General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCalling folks Uncle Toms, House Negroes, Aunt Jemima's and other similar terminology is racist.
Last edited Tue Jan 6, 2015, 02:14 PM - Edit history (1)
Just to let you all know. Some people seem confused and think that it's only racist if said by a republican about a Democrat. Sorry, but that is just not true. I have no idea why SOME white liberals have the burning desire to use racist terminology when dealing or speaking of a Black Republican they don't like. I really don't.
If the GOP was calling Michelle Obama 'Aunt Jemima' and Obama 'house Negro' it would not be cool.
Autumn
(45,107 posts)politics.
Trying to explain that to our Fox News Personality.
Autumn
(45,107 posts)those terms are racist you are wasting your time.
I know that in my head. I just can't shut up, though. I try, but I simply can't.
liberalmike27
(2,479 posts)What you would call Samuel L. Jackson's character in "Django Unchained?"
Personally I see racism as the result of an intent of racism. If you don't intend to be racist, if you're seeing say, this character as a problem, almost as much and as hated as the slaver, then isn't the intent to demonize him? And isn't that OK?
Then again, I realize a lot of people don't apparently "intend" racism, that do some quite racist things. And I'd agree, calling Obama a "House negro," seems racist. That said, pointing out certain black "journalists," who go on FOX and promote policies that are hurtful to the poor, or blacks, I think is not intended to be racist.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I am just trying to explain that if it's racist to say about people we like then it's racist when it's people we don't like.
I know people who use the n word liberally t describe blaxks they don't like, but tell me 'not you, your fine, n***** just means ignorant person'. But they never call white people those things. See ? It's the same thing.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)you are pretty much speaking into an empty well. Those that don't get it seem determined to NOT get it, and it is admirable to try to get them to step outside of themselves for 15 seconds. That said, for the one out of a million that wake up and smell the coffee, you have the other 999,999 that are determined to remain clueless.
Maybe I'm too cynical, though.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I just cannot stop until it's clear. I'll probably die from the insanity of repeating myself all the time.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)I just stumbled across it.
I've seen acrobats do fewer contortions than what went on in that thread.
7962
(11,841 posts)Because a lot of folks here have NO problem with it.
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Thank you.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)even had to say this. I would have thought that it was understood that this is never okay.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Maybe he will now. I'd like that.
Good grief!
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)he/she is using the worst possible word that he/she can think of without using the word that he/she really wants to use.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)I've seen nothing to indicate that. If you have something that you think does, you should post it, otherwise it's just a baseless smear.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)it is a general observation that only a criminal has a use for criminal tools.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)A bit over the top sensitive, too.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)That would be fucked up. But you are probably right. Everytime i think your wrong, your right.
calimary
(81,322 posts)He was so damn wrong-wing he was just simply irredeemable. And he'd send these obnoxious emails around, and forward email threads about such sterling topics as "why can't I say the 'N-word'? MY rights! MY rights!" Couldn't delete it fast enough but I never wanted to block him - I felt that I had better keep track. I did want to know what kind of shit my mother was being exposed to whenever they got together.
Dear GOD that was repulsive. And he was serious. And totally sincere. He really believed it. Cast-in-bronze teabagger he was.
My mom sure went downhill toward the end, and I'm not just talking health-wise.
mimi85
(1,805 posts)Which should go without saying....
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I know it was not intended to be harmful. At least there's that.
7962
(11,841 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I was really mostly objecting to the Mia Love thread. From earlier. I just don't want to see people doing that this time. We should object to her strange politics instead of the Aunt Jemima or Uncle Tom stuff. Sounds so ignorant, right? No more cracker or trailer trash stuff either. Tired. So stupid. I cringe.
7962
(11,841 posts)Sadly, i'm not surprised.
In a similar fashion, the propensity of many here to wish actual death on people like Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Cheney, Christie, etc. And they're not shy about describing just how they want them to go!!
I never had any use for Chavez, but when he got cancer, I shook my head. I HATE cancer. While I hoped he would lose his power, I'd never wish him to lose it because of disease.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Arrested, yeah. Unemployed? Sure. But dead in a painful way? No. Death is so final.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Another one used in that thread is "token".
Going by jury results in that thread, DU needs to hear this. Recced.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Along with Any racial terms. I don't even use cracker cause it's stupid and bigoted. I love this place.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)was presenting the mindset of Republicans. It wasn't endorsing that sort of thinking, it was criticizing by adopting it.
Bryant
Lucky Luciano
(11,257 posts)When he dropped some N-bombs, he specifically said that the point was that it made fun of the racist assholes who use the word and mean it.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)It's probably something i would steer clear of myself, but I could see where that poster was coming from.
Bryant
Number23
(24,544 posts)it was okay for this one white man to use the n word because he was using it "ironically" sounds incredibly stupid.
He had no business using that word and I have no doubt that he knew it. But also knew that his white fans, especially the clueless ones, would be okay with it because he was using it "ironically" and he was George Carlin, hero.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)But I think using the term to portray a white mindset is different than using it to comment on black people.
There's that movie Selma which just opened or is about to - i don't know if the white people in that movie use that term, but i'd expect them too - because it's portraying how racist the south is at that time.
Bryant
Number23
(24,544 posts)resorting to the very language that is the source of so much pain.
The way DU froths over Carlin, surely he was intelligent enough to lampoon racism without using racist language.
Lucky Luciano
(11,257 posts)First the clip that made me start becoming more liberal - about bombing brown people:
The clip below is where he drops n-bombs.
A continuation where he discusses how euphemisms corrupt our language - ie "shell shock" became "pust traumatic stress disorder" and this strips away the blunt meaning of shell shock.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)There are black conservatives. Conservative policies should be attacked. Not people. My best friend is black, gay, retired military and conservative.old time conservative and has not voted GOP in the last 10 years He's the smartest person I know. It hurts my heart when if some people think he's an Uncle Tom because he identifies himself as conservative. We have had many debates on issues but never once did I think he was being made a fool.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It's no wonder they think Democrats are racist too. If one of use finds out a black man or woman is conservative, the attacks become racial. I hate that. Attack their looney positions if they have them. Better that way.
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)but I still remember--
a very progressive woman asked me this:
if a guy with glasses harasses her, she may refute his harassment by making fun of his wearing glasses,
so..
if a guy who is Black, harasses her, is it racist for her to use the n word?
DUH!
also there was a white guy, whose car I was a passenger in, and he was almost swiped by another driver who was Black.
this guy whose car I was in used the n word!
when I expressed my shock and disgust, he "explained":
He only used the n word for Black people he doesn't like.
!!
people use the excuse of someone they don't like, to be racist.
It is never ok to use racial slurs no matter how evil the person is -
you can say what you want about SC judge Clarence Thomas, curse him, curse his momma, whatever...but if the insults turn into racial insults then it is racist, no matter what a bad guy he is.
Same as my friend and being harassed in the street. I hate being harassed by men, and I may curse them in any which way, but if I am reduced to racial curses, then I am a racist. Flat out.
someone else's bad behavior does not justify racist response.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It's an excuse. There is a sickness in our society.
I agree with your post. I would, however, like to make a small comment about your use of the word "looney", since we're talking about language. That word has historically been used to refer to people with mental or psychiatric disabilities, and can be seen as ableist language.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I guess I use it to feel superior to them because I'm diagnosed but they seem more crazy than I do.
7962
(11,841 posts)And she was SAVAGED. She printed a long list of "tweets" she got after that and she was called everything under the sun. Didnt seem to bother her, but it bothered me. No excuse for it.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I had other reasons to slightly dislike her. I had assumed she would vote Romney. I'm sure a few other famous black conservatives did too. But she did get it real bad, tho. I stayed out of it, I didn't want to read the comments. I think we make too much of a big deal when a black person is a republican. We are not all the same. Why should we be?
7962
(11,841 posts)See, your "but" was to point out how bad it was for her. WHen you'd hear other well-known people be asked about it, they would say "Oh, thats terrible! I dont think thats right at all! But......." and then go on with some blather about her positions on whatever. Which is pretty much the same as saying "i understand why people did it, even if I wouldnt"
bravenak
(34,648 posts)My personality type is the worst for Presidenting.
Too empathetic and introverted. I'd end up a hermit.
7962
(11,841 posts)I don't like the terms at all either and never use them. Focus on the stupid politics they believe in instead. This is a great thread.
Peace
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I can't imagine using any of them anywhere.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)Though I don't agree with either on most things, I rarely click a thread here about either because of the racist shit that is allowed around here...
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I don't like it, though. Not my website, however, so I just have to ignore things that are left in threads by juries if they offend me. It doesn't look like juries are going to hide that stuff as things are. They should still be alerted, though and comments posted in the threads indicated that such terms are unwelcome. Maybe people will get it eventually.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I've heard some do it.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Response to bravenak (Reply #15)
Name removed Message auto-removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I was explaining a reality.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)resist this explanation; but, when a Black person uses racially derogatory language, it carries a different meaning, than when a non-Black person uses it.
With that said, I disapprove of such language used by anyone, Black or non-Black, and have put, both, Black and non-Black, out of my house for using that type of language.
treestar
(82,383 posts)thanks for answering, I was curious. I get the difference (i.e. the rap songs and such). Good for you re putting them out of the house! I would never use it. I've heard black people use it - though I don't know if as a white person I'd be OK to put them out of the house!
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)more importantly should they be called on it? I think yes, they should.
treestar
(82,383 posts)being a white person accusing a black person of using racist terms - against black people.
Definitely no one should use those terms.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)So the answer is no.
treestar
(82,383 posts)There are plenty of names for the Herman Cains of the world that can also be applied to the McCains of the world, race neutral.
still_one
(92,219 posts)Using racial innuendos is racist no matter who says it
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)So I think the answer to the question you're asking is "no, it's not OK to racially abuse someone, even if you are the same race as them yourself".
Ink Man
(171 posts)If we disagree with their politics then make a intelligent argument why. Some of the things I read here looks like it was an cut and paste for a tea party site.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They say 'plantation', we say house negro or uncle tom. No better than them.
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)am told.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)It means a black person doing white people's bidding, and that's what these men do, genrally to the detriment of those of their own race. No reason not to call it what it is.
This is entirely unrelated to calling Michelle Obama "Aunt Jemima". There is just no comparison
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)There isn't one. That's the first clue that oreo may be problematic.
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)1. don't seek out epithets.
2. that phrase "white on the outside..." needs to be retired along with "oreo"- UGH.
3. if you don't like some one's policies, there are plenty of words in the English language you can use to say so.
What do you call Boehner (et al) when they shit upon MY interests?
I'm white, he's white - where is the epithet I can throw at him?
Even if there were one, it wouldn't serve.
We have brains, we have thinking ability, we have language, so let's use them.
VWolf
(3,944 posts)Boehner is orange.
Perhaps we can call him a creamsicle?
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)does not equal
And must never be allowed to.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Boehner is Orange!
But right about the epithets.
Roy Rolling
(6,918 posts)Surely you jest. Ask your kids, they will tell you the epithet and it is used quite often.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)tkmorris
(11,138 posts)But I am not going to repeat it here.
It's not relevant in any case. I don't think any of these words are acceptable in polite conversation.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)It's jocular rather than implying that one is a race traitor.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)"Wigger" ... Oh wait!
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)RobinA
(9,893 posts)Yeah, there are words for that.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)The one that rhymes with the 'N' word doesn't mean you're a traitor to your race. It means you've adopted some cultural/social aspects that appeal to you.
Oreo on the other hand...
treestar
(82,383 posts)when my jerk uncle used it (white guy). I thought he meant someone with a parent of each race, like President Obama, who he regularly vilifies.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)That is an ugly position because you believe the conservative black person isn't smart enough to have control of his own agency or has sinister reasons for doing so.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)with that. It's when they vote Republican that rubs me the wrong way, considering how the Republican Party has consistently tried to keep the Black voter, worker, mother, child, wages, and education down in order to lift up the same for Whites. That's what I don't understand. But I do understand that Black people can be very conservative solely based on their chosen religion. Equal rights for gay people, for example, isn't high on their list of things to defend. But that goes for Latinos, as well.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)School yard slur by white kids towards me growing up.
It's meant to denigrate.
Condi Rice and Thomas both had to survive in a world that not only called them 'oreos' - but one that also called them n*ggers.
Good bad, indifferent they survive it as best they could.
Now are they ass wipes? Yeppeeeeeeeeeeer!
Ass holes.
Ass wipes.
Nitwits
Fuckwits
Etc. etc. Those are cool!
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)If they take those away, I would not be able to say anything about Republicans at all!
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Then again my parents used to say we were acting like Republicans when we were being brats - and my mom would threaten to drop me off at the White House (Reagan Era) when I was a little kid - so the R word is kind of a curse word from where I sit.
I also am real quick to say I'm looking for that one fuck I'm supposed to give about something - so there's that.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Your mom is a crackup. I think you can definitely call yourself a lifelong Democrat! Reagan really was the worst of the worst of the worst. What a great way to make sure your kid never turns into a Republican. I'm going to share that with my friends!
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)My childhood was a lot of my father screaming and hollering at te CBS Evening news.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)And you should have seen her and her teacher friends when the subject of Reagan came up. They had this look of disgust as if something died. They had hated him as governor, and now they absolutely loathed him as president for his union busting and educational policies. Totally shows how you rub off on your children.
Unfortunately one of our neighbors who was the most hippie and pretty much the closest thing to a saint, her sons grew up to be staunch Republican assholes. Everyone still feels sorry for her! So your mom's trick of making a Republican the worst thing in the world is a good inoculation against selfish, greedy children.
Cheers to your mom & dad
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)As a side note, where did the "word" otherization come from.
Some people are just bad people. Nothing wrong with calling them names.
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)Totally up to you of course, but expect pushback.
Otherization is an almost innate human activity. What it does is identify the 'in-group' and the 'out-group' in the tribal system (tribal being actual tribes, race, religion, ethnicity, gender, nationality, what sports team you like, what high school you attend, rural v. urban, political views, ect ....)
One of the keys to tribalization is to belittle and dehumanize the 'other', hence 'otherization'.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)I do not use these terms willy niily.
It is a characteristic of Ben Carson and Clarence Thomas that they are externally (physically) black, but their talk (well, maybe not talking for Clarence) and actions are highly.detrimental (to put it mildly) to people of their own race.
If a large number of African Americans told me this offended them, I would not use it. I do not think DU, or African Americans on DU, necessarily are a representative cross-section of African-Americans in general.
Otherization is not always bad. Ok for neo-nazis to be otherized, terrorists to be otherized, WBC's to be otherized, and so on.
I understand and respect your point. I do not agree with it.
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)you feel you are getting the results you want by using them, then I suppose you are correct in doing so.
We will just have to agree to disagree........
Have a GREAT rest of the day!
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Question ...
Do you accept DU, or white folks on DU, as a representative cross-section of white Americans, in general?
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)But sorry, I don't see how that relates to post 200. Feel free to elaborate.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)view is representative of a cross section of African-American thought ... African-Americans telling you that from their/our experience, they/we do represent that thought, is clearly not enough for you.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)I do know that caucasian folks views on DU certainly do not represent the view of caucasian in this country.
Whether A-A views on this site represent broad A-A views on this subject, I don't know, but I foubt it.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I will grant, there are/will be disparate voices; but, from my experience, the voice expressed on DU by Black DUers, is within the mainstream of the larger Black community.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Anyhow, I respect your views, but I am done on this.
Peace.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I think you would benefit from reading back through your part of the thread and the responses you received, understanding that the majority of those that responded are Black.
The consider what you are saying (or rather, what we may be hearing) ... you respect our voice; but, not what we are telling you.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Was merely offering a chance to grow.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)That was not my intent. The way people learn is to have our errors pointed out to us.
But the other half of that is there is a willingness to hear about the error.
delrem
(9,688 posts)That is, explain:
"If a large number of African Americans told me this offended them, I would not use it. I do not think DU, or African Americans on DU, necessarily are a representative cross-section of African-Americans in general."
To be sure, DU isn't the entire world. But how, exactly, is a "large number of African Americans" to tell you that your usage of racially coded epithets offends them? How can they all, individually and one by one, line up in front of you to tell you (politely, mind you) that your usage offends them? At what point would you have enough feedback so you'd actually stop using the words? I ask, since there seems to be a huge majority of DUers who've explained the offence and you feel free to ignore it, as not being enough evidence - since you don't think DU, the place where you're posting and actually *getting* the feedback, is representative.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)is racist. Call them what they are, hypocrites.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Heelllooooo???
c588415
(285 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)If you dont see the problem with that, then you cant criticize someone who has the OPINION that Pres Obama is working "against white people". Debate the opinion and drop the name calling.
I'd love to see someone simply ASK Carson or Thomas or whoever about what you state. See what they answer. Obviously THEY dont feel that way. They're not doing it for money; Carson has been extremely successful for years before involving himself in politics.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'd say he has his own mind. Good grief!
7962
(11,841 posts)It also covers some of his "anger issues" when he was growing up; almost killed a guy over a radio station!!
But scroll down and you'll see the section that speaks about his work with the twins. Apparently he's been all over the world doing it. I didnt know that until I looked it up after you mentioned it. More impressive than I realized. I just could not do that type of work.. Wow.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)They are grown adults, they have their own reasons, opinions and feelings. You might not agree with them, but to break it down to them just doing a white man's bidding is wrong.
mountain grammy
(26,624 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)If one cares more about their Master's house burning than their neighbor's, something I see a lot of, it's perfectly appropriate, regardless of what some self-righteous high horse rider thinks.
It has nothing to do with race, and everything to do with power. And I will continue to think of people as such when they evince the appropriate behavior.
And here is Malcom X telling us when and how recognize them. I agree with him completely.
...
To understand this, you have to go back to what [the] young brother here referred to as the house Negro and the field Negro -- back during slavery. There was two kinds of slaves. There was the house Negro and the field Negro. The house Negroes - they lived in the house with master, they dressed pretty good, they ate good 'cause they ate his food -- what he left. They lived in the attic or the basement, but still they lived near the master; and they loved their master more than the master loved himself. They would give their life to save the master's house quicker than the master would. The house Negro, if the master said, "We got a good house here," the house Negro would say, "Yeah, we got a good house here." Whenever the master said "we," he said "we." That's how you can tell a house Negro.
If the master's house caught on fire, the house Negro would fight harder to put the blaze out than the master would. If the master got sick, the house Negro would say, "What's the matter, boss, we sick?" We sick! He identified himself with his master more than his master identified with himself. And if you came to the house Negro and said, "Let's run away, let's escape, let's separate," the house Negro would look at you and say, "Man, you crazy. What you mean, separate? Where is there a better house than this? Where can I wear better clothes than this? Where can I eat better food than this?" That was that house Negro. In those days he was called a "house nigger." And that's what we call him today, because we've still got some house niggers running around here.
This modern house Negro loves his master. He wants to live near him. He'll pay three times as much as the house is worth just to live near his master, and then brag about "I'm the only Negro out here." "I'm the only one on my job." "I'm the only one in this school." You're nothing but a house Negro. And if someone comes to you right now and says, "Let's separate," you say the same thing that the house Negro said on the plantation. "What you mean, separate? From America? This good white man? Where you going to get a better job than you get here?" I mean, this is what you say. "I ain't left nothing in Africa," that's what you say. Why, you left your mind in Africa.
...
http://field-negro.blogspot.com/2012/05/its-21st-century-but-house-negro-is.html
Unless one wants to paint Malcom X as a racist, which is what the scared white folk and other opponents at the time did to discredit him. When he came back from S. Africa he said he realized that his black nationalism didn't take in the whole scope of the problem. The issue was power, who had it and who didn't.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I am alive. It offends me to no end when White Liberals use those terms. Go see what he said about white liberals being worse than conservatives.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)the most vulnerable...things like that. Tantrums over thoughtless speech are a waste of time, but ymmv.
What some white liberal, or black liberal, says is irrelevant to me. I care about what they do.
And Malcom may be dead, but his words are still very much alive, and to the point.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)I rarely post on threads about race issues, but this post hit home.
My mother was raised as a very poor tenant farmer. First cotton then potatoes.
She understood as well as anyone, that deeds mattered above any rhetorical words muttered.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)In this deceitful American game of power politics, the Negroes (i.e., the race problem, the integration and civil rights issues) are nothing but tools, used by one group of whites called Liberals against another group of whites called Conservatives, either to get into power or to remain in power.
Among whites here in America, the political teams are no longer divided into Democrats and Republicans. The whites who are now struggling for control of the American political throne are divided into liberal and conservative camps. The white liberals from both parties cross party lines to work together toward the same goal, and white conservatives from both parties do likewise.
The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative.
Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negros friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political football game that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives.
Politically the American Negro is nothing but a football and the white liberals control this mentally dead ball through tricks of tokenism: false promises of integration and civil rights. In this profitable game of deceiving and exploiting the politics of the American Negro, those white liberals have the willing cooperation of the Negro civil rights leaders. These leaders sell out our people for just a few crumbs of token recognition and token gains. These leaders are satisfied with token victories and token progress because they themselves are nothing but token leaders .
NewDeal_Dem
(1,049 posts)to buttress positions you agree with while ignoring his statements you disagree with doesn't strengthen the former or weaken the latter.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I know who the fuck he was talking about. Black history is my life, dude. I'm black history in motion.
NewDeal_Dem
(1,049 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)the "leaders" he's talking about are black.
MLK and a slew of other black leaders had similar comments about white liberals and they weren't specifying the leadership either.
NewDeal_Dem
(1,049 posts)he's part of the government or part of the power structure.
Do non-descript, run of the mill 'white liberals' control black civil rights leaders? Were the Kennedys just ordinary 'white liberals?'
"The white liberals control the Negro and the Negro vote by controlling the Negro civil rights leaders. As long as they control the Negro civil rights leaders, they can also control and contain the Negro's struggle, and they can control the Negro's so-called revolt. The Negro "revolution" is controlled by these foxy white liberals, by the government itself....
The Negro "revolution" is controlled by this white government. The leaders of the Negro "revolution" (the civil rights leaders) are all subsidized, influenced and controlled by the white liberals; and all of the demonstrations that are taking place on this country to desegregate lunch counters, theaters, public toilets, etc., are just artificial fires that have been ignited and fanned by the white liberals in the desperate hope that they can use this artificial revolution to fight off the real black revolution that has already swept white supremacy out of Africa, Asia, and is sweeping it out of Latin America...and is even now manifesting itself also right here among the black masses in this country.
Can we prove that the Negro revolution is controlled by white liberals? Certainly!
Right after the Birmingham demonstrations, when the entire world had seen on television screens the police dogs, police clubs, and fire hoses brutalizing defenseless black women, children, and even babies, it was reported on page twenty-six in the May 15 issue of The New York Times, that the late President Kennedy and his brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, during a luncheon conference with several newspaper editors from the State of Alabama, had warned these editors that they must give at least some token gains to the moderate Negro leaders in order to enhance the image of these moderate Negro leaders in the eyesight of the black masses; otherwise the masses of Negroes might turn in the direction of Negro extremists. And the late President named the Black Muslims as being foremost among the Negro extremist groups that he did not want Negroes to turn toward.
In essence, the late President told these southern editors that he was trying to build up the weak image of the Negro civil rights leaders, in order to offset the strong religious image of the Muslim leader, The Honorable Elijah Muhammad. He wasn't giving these Negro leaders anything they deserved; but he was confessing the necessity of building them up, and propping them up, in order to hold the black masses in check, keep them in his grasp, and under his control. The late President knew that once Negroes hear The Honorable Elijah Muhammad, the white liberals will never influence or control or misuse those Negroes for the benefit of the white liberals any more. So the late President was faced with a desperate situation.
Martin Luther King's image had been shattered the previous year when he failed to bring about desegregation in Albany, Georgia. The other civil rights leaders had also become fallen idols. The black masses across the country at the grass roots level had already begun to take their cases to the streets on their own. The government in Washington knew that something had to be done to get the rampaging Negroes back into the corral, back under the control of the white liberals.
The government propaganda machine began encouraging Negroes to follow only what it called "responsible" Negro leaders. The government actually meant Negro leaders who were responsible to the government, and who could therefore by controlled by the government, and be used by that same government to control their impatient people...
http://www.malcolm-x.org/speeches/spc_120463.htm
Number23
(24,544 posts)to support them but in fact were no different from white conservatives.
I get why you so desperately want his position to be his castigation of white liberal leaders but it isn't. (But even if it was, who do you think made the white liberal "leaders" the leaders?) He in no way specifies that it's the leadership. You need to read up and listen up on Malcolm at his peak. Many of his positions changed a few years before his death. I grew up with him so I know exactly who and what he was.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)However, the quote you cited is advocating Black separatism.
Black folks are part of the fabric of this nation and I for one am glad of it.
They bring a rich cultural tapestry that we can all learn from, but for this to happen we all have to move beyond racial denigration no matter the source.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)what others are telling them.
And it is just as true today as it was then.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)The academic research on the subject did not occur until after his death. Literature based on interviews with former slaves shows that house slaves wore a mask in order to placate masters. It was a survival tool because planters wanted to believe they treated slaves like family, but of course they didn't. When union troops approached during the Civil War, house slaves were often the first to flee, which showed their consciousness was quite different from what planter families believed. See Leon Litwack, Been in the Storm So Long.
Another obvious point should be it is one thing for an African American to make a comment in the 1960s and quite another for a white person in the 21st century. The same argument you are making could be used to claim the N word isn't racist, which is of course patently false.
7962
(11,841 posts)It might apply if there were blacks that belonged to the Klan.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)I've always hated those terms, for the same reasons you give, but they have always seemed to be generally accepted to here.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Better than I expected. I like that.
Hutzpa
(11,461 posts)but here is an 'F' for effort.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)There are plenty of more accurate and universal words to describe negative qualities.
Anyone can display ego driven and opportunistic characteristics. Or.. greed, pathological ambition, misrepresentation of constituents...
To suggest that it is worse for black politicians to display those characteristic most certainly is racist.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)White politicians we don't like get creative descriptions, black republicans get racial names. Not cool.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)of those words safe for any type of use.
I have some over racists in my family...uncle by marriage...and I could not believe the kinds of crap that came out of their mouths.
Nobody should debase another group of people with racist language.
On edit:
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I feel the same way. We can do better than that. It lacks imagination too.
QC
(26,371 posts)Sen. Graham most assuredly is a right wing asshole, and he might well be a closet case, but it's never a good thing to use bigoted language, especially for progressives, who stand to lose their credibility.
Excellent thread!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Miss Lindsay. It's nasty to trans people everywhere.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)And it's a very good point.
QC
(26,371 posts)who is a horrible person in too many ways to count.
The problem is that it makes Graham a bad person for possibly being gay. Whether he is or not, that's not the problem with Graham.
And let's not even get started on the Ann Coulter slams.
Blanks
(4,835 posts)The black republican that annoys me the most is Allen West. My Facebook arch nemesis posts his opinions quite regularly.
I have no respect for West's opinions, but it's not right to call him clearly racist names.
He discharged a weapon near some guys head as an interrogation technique when he was in the military.
I don't like him, but for the same reasons that I don't like Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh. It has nothing to do with his race. He's just a right wing personality that spews stupid shit on a regular basis. It's not appropriate to dredge up special racist names that are offensive to people who don't spew stupid shit on a regular basis.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)radical RW !!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)For example, many of the political enablers ignored the 'bone in the nose' and 'watermelon white house lawn'' emails and let their fellow politicians who generated the emails, remain in office.
The "pray the president dies" email republican also still 'serves' .
Except for Larry Elder.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)as much as for Condi Rice or Clarence Thomas.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It's ignorant.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)1step
(380 posts)Elder is the biggest apologist for white racism in America.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Can you be a racist and not be white?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)No and No ... for the same reason: Racism = bigotry + institutional/cultural power.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)It was used in another thread today and it seemed like something similar to the phrases in the OP in that it belittles a group of people.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)RobinA
(9,893 posts)are racist. Try to keep up.
If you don't believe that, best keep out of these race discussions.
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)those venn diagrams: All racists are bigots, but not all bigots are racists.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)and well advised.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)in America, that DOES express (simplistically) the state of 21st century social science.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I mean is Daniel Webster out of the picture when defining who is racist now?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Of course he can't make the rules for the 21st century. If we let dead men make the rules, slavery would still be the law. Women and non landowners and non white men over 21 would not vote.
We can figure thigs out without sticking like glue to some outdated word usage. Words evolve. Nobody speaks old english except for a few scholars. See? Evolution of language.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)board and define for everyone what a word means.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I don't understand why it is that people think their opinion or the paradigm they see the world through is superior. That in itself is the very definition of a racist.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'll survive your dissaproval and accusations.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Just letting you know you are not the decider.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Each of us is our own decider
bravenak
(34,648 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)The opposite has been said -- e.g. explanations about "tribalism" upthread.
However, in the Americas, descendants of the European colonists ("whites", in the simplistic language of skin-color oriented racism) are the group that has had the raw power to institutionalize and drive home an incredibly deep and dehumanizing racist structure. The racist language that accompanies those racist institutions not just demeans, it helps control the narrative while expressing the emotional zeitgeist of whole communities.
We're *born into* a European colonist culture and its language (not just the racist epithets) and values are absorbed with our mother's milk, becoming our reality, our world. Nobody can tell me that it's all in the past. Not when, on mature reflection, I recognize how that inbred racism informed *me* and all of my friends, before I even started school, at home and exploring outside, at school, and throughout my life. It does seem to be getting better, at least the surface sheen is looking more polished so there are no more bars and restaurants with signs saying the native peoples are excluded. No more (at least openly, and with pride in the results) bulldozing native cemeteries into the river, and so on. But that polish is the thinnest veneer ....
Comparing *that* with some imagined "hurt" that I might receive on being called "honky" is ridiculous.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)carried out through law, religion, art and other institutional and cultural elements is false and in itself bigoted. In the State where YOU live, I can be fired for being gay, or denied housing. That's not racism, it's bigotry. And it is institutional to the point of being legislated and enforced law.
The heterocentricism of your equation is stunning, coming as it does packaged as a sermon to others who understand so much less.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)is tied to something other than race.
heterocentricism? The are literally 1,000s of strains of cancer ... refining the term to express specific observations regarding a particular strain, is not dismissive of the other strains, it is merely refining the definition.
ETA: (something more constructive)
Because I do not believe that the generic term bigotry, is strong, or descriptive, enough a term, I am an advocate of, and encourage you (or the LGBT community) to, come up with a term that can be used to describe the institutional/cultural oppression that is particular to the LGBT community.
Do so, and I would be happy to use it.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)characteristic (skin color, gender, sexual orientation, nationlity, religion, age, etc) while racism is bigotry against a race/ancestry or skin color. I am trying to understand what you and others mean because to me anyone of any skin color or nationality can prejudge others based on those characteristics.
This is NOT to say that there is not institutionalized racism, however.
My apologies for making you repeat yourself once again. I will come back to read more later and will be thinking about the differences of the terms.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)"white racism" is just absurd.
So no, "poor widdle white men" is not racist.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Only white people can be racist? Really?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)according to the weight of 21st century social science.
ileus
(15,396 posts)They're just wrong on everything. As quasi intellectuals we're allowed to say these things because of our purity and well meaning intentions.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I guess we just have to accept it from our friends.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)ignorance can be educated, arrogance = not so much.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)and when the "ignorant" refuse the education, and continue the "arrogance", what is it called class?
Anyone? ...
"Stupidity"
Class dismissed.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Note to self: Don't call them "Stupid", call them "Deliberately Obtuse."
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Throd
(7,208 posts)I am in complete agreement with you on this matter. However, as a 47 year old white male, my opinion doesn't carry as much weight with this.
I also feel the same way when people use sexist language against the likes of Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann. There is plenty to criticize about them with out resorting to slurs that would never be tolerated towards women on "our" side.
Plenty to criticize. I could write tomes on the Tea Party. No need for this.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)that one's race should be the overriding factor in determining one's politics. If you're black and your politics don't line up with the assumptions, then there's something wrong with you. Your race is somehow supposed to exclude you from holding certain views. Only white males get to populate the caverns of crackpot conservatism with impunity.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It's the land of the free to be who you are. Politics are not determined by color. I hate met quite a few conservative blacks. My uncle is one. Very stubborn man. But he always was good to me and was there when I needed him. He ain't no Uncle Tom. He's my damn Uncle.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)The 'Aunt Tom' comment or whatever. It's surprising how much it has been used on DU in the past. It reminds me a bit of the posts about Lindsay Graham that use homophobic tropes about him. People need to learn how to have political differences with people without using that sort of rhetoric. They do it to Glenn Greenwald as well. It is perfectly possible to object to any position or opinion or action of anyone without commenting on their personal details. It's not only possible but it is vital to do so.
Mia Love is an anti equality bigot, a conservative opponent of women's right to reproductive choices. That's plenty of material without bringing her race into it in any way.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)The woman is anti everything I believe in, but I can decide to be an idiot and just use racial language, or I can describe her flaws to a tee.
And I cringe on the miss Lindsay thing. Wtf is that?
We are falling into the trap of acting like those we claim to be nothing like. Not cool.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)terms. That's what I personally think.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)How lame.
greatauntoftriplets
(175,742 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,742 posts)It boggles the mind.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Sometimes, I have to look stuff up. And that's weird cause all I do is read.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)should be either a red flag or a learning moment for some folks here
Thank you
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Sad we still have to say these things in 2015c
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)How pathetic that anyone would even have to put this out there? You'd think people would grow up.
randys1
(16,286 posts)He is on Sirius channel 127, the liberal channel.
He is a Black preacher, lefter than most left atheists
https://www.facebook.com/matsimela
Racists call his show everyday, they call him the racist, of course, etc.
On occasion he will call a Black man "Uncle Tom", very rare, and he is very selective, and only when he is pissed.
Then he will usually apologize, says it aint right probably, and 2 weeks later he does it again.
It is a cathartic process for him, I think.
Before I understood the implication of the term, before I knew the true history of it, I had used it a few times, some years ago, and have since learned that it is wrong to use, for me.
Reminds me of a VERY long time ago my nephew coming to me about something, he is Gay, and was telling me about his troubles and I said something like "Well if you just stopped this Gay nonsense, it causes you so much trouble, why do you do that to yourself?"
Obviously I was an idiot on the subject back then, interestingly enough I never held hate for Gay people, even when I didnt understand them
bravenak
(34,648 posts)There aren't many of us black atheists. Might be fun. He's probably older, different time. At least he knows it ain't cool.
randys1
(16,286 posts)When a racist calls his show, he actually responds to them on a personal level, and sometimes it can be funny, but usually I just want to jump thru the radio, turn into The Hulk, and do some damage.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I already have a few preachers in the family. Can't take anymore preaching. I could literally start my own church by now, all the church I went to. No!
randys1
(16,286 posts)brings it up.
You could listen to him everyday for a month and not have a clue he is a preacher.
So dont let that stop you, I know you would love him!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)He's clever and outrageous at times, and I really enjoyed his show. He always had a thought provoking program.
kath
(10,565 posts)Like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders"?
Genuinely curious. I use this quote a lot, and really think it is true.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Would you say it about a white man? I'd leave the cutesy stuff out personally. I think it's true no matter color or gender. They want ALL of us for dinner.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)Clearly kath does not think the statement is racist. Now let's try your comparison.
A Black man voting Republican is like a chicken voting for Col Sanders.
Col Sanders does bad things to chickens (from the chicken's perspective). Republicans have spent the past few decades working tirelessly attacking the rights of African-Americans and supporting just about every racist attack on them.
Analogy works.
A White man voting Democratic is like a chicken voting for Col Sanders.
Col Sanders does bad things to chickens. Democrats have ... done absolutely nothing against Euro-Americans.
Analogy fails.
You asked kath, but were it directed at me the answer would be a clear cut, "no, I would not say it about a White man."
Because it wouldn't make any sense. The logic simply fails in the reverse scenario.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Anybody voting for a REPUBLICAN is like a chicken voting for colonel sanders. No just women or blacks. Why single us out? Only rich people benefit from republican policies.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)perfectly. The main reason the Republican Party garners support in the 40-50% range is precisely its not-so-covert racism. Scalise was 36 years old when he spoke at Duke's conference. He would have had to have his head up his ass not to know who his audience was. That he's getting a wink-and-nod from the Republican leadership says all that needs to be said.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They care about themselves and their donors. The rest of us can fuck off. Anybody not in the top ten voting republican is like a chicken voting for sanders.
They know what they are doing. Their voters will like him even more now. He's exactly the type they want running things.
kath
(10,565 posts)I was genuinely asking the question as to whether bravenak and others consider the statement to be racist - wondering whether I am out of line or not when I use that statement about blacks, or women, or anyone-but-very-rich-people for that matter.
i guess I had leaned toward thinking it is not racist, but wanted others' opinions on the matter.
I agree with you, ieoeja, that the analogy works, but the reverse scenario does not.
FWIW, the first time I ever heard the phrase used about black people, it was attributed to JC Watts's father.
kath
(10,565 posts)But do you not agree that their attitudes and policies toward people of color and women are particularly heinous?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But we are not them and do not need to go to that kinda talk to be correct . We can bash them for being hypocritical idiots.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)there is no racial context other than the person you are referring to being Black.
haele
(12,660 posts)for a republican or a libertarian is like a chicken voting for Colonel Saunders", and on occasion, I have used woman if I was talking about voting for a particular republican or libertarian politician.
But I've always tried to avoid any mention of race, because as one of the few white households in a very diverse working class neighborhood, it could smack of taking an attitude of unconscious privilege or setting oneself apart due to race, and frankly, I want to remain on trust terms with my neighbors. Just as I wouldn't use the N-word, the C-word, "Charlie" or the G-word (that could insult my SE Asian neighbors) or pepper my discussions with assorted Mexican street slang out in public, no matter how thoughtlessly angry I might be. Being a retired Navy Chief from the bad old days, I know a lot of pejoratives (probably close to 3/4 of the Urban Dictionary's worth) and how to use them to the "best effect". That doesn't mean I'm going to, because my mother raised me better than that.
The Colonel Saunders quote - that particular saying balances on the racism boundary through the potential to call up the "fried chicken = Poor Black" stereotype. As for sexist, I don't think that there is a equivalent "Chicken = Dumb Chick" stereotype that can be as quickly made, so it shouldn't be considered sexist unless someone is seriously emulating "Super Stretch Armstrong" to find some form of outrage in what one are saying. Just my two cents.
Haele
Rozlee
(2,529 posts)I think a lot of it depends on people's racial and ethnic sensibilities. My daughter is half-Hispanic, but she'll seriously go for someone's throat if they even make the slightest comment that she thinks is off-color about race, ethnicity or any other social class. She's been trying to get some internet and Facebook pages banned, like 'Mexican Word of the Day' and 'Being Latino.' Those are some of my favorite pages. But, she claims they're bigoted and belittle Latinos. My parents and siblings came to this country illegally and we wound up in a rural Texas town with me being the anchor baby. I've seen bigotry close and ugly when I was growing up, but I can also see when people aren't being hateful and just having fun. I like that my culture has its own little foibles and humor. My daughter can pass for white and tells me that I don't understand what she goes through. That she meets people all the time that are pleasant and friendly to minorities, then cut them and say spiteful things about them when they're not around, never suspecting that they're complaining about it to a minority. She's right. I don't understand her own minority circumstances. They weren't mine. Many things that offend her very deeply don't even cause a ripple in my psyche. Our experiences are very different. The lives of black Americans, who have lived through much worse bigotry and racism, is an even more different minority experience and I can comprehend it even less. They've experienced the worst of the worst in this country and are entitled to set the bar for what they consider offensive.
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)and are entitled to set the bar for what they consider offensive."
Not sure why this is so hard for some people to understand. Thanks for your post, well said.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Depends who's talking, who's the target, and why. If someone is acting as a willing tool of institutionalized racism, the terms may be appropriate.
These words are powerful, evoking painful memories. Use them with care, or you become part of the problem.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I can live without it. It makes me feel bad no matter the target. I just feel like if I managed to step too far out of line, I'd be getting called the Aunt Jemima next.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)derogatory language....even if it's Ann Coulter or Sarah Palin.
Because I know that makes it more acceptable to use against me.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)...in spite of our personal preferences.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)bluesbassman
(19,374 posts)If one's argument relies on using bigoted terms to enhance it, the argument must be pretty weak. Better to call out people for what they say and do. Period.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Rilgin
(787 posts)In this thread, you posted a Malcolm X quote which you later defended that calls white liberals either racists or hypocrites. Both of these are derogatory terms. I hope you would agree that calling someone a racist or hypocrite is not trying to praise them. Further, it is not a statement about a belief, policy, or particular event but is intended to attach to their person.
If you truly "agree" with the above post, you might look at your own practices. I would urge you to refrain from posts which are not specific about policy or specific acts of individuals but are just racial associations.
In this vein, I can agree with your OP that people should not use a number of specific derogatory terms. If you had just said "Some People" rather than "Some White Liberals", it would be a fine post. The particular terms you object to are offensive and should not be used by anyone.
Personally, I do not think I have ever used any of these terms probably because my personal and intellectual political issues or goals or what have you is to get past race and see our common humanity both as an individual and as a country.
Within that goal, it is easy to acknowledge that there are clear places where race has and does play a part in the current and past history and politics of the United States and all us individuals. However, such history is not static. There has been progress on overt racial laws and policies but there are places (particularly the justice system) where institutional bias remains and where class and wealth issues cause disparate results. On the individual level, there still exist racist and bigoted people. Some is overt and some is just conscious or unconscious bias. Some of these bias and bigots administer the systems that govern our lives.
None of us is totally immune. I can recognize areas within my self because of personal experiences I had growing up in NYC in the 60s where I have bias. For example, I know I have a heightened awareness/fear if I see a group of black teens on the sidewalk ahead of me. My childhood involved being robbed at knife point multiple times walking the streets of New York which left some bias. However it is something I fight rather than accept. It is also not only race. I tend to have that heightened awareness anytime I see teens on the street ahead of me regardless of race.
People tend to be somewhat tribal and not trust people who are not like them. However, I do not think bias or bigotry is limited to or dominant in "white people" "white men" "white liberals" or any other variant of the term. Further, the racial aspects of both society and individuals change over time. Often in these type threads, I feel that discussions relate to historical battles and not current battles.
Returning to the use of any post addressed to "white people". In each case, the term is invariably used in a derogatory sense or an attack. You will not see any post saying "white people" (or "black people" for that matter) in any positive sense. Second, in each case, it is an association of a negative trait with a racial characteristic.
These threads develop in a few ways. Invariably, if one of these "white people" bring up the problems with association, they are often told either "they don't get it" or "ignore it if its not about you". Some threads go further that that to justify the association. However, regardless, all of these responses are equally offensive. Association by race (of any kind) is wrong.
As was pointed out to you, Malcolm X rejected the implications of the quote you posted later in his life. Again returning to personal experience. I am the son of a fairly radical mother. Growing up, we had people coming and going through our apartment. Many involved with all of the civil rights and anti-war fights of that time. Many lived with/crashed with us for long periods of time. One person who lived with us off and on for years, came to my mother one day and said in essence "I will not be able to talk to you again because I am now part of a group that has labeled you the devil". And just to be clear, years later that person also developed and came back and apologized to my mother.
You appear to agree that association of derogatory terms by race or gender is wrong. I would urge you to put that agreement into practice.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I used 'some' white liberals, because this is a place where liberal leaning folks congregate. As this was in reference to another thread where 'some' white liberals congregated to call her Aunt Jemima, and House negro without considering the racial or historical implications for that, I though I'd post my fucking opinion.
Thanks for the lecture about how I can be a better Black Liberal from your <i'm guessing white> perspective , but I don't need a nanny or correction from another older white liberal on why I should just accept racist terminology if directed at an 'unnacceptable' negro.
Don't worry about what i post in reply to soneone else. For some reason people think it's still the seventies and we have to live our lives based on Dr. king and Malcolm X. We don't. I am my own person and quite intelligent enough to bring a fresh perspective on racism, from my own mind. Note: I actually live black. Everyday. Some people just sit around and discuss black from on high. You need to check yourself.
Rilgin
(787 posts)It is true that this is a liberal or progressive site. However,you didn't address your posts at liberals or progressives in your post as you seem to be saying. You only (empasis on only) addressed your point to white liberals.
I do not want you to be a "better Black Liberal". I would just hope that we avoid all racial associations. I actually agree that we should not use the specific pejorative terms you mentioned or any other term. You apparently, believe that it is allowed if you want to use "white" to label a person as part of a group with a pejorative trait. Either that or you do not see that you are implying something every time you use the racial term white in connection with any group. I get it. From reading your posts, your major issue for the world is the problems caused by white people. My ideas are different. I think it is better to discuss policy, ideas and actions rather than discuss group identity.
In other words, again, to put my point in very clear terms, you objected to label someone using a number of specific racial terms then proceeded to label every single white liberal as a hypocrite or racist. That is what I pointed out. I guess you will not or do not want to understand my point.
My lesson has been learned again. Threads are not where people can back down from their major themes.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And if you think about it, in America, white folks haven't exactly been kind to black folks for the majority of the time. My mom was born under segregration. Stop and frisk. The prison industrial complex. Those policies are created by white folks and they target black folks. That is my problem. That is my issue. You can complain that i say White, but you cannot say i'm lying.
You post enough to understand your points fully and the focus of your attentions.
I post fairly infrequently and actually try to stay away from threads like this although it is something I think about. There is more risk that I will say something that comes out wrong. However, I will try to explain further.
Your use of that quote, in particular, aroused me. I posted a true story about a long term friend, ally of my mother who severed all ties because he was joining a group who saw her as the "devil". This was just about the time of that quote and obviously was connected to the separatist and black Muslim political movements as a subset of the civil rights movement. That individual later apologized because his association was wrong.
With respect to segregation, stop and frisk, the creation of the prison system, there is 0 connection to my family or relatives. My relatives were european and russian jews and had their own problems.
When you say "white folks" haven't been particularly kind, you are talking about a history that I am not connected to yet you are making that connection for every white person including me. I also have no power or ability create policy that is currently racist or has racial effects. I have neither money or power. That is the problem with using white people as a group or trying to get people to accept responsibility for acts of other people based on your association. There are people who have power and those who do not. There are people who abuse others and those who do not. I am no more responsible for segregation or stop and frisk then you.
I do see you use "black" a lot but have not seen a post of your where you give a black person reading the post a choice of perjoratives. They can either be a racist or hypocrite as per the quote you posted with approval. I also do not see you post with the implication, goal or theory that a particular black person should take responsibility for anything done by any other black person.
Again to compare apples to apples, I again told about my childhood and being held up/mugged on the street numerous times. Three times by knife, once by baseball bat. Yet you had nothing to do with those muggings. I would not draft a post that said "black people" robbed me or which tried to get you to take responsibility for those actions only because your skin color was the same as the robbers. In fact, the opposite, it is one of the struggles of my life to fight any bias caused by those childhood interactions.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You don't like the quote? Too bad. I can't help you there. That was my response to another quote by the same person. People are who they are, they say what they say.
You may not be directly responsible for anything. I am not either. But I suffer. Just for my color. That's enough for me to speak out.
You have the ability to move freely through society without judgement. For you to get all upset at me because of something that happened years before I was born is weird. Something somebody said years ago in your house has nothing to do with me at all. That is personal.
I do say that racism is a problem white people need to work on. I suffer from it, they benefit from my loss. Get it?
Pretty much said all I had to say. Its not the quote, It is your support of what is in the quote in labeling people on the basis of race in a pejorative way. Is it your view that all white liberals are"racists" or "hypocrites"? if not, why post the quote as being valid. Would that not be better to address as the wrong way to use race even though its about 'white people'. Taking your advice from numerous threads would you say the same sentence about "black people" or label them in that fashion? If not is it not wrong to do about any other group.
Yes, racism, bigotry and bad social policy are bad and should not be supported by anyone. Inequality in many areas seems to be the major issue that will be fought by people seeking social and economic justice. However, "white people" do not need to work on anything. People of all types have fought those battles in the past (including me) and need to get together to fight the current battles. Get it. People. People who are the enemy of solutions to societal problems are not white people, they also are people. Just misinformed people.
I need to work on my individual and societal biases. However, you are the same. You have your own bias and bigotry that shows when you use the word "White People". I get that your issue is described by you as you suffer and lose because of white people without looking at individual actions or policies. Labeling problems as caused by white people. I just think it is a limiting view and not consistent with obtaining a fair and equal society.
My last post. I am off for the day. I have tried to be direct but hopefully have not been too direct or offensive individually. I am sure you have heard the same thing from others. My guess is this thread will just help me identify better my views on race and will again be written off by you as "inane". Anyhow, take care.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)I do not insult like that because it helps nothing. However my question is is it ever an accurate though negative description of someone's behavior?
Colin Powell supported the Bush administration far too much when he knew better, perhaps trying to stay in their good graces so he could do other things which were decent, like support condom use (Vs) the terms you reference in your OP. The first gives more info on what actions ofhos I am basing my argument on, the second is many only to insult by picking on his skin color.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Just like how I hate the word Cracker, or Honkey. It sounds stupid and I cannot fix my lips to use those words. Besides, I have white family who may get their feelings hurt just so I can insult somebody. I think that kinda wrong.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Would I use a word to someone's face? Like my black family members or white family members. Or gay family members. Or my friends and neighbors. Would I call my friend an Uncle Tom because he is s conservative or would I refer to a gay nephew as miss.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And I feel weird around people who do. I just walk away after saying my piece.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)their own interests and it seems better to clearly describe their behavior than sink to insults based on race, or gender, or other category. We are all more than a simple category. Why insult except to hurt, which tells me more about the person insulting than they may wish.
I don't know how anyone can say an insult based on skin color is not racist, how attributing behavior like your OP examples is not racism.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Some people just can't let it go. They want to keep some bigoted insults and just pretend that the implied and obvious bigotry is not real for some reason.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)the proper term, the ones in your OP are not ever accurate. Thank you for continuing to reply to people, you made the answer clear for me.
Calling people hypocritical, hypocrites is right. Not the terms in the op.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)I knew he was lying to the UN. You think he didn't know.
He also was involved in My Lai coverup.
He tried to stay in their good graces because he liked the position of power.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)handmade34
(22,756 posts)are a sad excuse to avoid needed dialogue and true action
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Best way to discuss nothing.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Response to bravenak (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Though I have called myself a redneck but it's more of a deflection like yeah I'm a redneck so what.
A few years ago because of a series of unfortunate events I found myself pumping gas with a bleeding goat tied up in the back of my pickup, blood dripping out the back of the truck. I forgot to put my teeth in in the rush to get the goat to the vet. And I had goat pee and shit on my jeans. And I was wearing fluffy slippers. One of the fellas I knew from the feed store was pumping gas at the time and told me you can't get anymore redneck. I didn't take it personally. But I would take offense if someone who did not have on boots covered with cow shit call me that.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Like, are we trying to out the guy or just being nasty bigots on that one? Either way, wtf i that all about. I do not care about his sex life.
I have met rednecks, but they were black. All about horses, hunting, and stuff I could not understand like guns and vehicles. So, basically they were just dudes who liked hunting and guns. But they say they 're rednecks. Maybe they know better than me what that is.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)I'm not fond of his politics but when they burnt him in effigy down in SC it made me sick.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/07/23/109209/terry-graham/
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They just hate so much, they can't let any perceived difference exist without madness. Crazy people.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)to watch him burn in effigy. They are sick people.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Period.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Not comparable to Uncle TOm, because there is omething wrong with blacks (you can throw Bill Cosby into the mix) denigrating black people.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)I despise the language police as the worst sort of creeping fascism.
I disagree that calling black people who support racist policies with the terms Uncle Tom, House Negro, Aunt Jemima, or token is racist. That would be like saying a person who refers to people who support NRA gun policy with the terms Gun Nut, ammo sexual, etc. as supporting NRA gun policy.
It is a misuse of the word racist.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)You deplore the "language police" ... then, state: "It is a misuse of the word racist."
Well alrighty then, Okay, Mr./Ms. Officer!
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)I'll take that as agreement.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)you decry the "Language Police", then in the next breath, attempt to tell someone that the/a term is misused ... because YOU think so.
Please self-Reflect.
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)enlightened?
lol
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)It's your choice.
While slightly amusing, your noting that my pique at the misuse of language glosses over the point that the OP is trying to play the GOP canard of calling anyone who notes racist behavior as racist.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Please!
Your pique at the misuse of language, while lamenting the Language Police ... get what I am "amusing" you, slightly, about.
Calling a Black person an uncle tom is NOT noting that Black person's racism ... it's noting that Black person's being overly servile to white folks.
And, as the OP notes, in the main, if it is racist for someone to call a Black person that will like, an uncle tom; it is, equally, as racist to call a Black person that we don't like, an uncle tom.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Hmmm.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)and I believe you're being ... what was the term ... Deliberately Obtuse.
Is it because you want the liberty to use racist terms against Black people you don't like ... Just like Malcolm?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)another thread posted by an African American member of DU saying something is racist, another poster making it about themselves. How is calling out racists fascist?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Fascist is the new black.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Not allowed.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)I know they hate facts
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But, u knew that, though.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)all for you.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)How can insults based on race NOT be racist? Calling them hypocrites is not racist.
Your comparison doors not make sense to me. You seem to be saying "a person who refers to black people who support racist policies the insults in the OP as supporting racism".
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)However, can insults based on race NOT be racist? Yes. Insults based on race can also be racist. It depends on the usage and the context.
Calling them hypocrites is not racist. True. No argument there.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)I copied from your post, the last sentence that you say doesn't make sense, but substituted black and the racist for NRA supporter and gun but. It makes the same sense your sentence did.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)You will of course, explain precisely how it's a misuse of the word (premise, objective support, conclusion rather than a simplistic and vague analogy) for those of us not quite as enlightened as you, yes?
Or is asking for an answer merely supporting your little Language Police Industrial Complex?
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)The OP said, "Calling folks Uncle Toms, House Negroes, Aunt Jemima's and other similar terminology is racist."
By "folks", the OP is referring to black people who support racist groups and policies, such as a black person voting for David Duke, or a black person supporting stop-and-frisk or other Republican policies.
Now for Benedict Arnold. Using the OP's complaint as the pattern, "Calling someone a Benedict Arnold is treasonous." Obviously the speaker is using the term "treasonous" incorrectly. Calling someone a Benedict Arnold is calling someone a traitor. Just as calling someone an Uncle Tom is calling them a particularly despicable form of racist.
The previous is a counter example showing the OP's misuse of the term racist.
The OP is unhappy with the terms, but his or her unhappiness does not make the terms in and of themselves racist. In fact, it is the exact opposite, and is similar to the stupid argument by some Republicans that calling out racist behavior is racist behavior.
People use the terms to call out a black person who acts subservient to white people. It does not imply that black are racially inferior. It implies the exact opposite of that. It means that we should look down upon black people who behave in a subservient manner to white people because black people should be equal to white people.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)And here:
I think I see the problem here ... you don't know what you are talking about. Calling someone (a Black person) an "uncle tom" is NOT calling them a racist.
And the terms have their origin is racism.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)From good old Wikipedia
The phrase "Uncle Tom" has also become an epithet for a person who is slavish and excessively subservient to perceived authority figures, particularly a black person who behaves in a subservient manner to white people; or any person perceived to be complicit in the oppression of their own group.(block quote mine)[1][2] The negative epithet is the result of later works derived from the original novel.
I'll stand by my usage of the term Uncle Tom.
Are you telling me that a black person who promotes racism (Uncle Tom) isn't a racist?
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Yes ... I am telling you that a Black person complicit in the oppression of other Black people is NOT a racist.
That complicit Black person may be serving as a agent of racism, but because he/she is not supported by the institutions/cultures (though his actions may be), he/she does not have the capacity to be a racist.
To extend a (imperfect) sports analogy ... just because I kick the ball into my own team's goal doesn't make me a member of the other team.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)in his/her expertise on the term.
ETA: But more, see Post 249.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)While I am just as much of an amateur as you are when it comes to the use of the specific word "racism", I am somewhat of an expert when it comes to general style and usage of the parts of speech. The OP is misusing the specific adjective, "racist", and my examples demonstrate that point.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)and that's irrelevant. Have you worked as a sociologist? Or in anti-racism education?
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Your credentials.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)It's just as fitting, without the racist overtones.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Kurska
(5,739 posts)Why people don't get that is a racist concept continues to mystify me.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)If that is the case, and we have to maintain a stereotype, then I don't precisely act black enough in my daily life. I cannot sing.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)but I do wiggle, a little bit!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)We are just not acceptable Negros.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)I've been accused by racists that I am white trying to act black. I've corrected them by saying I believe I am actually a Cuban salsa dancer trapped in an old white woman's body. I love to dance. I love music. All kinds of music. I dance for any reason.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Hell yeah! I dance all the time too. It took me years to find a piece of rhythm. But now, I can dance and forget where I am. Still can do my turns like a pro. It's all about those ankles.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)I dropped it like it was hot it stayed there my friend had to lift me back up
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I was listening to some old ass little Wayne, you know the part where he repeats 'drop it like it 's hot , drop drop it like it 's hot!' I swear to god my knee went out on the up swing. I couldn't figure out what to do, it hurt so bad, I just fell over on the floor. My kids were like 'mommy, what's wrong?'
I just said, ' mommy's old, leave me alone...' Laid there for a while.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)I can just picture the kids. That made my day
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I have pics on facebook I think. One day u can stop by and take a look.
Kurska
(5,739 posts)As a random white person on the Internet, I possess all the qualities required to endow you with your blackness.
Go forth, go forth and be black.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I was super worried no one would approve me.
Kurska
(5,739 posts)Well probably not the exact same thing, that'd be kinda odd.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Those that do truly are racist. Because a certain race does not act like a certain group thinks they should, then that group gets the label. It is racist on many levels. Those who use the word also have no understanding that they are supporting a racist stereotype. If they don't think the same then they really aren't a part of said group. They are less-thans. It is about more than ideology and intelligence, it is a direct shot that they aren't "black enough."
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I have been accused of that many times. There is no hive mind function.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Like what? Huh? What's that mean?
I'd rather a white person drop an n-bomb than say that to me . . . "Well you aren't black like that!".
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They can't. But I do like to keep asking for an explanation. It makes me think they are classifying us in some way. Good negroes, bad negroes. Like we're fruit.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)for female republicans either.
i have my grievances with powell that i can state without resorting to racist speech (he lied to the UN for instance.)
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Just LIAR! And stuff like that. Best I could do.
I think some people do it for fun. Argue this, I mean.
brer cat
(24,578 posts)"no idea why anyone is arguing this at all."
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Context makes a difference.
What do these terms actually mean? They refer to a black person who cow tows to white handlers. If you call Clarence Thomas an Uncle Tom, it's a generalized but not completely inappropriate description. It's obviously meant to hurt.... because of its racist leanings.... but I'm not so sure the user MUST be a racist. Calling Michelle Obama an Aunt Jemima is indeed MORE racists because that doesn't describe her behavior at all, unlike Clarence Thomas.
The terms are meant to hurt and be controversial, and therefore are not very PC. But assuming anyone who uses them for any reason is a total racist is...well.... kinda racist.
But, pointing out the complexities of such terms and their use, I know, upsets the "I'm outraged....see how cool I am" apple cart and gives the PC police a great opportunity to play armchair psychologist.
Still.... they are terms meant to hurt and are, of course, racist in origin. We all knew that.... including the people using such terms.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Not everybody thinks of etymology and historical usage. Better to end the race based insults than to try to hold on the the right to use them. Sure, everybody has the right. But it's hurtful, ignorant and imo racist even if the target is a republican.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)Although I have no qualms about labeling most black conservatives as panderers and some as even crazy, I never use that sort of language against them.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And they look stupid too.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)Or any variation thereof
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)eom
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)Or are you a white person telling a person of color how to feel OR define racist terminology?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)this Language Police hater clearly does not know what he/she is talking about.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Iggo
(47,558 posts)Hide thread...
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)Iggo
(47,558 posts)kickysnana
(3,908 posts)..no matter how wrong, innocent or assinine the OP or the objectors reasons are. Cause getting this right is the only thing we need to do to make things right and building artificial walls to communication always results in progress.
Truth is I am too old to fight/play these time wasting mind games again so I won't no matter what guilt trip you try to lay on me this time. (And stay off the lawn!)
bravenak
(34,648 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)not because you shouldn't speak; but because you refuse to listen.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)But you see it here in post after post after post.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It's true. They hate people who look like me and have since the beginning. Try to take my vote. My birth control. Stop gay weddings. Call me names. Yell at children at the border. Bundy Ranch . Fox News. They are standing in the way of progress.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)The leaders are men. That's why.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Your prejudice is showing.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Bullcrap. Republican's don't let women be leaders of men. Look at congress. Dem woman is leader of house democrats. Can't even imagine a republican woman speaker of the house.
kcass1954
(1,819 posts)He was grounded for a week. And he had to write a letter to our father (AF pilot who was tdy) and tell him what he did.
mom explained that he was in trouble because he tried to use negro as a slur, that there was nothing wrong with being one.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Nothing wrong with it at all.
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)folks who vote against their economic interest due to the mistaken belief that some of the Koch Bros wealth will trickle down to them if they just keep minorities oppressed. The second term is also used to refer to any white person who is poor in America, as if to say that the only reason any white person in this country might be poor is because he/she (usually a she and often a child) is so lazy and worthless.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I do not use such language and will not teach my kids to do so.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)C'mon DUers, we're better than that. Bad enough that such stuff would get posted, inexcusable that it should survive a jury.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)clearly it is ... Not only survive a jury, but actively defended.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It's human to be this way. Humans are weird.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Then when they interbreed and become monsters, they'd come back to kill us all.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)still_one
(92,219 posts)Better characterizes it
There are examples where individuals were given a helping hand, though those same individuals do not want to help others in the same situation
The "I got mine", too bad for you is typical of the Republican Party platform today.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)6000eliot
(5,643 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)When people say that in my presence I just ask them if they even know what they're talking about. I can think of many terms for Condi Rice, like War Criminal and Prisoner No2047; Clarence Thomas should be Mr. Impeached, but calling a person at the pinnacle of power a slave epithet is just stupid. It's how they justify being below someone black. Yeah, keep thinking that Jethro.
People mimic what they hear. I've been called some interesting things, but they were never very creative. When people stop perpetuating racist tropes, hopefully they will die out. This thread is helping make that faster. Thanks.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)We should be more creative like that. I agree with yr entire post.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)It has been excellent and you have been an incredible host. I am going to keep Mr. Impeached and I leave you with this thank you gift.
[url=https://imgflip.com/i/g3myu][img][/img][/url]
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He would look even better in an orange jumpsuit.
Thanks.
jmondine
(1,649 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)Feral Child
(2,086 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)being a legitimate black person.
Just, no.
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)is part of the problem. There are just people, no?
kath
(10,565 posts)Note this line: "All Blacks who called themselves Republicans must sellout their culture and race to tow the party line."
http://www.salon.com/2002/10/25/belafonte/
bravenak
(34,648 posts)We even have dark skin light skin wars. I'm going to avoid it.
Are we also selling out our race when we vote for race baiting dems against a republican, is what I'd like to know. Feels like it.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)Quackers
(2,256 posts)Any insult that is used in relation to someone's skin color is racist.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)rpannier
(24,330 posts)Good post
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Sissyk
(12,665 posts)but would just like to say I agree with you completely.
My son is black. My husband and I were given this wonderful human life when his parents were killed by a drunk driver. We are both white, and his older brother is white. My son spends as much time as he wants, and always has, with his uncle and other black family members. We are all fortunate to live in the same area where this has always been possible.
I say that, to say this.
My son's uncle has taught him to think about how he would feel to be called any of those words. He has taught him that to be equal, he must act and live equal. He has taught him that politics is not the way to live your life for just as many democrats as repubs are racist; and that your political affiliation does not define who you are as a person. He has also banned him from using the n word, and nigga, will his black friends; and has taught him not to let his white friends use that towards him, even in "friendship". He is not a POC that feels those words used in that context, or any context, are harmless.
I don't participate much on threads because I don't feel (even with a black son) that I can speak for the POC on this site. I've spent the years since we were blessed with our son learning and still have a lot to learn.
Thanks for this thread, bravenak!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You sound like a wonderful mother. I'm glad he has you guys to love him.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)I haven't been reading much in GD these days, so I don't know which post(s) such disgusting terminology has appeared in - but, DAMN. What the hell is wrong with peoples' heads?
If you must express disdain for a Black Republican, then attack their statements and/or actions, not their race, for cripessakes.
Denzil_DC
(7,242 posts)on GD that blatantly referred to President Obama as "an Uncle Tom" (that was pretty much all the comment said) because the time limit had lapsed. For all I know, it might have survived a jury already, but I hope not. In the end, I just alerted it to admins. I'm not aware of any action being taken, but at least they received a heads up for future reference.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)There are so many things we can say. It never ends. GD is weird.
I have not found the time to read all these comments. I choose to call Clarence Thomas an pompous, self-righteous asshole, I do not think that has racist overtones at all. You can describe someone's offensive behavior without addressing race, gender or religion.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)There is never a good situation to use those terms. I stopped reading Ted Rall comics over this issue and I lost a lot of respect for Alan Colmes when he couldn't bring himself to say a bad word about Ted Rall and people who were using racist terms against Condi Rice and Colin Powell. It's disgusting I don't care who does it. I don't like people saying Mann Coulter either it's just weird and has nothing to do with the bile that comes out of her mouth. I am not even sure I like when people compair other people to animals. That's weird especially when many of those people that do that treat animals better than they treat some people.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I liked the Coultergeist. That was funny.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)and it would apply no matter what color, gender, or creed she is.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)brer cat
(24,578 posts)I can't believe it took 225 posts until La Lioness Priyanka said the obvious: "no idea why anyone is arguing this at all." I have been away today, and couldn't believe it when I waded into this thread.
It makes me want to cry to realize how many people on this liberal, progressive, democratic site are still clueless about racism. And the same goes for name-calling people like Graham and Mann.
I admire you for posting the thread and keeping your cool through it. I just greatly regret that there was a need for it.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I try to not get frustrated. Really hard.
alp227
(32,034 posts)persuades. thanks for this post!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They use it against us with relish!
4dsc
(5,787 posts)and if the description fits then so be it. Most people are clueless to the meaning of the word.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)Uncle Tom has a specific historical meaning, whereas Aunt Jemima is a demeaning caricature. I have often suspected people who use the term Uncle Tom, in their ignorance, are thinking of a certain brand of rice.
I think it's important to examine and expose the latent racism deeply embedded in our culture. It's everywhere, and what lingers just beneath the surface is perhaps the most pernicious. But on the other hand, I'm not in favor of a wholesale watering down of language. I remember how powerful it was when Harry Belafonte said this about Colin Powell:
Theres an old saying in the days of slavery, there are those slaves who lived on the plantation, and there were those slaves who lived in the house. You got the privilege of living in the house if you served the master to exactly the way the master intended to have you serve him. That gave you privilege. Colin Powell is permitted to come into the house of the master, as long as he will serve the master according to the masters dictates. Now, when Colin Powell dares to suggest something other than what the master wants to hear, he will be turned back out to pasture.
Whether you agree with this or not, I would not have wanted Belafonte to have to struggle to find gentler words to get his message across.
It reminds me of George Carlin's routine about "soft language", which I think is relevant here:
bravenak
(34,648 posts)George Carlin was a funny guy, but he was not my idol. Both terms are meant to be demeaning and it is always white folks who decide the meaning of things for us. I have had plenty of white folks go to the dictionary that was written in the age of eugenics to try to prove a word was not racist like the word nigger. They always have such a succinct explanation of why it's okay for them to say, either because some black people say it and they want to say it too or because our feelings related to that nasty language are not as important as their explaining why it should not be hurtful and them being able to use it without fear of being called racist.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)Clearly, Uncle Tom is a demeaning and insulting thing to call someone. It's going to sting and leave a mark. I also think, as applied to someone such as Clarence Thomas, it's completely fair and richly deserved. If I understand you correctly, you're saying that 100% of the time, use of the term Uncle Tom is racist, and I disagree.
Again, Uncle Tom has a specific historical meaning and it's important to know it's significance. It's not like pulling out an old dictionary and splitting hairs over word origins. Not at all.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)If you read it you would realize that Uncle Tom was a good man.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)But the significance of the character was not that he was a good man.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It was the POINT of the novel.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)What he came to represent. That is important.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Think about it. To black people who actually READ the book, it does not mean that. The majority decides what Uncle Tom meant to them and that idea spread back down to us.
It was made derogatory on purpose. Uncle Tom was a popular character who helped the abolitionist movement, not the slave movement. It was written by an abolitionist. It was made derogatory on purpose. Can't have a black man be too popular.
Uncle Tom was who he was. A good man. Like in the book you say you read that had him as an unsympathetic character, but in the real book he died to allow others to escape to freedom.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)i.e. James Baldwin. Many others.
Look, I'm not trying to disrespect your opinion. I'm just giving my viewpoint, but I think it's always good to reexamine our beliefs and I will think about what you said.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I am allowed to see it differently. I'm lucky.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)At this point Tom Loker returns to the story. Loker has changed as the result of being healed by the Quakers. George, Eliza, and Harry have also obtained their freedom after crossing into Canada. In Louisiana, Uncle Tom almost succumbs to hopelessness as his faith in God is tested by the hardships of the plantation. However, he has two visions, one of Jesus and one of Eva, which renew his resolve to remain a faithful Christian, even unto death. He encourages Cassy to escape, which she does, taking Emmeline with her. When Tom refuses to tell Legree where Cassy and Emmeline have gone, Legree orders his overseers to kill Tom. As Tom is dying, he forgives the overseers who savagely beat him. Humbled by the character of the man they have killed, both men become Christians. Very shortly before Tom's death, George Shelby (Arthur Shelby's son) arrives to buy Toms freedom but finds he is too late.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)why even bother explaining the truth of it when the ears and hearts are dull? i don't for a second believe the poster above ever read uncle tom's cabin.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I must have a passion for it or something. I don't think very many people read it who use the term. It shows.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)Maybe you didn't read it, but I did. In any event, you clearly missed my very valid point. Entirely.
I was trying to respectfully disagree and offer a different view, whereas you are rudely calling me a liar, and not even having the decency to say it to my face. I think that says more about you than me.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)because you learned nothing.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)Why don't you tell me specifically what I failed to learn from Uncle Tom's Cabin and how it negates the points I made above. You know, since you've got that that superior comprehension and all.
And maybe you could also explain why many important black writers and activists came to despise the character of Uncle Tom? Were their ears and hearts dull? Did they lack comprehension?
Go ahead, explain. I'll wait...
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)incidently, i was not required to read "uncle tom's cabin" in school. i read it because i wanted to read it. and don't you dare talk to me about "despised" characters in communities of color when the "despising" is conditioned and set with propaganda to instill reverse racism and the "sellout" or "throw the dog a bone" divisive tools planted in communities of color.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)I mean, maybe my poor reading comprehension is preventing me from absorbing your wisdom but that was quite a word salad.
I expected a substance-free non-answer, but holy cow.
7962
(11,841 posts)And its seen here a LOT. I alerted on an OP calling Ben Carson an "Oreo". I bet you can guess; it was not hidden.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)We'll just have to keep repeating it over and over until it sinks in properly. Sometimes people need time to think it over.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Hekate
(90,714 posts)Yeeeeeeesh, the cluelessness, it burns.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)The people who haven't read the book crack me up.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)someone's race, gender, creed, sexuality, etc., it is broadbrushing and hurtful.
By making such statements, you are taking away the persons individuality, and grouping them into stereotypes, or preconceived biases.
Taking away anyone's individuality, and treating them as a separate class of group, is always hurtful, and always wrong.
I just don't understand why it's so difficult to comprehend this.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Saying shit like that is, in essence, saying that black people cannot possibly have individual thoughts, feelings and opinions.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Like if they don't vote for us, they're not really black. So, we can insult them as we please. In every way. Crazy.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)I'm not sure why you even needed to point this out. My heart is sinking, and my stomach clenching, as I consider the possibilities.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But, some people want to hold on to it. It makes no sense.
Farmbrook
(48 posts)Because this has to do with one's politics and behavior rather than the person. Besides who are you to say the terminology is racist. That is your opinion, end of story.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But since you have THAT attitude, expect people to call you whatever they please with a straight face. Fair is fair.
Farmbrook
(48 posts)Because this has to do with one's politics and behavior rather than the person. Besides who are you to say the terminology is racist. That is your opinion, end of story.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)As a black woman that is my Talent. Now, burn up off the block!
Inkfreak
(1,695 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Some needed an explanation and others are on the wrong Board.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Some were very cool and listened to me plead my case. I'm feeling positive. As for the others... Either they'll change or get told how they sound.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)I've been informed right here on DU that it's all in the context.
Shit I once served on a jury where a long term DU'er called someone a House Negro and the majority let the post stand. * that was the exact moment my black ass stopped being a paying member of DU *
You title an OP "I hate niggers. That is all" and again a majority let it stand.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I was told by a very 'serious' person right here, on DU, TBH. But since he's on vacay, i decided to decide for myself. Crazy concept.