lucky Luciano Jan 2015 #396
Absolutely gwheezie Jan 2015 #9
That sucks. bravenak Jan 2015 #14
very true. reminds me of something that happened 40+ years ago, ellenrr Jan 2015 #24
You're right. bravenak Jan 2015 #35
Off-topic azmom Jan 2015 #278
You're right. bravenak Jan 2015 #279
Look what happened to Stacy Dash. All she said was "Im voting for Romney" 7962 Jan 2015 #419
I remember that. bravenak Jan 2015 #421
YOU should run for office! 7962 Jan 2015 #436
You're funny. bravenak Jan 2015 #441
Now you made ME laugh. :) nt 7962 Jan 2015 #448
Exactly hibbing Jan 2015 #171
Yup. They're all racist terms. MineralMan Jan 2015 #12
Do a DU search for Condi Rice or Clarence Thomas pipoman Jan 2015 #20
I know. I've seen those terms used on DU. MineralMan Jan 2015 #45
+100 n/t ChazII Jan 2015 #65
Can black liberals use those terms of black conservatives? treestar Jan 2015 #13
I don't like it. bravenak Jan 2015 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2015 #131
Nope. bravenak Jan 2015 #134
I know the majority here ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #92
You are right. treestar Jan 2015 #306
Can they? Of course, just like while liberals can. There is no law against it. Should they, or, kelly1mm Jan 2015 #96
True. It just seems odd you can end up treestar Jan 2015 #308
I wouldn't use any language for black conservatives that I couldn't use for white ones MrScorpio Jan 2015 #205
Thanks for answering. treestar Jan 2015 #311
They can but it is still racist. Instead of attacking the behavior or hypocrisy still_one Jan 2015 #277
Anyone *can* use them; it's just that it's wrong to do so. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2015 #289
It's counterproductive. Ink Man Jan 2015 #16
I was thinking the same thing. bravenak Jan 2015 #19
It is all part of the 'otherization' process. But when 'we' do it it is for good reasons, or so I kelly1mm Jan 2015 #100
I disagree. Calling Clarence Thomas or Ben Carson an oreo is not racist in my opinion. HERVEPA Jan 2015 #21
Yes. It is. bravenak Jan 2015 #26
What's the epithet for "white on the outside, black on the inside?" Gormy Cuss Jan 2015 #37
I love your answer, and I'd add to Herverpa... ellenrr Jan 2015 #49
Strictly speaking, VWolf Jan 2015 #116
Please don't ruin Creamsicles for me! FrodosPet Jan 2015 #280
I call him jag-off. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2015 #281
lol not the best example! treestar Jan 2015 #315
There isn't one? Roy Rolling Jan 2015 #85
See post 142. n/t Gormy Cuss Jan 2015 #156
Actually there IS a word for that tkmorris Jan 2015 #87
If you're thinking of the word 1SBM used, it's hardly equivalent as an insult Gormy Cuss Jan 2015 #124
Yes there is ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #98
... Gormy Cuss Jan 2015 #119
Uhhhh... RobinA Jan 2015 #128
No, there isn't. Gormy Cuss Jan 2015 #142
I hadn't heard that word used until recently. treestar Jan 2015 #317
So, do you think a black person cannot philosophically be a conservative? TexasMommaWithAHat Jan 2015 #60
Many, if not the majority, of Blacks are conservative, and there's absolutely nothing wrong BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #158
It is - that and zebra JustAnotherGen Jan 2015 #74
There has been some call to get rid of curse words on DU BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #369
I'm with you brother! JustAnotherGen Jan 2015 #388
Haha! BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #407
Feel free! JustAnotherGen Jan 2015 #434
My mother was a teacher BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #454
Why do you need a label to say that? Why the need for constant 'otherization'? nt kelly1mm Jan 2015 #104
Nothing wrong with labels in my opinion when they apply. HERVEPA Jan 2015 #125
If others are offended by the labels you use then perhaps you should rethink using them. kelly1mm Jan 2015 #146
If others are offended, so be it. HERVEPA Jan 2015 #204
Thank you for the kind words. You are free to use whatever words you wish in my book! And if kelly1mm Jan 2015 #217
See Post 200. ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #228
No I don't of course. HERVEPA Jan 2015 #236
You seem to want to pick and choose whose ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #254
Because you say you represent African-American thought does not mean that you do. HERVEPA Jan 2015 #284
You doubt it because ...? 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #286
I doubt it because the voices on DU in general are much more liberal than voices nationwide overall HERVEPA Jan 2015 #290
One more point, then you can be done ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #293
I can be done when I say I can be done, actually. HERVEPA Jan 2015 #302
Very true ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #304
Condescending. HERVEPA Jan 2015 #310
Sorry, .... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #318
Could you explain the 2nd para, please? delrem Jan 2015 #282
+1 ... That about sums it up. 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #288
In which case, call them hypocrites, the other terms are saying they are not "black enough" which uppityperson Jan 2015 #301
+ ellenrr Jan 2015 #347
"it's not racist" you say and then go on to prove 100% how it ABSOLUTELY IS Number23 Jan 2015 #354
Clarence Thomas is more of a Uncle Rukus" c588415 Jan 2015 #390
"doing white peoples bidding"? Thats YOUR opinion. To then denigrate them is NOT. 7962 Jan 2015 #435
Didn't he separate conjoined twins? bravenak Jan 2015 #449
Yes, thats what made him famous at a young age. here's a bio: 7962 Jan 2015 #450
Yes it is. Marrah_G Jan 2015 #439
I agree, 100%. mountain grammy Jan 2015 #22
Thank you. bravenak Jan 2015 #27
No, not always. Because "It's the 21st Century, but the house Negro is still here." jtuck004 Jan 2015 #23
Malcolm is dead. bravenak Jan 2015 #25
What offends me is poverty, kids not eating, countries that enrich bank$sters at the expense of jtuck004 Jan 2015 #359
This in a nutshell. malokvale77 Jan 2015 #385
I found it. Well some of it. bravenak Jan 2015 #31
malcolm is talking about the white liberal leadership there. and citing him NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #61
I don't have to agree with everything. bravenak Jan 2015 #63
No, you don't. Neither do others. And I guess malcolm x was also black history in motion. NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #67
He definitely was. bravenak Jan 2015 #70
He does not in any way specify that he is talking about white liberal leadership Number23 Jan 2015 #363
It's clear who he's talking about, and it isn't your ordinary white liberal, unless NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #384
His point was that many civil rights leaders were beholden to white liberals because they pretended Number23 Jan 2015 #389
While you are right about the issue being about power... blackspade Jan 2015 #109
The quote I cited was about helping people recognize when they are in servitude, regardless of jtuck004 Jan 2015 #358
He had an incomplete understanding of the dynamics of slavery in the big house BainsBane Jan 2015 #319
Thats the most ridiculous analogy I've seen. 7962 Jan 2015 #437
Well, perhaps your experience is as limited as your vision. n/t jtuck004 Jan 2015 #451
If you say it's racist, that's good enough for me. nt Bonobo Jan 2015 #28
Thank you. bravenak Jan 2015 #32
i'm surprised to see such agreement about this Enrique Jan 2015 #29
I'm glad to see agreement. bravenak Jan 2015 #34
You've got it twisted Hutzpa Jan 2015 #30
Oh, please! bravenak Jan 2015 #33
Absolutely loyalsister Jan 2015 #36
For real. bravenak Jan 2015 #38
+ ellenrr Jan 2015 #51
No kidding. I'm not sure that any Dem, Progressive or person with a conscience would find any R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2015 #39
Thank you Daneel. bravenak Jan 2015 #41
Very true. It's also wrong to refer to Sen. Graham as "Miss Lindsey" and the like. QC Jan 2015 #40
I hate that!!! bravenak Jan 2015 #42
I hate that too JustAnotherGen Jan 2015 #244
Thanks! And it's got nothing to do with Lindsey Graham, QC Jan 2015 #296
That ain't right. The name calling that is... Blanks Jan 2015 #43
That Gomerard?(spelling) man who wants speaker of the house was the one who wanted West speaker. Sunlei Jan 2015 #48
Allen West is the biggest jerk in the universe. bravenak Jan 2015 #50
I think President Obama got called some of those and worse by political 'leadership'. Sunlei Jan 2015 #44
I Agree 1step Jan 2015 #46
I hate him too. bravenak Jan 2015 #47
But you would presumably denounce the use of those names for him muriel_volestrangler Jan 2015 #106
Of course. bravenak Jan 2015 #107
Please insert the Sarcasm or laughing thingy. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #108
But Why? 1step Jan 2015 #111
Is "poor widdle white men" racist? upaloopa Jan 2015 #52
What does this have to do with the op? bravenak Jan 2015 #55
Can't I ask a question? upaloopa Jan 2015 #71
Any time. bravenak Jan 2015 #80
Ill-advised, and, possibly, bigoted; but ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #105
Well thanks but I am confused now. upaloopa Jan 2015 #112
I don't understand. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #152
Only Whites RobinA Jan 2015 #161
To avoid that I just use bigoted instead for both 'racist' and 'bigoted' actions. Kind of one of kelly1mm Jan 2015 #185
Bingo ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #234
Sarcastic or not ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #230
Who gets to make the rules? upaloopa Jan 2015 #238
Daniel Webster is dead. bravenak Jan 2015 #243
Yes but we don't get to go to some Internet upaloopa Jan 2015 #251
I can. bravenak Jan 2015 #252
Not for me you can't and many others upaloopa Jan 2015 #261
I'll be around for a while deciding things. bravenak Jan 2015 #263
I am sure you will. upaloopa Jan 2015 #268
Yes I am. bravenak Jan 2015 #270
For you upaloopa Jan 2015 #305
I definately am my own decider. bravenak Jan 2015 #316
Nobody but you has said that. delrem Jan 2015 #299
Except that bigotry also is tied to institutional and cultural power, your claim that bigotry is not Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #245
Agreed; but, the bigotry you mention ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #273
I have thought that bigotry can be against any number of group of people sharing a uppityperson Jan 2015 #312
The very concept of Bobbie Jo Jan 2015 #215
Please explain upaloopa Jan 2015 #232
Yes. Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #239
We can use this terminology because we're better...and right. ileus Jan 2015 #53
It's only racist if your a republican. bravenak Jan 2015 #56
the ignorance surrounding race relations on this board continually astounds me. n/t Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2015 #54
Me too.nt bravenak Jan 2015 #57
It's not ignorance ... It's Arrogance. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #110
*sigh* true enough. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2015 #122
+1 ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #150
also true .. however ... "deliberately obtuse" does better with regards to DU3 juries Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2015 #154
Thanks. 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #163
+1 n/t Gormy Cuss Jan 2015 #135
It's NOT ignorance.....it is deliberate tone deafness. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #175
that works too. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2015 #181
I'm glad you said it. Throd Jan 2015 #58
I agree. bravenak Jan 2015 #73
I think another layer of the racism lies in the implicit assumption Jackpine Radical Jan 2015 #59
I never really even thought about it like that, but You're right. bravenak Jan 2015 #76
I agree with you fully, I saw that thread when it was new. Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #62
Hell yeah! bravenak Jan 2015 #66
It's also politically stupid, but I think most who use such terms 'ironically' do so just to use the Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #102
Trying to fit in, then. bravenak Jan 2015 #103
I agree absolutely. greatauntoftriplets Jan 2015 #64
Thanks. I appreciate that. bravenak Jan 2015 #78
I've seen words tossed around here that were last used (I thought) 50 years ago. greatauntoftriplets Jan 2015 #91
I know, right? bravenak Jan 2015 #95
That you even had to say it azurnoir Jan 2015 #68
Thank you. bravenak Jan 2015 #174
+1,000,000 ismnotwasm Jan 2015 #69
I am a huge fan of Mark Thompson or Matsimela Mapfumo of Sirius left radio... randys1 Jan 2015 #75
I'll check him out. bravenak Jan 2015 #84
He is a preacher, Christian and in his early 40's...NYC... randys1 Jan 2015 #89
Oh, no!!!! bravenak Jan 2015 #97
On his show he literally never preaches and only talks religion if someone randys1 Jan 2015 #138
Ok. You brought me back into the fold. bravenak Jan 2015 #145
When I had XM, I used to listen to Matsimela Mapfumo whenever possible. Zorra Jan 2015 #266
So, is it racist (or sexist) for me to say "A black person (or woman) voting for a Republican is kath Jan 2015 #77
What do you think? bravenak Jan 2015 #83
See: "I use this quote a lot, and really think it is true." ieoeja Jan 2015 #164
Whatever. bravenak Jan 2015 #168
Anyone other than the top 10%. The Republicans represent the top 10%'s interests KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #193
I agree. bravenak Jan 2015 #202
but I *don't* clearly think the statement is not racist. kath Jan 2015 #334
True, they want ALL of us for dinner ( the 99%) kath Jan 2015 #329
Of course. bravenak Jan 2015 #331
No ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #118
That one's tricky - I have said "any poor (or low wage earner) voting ... haele Jan 2015 #153
I'm Hispanic and I've paraphrased that to say it about Hispanics to my Repub sister. Rozlee Jan 2015 #402
"They've experienced the worst of the worst in this country F4lconF16 Jan 2015 #455
Context is all. Orsino Jan 2015 #79
I can understand your position. bravenak Jan 2015 #88
No--context is not all. As a woman, I still don't want to see another woman referred to with msanthrope Jan 2015 #177
Context is still all... Orsino Jan 2015 #180
Correct HERVEPA Jan 2015 #292
Just calling them a Republican should be insult enough! blackspade Jan 2015 #81
For real, though. bravenak Jan 2015 #82
Derogatory terms based on race, gender, sexuality identity, or age are never acceptable. bluesbassman Jan 2015 #86
I agree. bravenak Jan 2015 #90
You might look at your own derogatory associations about "white people" Rilgin Jan 2015 #221
You really put a lot of though into that inane self serving crap. bravenak Jan 2015 #223
You are right, I did think about my post before I posted it Rilgin Jan 2015 #285
I use the word Black alot too. bravenak Jan 2015 #287
Yes Rilgin Jan 2015 #321
Maybe you should make an attempt to better understand the history then. bravenak Jan 2015 #327
Again yes Rilgin Jan 2015 #350
Take care. bravenak Jan 2015 #351
100% agree with you. tammywammy Jan 2015 #186
Of course calling names to insult based on skin color is racist. I wont, but have a question uppityperson Jan 2015 #113
If you would not use it on a person of another color, it is not ok. bravenak Jan 2015 #115
I take it personally gwheezie Jan 2015 #137
Me too. bravenak Jan 2015 #139
I am firmly in the describe behavior vs insult the person, group. people do act not in uppityperson Jan 2015 #165
I don't understand it either. bravenak Jan 2015 #169
I was wrong, about my question if it is a negative but accurate term ever. Hypocrite is uppityperson Jan 2015 #210
Thank you.nt bravenak Jan 2015 #212
Mighty generous of you towards Powell HERVEPA Jan 2015 #298
you got a lot out of my saying "condoms", didn't you? uppityperson Jan 2015 #314
labels handmade34 Jan 2015 #114
Agreed. bravenak Jan 2015 #120
exactly. nt uppityperson Jan 2015 #167
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2015 #117
I hate Uncle Tom, ms Lindsey and redneck gwheezie Jan 2015 #121
The Ms. lindsay thing creeps me out. bravenak Jan 2015 #191
I don't like the things they say about Lindsey Graham rbrnmw Jan 2015 #203
Damn, that was Republicans doing that crap? bravenak Jan 2015 #207
Yep they even brought their kids rbrnmw Jan 2015 #211
Bundy ranch. bravenak Jan 2015 #213
The Miss Lindsey stuff is wrong because it implies there is something wrong with being gay. HERVEPA Jan 2015 #300
Language police Android3.14 Jan 2015 #123
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #127
But no actual argument? Android3.14 Jan 2015 #130
You have the PRIVILEGE to do so. bravenak Jan 2015 #136
What argument is required ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #144
Come on, don't you understand it is all the rest of us who need it explained to us? So we can be kelly1mm Jan 2015 #160
Amazing isn't it? n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #166
Argue, continue to behave like a bully, do whatever Android3.14 Jan 2015 #342
Behave like a bully???? 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #356
So when Malcolm X called Martin Luther King an Uncle Tom, Malcolm X was being racist Android3.14 Jan 2015 #357
No ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #362
Waaaahhhh! bravenak Jan 2015 #132
really? language police rbrnmw Jan 2015 #147
Everything is fascist now. bravenak Jan 2015 #155
yes because Hitler loved darker hued folks rbrnmw Jan 2015 #194
Oh. Are you bringing up factual historical data? bravenak Jan 2015 #201
oops sorry wouldn't want to offend the lurkers rbrnmw Jan 2015 #206
Not just the lurkers. bravenak Jan 2015 #208
Sure do and they know I know rbrnmw Jan 2015 #214
Oh give me a break. NuclearDem Jan 2015 #148
One break Android3.14 Jan 2015 #343
Are you serious? "calling black people" an insult of their skin color is...not racist? uppityperson Jan 2015 #172
I didn't understand the last sentence of your post Android3.14 Jan 2015 #346
A race based insult is not racist? Wow. I'd quote Inigo Montoya but it's getting old. uppityperson Jan 2015 #348
is asking for an answer merely supporting your little Language Police Industrial Complex? LanternWaste Jan 2015 #178
It's a usage error. Consider the term "Benedict Arnold" Android3.14 Jan 2015 #218
Wait what ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #249
Hmmm Android3.14 Jan 2015 #333
Are you saying "uncle tom" does not have it's origins in racism or isn't racist? uppityperson Jan 2015 #345
Not getting into the efficacy of using Wiki as a source ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #360
I'm sure you're an expert on the use of the word "racism." gollygee Jan 2015 #231
But at least he/she is not being "Language Policey" ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #250
Not an expert on racism, but I do make my living as a wordsmith Android3.14 Jan 2015 #335
My degree and work have also been in writing gollygee Jan 2015 #352
Because, after all, the only people who should comment are sociologists and anti-racism educators Android3.14 Jan 2015 #355
They are only people in a position of expertise about the word "racism." n/t gollygee Jan 2015 #361
I think the poster was pointing out JustAnotherGen Jan 2015 #391
lolwut? nt geek tragedy Jan 2015 #309
Yes, why not just call them "phoney-baloney hypocrites"? GoCubsGo Jan 2015 #126
Works for me!nt bravenak Jan 2015 #140
Happy to kick and rec this! zappaman Jan 2015 #129
Thanks!nt bravenak Jan 2015 #143
Sorry you had to say that, bravenak, but glad you did. sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #149
I know, Sabrina. It's too much sometimes, I have to laugh a bit. bravenak Jan 2015 #151
It implies there are certain behavioral standards to maintain "blackness" Kurska Jan 2015 #157
It is bizarre. bravenak Jan 2015 #159
Nor can I dance ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #162
See! bravenak Jan 2015 #170
Well I can dance gwheezie Jan 2015 #183
Trapped in a Cuban Salsa dancer's body!! bravenak Jan 2015 #187
This last time gwheezie Jan 2015 #190
Omg, I'm dying over here! bravenak Jan 2015 #192
Lol lol lol gwheezie Jan 2015 #195
They are very sweet when they wanna be. bravenak Jan 2015 #198
No matter Kurska Jan 2015 #423
Thanks, man. bravenak Jan 2015 #424
No worries, I know you'd do the same for me. Kurska Jan 2015 #426
It is raw racism and I have seen the left use those terms. NCTraveler Jan 2015 #173
Not black enough, exactly. bravenak Jan 2015 #176
I've gotten 'not black like that' JustAnotherGen Jan 2015 #246
They never explain it either. bravenak Jan 2015 #255
Agreed. La Lioness Priyanka Jan 2015 #179
Thank you. bravenak Jan 2015 #184
no idea why anyone is arguing this at all. its exactly why we shouldn't use sexist commentary La Lioness Priyanka Jan 2015 #225
I wrote mean things in my copy of his Autobiography. bravenak Jan 2015 #240
+1 brer cat Jan 2015 #381
Context AlbertCat Jan 2015 #188
I'm just going to call it racist. bravenak Jan 2015 #196
Agreed... MrScorpio Jan 2015 #189
Panderers they are. bravenak Jan 2015 #199
Agreed. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #209
For those confusing and defending racist speech with the "free speech" argument ismnotwasm Jan 2015 #216
See post 218 Android3.14 Jan 2015 #219
Are you a person of color? ismnotwasm Jan 2015 #222
See my Post 249 ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #258
Because, after all, there are only two options Android3.14 Jan 2015 #337
Eye rolling is a sign of contempt JustAnotherGen Jan 2015 #392
Oh good gawd. Iggo Jan 2015 #220
Because??? n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #260
why does bravenak's thread offend you? rbrnmw Jan 2015 #272
Who said I'm offended? Iggo Jan 2015 #313
sorry rbrnmw Jan 2015 #332
OK, you got it, I promise not to speak about race in 2015 so I don't risk offending anybody kickysnana Jan 2015 #224
Um. Ok. bravenak Jan 2015 #237
That is probably best ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #241
And saying that the problem is "old, white men" is ageist and racist. nichomachus Jan 2015 #227
When I say it I say 'old, conservstive, white men'. bravenak Jan 2015 #233
Why not just say "conservatives?" Unless less young and female conservatives are different? n/t nichomachus Jan 2015 #253
They are following the leader. bravenak Jan 2015 #256
Bullcrap. nichomachus Jan 2015 #259
He leaders are not men? bravenak Jan 2015 #262
when we were kids, my brother called my sister a negro kcass1954 Jan 2015 #229
Perfect. bravenak Jan 2015 #235
I think I love your mother! JustAnotherGen Jan 2015 #247
Curious, r "red neck" and "white trash" also racist? These are terms used to describe stupid white McCamy Taylor Jan 2015 #248
I think both terms are ignorant, bigoted, and unacceptable. bravenak Jan 2015 #265
It's a poor reflection on DU that this post is necessary. Scuba Jan 2015 #257
But, read the comments contained within ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #264
I think we get too comfortable thinking that only republicans can be wrong. bravenak Jan 2015 #267
We are weird, and perhaps our disdain for each other while being interdependent is the weirdest. Scuba Jan 2015 #269
Hell yeah. If we could move to different planets, some idiots would. bravenak Jan 2015 #271
Maybe that's what happened ... Scuba Jan 2015 #276
I agree, no matter who uses it, or what race they are. Words like hypocrite still_one Jan 2015 #274
Hypocrite fits perfectly. bravenak Jan 2015 #283
Whatever happened to disagreeing with someone without name calling? 6000eliot Jan 2015 #291
I don't know. bravenak Jan 2015 #294
Most people who use those terms don't even know what they mean BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #295
Thank you for Mr. impeached and prisoner number 2047. bravenak Jan 2015 #349
Thank you for this discussion BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #408
LOL! bravenak Jan 2015 #409
Agreed. I just call them fracking, smegging, gorram, nerf herding mud-bloods. jmondine Jan 2015 #297
As a general rule, insults are meant to be cruel. GeorgeGist Jan 2015 #303
K&R n/t Feral Child Jan 2015 #307
White people ought not to be policing who's geek tragedy Jan 2015 #325
Perhaps the idea that there is a legitimate black person (or a legitimate female, white, asian, etc. kelly1mm Jan 2015 #338
Two interesting pieces on the Harry Belafonte flap back in 2002: kath Jan 2015 #328
We have been taught to use race to bash each other. bravenak Jan 2015 #330
I remember that rbrnmw Jan 2015 #336
You are absolutely right! Quackers Jan 2015 #339
I think so. bravenak Jan 2015 #344
Name-calling is bad but what the Republicans do is FAR FAR WORSE. nt valerief Jan 2015 #340
I don't want to be bad and point the finger at worse. That's all.nt bravenak Jan 2015 #341
I happen to agree with you rpannier Jan 2015 #364
Thank you. bravenak Jan 2015 #365
I'm coming into this thread late, Sissyk Jan 2015 #368
Thank you back! bravenak Jan 2015 #372
How is this not self-evident? I'm very sorry you find it necessary to point it out here on DU. scarletwoman Jan 2015 #370
A couple of weeks ago, I was too late to jury alert a comment Denzil_DC Jan 2015 #374
I think we are all smart enough to find creative descriptions. bravenak Jan 2015 #376
Wow TNNurse Jan 2015 #371
Absolutely Kalidurga Jan 2015 #373
Everything you just said plus 10. bravenak Jan 2015 #375
Yeah that is funny Kalidurga Jan 2015 #377
Yep. She's an evil entity like Cheney the Ghoul. bravenak Jan 2015 #378
lordy, bravenak. brer cat Jan 2015 #379
She always cuts straight to it. bravenak Jan 2015 #380
and it only gives right wankers even MORE ammo to shit on the left. doing so discredits more than alp227 Jan 2015 #382
I agree with that wholeheartedly. bravenak Jan 2015 #383
I had a black person explain to me what an Uncle Tom meant 4dsc Jan 2015 #386
Brilliant. bravenak Jan 2015 #387
Huge difference between Uncle Tom and Aunt Jemima CrawlingChaos Jan 2015 #393
You can think however you please. bravenak Jan 2015 #394
We'll likely continue to disagree, but... CrawlingChaos Jan 2015 #395
Have you read the book? bravenak Jan 2015 #397
Yes CrawlingChaos Jan 2015 #398
Yes it was. bravenak Jan 2015 #400
I'm talking about the historical significance of the character CrawlingChaos Jan 2015 #401
Who decided that? bravenak Jan 2015 #403
Black writers and activists CrawlingChaos Jan 2015 #405
They took cues from what they saw. bravenak Jan 2015 #406
Here is a snip of th end plot where Uncke Tom gets beat to death allowing the other slaves to escape bravenak Jan 2015 #399
KnR Hekate Jan 2015 #404
bravenak ~ hopemountain Jan 2015 #410
I don't think so either. bravenak Jan 2015 #411
Like MANY people, I had to read it in school CrawlingChaos Jan 2015 #415
well then, i question your comprehension hopemountain Jan 2015 #417
What are you even talking about? Do you know? CrawlingChaos Jan 2015 #427
bravenak already explained it to you. hopemountain Jan 2015 #429
What the....what? CrawlingChaos Jan 2015 #430
THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! I'm SO tired of the double standard. 7962 Jan 2015 #412
I think we should end the double standard. bravenak Jan 2015 #414
Oreo is another one to add to the list. blkmusclmachine Jan 2015 #425
Yup.nt bravenak Jan 2015 #428
Bravenak, I KnR'd this ages ago. It's really quite the Rorschach Test by now, isn't it? Hekate Jan 2015 #431
I have been confused and amused. bravenak Jan 2015 #432
Anytime a comment is made, based on KMOD Jan 2015 #433
I agree Marrah_G Jan 2015 #438
Exactly! bravenak Jan 2015 #444
Of course. LWolf Jan 2015 #440
It's weird. bravenak Jan 2015 #442
As a black person I will use those terminology regardless of your race Farmbrook Jan 2015 #443
Do as you please. bravenak Jan 2015 #445
As a black person I will use those terminologies regardless of your race Farmbrook Jan 2015 #446
I'll clown you and make you look stupid. bravenak Jan 2015 #447
It's really crazy that you had to post this. DUers should know better. (nt) Inkfreak Jan 2015 #452
Yes, we should. bravenak Jan 2015 #453
Kick and R. BeanMusical Jan 2015 #456
True. bravenak Jan 2015 #458
Oh bullshit. Glassunion Jan 2015 #457
Well pardon me but that was 'fake' racism. bravenak Jan 2015 #459

liberalmike27

(2,479 posts)
197. I wonder
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:49 PM
Jan 2015

What you would call Samuel L. Jackson's character in "Django Unchained?"

Personally I see racism as the result of an intent of racism. If you don't intend to be racist, if you're seeing say, this character as a problem, almost as much and as hated as the slaver, then isn't the intent to demonize him? And isn't that OK?

Then again, I realize a lot of people don't apparently "intend" racism, that do some quite racist things. And I'd agree, calling Obama a "House negro," seems racist. That said, pointing out certain black "journalists," who go on FOX and promote policies that are hurtful to the poor, or blacks, I think is not intended to be racist.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
200. A selfish asshole?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:52 PM
Jan 2015

I am just trying to explain that if it's racist to say about people we like then it's racist when it's people we don't like.

I know people who use the n word liberally t describe blaxks they don't like, but tell me 'not you, your fine, n***** just means ignorant person'. But they never call white people those things. See ? It's the same thing.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
320. If you have to explain it
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:34 PM
Jan 2015

you are pretty much speaking into an empty well. Those that don't get it seem determined to NOT get it, and it is admirable to try to get them to step outside of themselves for 15 seconds. That said, for the one out of a million that wake up and smell the coffee, you have the other 999,999 that are determined to remain clueless.

Maybe I'm too cynical, though.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
322. I feel like I have to try.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:37 PM
Jan 2015

I just cannot stop until it's clear. I'll probably die from the insanity of repeating myself all the time.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
326. I believe I know which thread you are referring to
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:45 PM
Jan 2015

I just stumbled across it.

I've seen acrobats do fewer contortions than what went on in that thread.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
413. By "pointing out", do you mean using those terms mentioned in the OP??
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 01:02 AM
Jan 2015

Because a lot of folks here have NO problem with it.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
5. It's pretty disgusting that you
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:07 PM
Jan 2015

even had to say this. I would have thought that it was understood that this is never okay.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
72. Perhaps this is a window to that soul ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:09 PM
Jan 2015

he/she is using the worst possible word that he/she can think of without using the word that he/she really wants to use.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
93. That's uncalled for.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:18 PM
Jan 2015

I've seen nothing to indicate that. If you have something that you think does, you should post it, otherwise it's just a baseless smear.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
133. I have no idea whom this OP is referring to ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:45 PM
Jan 2015

it is a general observation that only a criminal has a use for criminal tools.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
141. 1SBM made a suggestion, not a statement of fact. Your response is what's uncalled for.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:48 PM
Jan 2015

A bit over the top sensitive, too.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
99. I hope to hell not!
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:21 PM
Jan 2015

That would be fucked up. But you are probably right. Everytime i think your wrong, your right.

calimary

(81,322 posts)
182. Sounds like this friend of my late mom's.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:32 PM
Jan 2015

He was so damn wrong-wing he was just simply irredeemable. And he'd send these obnoxious emails around, and forward email threads about such sterling topics as "why can't I say the 'N-word'? MY rights! MY rights!" Couldn't delete it fast enough but I never wanted to block him - I felt that I had better keep track. I did want to know what kind of shit my mother was being exposed to whenever they got together.



Dear GOD that was repulsive. And he was serious. And totally sincere. He really believed it. Cast-in-bronze teabagger he was.

My mom sure went downhill toward the end, and I'm not just talking health-wise.

mimi85

(1,805 posts)
94. Perhaps you should alert the next time you see the post, you should alert on it.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:18 PM
Jan 2015

Which should go without saying....

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
418. Wow, no, it was somebody else and it was settled earlier.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 01:11 AM
Jan 2015

I was really mostly objecting to the Mia Love thread. From earlier. I just don't want to see people doing that this time. We should object to her strange politics instead of the Aunt Jemima or Uncle Tom stuff. Sounds so ignorant, right? No more cracker or trailer trash stuff either. Tired. So stupid. I cringe.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
420. Preachin to the choir! I missed the Love thread; I'll look it up.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 01:18 AM
Jan 2015

Sadly, i'm not surprised.
In a similar fashion, the propensity of many here to wish actual death on people like Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Cheney, Christie, etc. And they're not shy about describing just how they want them to go!!
I never had any use for Chavez, but when he got cancer, I shook my head. I HATE cancer. While I hoped he would lose his power, I'd never wish him to lose it because of disease.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
422. I also do not wish people dead.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 01:22 AM
Jan 2015

Arrested, yeah. Unemployed? Sure. But dead in a painful way? No. Death is so final.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
8. Totally agree.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:13 PM
Jan 2015

Another one used in that thread is "token".

Going by jury results in that thread, DU needs to hear this. Recced.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
11. I don't like that one either.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:15 PM
Jan 2015

Along with Any racial terms. I don't even use cracker cause it's stupid and bigoted. I love this place.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
17. I was on that jury. I think that context matters - and the context in that case
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:19 PM
Jan 2015

was presenting the mindset of Republicans. It wasn't endorsing that sort of thinking, it was criticizing by adopting it.

Bryant

Lucky Luciano

(11,257 posts)
242. George Carlin understood that well.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:53 PM
Jan 2015

When he dropped some N-bombs, he specifically said that the point was that it made fun of the racist assholes who use the word and mean it.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
275. Nods - and I think that was the intention of the poster.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:27 PM
Jan 2015

It's probably something i would steer clear of myself, but I could see where that poster was coming from.

Bryant

Number23

(24,544 posts)
353. I know George Carlin is some DU God (I know practically nothing about him) but the idea that
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 07:02 PM
Jan 2015

it was okay for this one white man to use the n word because he was using it "ironically" sounds incredibly stupid.

He had no business using that word and I have no doubt that he knew it. But also knew that his white fans, especially the clueless ones, would be okay with it because he was using it "ironically" and he was George Carlin, hero.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
366. I don't know the bit so can't comment either
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 08:20 PM
Jan 2015

But I think using the term to portray a white mindset is different than using it to comment on black people.

There's that movie Selma which just opened or is about to - i don't know if the white people in that movie use that term, but i'd expect them too - because it's portraying how racist the south is at that time.

Bryant

Number23

(24,544 posts)
367. I agree to an extent. But it is possible for people to point out the flaws in our society without
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 08:23 PM
Jan 2015

resorting to the very language that is the source of so much pain.

The way DU froths over Carlin, surely he was intelligent enough to lampoon racism without using racist language.

Lucky Luciano

(11,257 posts)
396. The clip and a couple others.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 11:09 PM
Jan 2015

First the clip that made me start becoming more liberal - about bombing brown people:




The clip below is where he drops n-bombs.



A continuation where he discusses how euphemisms corrupt our language - ie "shell shock" became "pust traumatic stress disorder" and this strips away the blunt meaning of shell shock.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
9. Absolutely
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:13 PM
Jan 2015

There are black conservatives. Conservative policies should be attacked. Not people. My best friend is black, gay, retired military and conservative.old time conservative and has not voted GOP in the last 10 years He's the smartest person I know. It hurts my heart when if some people think he's an Uncle Tom because he identifies himself as conservative. We have had many debates on issues but never once did I think he was being made a fool.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
14. That sucks.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:17 PM
Jan 2015

It's no wonder they think Democrats are racist too. If one of use finds out a black man or woman is conservative, the attacks become racial. I hate that. Attack their looney positions if they have them. Better that way.

ellenrr

(3,864 posts)
24. very true. reminds me of something that happened 40+ years ago,
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:30 PM
Jan 2015

but I still remember--
a very progressive woman asked me this:
if a guy with glasses harasses her, she may refute his harassment by making fun of his wearing glasses,
so..
if a guy who is Black, harasses her, is it racist for her to use the n word?

DUH!

also there was a white guy, whose car I was a passenger in, and he was almost swiped by another driver who was Black.
this guy whose car I was in used the n word!

when I expressed my shock and disgust, he "explained":
He only used the n word for Black people he doesn't like.

!!

people use the excuse of someone they don't like, to be racist.

It is never ok to use racial slurs no matter how evil the person is -
you can say what you want about SC judge Clarence Thomas, curse him, curse his momma, whatever...but if the insults turn into racial insults then it is racist, no matter what a bad guy he is.

Same as my friend and being harassed in the street. I hate being harassed by men, and I may curse them in any which way, but if I am reduced to racial curses, then I am a racist. Flat out.

someone else's bad behavior does not justify racist response.

azmom

(5,208 posts)
278. Off-topic
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:34 PM
Jan 2015

I agree with your post. I would, however, like to make a small comment about your use of the word "looney", since we're talking about language. That word has historically been used to refer to people with mental or psychiatric disabilities, and can be seen as ableist language.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
279. You're right.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:38 PM
Jan 2015

I guess I use it to feel superior to them because I'm diagnosed but they seem more crazy than I do.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
419. Look what happened to Stacy Dash. All she said was "Im voting for Romney"
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 01:13 AM
Jan 2015

And she was SAVAGED. She printed a long list of "tweets" she got after that and she was called everything under the sun. Didnt seem to bother her, but it bothered me. No excuse for it.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
421. I remember that.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 01:20 AM
Jan 2015

I had other reasons to slightly dislike her. I had assumed she would vote Romney. I'm sure a few other famous black conservatives did too. But she did get it real bad, tho. I stayed out of it, I didn't want to read the comments. I think we make too much of a big deal when a black person is a republican. We are not all the same. Why should we be?

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
436. YOU should run for office!
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 08:18 AM
Jan 2015

See, your "but" was to point out how bad it was for her. WHen you'd hear other well-known people be asked about it, they would say "Oh, thats terrible! I dont think thats right at all! But......." and then go on with some blather about her positions on whatever. Which is pretty much the same as saying "i understand why people did it, even if I wouldnt"

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
441. You're funny.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 10:32 AM
Jan 2015

My personality type is the worst for Presidenting.
Too empathetic and introverted. I'd end up a hermit.

hibbing

(10,098 posts)
171. Exactly
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:13 PM
Jan 2015

I don't like the terms at all either and never use them. Focus on the stupid politics they believe in instead. This is a great thread.

Peace

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
20. Do a DU search for Condi Rice or Clarence Thomas
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:24 PM
Jan 2015

Though I don't agree with either on most things, I rarely click a thread here about either because of the racist shit that is allowed around here...

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
45. I know. I've seen those terms used on DU.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:51 PM
Jan 2015

I don't like it, though. Not my website, however, so I just have to ignore things that are left in threads by juries if they offend me. It doesn't look like juries are going to hide that stuff as things are. They should still be alerted, though and comments posted in the threads indicated that such terms are unwelcome. Maybe people will get it eventually.

Response to bravenak (Reply #15)

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
92. I know the majority here ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:18 PM
Jan 2015

resist this explanation; but, when a Black person uses racially derogatory language, it carries a different meaning, than when a non-Black person uses it.

With that said, I disapprove of such language used by anyone, Black or non-Black, and have put, both, Black and non-Black, out of my house for using that type of language.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
306. You are right.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:20 PM
Jan 2015

thanks for answering, I was curious. I get the difference (i.e. the rap songs and such). Good for you re putting them out of the house! I would never use it. I've heard black people use it - though I don't know if as a white person I'd be OK to put them out of the house!

kelly1mm

(4,733 posts)
96. Can they? Of course, just like while liberals can. There is no law against it. Should they, or,
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:20 PM
Jan 2015

more importantly should they be called on it? I think yes, they should.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
308. True. It just seems odd you can end up
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:21 PM
Jan 2015

being a white person accusing a black person of using racist terms - against black people.

Definitely no one should use those terms.

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
205. I wouldn't use any language for black conservatives that I couldn't use for white ones
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:58 PM
Jan 2015

So the answer is no.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
311. Thanks for answering.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:23 PM
Jan 2015

There are plenty of names for the Herman Cains of the world that can also be applied to the McCains of the world, race neutral.

still_one

(92,219 posts)
277. They can but it is still racist. Instead of attacking the behavior or hypocrisy
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:30 PM
Jan 2015

Using racial innuendos is racist no matter who says it

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
289. Anyone *can* use them; it's just that it's wrong to do so.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:54 PM
Jan 2015

So I think the answer to the question you're asking is "no, it's not OK to racially abuse someone, even if you are the same race as them yourself".

 

Ink Man

(171 posts)
16. It's counterproductive.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:18 PM
Jan 2015

If we disagree with their politics then make a intelligent argument why. Some of the things I read here looks like it was an cut and paste for a tea party site.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
19. I was thinking the same thing.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:20 PM
Jan 2015

They say 'plantation', we say house negro or uncle tom. No better than them.

kelly1mm

(4,733 posts)
100. It is all part of the 'otherization' process. But when 'we' do it it is for good reasons, or so I
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:22 PM
Jan 2015

am told.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
21. I disagree. Calling Clarence Thomas or Ben Carson an oreo is not racist in my opinion.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:25 PM
Jan 2015

It means a black person doing white people's bidding, and that's what these men do, genrally to the detriment of those of their own race. No reason not to call it what it is.

This is entirely unrelated to calling Michelle Obama "Aunt Jemima". There is just no comparison

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
37. What's the epithet for "white on the outside, black on the inside?"
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:45 PM
Jan 2015

There isn't one. That's the first clue that oreo may be problematic.

ellenrr

(3,864 posts)
49. I love your answer, and I'd add to Herverpa...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:52 PM
Jan 2015

1. don't seek out epithets.
2. that phrase "white on the outside..." needs to be retired along with "oreo"- UGH.
3. if you don't like some one's policies, there are plenty of words in the English language you can use to say so.

What do you call Boehner (et al) when they shit upon MY interests?
I'm white, he's white - where is the epithet I can throw at him?

Even if there were one, it wouldn't serve.
We have brains, we have thinking ability, we have language, so let's use them.

Roy Rolling

(6,918 posts)
85. There isn't one?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:16 PM
Jan 2015

Surely you jest. Ask your kids, they will tell you the epithet and it is used quite often.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
87. Actually there IS a word for that
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:17 PM
Jan 2015

But I am not going to repeat it here.

It's not relevant in any case. I don't think any of these words are acceptable in polite conversation.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
124. If you're thinking of the word 1SBM used, it's hardly equivalent as an insult
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:41 PM
Jan 2015

It's jocular rather than implying that one is a race traitor.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
142. No, there isn't.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:48 PM
Jan 2015

The one that rhymes with the 'N' word doesn't mean you're a traitor to your race. It means you've adopted some cultural/social aspects that appeal to you.

Oreo on the other hand...

treestar

(82,383 posts)
317. I hadn't heard that word used until recently.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:30 PM
Jan 2015

when my jerk uncle used it (white guy). I thought he meant someone with a parent of each race, like President Obama, who he regularly vilifies.

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
60. So, do you think a black person cannot philosophically be a conservative?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:59 PM
Jan 2015

That is an ugly position because you believe the conservative black person isn't smart enough to have control of his own agency or has sinister reasons for doing so.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
158. Many, if not the majority, of Blacks are conservative, and there's absolutely nothing wrong
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:58 PM
Jan 2015

with that. It's when they vote Republican that rubs me the wrong way, considering how the Republican Party has consistently tried to keep the Black voter, worker, mother, child, wages, and education down in order to lift up the same for Whites. That's what I don't understand. But I do understand that Black people can be very conservative solely based on their chosen religion. Equal rights for gay people, for example, isn't high on their list of things to defend. But that goes for Latinos, as well.

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
74. It is - that and zebra
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:10 PM
Jan 2015

School yard slur by white kids towards me growing up.

It's meant to denigrate.

Condi Rice and Thomas both had to survive in a world that not only called them 'oreos' - but one that also called them n*ggers.

Good bad, indifferent they survive it as best they could.


Now are they ass wipes? Yeppeeeeeeeeeeer!
Ass holes.
Ass wipes.
Nitwits
Fuckwits


Etc. etc. Those are cool!

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
369. There has been some call to get rid of curse words on DU
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 08:34 PM
Jan 2015

If they take those away, I would not be able to say anything about Republicans at all!

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
388. I'm with you brother!
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 09:56 PM
Jan 2015

Then again my parents used to say we were acting like Republicans when we were being brats - and my mom would threaten to drop me off at the White House (Reagan Era) when I was a little kid - so the R word is kind of a curse word from where I sit.

I also am real quick to say I'm looking for that one fuck I'm supposed to give about something - so there's that.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
407. Haha!
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 11:47 PM
Jan 2015

Your mom is a crackup. I think you can definitely call yourself a lifelong Democrat! Reagan really was the worst of the worst of the worst. What a great way to make sure your kid never turns into a Republican. I'm going to share that with my friends!

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
454. My mother was a teacher
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 02:38 PM
Jan 2015

And you should have seen her and her teacher friends when the subject of Reagan came up. They had this look of disgust as if something died. They had hated him as governor, and now they absolutely loathed him as president for his union busting and educational policies. Totally shows how you rub off on your children.

Unfortunately one of our neighbors who was the most hippie and pretty much the closest thing to a saint, her sons grew up to be staunch Republican assholes. Everyone still feels sorry for her! So your mom's trick of making a Republican the worst thing in the world is a good inoculation against selfish, greedy children.

Cheers to your mom & dad

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
125. Nothing wrong with labels in my opinion when they apply.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:42 PM
Jan 2015

As a side note, where did the "word" otherization come from.
Some people are just bad people. Nothing wrong with calling them names.

kelly1mm

(4,733 posts)
146. If others are offended by the labels you use then perhaps you should rethink using them.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:49 PM
Jan 2015

Totally up to you of course, but expect pushback.

Otherization is an almost innate human activity. What it does is identify the 'in-group' and the 'out-group' in the tribal system (tribal being actual tribes, race, religion, ethnicity, gender, nationality, what sports team you like, what high school you attend, rural v. urban, political views, ect ....)

One of the keys to tribalization is to belittle and dehumanize the 'other', hence 'otherization'.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
204. If others are offended, so be it.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:57 PM
Jan 2015

I do not use these terms willy niily.
It is a characteristic of Ben Carson and Clarence Thomas that they are externally (physically) black, but their talk (well, maybe not talking for Clarence) and actions are highly.detrimental (to put it mildly) to people of their own race.

If a large number of African Americans told me this offended them, I would not use it. I do not think DU, or African Americans on DU, necessarily are a representative cross-section of African-Americans in general.

Otherization is not always bad. Ok for neo-nazis to be otherized, terrorists to be otherized, WBC's to be otherized, and so on.

I understand and respect your point. I do not agree with it.


kelly1mm

(4,733 posts)
217. Thank you for the kind words. You are free to use whatever words you wish in my book! And if
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:08 PM
Jan 2015

you feel you are getting the results you want by using them, then I suppose you are correct in doing so.

We will just have to agree to disagree........

Have a GREAT rest of the day!

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
228. See Post 200. ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:43 PM
Jan 2015

Question ...

If a large number of African Americans told me this offended them, I would not use it. I do not think DU, or African Americans on DU, necessarily are a representative cross-section of African-Americans in general.


Do you accept DU, or white folks on DU, as a representative cross-section of white Americans, in general?
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
254. You seem to want to pick and choose whose ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:09 PM
Jan 2015

view is representative of a cross section of African-American thought ... African-Americans telling you that from their/our experience, they/we do represent that thought, is clearly not enough for you.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
284. Because you say you represent African-American thought does not mean that you do.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:40 PM
Jan 2015

I do know that caucasian folks views on DU certainly do not represent the view of caucasian in this country.
Whether A-A views on this site represent broad A-A views on this subject, I don't know, but I foubt it.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
286. You doubt it because ...?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:44 PM
Jan 2015

I will grant, there are/will be disparate voices; but, from my experience, the voice expressed on DU by Black DUers, is within the mainstream of the larger Black community.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
290. I doubt it because the voices on DU in general are much more liberal than voices nationwide overall
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:56 PM
Jan 2015

Anyhow, I respect your views, but I am done on this.
Peace.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
293. One more point, then you can be done ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:02 PM
Jan 2015

I think you would benefit from reading back through your part of the thread and the responses you received, understanding that the majority of those that responded are Black.

The consider what you are saying (or rather, what we may be hearing) ... you respect our voice; but, not what we are telling you.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
318. Sorry, ....
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:31 PM
Jan 2015

That was not my intent. The way people learn is to have our errors pointed out to us.

But the other half of that is there is a willingness to hear about the error.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
282. Could you explain the 2nd para, please?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:40 PM
Jan 2015

That is, explain:
"If a large number of African Americans told me this offended them, I would not use it. I do not think DU, or African Americans on DU, necessarily are a representative cross-section of African-Americans in general."

To be sure, DU isn't the entire world. But how, exactly, is a "large number of African Americans" to tell you that your usage of racially coded epithets offends them? How can they all, individually and one by one, line up in front of you to tell you (politely, mind you) that your usage offends them? At what point would you have enough feedback so you'd actually stop using the words? I ask, since there seems to be a huge majority of DUers who've explained the offence and you feel free to ignore it, as not being enough evidence - since you don't think DU, the place where you're posting and actually *getting* the feedback, is representative.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
301. In which case, call them hypocrites, the other terms are saying they are not "black enough" which
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:07 PM
Jan 2015

is racist. Call them what they are, hypocrites.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
354. "it's not racist" you say and then go on to prove 100% how it ABSOLUTELY IS
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 07:08 PM
Jan 2015
It means a black person doing white people's bidding

Heelllooooo???
 

7962

(11,841 posts)
435. "doing white peoples bidding"? Thats YOUR opinion. To then denigrate them is NOT.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 08:13 AM
Jan 2015

If you dont see the problem with that, then you cant criticize someone who has the OPINION that Pres Obama is working "against white people". Debate the opinion and drop the name calling.
I'd love to see someone simply ASK Carson or Thomas or whoever about what you state. See what they answer. Obviously THEY dont feel that way. They're not doing it for money; Carson has been extremely successful for years before involving himself in politics.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
450. Yes, thats what made him famous at a young age. here's a bio:
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 02:18 PM
Jan 2015
http://www.biography.com/people/ben-carson-475422#separating-conjoined-twins

It also covers some of his "anger issues" when he was growing up; almost killed a guy over a radio station!!

But scroll down and you'll see the section that speaks about his work with the twins. Apparently he's been all over the world doing it. I didnt know that until I looked it up after you mentioned it. More impressive than I realized. I just could not do that type of work.. Wow.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
439. Yes it is.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 08:30 AM
Jan 2015

They are grown adults, they have their own reasons, opinions and feelings. You might not agree with them, but to break it down to them just doing a white man's bidding is wrong.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
23. No, not always. Because "It's the 21st Century, but the house Negro is still here."
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:29 PM
Jan 2015

If one cares more about their Master's house burning than their neighbor's, something I see a lot of, it's perfectly appropriate, regardless of what some self-righteous high horse rider thinks.

It has nothing to do with race, and everything to do with power. And I will continue to think of people as such when they evince the appropriate behavior.

And here is Malcom X telling us when and how recognize them. I agree with him completely.


...

To understand this, you have to go back to what [the] young brother here referred to as the house Negro and the field Negro -- back during slavery. There was two kinds of slaves. There was the house Negro and the field Negro. The house Negroes - they lived in the house with master, they dressed pretty good, they ate good 'cause they ate his food -- what he left. They lived in the attic or the basement, but still they lived near the master; and they loved their master more than the master loved himself. They would give their life to save the master's house quicker than the master would. The house Negro, if the master said, "We got a good house here," the house Negro would say, "Yeah, we got a good house here." Whenever the master said "we," he said "we." That's how you can tell a house Negro.

If the master's house caught on fire, the house Negro would fight harder to put the blaze out than the master would. If the master got sick, the house Negro would say, "What's the matter, boss, we sick?" We sick! He identified himself with his master more than his master identified with himself. And if you came to the house Negro and said, "Let's run away, let's escape, let's separate," the house Negro would look at you and say, "Man, you crazy. What you mean, separate? Where is there a better house than this? Where can I wear better clothes than this? Where can I eat better food than this?" That was that house Negro. In those days he was called a "house nigger." And that's what we call him today, because we've still got some house niggers running around here.

This modern house Negro loves his master. He wants to live near him. He'll pay three times as much as the house is worth just to live near his master, and then brag about "I'm the only Negro out here." "I'm the only one on my job." "I'm the only one in this school." You're nothing but a house Negro. And if someone comes to you right now and says, "Let's separate," you say the same thing that the house Negro said on the plantation. "What you mean, separate? From America? This good white man? Where you going to get a better job than you get here?" I mean, this is what you say. "I ain't left nothing in Africa," that's what you say. Why, you left your mind in Africa.
...


http://field-negro.blogspot.com/2012/05/its-21st-century-but-house-negro-is.html

Unless one wants to paint Malcom X as a racist, which is what the scared white folk and other opponents at the time did to discredit him. When he came back from S. Africa he said he realized that his black nationalism didn't take in the whole scope of the problem. The issue was power, who had it and who didn't.
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
25. Malcolm is dead.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:35 PM
Jan 2015

I am alive. It offends me to no end when White Liberals use those terms. Go see what he said about white liberals being worse than conservatives.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
359. What offends me is poverty, kids not eating, countries that enrich bank$sters at the expense of
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 07:38 PM
Jan 2015

the most vulnerable...things like that. Tantrums over thoughtless speech are a waste of time, but ymmv.

What some white liberal, or black liberal, says is irrelevant to me. I care about what they do.

And Malcom may be dead, but his words are still very much alive, and to the point.

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
385. This in a nutshell.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 09:47 PM
Jan 2015

I rarely post on threads about race issues, but this post hit home.

My mother was raised as a very poor tenant farmer. First cotton then potatoes.

She understood as well as anyone, that deeds mattered above any rhetorical words muttered.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
31. I found it. Well some of it.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:40 PM
Jan 2015
In this deceitful American game of power politics, the Negroes (i.e., the race problem, the integration and civil rights issues) are nothing but tools, used by one group of whites called Liberals against another group of whites called Conservatives, either to get into power or to remain in power.

Among whites here in America, the political teams are no longer divided into Democrats and Republicans. The whites who are now struggling for control of the American political throne are divided into “liberal” and “conservative” camps. The white liberals from both parties cross party lines to work together toward the same goal, and white conservatives from both parties do likewise.

The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative.

Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro’s friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political “football game” that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives.

Politically the American Negro is nothing but a football and the white liberals control this mentally dead ball through tricks of tokenism: false promises of integration and civil rights. In this profitable game of deceiving and exploiting the politics of the American Negro, those white liberals have the willing cooperation of the Negro civil rights leaders. These “leaders” sell out our people for just a few crumbs of token recognition and token gains. These “leaders” are satisfied with token victories and token progress because they themselves are nothing but token leaders….
 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
61. malcolm is talking about the white liberal leadership there. and citing him
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:00 PM
Jan 2015

to buttress positions you agree with while ignoring his statements you disagree with doesn't strengthen the former or weaken the latter.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
63. I don't have to agree with everything.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:02 PM
Jan 2015

I know who the fuck he was talking about. Black history is my life, dude. I'm black history in motion.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
363. He does not in any way specify that he is talking about white liberal leadership
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 07:50 PM
Jan 2015

the "leaders" he's talking about are black.

MLK and a slew of other black leaders had similar comments about white liberals and they weren't specifying the leadership either.

 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
384. It's clear who he's talking about, and it isn't your ordinary white liberal, unless
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 09:33 PM
Jan 2015

he's part of the government or part of the power structure.

Do non-descript, run of the mill 'white liberals' control black civil rights leaders? Were the Kennedys just ordinary 'white liberals?'


"The white liberals control the Negro and the Negro vote by controlling the Negro civil rights leaders. As long as they control the Negro civil rights leaders, they can also control and contain the Negro's struggle, and they can control the Negro's so-called revolt. The Negro "revolution" is controlled by these foxy white liberals, by the government itself....

The Negro "revolution" is controlled by this white government. The leaders of the Negro "revolution" (the civil rights leaders) are all subsidized, influenced and controlled by the white liberals; and all of the demonstrations that are taking place on this country to desegregate lunch counters, theaters, public toilets, etc., are just artificial fires that have been ignited and fanned by the white liberals in the desperate hope that they can use this artificial revolution to fight off the real black revolution that has already swept white supremacy out of Africa, Asia, and is sweeping it out of Latin America...and is even now manifesting itself also right here among the black masses in this country.

Can we prove that the Negro revolution is controlled by white liberals? Certainly!

Right after the Birmingham demonstrations, when the entire world had seen on television screens the police dogs, police clubs, and fire hoses brutalizing defenseless black women, children, and even babies, it was reported on page twenty-six in the May 15 issue of The New York Times, that the late President Kennedy and his brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, during a luncheon conference with several newspaper editors from the State of Alabama, had warned these editors that they must give at least some token gains to the moderate Negro leaders in order to enhance the image of these moderate Negro leaders in the eyesight of the black masses; otherwise the masses of Negroes might turn in the direction of Negro extremists. And the late President named the Black Muslims as being foremost among the Negro extremist groups that he did not want Negroes to turn toward.

In essence, the late President told these southern editors that he was trying to build up the weak image of the Negro civil rights leaders, in order to offset the strong religious image of the Muslim leader, The Honorable Elijah Muhammad. He wasn't giving these Negro leaders anything they deserved; but he was confessing the necessity of building them up, and propping them up, in order to hold the black masses in check, keep them in his grasp, and under his control. The late President knew that once Negroes hear The Honorable Elijah Muhammad, the white liberals will never influence or control or misuse those Negroes for the benefit of the white liberals any more. So the late President was faced with a desperate situation.

Martin Luther King's image had been shattered the previous year when he failed to bring about desegregation in Albany, Georgia. The other civil rights leaders had also become fallen idols. The black masses across the country at the grass roots level had already begun to take their cases to the streets on their own. The government in Washington knew that something had to be done to get the rampaging Negroes back into the corral, back under the control of the white liberals.

The government propaganda machine began encouraging Negroes to follow only what it called "responsible" Negro leaders. The government actually meant Negro leaders who were responsible to the government, and who could therefore by controlled by the government, and be used by that same government to control their impatient people...

http://www.malcolm-x.org/speeches/spc_120463.htm

Number23

(24,544 posts)
389. His point was that many civil rights leaders were beholden to white liberals because they pretended
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 10:01 PM
Jan 2015

to support them but in fact were no different from white conservatives.

I get why you so desperately want his position to be his castigation of white liberal leaders but it isn't. (But even if it was, who do you think made the white liberal "leaders" the leaders?) He in no way specifies that it's the leadership. You need to read up and listen up on Malcolm at his peak. Many of his positions changed a few years before his death. I grew up with him so I know exactly who and what he was.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
109. While you are right about the issue being about power...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:31 PM
Jan 2015

However, the quote you cited is advocating Black separatism.
Black folks are part of the fabric of this nation and I for one am glad of it.
They bring a rich cultural tapestry that we can all learn from, but for this to happen we all have to move beyond racial denigration no matter the source.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
358. The quote I cited was about helping people recognize when they are in servitude, regardless of
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 07:34 PM
Jan 2015

what others are telling them.

And it is just as true today as it was then.





BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
319. He had an incomplete understanding of the dynamics of slavery in the big house
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:32 PM
Jan 2015

The academic research on the subject did not occur until after his death. Literature based on interviews with former slaves shows that house slaves wore a mask in order to placate masters. It was a survival tool because planters wanted to believe they treated slaves like family, but of course they didn't. When union troops approached during the Civil War, house slaves were often the first to flee, which showed their consciousness was quite different from what planter families believed. See Leon Litwack, Been in the Storm So Long.

Another obvious point should be it is one thing for an African American to make a comment in the 1960s and quite another for a white person in the 21st century. The same argument you are making could be used to claim the N word isn't racist, which is of course patently false.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
437. Thats the most ridiculous analogy I've seen.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 08:23 AM
Jan 2015

It might apply if there were blacks that belonged to the Klan.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
29. i'm surprised to see such agreement about this
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:40 PM
Jan 2015

I've always hated those terms, for the same reasons you give, but they have always seemed to be generally accepted to here.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
36. Absolutely
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:44 PM
Jan 2015

There are plenty of more accurate and universal words to describe negative qualities.
Anyone can display ego driven and opportunistic characteristics. Or.. greed, pathological ambition, misrepresentation of constituents...

To suggest that it is worse for black politicians to display those characteristic most certainly is racist.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
38. For real.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:46 PM
Jan 2015

White politicians we don't like get creative descriptions, black republicans get racial names. Not cool.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
39. No kidding. I'm not sure that any Dem, Progressive or person with a conscience would find any
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:46 PM
Jan 2015

of those words safe for any type of use.

I have some over racists in my family...uncle by marriage...and I could not believe the kinds of crap that came out of their mouths.


Nobody should debase another group of people with racist language.

On edit:

QC

(26,371 posts)
40. Very true. It's also wrong to refer to Sen. Graham as "Miss Lindsey" and the like.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:47 PM
Jan 2015

Sen. Graham most assuredly is a right wing asshole, and he might well be a closet case, but it's never a good thing to use bigoted language, especially for progressives, who stand to lose their credibility.

Excellent thread!

QC

(26,371 posts)
296. Thanks! And it's got nothing to do with Lindsey Graham,
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:03 PM
Jan 2015

who is a horrible person in too many ways to count.

The problem is that it makes Graham a bad person for possibly being gay. Whether he is or not, that's not the problem with Graham.

And let's not even get started on the Ann Coulter slams.

Blanks

(4,835 posts)
43. That ain't right. The name calling that is...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:49 PM
Jan 2015

The black republican that annoys me the most is Allen West. My Facebook arch nemesis posts his opinions quite regularly.

I have no respect for West's opinions, but it's not right to call him clearly racist names.

He discharged a weapon near some guys head as an interrogation technique when he was in the military.

I don't like him, but for the same reasons that I don't like Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh. It has nothing to do with his race. He's just a right wing personality that spews stupid shit on a regular basis. It's not appropriate to dredge up special racist names that are offensive to people who don't spew stupid shit on a regular basis.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
48. That Gomerard?(spelling) man who wants speaker of the house was the one who wanted West speaker.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:52 PM
Jan 2015

radical RW !!

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
44. I think President Obama got called some of those and worse by political 'leadership'.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:50 PM
Jan 2015

For example, many of the political enablers ignored the 'bone in the nose' and 'watermelon white house lawn'' emails and let their fellow politicians who generated the emails, remain in office.

The "pray the president dies" email republican also still 'serves' .

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
106. But you would presumably denounce the use of those names for him
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:29 PM
Jan 2015

as much as for Condi Rice or Clarence Thomas.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
105. Ill-advised, and, possibly, bigoted; but ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:28 PM
Jan 2015

No and No ... for the same reason: Racism = bigotry + institutional/cultural power.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
112. Well thanks but I am confused now.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:33 PM
Jan 2015

It was used in another thread today and it seemed like something similar to the phrases in the OP in that it belittles a group of people.

RobinA

(9,893 posts)
161. Only Whites
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:01 PM
Jan 2015

are racist. Try to keep up.

If you don't believe that, best keep out of these race discussions.

kelly1mm

(4,733 posts)
185. To avoid that I just use bigoted instead for both 'racist' and 'bigoted' actions. Kind of one of
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:37 PM
Jan 2015

those venn diagrams: All racists are bigots, but not all bigots are racists.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
230. Sarcastic or not ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:46 PM
Jan 2015

in America, that DOES express (simplistically) the state of 21st century social science.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
238. Who gets to make the rules?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:48 PM
Jan 2015

I mean is Daniel Webster out of the picture when defining who is racist now?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
243. Daniel Webster is dead.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:55 PM
Jan 2015

Of course he can't make the rules for the 21st century. If we let dead men make the rules, slavery would still be the law. Women and non landowners and non white men over 21 would not vote.
We can figure thigs out without sticking like glue to some outdated word usage. Words evolve. Nobody speaks old english except for a few scholars. See? Evolution of language.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
261. Not for me you can't and many others
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:12 PM
Jan 2015

I don't understand why it is that people think their opinion or the paradigm they see the world through is superior. That in itself is the very definition of a racist.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
299. Nobody but you has said that.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:07 PM
Jan 2015

The opposite has been said -- e.g. explanations about "tribalism" upthread.

However, in the Americas, descendants of the European colonists ("whites", in the simplistic language of skin-color oriented racism) are the group that has had the raw power to institutionalize and drive home an incredibly deep and dehumanizing racist structure. The racist language that accompanies those racist institutions not just demeans, it helps control the narrative while expressing the emotional zeitgeist of whole communities.

We're *born into* a European colonist culture and its language (not just the racist epithets) and values are absorbed with our mother's milk, becoming our reality, our world. Nobody can tell me that it's all in the past. Not when, on mature reflection, I recognize how that inbred racism informed *me* and all of my friends, before I even started school, at home and exploring outside, at school, and throughout my life. It does seem to be getting better, at least the surface sheen is looking more polished so there are no more bars and restaurants with signs saying the native peoples are excluded. No more (at least openly, and with pride in the results) bulldozing native cemeteries into the river, and so on. But that polish is the thinnest veneer ....

Comparing *that* with some imagined "hurt" that I might receive on being called "honky" is ridiculous.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
245. Except that bigotry also is tied to institutional and cultural power, your claim that bigotry is not
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:58 PM
Jan 2015

carried out through law, religion, art and other institutional and cultural elements is false and in itself bigoted. In the State where YOU live, I can be fired for being gay, or denied housing. That's not racism, it's bigotry. And it is institutional to the point of being legislated and enforced law.
The heterocentricism of your equation is stunning, coming as it does packaged as a sermon to others who understand so much less.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
273. Agreed; but, the bigotry you mention ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:26 PM
Jan 2015

is tied to something other than race.

The heterocentricism of your equation is stunning, coming as it does packaged as a sermon to others who understand so much less.


heterocentricism? The are literally 1,000s of strains of cancer ... refining the term to express specific observations regarding a particular strain, is not dismissive of the other strains, it is merely refining the definition.

ETA: (something more constructive) And your feeling chastised as "understanding so much less", is a function of your unwillingness to listen. If you would accept, not MY "sermon"; but rather, the 21st century definition of racism, perhaps you would feel insulted.

Because I do not believe that the generic term bigotry, is strong, or descriptive, enough a term, I am an advocate of, and encourage you (or the LGBT community) to, come up with a term that can be used to describe the institutional/cultural oppression that is particular to the LGBT community.

Do so, and I would be happy to use it.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
312. I have thought that bigotry can be against any number of group of people sharing a
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:23 PM
Jan 2015

characteristic (skin color, gender, sexual orientation, nationlity, religion, age, etc) while racism is bigotry against a race/ancestry or skin color. I am trying to understand what you and others mean because to me anyone of any skin color or nationality can prejudge others based on those characteristics.


This is NOT to say that there is not institutionalized racism, however.

My apologies for making you repeat yourself once again. I will come back to read more later and will be thinking about the differences of the terms.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
53. We can use this terminology because we're better...and right.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:55 PM
Jan 2015

They're just wrong on everything. As quasi intellectuals we're allowed to say these things because of our purity and well meaning intentions.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
150. +1 ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:52 PM
Jan 2015

and when the "ignorant" refuse the education, and continue the "arrogance", what is it called class?

Anyone? ...

"Stupidity"

Class dismissed.

Throd

(7,208 posts)
58. I'm glad you said it.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:59 PM
Jan 2015

I am in complete agreement with you on this matter. However, as a 47 year old white male, my opinion doesn't carry as much weight with this.

I also feel the same way when people use sexist language against the likes of Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann. There is plenty to criticize about them with out resorting to slurs that would never be tolerated towards women on "our" side.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
59. I think another layer of the racism lies in the implicit assumption
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 12:59 PM
Jan 2015

that one's race should be the overriding factor in determining one's politics. If you're black and your politics don't line up with the assumptions, then there's something wrong with you. Your race is somehow supposed to exclude you from holding certain views. Only white males get to populate the caverns of crackpot conservatism with impunity.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
76. I never really even thought about it like that, but You're right.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:12 PM
Jan 2015

It's the land of the free to be who you are. Politics are not determined by color. I hate met quite a few conservative blacks. My uncle is one. Very stubborn man. But he always was good to me and was there when I needed him. He ain't no Uncle Tom. He's my damn Uncle.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
62. I agree with you fully, I saw that thread when it was new.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:01 PM
Jan 2015

The 'Aunt Tom' comment or whatever. It's surprising how much it has been used on DU in the past. It reminds me a bit of the posts about Lindsay Graham that use homophobic tropes about him. People need to learn how to have political differences with people without using that sort of rhetoric. They do it to Glenn Greenwald as well. It is perfectly possible to object to any position or opinion or action of anyone without commenting on their personal details. It's not only possible but it is vital to do so.
Mia Love is an anti equality bigot, a conservative opponent of women's right to reproductive choices. That's plenty of material without bringing her race into it in any way.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
66. Hell yeah!
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:05 PM
Jan 2015

The woman is anti everything I believe in, but I can decide to be an idiot and just use racial language, or I can describe her flaws to a tee.
And I cringe on the miss Lindsay thing. Wtf is that?

We are falling into the trap of acting like those we claim to be nothing like. Not cool.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
102. It's also politically stupid, but I think most who use such terms 'ironically' do so just to use the
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:22 PM
Jan 2015

terms. That's what I personally think.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
68. That you even had to say it
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:06 PM
Jan 2015

should be either a red flag or a learning moment for some folks here

Thank you

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
69. +1,000,000
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:06 PM
Jan 2015

How pathetic that anyone would even have to put this out there? You'd think people would grow up.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
75. I am a huge fan of Mark Thompson or Matsimela Mapfumo of Sirius left radio...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:11 PM
Jan 2015

He is on Sirius channel 127, the liberal channel.

He is a Black preacher, lefter than most left atheists

https://www.facebook.com/matsimela



Racists call his show everyday, they call him the racist, of course, etc.

On occasion he will call a Black man "Uncle Tom", very rare, and he is very selective, and only when he is pissed.


Then he will usually apologize, says it aint right probably, and 2 weeks later he does it again.

It is a cathartic process for him, I think.

Before I understood the implication of the term, before I knew the true history of it, I had used it a few times, some years ago, and have since learned that it is wrong to use, for me.


Reminds me of a VERY long time ago my nephew coming to me about something, he is Gay, and was telling me about his troubles and I said something like "Well if you just stopped this Gay nonsense, it causes you so much trouble, why do you do that to yourself?"


Obviously I was an idiot on the subject back then, interestingly enough I never held hate for Gay people, even when I didnt understand them

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
84. I'll check him out.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:16 PM
Jan 2015

There aren't many of us black atheists. Might be fun. He's probably older, different time. At least he knows it ain't cool.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
89. He is a preacher, Christian and in his early 40's...NYC...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:17 PM
Jan 2015

When a racist calls his show, he actually responds to them on a personal level, and sometimes it can be funny, but usually I just want to jump thru the radio, turn into The Hulk, and do some damage.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
97. Oh, no!!!!
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:20 PM
Jan 2015

I already have a few preachers in the family. Can't take anymore preaching. I could literally start my own church by now, all the church I went to. No!

randys1

(16,286 posts)
138. On his show he literally never preaches and only talks religion if someone
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:47 PM
Jan 2015

brings it up.

You could listen to him everyday for a month and not have a clue he is a preacher.

So dont let that stop you, I know you would love him!

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
266. When I had XM, I used to listen to Matsimela Mapfumo whenever possible.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:16 PM
Jan 2015

He's clever and outrageous at times, and I really enjoyed his show. He always had a thought provoking program.

kath

(10,565 posts)
77. So, is it racist (or sexist) for me to say "A black person (or woman) voting for a Republican is
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:12 PM
Jan 2015

Like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders"?

Genuinely curious. I use this quote a lot, and really think it is true.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
83. What do you think?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:14 PM
Jan 2015

Would you say it about a white man? I'd leave the cutesy stuff out personally. I think it's true no matter color or gender. They want ALL of us for dinner.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
164. See: "I use this quote a lot, and really think it is true."
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:07 PM
Jan 2015

Clearly kath does not think the statement is racist. Now let's try your comparison.

A Black man voting Republican is like a chicken voting for Col Sanders.


Col Sanders does bad things to chickens (from the chicken's perspective). Republicans have spent the past few decades working tirelessly attacking the rights of African-Americans and supporting just about every racist attack on them.

Analogy works.


A White man voting Democratic is like a chicken voting for Col Sanders.


Col Sanders does bad things to chickens. Democrats have ... done absolutely nothing against Euro-Americans.

Analogy fails.


You asked kath, but were it directed at me the answer would be a clear cut, "no, I would not say it about a White man."

Because it wouldn't make any sense. The logic simply fails in the reverse scenario.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
168. Whatever.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:09 PM
Jan 2015

Anybody voting for a REPUBLICAN is like a chicken voting for colonel sanders. No just women or blacks. Why single us out? Only rich people benefit from republican policies.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
193. Anyone other than the top 10%. The Republicans represent the top 10%'s interests
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:47 PM
Jan 2015

perfectly. The main reason the Republican Party garners support in the 40-50% range is precisely its not-so-covert racism. Scalise was 36 years old when he spoke at Duke's conference. He would have had to have his head up his ass not to know who his audience was. That he's getting a wink-and-nod from the Republican leadership says all that needs to be said.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
202. I agree.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:55 PM
Jan 2015

They care about themselves and their donors. The rest of us can fuck off. Anybody not in the top ten voting republican is like a chicken voting for sanders.
They know what they are doing. Their voters will like him even more now. He's exactly the type they want running things.

kath

(10,565 posts)
334. but I *don't* clearly think the statement is not racist.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 06:07 PM
Jan 2015

I was genuinely asking the question as to whether bravenak and others consider the statement to be racist - wondering whether I am out of line or not when I use that statement about blacks, or women, or anyone-but-very-rich-people for that matter.

i guess I had leaned toward thinking it is not racist, but wanted others' opinions on the matter.

I agree with you, ieoeja, that the analogy works, but the reverse scenario does not.

FWIW, the first time I ever heard the phrase used about black people, it was attributed to JC Watts's father.

kath

(10,565 posts)
329. True, they want ALL of us for dinner ( the 99%)
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:55 PM
Jan 2015

But do you not agree that their attitudes and policies toward people of color and women are particularly heinous?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
331. Of course.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:56 PM
Jan 2015

But we are not them and do not need to go to that kinda talk to be correct . We can bash them for being hypocritical idiots.

haele

(12,660 posts)
153. That one's tricky - I have said "any poor (or low wage earner) voting ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:53 PM
Jan 2015

for a republican or a libertarian is like a chicken voting for Colonel Saunders", and on occasion, I have used woman if I was talking about voting for a particular republican or libertarian politician.
But I've always tried to avoid any mention of race, because as one of the few white households in a very diverse working class neighborhood, it could smack of taking an attitude of unconscious privilege or setting oneself apart due to race, and frankly, I want to remain on trust terms with my neighbors. Just as I wouldn't use the N-word, the C-word, "Charlie" or the G-word (that could insult my SE Asian neighbors) or pepper my discussions with assorted Mexican street slang out in public, no matter how thoughtlessly angry I might be. Being a retired Navy Chief from the bad old days, I know a lot of pejoratives (probably close to 3/4 of the Urban Dictionary's worth) and how to use them to the "best effect". That doesn't mean I'm going to, because my mother raised me better than that.

The Colonel Saunders quote - that particular saying balances on the racism boundary through the potential to call up the "fried chicken = Poor Black" stereotype. As for sexist, I don't think that there is a equivalent "Chicken = Dumb Chick" stereotype that can be as quickly made, so it shouldn't be considered sexist unless someone is seriously emulating "Super Stretch Armstrong" to find some form of outrage in what one are saying. Just my two cents.

Haele

Rozlee

(2,529 posts)
402. I'm Hispanic and I've paraphrased that to say it about Hispanics to my Repub sister.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 11:30 PM
Jan 2015

I think a lot of it depends on people's racial and ethnic sensibilities. My daughter is half-Hispanic, but she'll seriously go for someone's throat if they even make the slightest comment that she thinks is off-color about race, ethnicity or any other social class. She's been trying to get some internet and Facebook pages banned, like 'Mexican Word of the Day' and 'Being Latino.' Those are some of my favorite pages. But, she claims they're bigoted and belittle Latinos. My parents and siblings came to this country illegally and we wound up in a rural Texas town with me being the anchor baby. I've seen bigotry close and ugly when I was growing up, but I can also see when people aren't being hateful and just having fun. I like that my culture has its own little foibles and humor. My daughter can pass for white and tells me that I don't understand what she goes through. That she meets people all the time that are pleasant and friendly to minorities, then cut them and say spiteful things about them when they're not around, never suspecting that they're complaining about it to a minority. She's right. I don't understand her own minority circumstances. They weren't mine. Many things that offend her very deeply don't even cause a ripple in my psyche. Our experiences are very different. The lives of black Americans, who have lived through much worse bigotry and racism, is an even more different minority experience and I can comprehend it even less. They've experienced the worst of the worst in this country and are entitled to set the bar for what they consider offensive.

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
455. "They've experienced the worst of the worst in this country
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 03:39 PM
Jan 2015

and are entitled to set the bar for what they consider offensive."

Not sure why this is so hard for some people to understand. Thanks for your post, well said.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
79. Context is all.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:12 PM
Jan 2015

Depends who's talking, who's the target, and why. If someone is acting as a willing tool of institutionalized racism, the terms may be appropriate.

These words are powerful, evoking painful memories. Use them with care, or you become part of the problem.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
88. I can understand your position.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:17 PM
Jan 2015

I can live without it. It makes me feel bad no matter the target. I just feel like if I managed to step too far out of line, I'd be getting called the Aunt Jemima next.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
177. No--context is not all. As a woman, I still don't want to see another woman referred to with
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:28 PM
Jan 2015

derogatory language....even if it's Ann Coulter or Sarah Palin.

Because I know that makes it more acceptable to use against me.

bluesbassman

(19,374 posts)
86. Derogatory terms based on race, gender, sexuality identity, or age are never acceptable.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:16 PM
Jan 2015

If one's argument relies on using bigoted terms to enhance it, the argument must be pretty weak. Better to call out people for what they say and do. Period.

Rilgin

(787 posts)
221. You might look at your own derogatory associations about "white people"
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:22 PM
Jan 2015

In this thread, you posted a Malcolm X quote which you later defended that calls white liberals either racists or hypocrites. Both of these are derogatory terms. I hope you would agree that calling someone a racist or hypocrite is not trying to praise them. Further, it is not a statement about a belief, policy, or particular event but is intended to attach to their person.

If you truly "agree" with the above post, you might look at your own practices. I would urge you to refrain from posts which are not specific about policy or specific acts of individuals but are just racial associations.

In this vein, I can agree with your OP that people should not use a number of specific derogatory terms. If you had just said "Some People" rather than "Some White Liberals", it would be a fine post. The particular terms you object to are offensive and should not be used by anyone.

Personally, I do not think I have ever used any of these terms probably because my personal and intellectual political issues or goals or what have you is to get past race and see our common humanity both as an individual and as a country.

Within that goal, it is easy to acknowledge that there are clear places where race has and does play a part in the current and past history and politics of the United States and all us individuals. However, such history is not static. There has been progress on overt racial laws and policies but there are places (particularly the justice system) where institutional bias remains and where class and wealth issues cause disparate results. On the individual level, there still exist racist and bigoted people. Some is overt and some is just conscious or unconscious bias. Some of these bias and bigots administer the systems that govern our lives.

None of us is totally immune. I can recognize areas within my self because of personal experiences I had growing up in NYC in the 60s where I have bias. For example, I know I have a heightened awareness/fear if I see a group of black teens on the sidewalk ahead of me. My childhood involved being robbed at knife point multiple times walking the streets of New York which left some bias. However it is something I fight rather than accept. It is also not only race. I tend to have that heightened awareness anytime I see teens on the street ahead of me regardless of race.

People tend to be somewhat tribal and not trust people who are not like them. However, I do not think bias or bigotry is limited to or dominant in "white people" "white men" "white liberals" or any other variant of the term. Further, the racial aspects of both society and individuals change over time. Often in these type threads, I feel that discussions relate to historical battles and not current battles.

Returning to the use of any post addressed to "white people". In each case, the term is invariably used in a derogatory sense or an attack. You will not see any post saying "white people" (or "black people" for that matter) in any positive sense. Second, in each case, it is an association of a negative trait with a racial characteristic.

These threads develop in a few ways. Invariably, if one of these "white people" bring up the problems with association, they are often told either "they don't get it" or "ignore it if its not about you". Some threads go further that that to justify the association. However, regardless, all of these responses are equally offensive. Association by race (of any kind) is wrong.

As was pointed out to you, Malcolm X rejected the implications of the quote you posted later in his life. Again returning to personal experience. I am the son of a fairly radical mother. Growing up, we had people coming and going through our apartment. Many involved with all of the civil rights and anti-war fights of that time. Many lived with/crashed with us for long periods of time. One person who lived with us off and on for years, came to my mother one day and said in essence "I will not be able to talk to you again because I am now part of a group that has labeled you the devil". And just to be clear, years later that person also developed and came back and apologized to my mother.

You appear to agree that association of derogatory terms by race or gender is wrong. I would urge you to put that agreement into practice.


 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
223. You really put a lot of though into that inane self serving crap.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:32 PM
Jan 2015

I used 'some' white liberals, because this is a place where liberal leaning folks congregate. As this was in reference to another thread where 'some' white liberals congregated to call her Aunt Jemima, and House negro without considering the racial or historical implications for that, I though I'd post my fucking opinion.
Thanks for the lecture about how I can be a better Black Liberal from your <i'm guessing white> perspective , but I don't need a nanny or correction from another older white liberal on why I should just accept racist terminology if directed at an 'unnacceptable' negro.

Don't worry about what i post in reply to soneone else. For some reason people think it's still the seventies and we have to live our lives based on Dr. king and Malcolm X. We don't. I am my own person and quite intelligent enough to bring a fresh perspective on racism, from my own mind. Note: I actually live black. Everyday. Some people just sit around and discuss black from on high. You need to check yourself.

Rilgin

(787 posts)
285. You are right, I did think about my post before I posted it
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:41 PM
Jan 2015

It is true that this is a liberal or progressive site. However,you didn't address your posts at liberals or progressives in your post as you seem to be saying. You only (empasis on only) addressed your point to white liberals.

I do not want you to be a "better Black Liberal". I would just hope that we avoid all racial associations. I actually agree that we should not use the specific pejorative terms you mentioned or any other term. You apparently, believe that it is allowed if you want to use "white" to label a person as part of a group with a pejorative trait. Either that or you do not see that you are implying something every time you use the racial term white in connection with any group. I get it. From reading your posts, your major issue for the world is the problems caused by white people. My ideas are different. I think it is better to discuss policy, ideas and actions rather than discuss group identity.

In other words, again, to put my point in very clear terms, you objected to label someone using a number of specific racial terms then proceeded to label every single white liberal as a hypocrite or racist. That is what I pointed out. I guess you will not or do not want to understand my point.

My lesson has been learned again. Threads are not where people can back down from their major themes.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
287. I use the word Black alot too.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:47 PM
Jan 2015

And if you think about it, in America, white folks haven't exactly been kind to black folks for the majority of the time. My mom was born under segregration. Stop and frisk. The prison industrial complex. Those policies are created by white folks and they target black folks. That is my problem. That is my issue. You can complain that i say White, but you cannot say i'm lying.

Rilgin

(787 posts)
321. Yes
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:36 PM
Jan 2015

You post enough to understand your points fully and the focus of your attentions.

I post fairly infrequently and actually try to stay away from threads like this although it is something I think about. There is more risk that I will say something that comes out wrong. However, I will try to explain further.

Your use of that quote, in particular, aroused me. I posted a true story about a long term friend, ally of my mother who severed all ties because he was joining a group who saw her as the "devil". This was just about the time of that quote and obviously was connected to the separatist and black Muslim political movements as a subset of the civil rights movement. That individual later apologized because his association was wrong.

With respect to segregation, stop and frisk, the creation of the prison system, there is 0 connection to my family or relatives. My relatives were european and russian jews and had their own problems.

When you say "white folks" haven't been particularly kind, you are talking about a history that I am not connected to yet you are making that connection for every white person including me. I also have no power or ability create policy that is currently racist or has racial effects. I have neither money or power. That is the problem with using white people as a group or trying to get people to accept responsibility for acts of other people based on your association. There are people who have power and those who do not. There are people who abuse others and those who do not. I am no more responsible for segregation or stop and frisk then you.

I do see you use "black" a lot but have not seen a post of your where you give a black person reading the post a choice of perjoratives. They can either be a racist or hypocrite as per the quote you posted with approval. I also do not see you post with the implication, goal or theory that a particular black person should take responsibility for anything done by any other black person.

Again to compare apples to apples, I again told about my childhood and being held up/mugged on the street numerous times. Three times by knife, once by baseball bat. Yet you had nothing to do with those muggings. I would not draft a post that said "black people" robbed me or which tried to get you to take responsibility for those actions only because your skin color was the same as the robbers. In fact, the opposite, it is one of the struggles of my life to fight any bias caused by those childhood interactions.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
327. Maybe you should make an attempt to better understand the history then.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:47 PM
Jan 2015

You don't like the quote? Too bad. I can't help you there. That was my response to another quote by the same person. People are who they are, they say what they say.
You may not be directly responsible for anything. I am not either. But I suffer. Just for my color. That's enough for me to speak out.
You have the ability to move freely through society without judgement. For you to get all upset at me because of something that happened years before I was born is weird. Something somebody said years ago in your house has nothing to do with me at all. That is personal.

I do say that racism is a problem white people need to work on. I suffer from it, they benefit from my loss. Get it?

Rilgin

(787 posts)
350. Again yes
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 06:46 PM
Jan 2015

Pretty much said all I had to say. Its not the quote, It is your support of what is in the quote in labeling people on the basis of race in a pejorative way. Is it your view that all white liberals are"racists" or "hypocrites"? if not, why post the quote as being valid. Would that not be better to address as the wrong way to use race even though its about 'white people'. Taking your advice from numerous threads would you say the same sentence about "black people" or label them in that fashion? If not is it not wrong to do about any other group.

Yes, racism, bigotry and bad social policy are bad and should not be supported by anyone. Inequality in many areas seems to be the major issue that will be fought by people seeking social and economic justice. However, "white people" do not need to work on anything. People of all types have fought those battles in the past (including me) and need to get together to fight the current battles. Get it. People. People who are the enemy of solutions to societal problems are not white people, they also are people. Just misinformed people.

I need to work on my individual and societal biases. However, you are the same. You have your own bias and bigotry that shows when you use the word "White People". I get that your issue is described by you as you suffer and lose because of white people without looking at individual actions or policies. Labeling problems as caused by white people. I just think it is a limiting view and not consistent with obtaining a fair and equal society.

My last post. I am off for the day. I have tried to be direct but hopefully have not been too direct or offensive individually. I am sure you have heard the same thing from others. My guess is this thread will just help me identify better my views on race and will again be written off by you as "inane". Anyhow, take care.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
113. Of course calling names to insult based on skin color is racist. I wont, but have a question
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:34 PM
Jan 2015

I do not insult like that because it helps nothing. However my question is is it ever an accurate though negative description of someone's behavior?

Colin Powell supported the Bush administration far too much when he knew better, perhaps trying to stay in their good graces so he could do other things which were decent, like support condom use (Vs) the terms you reference in your OP. The first gives more info on what actions ofhos I am basing my argument on, the second is many only to insult by picking on his skin color.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
115. If you would not use it on a person of another color, it is not ok.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:37 PM
Jan 2015

Just like how I hate the word Cracker, or Honkey. It sounds stupid and I cannot fix my lips to use those words. Besides, I have white family who may get their feelings hurt just so I can insult somebody. I think that kinda wrong.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
137. I take it personally
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:46 PM
Jan 2015

Would I use a word to someone's face? Like my black family members or white family members. Or gay family members. Or my friends and neighbors. Would I call my friend an Uncle Tom because he is s conservative or would I refer to a gay nephew as miss.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
165. I am firmly in the describe behavior vs insult the person, group. people do act not in
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:07 PM
Jan 2015

their own interests and it seems better to clearly describe their behavior than sink to insults based on race, or gender, or other category. We are all more than a simple category. Why insult except to hurt, which tells me more about the person insulting than they may wish.

I don't know how anyone can say an insult based on skin color is not racist, how attributing behavior like your OP examples is not racism.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
169. I don't understand it either.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:10 PM
Jan 2015

Some people just can't let it go. They want to keep some bigoted insults and just pretend that the implied and obvious bigotry is not real for some reason.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
210. I was wrong, about my question if it is a negative but accurate term ever. Hypocrite is
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:01 PM
Jan 2015

the proper term, the ones in your OP are not ever accurate. Thank you for continuing to reply to people, you made the answer clear for me.

Calling people hypocritical, hypocrites is right. Not the terms in the op.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
298. Mighty generous of you towards Powell
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:04 PM
Jan 2015

I knew he was lying to the UN. You think he didn't know.
He also was involved in My Lai coverup.
He tried to stay in their good graces because he liked the position of power.

Response to bravenak (Original post)

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
121. I hate Uncle Tom, ms Lindsey and redneck
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:38 PM
Jan 2015

Though I have called myself a redneck but it's more of a deflection like yeah I'm a redneck so what.
A few years ago because of a series of unfortunate events I found myself pumping gas with a bleeding goat tied up in the back of my pickup, blood dripping out the back of the truck. I forgot to put my teeth in in the rush to get the goat to the vet. And I had goat pee and shit on my jeans. And I was wearing fluffy slippers. One of the fellas I knew from the feed store was pumping gas at the time and told me you can't get anymore redneck. I didn't take it personally. But I would take offense if someone who did not have on boots covered with cow shit call me that.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
191. The Ms. lindsay thing creeps me out.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:42 PM
Jan 2015

Like, are we trying to out the guy or just being nasty bigots on that one? Either way, wtf i that all about. I do not care about his sex life.
I have met rednecks, but they were black. All about horses, hunting, and stuff I could not understand like guns and vehicles. So, basically they were just dudes who liked hunting and guns. But they say they 're rednecks. Maybe they know better than me what that is.

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
203. I don't like the things they say about Lindsey Graham
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:57 PM
Jan 2015

I'm not fond of his politics but when they burnt him in effigy down in SC it made me sick.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/07/23/109209/terry-graham/

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
207. Damn, that was Republicans doing that crap?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:59 PM
Jan 2015

They just hate so much, they can't let any perceived difference exist without madness. Crazy people.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
300. The Miss Lindsey stuff is wrong because it implies there is something wrong with being gay.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:07 PM
Jan 2015

Not comparable to Uncle TOm, because there is omething wrong with blacks (you can throw Bill Cosby into the mix) denigrating black people.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
123. Language police
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:40 PM
Jan 2015

I despise the language police as the worst sort of creeping fascism.

I disagree that calling black people who support racist policies with the terms Uncle Tom, House Negro, Aunt Jemima, or token is racist. That would be like saying a person who refers to people who support NRA gun policy with the terms Gun Nut, ammo sexual, etc. as supporting NRA gun policy.

It is a misuse of the word racist.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
127. LOL ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:43 PM
Jan 2015

You deplore the "language police" ... then, state: "It is a misuse of the word racist."

Well alrighty then, Okay, Mr./Ms. Officer!

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
144. What argument is required ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:49 PM
Jan 2015

you decry the "Language Police", then in the next breath, attempt to tell someone that the/a term is misused ... because YOU think so.

Please self-Reflect.

kelly1mm

(4,733 posts)
160. Come on, don't you understand it is all the rest of us who need it explained to us? So we can be
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:01 PM
Jan 2015

enlightened?

lol

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
342. Argue, continue to behave like a bully, do whatever
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 06:25 PM
Jan 2015

It's your choice.

While slightly amusing, your noting that my pique at the misuse of language glosses over the point that the OP is trying to play the GOP canard of calling anyone who notes racist behavior as racist.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
356. Behave like a bully????
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 07:24 PM
Jan 2015

Please!

Your pique at the misuse of language, while lamenting the Language Police ... get what I am "amusing" you, slightly, about.

Calling a Black person an uncle tom is NOT noting that Black person's racism ... it's noting that Black person's being overly servile to white folks.

And, as the OP notes, in the main, if it is racist for someone to call a Black person that will like, an uncle tom; it is, equally, as racist to call a Black person that we don't like, an uncle tom.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
362. No ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 07:44 PM
Jan 2015

and I believe you're being ... what was the term ... Deliberately Obtuse.

Is it because you want the liberty to use racist terms against Black people you don't like ... Just like Malcolm?

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
147. really? language police
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:50 PM
Jan 2015

another thread posted by an African American member of DU saying something is racist, another poster making it about themselves. How is calling out racists fascist?

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
172. Are you serious? "calling black people" an insult of their skin color is...not racist?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:15 PM
Jan 2015

How can insults based on race NOT be racist? Calling them hypocrites is not racist.


Your comparison doors not make sense to me. You seem to be saying "a person who refers to black people who support racist policies the insults in the OP as supporting racism".

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
346. I didn't understand the last sentence of your post
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 06:32 PM
Jan 2015

However, can insults based on race NOT be racist? Yes. Insults based on race can also be racist. It depends on the usage and the context.

Calling them hypocrites is not racist. True. No argument there.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
348. A race based insult is not racist? Wow. I'd quote Inigo Montoya but it's getting old.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 06:36 PM
Jan 2015

I copied from your post, the last sentence that you say doesn't make sense, but substituted black and the racist for NRA supporter and gun but. It makes the same sense your sentence did.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
178. is asking for an answer merely supporting your little Language Police Industrial Complex?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:29 PM
Jan 2015

You will of course, explain precisely how it's a misuse of the word (premise, objective support, conclusion rather than a simplistic and vague analogy) for those of us not quite as enlightened as you, yes?

Or is asking for an answer merely supporting your little Language Police Industrial Complex?

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
218. It's a usage error. Consider the term "Benedict Arnold"
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:11 PM
Jan 2015

The OP said, "Calling folks Uncle Toms, House Negroes, Aunt Jemima's and other similar terminology is racist."

By "folks", the OP is referring to black people who support racist groups and policies, such as a black person voting for David Duke, or a black person supporting stop-and-frisk or other Republican policies.

Now for Benedict Arnold. Using the OP's complaint as the pattern, "Calling someone a Benedict Arnold is treasonous." Obviously the speaker is using the term "treasonous" incorrectly. Calling someone a Benedict Arnold is calling someone a traitor. Just as calling someone an Uncle Tom is calling them a particularly despicable form of racist.

The previous is a counter example showing the OP's misuse of the term racist.

The OP is unhappy with the terms, but his or her unhappiness does not make the terms in and of themselves racist. In fact, it is the exact opposite, and is similar to the stupid argument by some Republicans that calling out racist behavior is racist behavior.

People use the terms to call out a black person who acts subservient to white people. It does not imply that black are racially inferior. It implies the exact opposite of that. It means that we should look down upon black people who behave in a subservient manner to white people because black people should be equal to white people.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
249. Wait what ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:03 PM
Jan 2015
Calling someone a Benedict Arnold is calling someone a traitor. Just as calling someone an Uncle Tom is calling them a particularly despicable form of racist.


And here:

The OP is unhappy with the terms, but his or her unhappiness does not make the terms in and of themselves racist.


I think I see the problem here ... you don't know what you are talking about. Calling someone (a Black person) an "uncle tom" is NOT calling them a racist.

And the terms have their origin is racism.
 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
333. Hmmm
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 06:06 PM
Jan 2015

From good old Wikipedia

The phrase "Uncle Tom" has also become an epithet for a person who is slavish and excessively subservient to perceived authority figures, particularly a black person who behaves in a subservient manner to white people; or any person perceived to be complicit in the oppression of their own group.(block quote mine)[1][2] The negative epithet is the result of later works derived from the original novel.


I'll stand by my usage of the term Uncle Tom.

Are you telling me that a black person who promotes racism (Uncle Tom) isn't a racist?
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
360. Not getting into the efficacy of using Wiki as a source ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 07:38 PM
Jan 2015

Yes ... I am telling you that a Black person complicit in the oppression of other Black people is NOT a racist.

That complicit Black person may be serving as a agent of racism, but because he/she is not supported by the institutions/cultures (though his actions may be), he/she does not have the capacity to be a racist.

To extend a (imperfect) sports analogy ... just because I kick the ball into my own team's goal doesn't make me a member of the other team.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
250. But at least he/she is not being "Language Policey" ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:05 PM
Jan 2015

in his/her expertise on the term.

ETA: But more, see Post 249.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
335. Not an expert on racism, but I do make my living as a wordsmith
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 06:13 PM
Jan 2015

While I am just as much of an amateur as you are when it comes to the use of the specific word "racism", I am somewhat of an expert when it comes to general style and usage of the parts of speech. The OP is misusing the specific adjective, "racist", and my examples demonstrate that point.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
352. My degree and work have also been in writing
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 06:47 PM
Jan 2015

and that's irrelevant. Have you worked as a sociologist? Or in anti-racism education?

GoCubsGo

(32,086 posts)
126. Yes, why not just call them "phoney-baloney hypocrites"?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:42 PM
Jan 2015

It's just as fitting, without the racist overtones.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
157. It implies there are certain behavioral standards to maintain "blackness"
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:57 PM
Jan 2015

Why people don't get that is a racist concept continues to mystify me.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
159. It is bizarre.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 01:59 PM
Jan 2015

If that is the case, and we have to maintain a stereotype, then I don't precisely act black enough in my daily life. I cannot sing.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
183. Well I can dance
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:35 PM
Jan 2015

I've been accused by racists that I am white trying to act black. I've corrected them by saying I believe I am actually a Cuban salsa dancer trapped in an old white woman's body. I love to dance. I love music. All kinds of music. I dance for any reason.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
187. Trapped in a Cuban Salsa dancer's body!!
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:38 PM
Jan 2015

Hell yeah! I dance all the time too. It took me years to find a piece of rhythm. But now, I can dance and forget where I am. Still can do my turns like a pro. It's all about those ankles.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
192. Omg, I'm dying over here!
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:45 PM
Jan 2015

I was listening to some old ass little Wayne, you know the part where he repeats 'drop it like it 's hot , drop drop it like it 's hot!' I swear to god my knee went out on the up swing. I couldn't figure out what to do, it hurt so bad, I just fell over on the floor. My kids were like 'mommy, what's wrong?'
I just said, ' mommy's old, leave me alone...' Laid there for a while.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
198. They are very sweet when they wanna be.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:49 PM
Jan 2015

I have pics on facebook I think. One day u can stop by and take a look.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
423. No matter
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 01:34 AM
Jan 2015

As a random white person on the Internet, I possess all the qualities required to endow you with your blackness.

Go forth, go forth and be black.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
426. No worries, I know you'd do the same for me.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 01:52 AM
Jan 2015

Well probably not the exact same thing, that'd be kinda odd.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
173. It is raw racism and I have seen the left use those terms.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:19 PM
Jan 2015

Those that do truly are racist. Because a certain race does not act like a certain group thinks they should, then that group gets the label. It is racist on many levels. Those who use the word also have no understanding that they are supporting a racist stereotype. If they don't think the same then they really aren't a part of said group. They are less-thans. It is about more than ideology and intelligence, it is a direct shot that they aren't "black enough."

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
176. Not black enough, exactly.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:25 PM
Jan 2015

I have been accused of that many times. There is no hive mind function.

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
246. I've gotten 'not black like that'
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:02 PM
Jan 2015

Like what? Huh? What's that mean?

I'd rather a white person drop an n-bomb than say that to me . . . "Well you aren't black like that!".

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
255. They never explain it either.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:10 PM
Jan 2015

They can't. But I do like to keep asking for an explanation. It makes me think they are classifying us in some way. Good negroes, bad negroes. Like we're fruit.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
225. no idea why anyone is arguing this at all. its exactly why we shouldn't use sexist commentary
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:35 PM
Jan 2015

for female republicans either.

i have my grievances with powell that i can state without resorting to racist speech (he lied to the UN for instance.)

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
240. I wrote mean things in my copy of his Autobiography.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:50 PM
Jan 2015

Just LIAR! And stuff like that. Best I could do.

I think some people do it for fun. Argue this, I mean.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
188. Context
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:40 PM
Jan 2015

Context makes a difference.

What do these terms actually mean? They refer to a black person who cow tows to white handlers. If you call Clarence Thomas an Uncle Tom, it's a generalized but not completely inappropriate description. It's obviously meant to hurt.... because of its racist leanings.... but I'm not so sure the user MUST be a racist. Calling Michelle Obama an Aunt Jemima is indeed MORE racists because that doesn't describe her behavior at all, unlike Clarence Thomas.

The terms are meant to hurt and be controversial, and therefore are not very PC. But assuming anyone who uses them for any reason is a total racist is...well.... kinda racist.

But, pointing out the complexities of such terms and their use, I know, upsets the "I'm outraged....see how cool I am" apple cart and gives the PC police a great opportunity to play armchair psychologist.

Still.... they are terms meant to hurt and are, of course, racist in origin. We all knew that.... including the people using such terms.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
196. I'm just going to call it racist.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:48 PM
Jan 2015

Not everybody thinks of etymology and historical usage. Better to end the race based insults than to try to hold on the the right to use them. Sure, everybody has the right. But it's hurtful, ignorant and imo racist even if the target is a republican.

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
189. Agreed...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:40 PM
Jan 2015

Although I have no qualms about labeling most black conservatives as panderers and some as even crazy, I never use that sort of language against them.

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
216. For those confusing and defending racist speech with the "free speech" argument
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:07 PM
Jan 2015

Or any variation thereof

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
222. Are you a person of color?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:24 PM
Jan 2015

Or are you a white person telling a person of color how to feel OR define racist terminology?

kickysnana

(3,908 posts)
224. OK, you got it, I promise not to speak about race in 2015 so I don't risk offending anybody
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:33 PM
Jan 2015

..no matter how wrong, innocent or assinine the OP or the objectors reasons are. Cause getting this right is the only thing we need to do to make things right and building artificial walls to communication always results in progress.



Truth is I am too old to fight/play these time wasting mind games again so I won't no matter what guilt trip you try to lay on me this time. (And stay off the lawn!)

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
227. And saying that the problem is "old, white men" is ageist and racist.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:42 PM
Jan 2015

But you see it here in post after post after post.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
233. When I say it I say 'old, conservstive, white men'.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:47 PM
Jan 2015

It's true. They hate people who look like me and have since the beginning. Try to take my vote. My birth control. Stop gay weddings. Call me names. Yell at children at the border. Bundy Ranch . Fox News. They are standing in the way of progress.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
262. He leaders are not men?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:13 PM
Jan 2015

Bullcrap. Republican's don't let women be leaders of men. Look at congress. Dem woman is leader of house democrats. Can't even imagine a republican woman speaker of the house.

kcass1954

(1,819 posts)
229. when we were kids, my brother called my sister a negro
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:45 PM
Jan 2015

He was grounded for a week. And he had to write a letter to our father (AF pilot who was tdy) and tell him what he did.

mom explained that he was in trouble because he tried to use negro as a slur, that there was nothing wrong with being one.

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
248. Curious, r "red neck" and "white trash" also racist? These are terms used to describe stupid white
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:03 PM
Jan 2015

folks who vote against their economic interest due to the mistaken belief that some of the Koch Bros wealth will trickle down to them if they just keep minorities oppressed. The second term is also used to refer to any white person who is poor in America, as if to say that the only reason any white person in this country might be poor is because he/she (usually a she and often a child) is so lazy and worthless.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
265. I think both terms are ignorant, bigoted, and unacceptable.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:15 PM
Jan 2015

I do not use such language and will not teach my kids to do so.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
257. It's a poor reflection on DU that this post is necessary.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:11 PM
Jan 2015

C'mon DUers, we're better than that. Bad enough that such stuff would get posted, inexcusable that it should survive a jury.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
264. But, read the comments contained within ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:15 PM
Jan 2015

clearly it is ... Not only survive a jury, but actively defended.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
267. I think we get too comfortable thinking that only republicans can be wrong.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:20 PM
Jan 2015

It's human to be this way. Humans are weird.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
269. We are weird, and perhaps our disdain for each other while being interdependent is the weirdest.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:21 PM
Jan 2015
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
271. Hell yeah. If we could move to different planets, some idiots would.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:24 PM
Jan 2015

Then when they interbreed and become monsters, they'd come back to kill us all.

still_one

(92,219 posts)
274. I agree, no matter who uses it, or what race they are. Words like hypocrite
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 04:27 PM
Jan 2015

Better characterizes it

There are examples where individuals were given a helping hand, though those same individuals do not want to help others in the same situation

The "I got mine", too bad for you is typical of the Republican Party platform today.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
295. Most people who use those terms don't even know what they mean
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:03 PM
Jan 2015

When people say that in my presence I just ask them if they even know what they're talking about. I can think of many terms for Condi Rice, like War Criminal and Prisoner No2047; Clarence Thomas should be Mr. Impeached, but calling a person at the pinnacle of power a slave epithet is just stupid. It's how they justify being below someone black. Yeah, keep thinking that Jethro.

People mimic what they hear. I've been called some interesting things, but they were never very creative. When people stop perpetuating racist tropes, hopefully they will die out. This thread is helping make that faster. Thanks.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
349. Thank you for Mr. impeached and prisoner number 2047.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 06:41 PM
Jan 2015

We should be more creative like that. I agree with yr entire post.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
408. Thank you for this discussion
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 11:59 PM
Jan 2015

It has been excellent and you have been an incredible host. I am going to keep Mr. Impeached and I leave you with this thank you gift.

[url=https://imgflip.com/i/g3myu][img][/img][/url]

kelly1mm

(4,733 posts)
338. Perhaps the idea that there is a legitimate black person (or a legitimate female, white, asian, etc.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 06:21 PM
Jan 2015

is part of the problem. There are just people, no?

kath

(10,565 posts)
328. Two interesting pieces on the Harry Belafonte flap back in 2002:
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:51 PM
Jan 2015
http://www.blacknewsweekly.com/195.html
Note this line: "All Blacks who called themselves Republicans must sellout their culture and race to tow the party line."

http://www.salon.com/2002/10/25/belafonte/
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
330. We have been taught to use race to bash each other.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:55 PM
Jan 2015

We even have dark skin light skin wars. I'm going to avoid it.
Are we also selling out our race when we vote for race baiting dems against a republican, is what I'd like to know. Feels like it.

Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
368. I'm coming into this thread late,
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 08:33 PM
Jan 2015

but would just like to say I agree with you completely.

My son is black. My husband and I were given this wonderful human life when his parents were killed by a drunk driver. We are both white, and his older brother is white. My son spends as much time as he wants, and always has, with his uncle and other black family members. We are all fortunate to live in the same area where this has always been possible.

I say that, to say this.

My son's uncle has taught him to think about how he would feel to be called any of those words. He has taught him that to be equal, he must act and live equal. He has taught him that politics is not the way to live your life for just as many democrats as repubs are racist; and that your political affiliation does not define who you are as a person. He has also banned him from using the n word, and nigga, will his black friends; and has taught him not to let his white friends use that towards him, even in "friendship". He is not a POC that feels those words used in that context, or any context, are harmless.

I don't participate much on threads because I don't feel (even with a black son) that I can speak for the POC on this site. I've spent the years since we were blessed with our son learning and still have a lot to learn.

Thanks for this thread, bravenak!

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
370. How is this not self-evident? I'm very sorry you find it necessary to point it out here on DU.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 08:38 PM
Jan 2015

I haven't been reading much in GD these days, so I don't know which post(s) such disgusting terminology has appeared in - but, DAMN. What the hell is wrong with peoples' heads?

If you must express disdain for a Black Republican, then attack their statements and/or actions, not their race, for cripessakes.

Denzil_DC

(7,242 posts)
374. A couple of weeks ago, I was too late to jury alert a comment
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 09:01 PM
Jan 2015

on GD that blatantly referred to President Obama as "an Uncle Tom" (that was pretty much all the comment said) because the time limit had lapsed. For all I know, it might have survived a jury already, but I hope not. In the end, I just alerted it to admins. I'm not aware of any action being taken, but at least they received a heads up for future reference.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
376. I think we are all smart enough to find creative descriptions.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 09:05 PM
Jan 2015

There are so many things we can say. It never ends. GD is weird.

TNNurse

(6,927 posts)
371. Wow
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 08:56 PM
Jan 2015

I have not found the time to read all these comments. I choose to call Clarence Thomas an pompous, self-righteous asshole, I do not think that has racist overtones at all. You can describe someone's offensive behavior without addressing race, gender or religion.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
373. Absolutely
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 08:59 PM
Jan 2015

There is never a good situation to use those terms. I stopped reading Ted Rall comics over this issue and I lost a lot of respect for Alan Colmes when he couldn't bring himself to say a bad word about Ted Rall and people who were using racist terms against Condi Rice and Colin Powell. It's disgusting I don't care who does it. I don't like people saying Mann Coulter either it's just weird and has nothing to do with the bile that comes out of her mouth. I am not even sure I like when people compair other people to animals. That's weird especially when many of those people that do that treat animals better than they treat some people.

brer cat

(24,578 posts)
379. lordy, bravenak.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 09:23 PM
Jan 2015

I can't believe it took 225 posts until La Lioness Priyanka said the obvious: "no idea why anyone is arguing this at all." I have been away today, and couldn't believe it when I waded into this thread.

It makes me want to cry to realize how many people on this liberal, progressive, democratic site are still clueless about racism. And the same goes for name-calling people like Graham and Mann.

I admire you for posting the thread and keeping your cool through it. I just greatly regret that there was a need for it.

alp227

(32,034 posts)
382. and it only gives right wankers even MORE ammo to shit on the left. doing so discredits more than
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 09:26 PM
Jan 2015

persuades. thanks for this post!

 

4dsc

(5,787 posts)
386. I had a black person explain to me what an Uncle Tom meant
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 09:48 PM
Jan 2015

and if the description fits then so be it. Most people are clueless to the meaning of the word.

CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
393. Huge difference between Uncle Tom and Aunt Jemima
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 10:27 PM
Jan 2015

Uncle Tom has a specific historical meaning, whereas Aunt Jemima is a demeaning caricature. I have often suspected people who use the term Uncle Tom, in their ignorance, are thinking of a certain brand of rice.

I think it's important to examine and expose the latent racism deeply embedded in our culture. It's everywhere, and what lingers just beneath the surface is perhaps the most pernicious. But on the other hand, I'm not in favor of a wholesale watering down of language. I remember how powerful it was when Harry Belafonte said this about Colin Powell:

“There’s an old saying in the days of slavery, there are those slaves who lived on the plantation, and there were those slaves who lived in the house. You got the privilege of living in the house if you served the master to exactly the way the master intended to have you serve him. That gave you privilege. Colin Powell is permitted to come into the house of the master, as long as he will serve the master according to the master’s dictates. Now, when Colin Powell dares to suggest something other than what the master wants to hear, he will be turned back out to pasture.”

Whether you agree with this or not, I would not have wanted Belafonte to have to struggle to find gentler words to get his message across.

It reminds me of George Carlin's routine about "soft language", which I think is relevant here:


 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
394. You can think however you please.
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 10:40 PM
Jan 2015

George Carlin was a funny guy, but he was not my idol. Both terms are meant to be demeaning and it is always white folks who decide the meaning of things for us. I have had plenty of white folks go to the dictionary that was written in the age of eugenics to try to prove a word was not racist like the word nigger. They always have such a succinct explanation of why it's okay for them to say, either because some black people say it and they want to say it too or because our feelings related to that nasty language are not as important as their explaining why it should not be hurtful and them being able to use it without fear of being called racist.

CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
395. We'll likely continue to disagree, but...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 11:08 PM
Jan 2015

Clearly, Uncle Tom is a demeaning and insulting thing to call someone. It's going to sting and leave a mark. I also think, as applied to someone such as Clarence Thomas, it's completely fair and richly deserved. If I understand you correctly, you're saying that 100% of the time, use of the term Uncle Tom is racist, and I disagree.

Again, Uncle Tom has a specific historical meaning and it's important to know it's significance. It's not like pulling out an old dictionary and splitting hairs over word origins. Not at all.


CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
401. I'm talking about the historical significance of the character
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 11:29 PM
Jan 2015

What he came to represent. That is important.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
403. Who decided that?
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 11:34 PM
Jan 2015

Think about it. To black people who actually READ the book, it does not mean that. The majority decides what Uncle Tom meant to them and that idea spread back down to us.
It was made derogatory on purpose. Uncle Tom was a popular character who helped the abolitionist movement, not the slave movement. It was written by an abolitionist. It was made derogatory on purpose. Can't have a black man be too popular.

Uncle Tom was who he was. A good man. Like in the book you say you read that had him as an unsympathetic character, but in the real book he died to allow others to escape to freedom.

CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
405. Black writers and activists
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 11:43 PM
Jan 2015

i.e. James Baldwin. Many others.

Look, I'm not trying to disrespect your opinion. I'm just giving my viewpoint, but I think it's always good to reexamine our beliefs and I will think about what you said.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
399. Here is a snip of th end plot where Uncke Tom gets beat to death allowing the other slaves to escape
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 11:17 PM
Jan 2015
At this point Tom Loker returns to the story. Loker has changed as the result of being healed by the Quakers. George, Eliza, and Harry have also obtained their freedom after crossing into Canada. In Louisiana, Uncle Tom almost succumbs to hopelessness as his faith in God is tested by the hardships of the plantation. However, he has two visions, one of Jesus and one of Eva, which renew his resolve to remain a faithful Christian, even unto death. He encourages Cassy to escape, which she does, taking Emmeline with her. When Tom refuses to tell Legree where Cassy and Emmeline have gone, Legree orders his overseers to kill Tom. As Tom is dying, he forgives the overseers who savagely beat him. Humbled by the character of the man they have killed, both men become Christians. Very shortly before Tom's death, George Shelby (Arthur Shelby's son) arrives to buy Tom’s freedom but finds he is too late.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
410. bravenak ~
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 12:23 AM
Jan 2015

why even bother explaining the truth of it when the ears and hearts are dull? i don't for a second believe the poster above ever read uncle tom's cabin.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
411. I don't think so either.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 12:31 AM
Jan 2015

I must have a passion for it or something. I don't think very many people read it who use the term. It shows.

CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
415. Like MANY people, I had to read it in school
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 01:05 AM
Jan 2015

Maybe you didn't read it, but I did. In any event, you clearly missed my very valid point. Entirely.

I was trying to respectfully disagree and offer a different view, whereas you are rudely calling me a liar, and not even having the decency to say it to my face. I think that says more about you than me.

CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
427. What are you even talking about? Do you know?
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 02:01 AM
Jan 2015

Why don't you tell me specifically what I failed to learn from Uncle Tom's Cabin and how it negates the points I made above. You know, since you've got that that superior comprehension and all.

And maybe you could also explain why many important black writers and activists came to despise the character of Uncle Tom? Were their ears and hearts dull? Did they lack comprehension?

Go ahead, explain. I'll wait...

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
429. bravenak already explained it to you.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 02:23 AM
Jan 2015

incidently, i was not required to read "uncle tom's cabin" in school. i read it because i wanted to read it. and don't you dare talk to me about "despised" characters in communities of color when the "despising" is conditioned and set with propaganda to instill reverse racism and the "sellout" or "throw the dog a bone" divisive tools planted in communities of color.

CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
430. What the....what?
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 02:43 AM
Jan 2015

I mean, maybe my poor reading comprehension is preventing me from absorbing your wisdom but that was quite a word salad.

I expected a substance-free non-answer, but holy cow.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
412. THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! I'm SO tired of the double standard.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 12:59 AM
Jan 2015

And its seen here a LOT. I alerted on an OP calling Ben Carson an "Oreo". I bet you can guess; it was not hidden.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
414. I think we should end the double standard.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 01:03 AM
Jan 2015

We'll just have to keep repeating it over and over until it sinks in properly. Sometimes people need time to think it over.

Hekate

(90,714 posts)
431. Bravenak, I KnR'd this ages ago. It's really quite the Rorschach Test by now, isn't it?
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 02:53 AM
Jan 2015

Yeeeeeeesh, the cluelessness, it burns.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
433. Anytime a comment is made, based on
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 03:08 AM
Jan 2015

someone's race, gender, creed, sexuality, etc., it is broadbrushing and hurtful.

By making such statements, you are taking away the persons individuality, and grouping them into stereotypes, or preconceived biases.

Taking away anyone's individuality, and treating them as a separate class of group, is always hurtful, and always wrong.

I just don't understand why it's so difficult to comprehend this.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
438. I agree
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 08:23 AM
Jan 2015

Saying shit like that is, in essence, saying that black people cannot possibly have individual thoughts, feelings and opinions.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
444. Exactly!
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 10:45 AM
Jan 2015

Like if they don't vote for us, they're not really black. So, we can insult them as we please. In every way. Crazy.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
440. Of course.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 09:28 AM
Jan 2015

I'm not sure why you even needed to point this out. My heart is sinking, and my stomach clenching, as I consider the possibilities.

Farmbrook

(48 posts)
443. As a black person I will use those terminology regardless of your race
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 10:44 AM
Jan 2015

Because this has to do with one's politics and behavior rather than the person. Besides who are you to say the terminology is racist. That is your opinion, end of story.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
445. Do as you please.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 10:47 AM
Jan 2015

But since you have THAT attitude, expect people to call you whatever they please with a straight face. Fair is fair.

Farmbrook

(48 posts)
446. As a black person I will use those terminologies regardless of your race
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 10:48 AM
Jan 2015

Because this has to do with one's politics and behavior rather than the person. Besides who are you to say the terminology is racist. That is your opinion, end of story.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
447. I'll clown you and make you look stupid.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 10:49 AM
Jan 2015

As a black woman that is my Talent. Now, burn up off the block!

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
458. True.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 09:15 PM
Jan 2015

Some were very cool and listened to me plead my case. I'm feeling positive. As for the others... Either they'll change or get told how they sound.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
457. Oh bullshit.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 09:12 PM
Jan 2015

I've been informed right here on DU that it's all in the context.

Shit I once served on a jury where a long term DU'er called someone a House Negro and the majority let the post stand. * that was the exact moment my black ass stopped being a paying member of DU *

You title an OP "I hate niggers. That is all" and again a majority let it stand.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
459. Well pardon me but that was 'fake' racism.
Wed Jan 7, 2015, 09:17 PM
Jan 2015

I was told by a very 'serious' person right here, on DU, TBH. But since he's on vacay, i decided to decide for myself. Crazy concept.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Calling folks Uncle Toms,...