General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLocal upstate NY Congressman announced this is his last term, a self imposed term limit so that
he can run for higher office in 2016.
No big deal except the local GOP buzz is that Gillbrand will not be in the Senate after 2016. I believe her term runs to 2018.
I have heard 2 reasons. She will leave to run as VP and the other reason is she will challenge Hillary and Hillary drops out.
Mass
(27,315 posts)She would not need to leave the Senate to run for President in 2016.
Not sure why Gibson quit (he is too moderate for the GOP anyway), and I doubt he could be able to win a state primary.
Did he say he wants to run for higher office?
http://atr.rollcall.com/house-races-2016-chris-gibson-retirement/
This article says he is interested to run in 2018, though I have the same reservation on whether he could win a primary (and it is an anonymous source, so who knows whether it is more than rumors).
CK_John
(10,005 posts)run for statewide office.
There is no Constitutional prohibition against the President and Vice President being from the same state.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)No way can a Democratic ticket throw away NY votes. So, while true the Constitution does not say they can't -- for all practical purposes, they can't. (If they were both from VT - they could win without the states small number of electoral votes.)
Forgot that part.
http://www.snopes.com/history/american/vicepresident.asp
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)He was a legal resident of Texas (same as Bush) right up until only days before he was officially nominated as VP. There was even a lawsuit about it that was dismissed by a Reagan judge while the whole Florida debacle was going on another travesty of that election that doesn't get much attention.
http://amarillo.com/stories/2000/12/02/tex_judgedis.shtml
All she'd have to do is resign and change her residency before the Electoral College meets in December 2016. (That judge ruled in 2004 that it only matters where the candidate resides on the day the EC meets and not at any time before.)
karynnj
(59,504 posts)The Democrats COULD have raised the issue then -- likely had they thought Cheney a strong VP - they could have questioned it. When the issue was raised - it almost seemed after the fact - and thus not quite fair to apply.
I suspect that it could be more an issue if you had an elected representative of NY.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)(Or what remains of it due to redistricting)?
I'd love to see this as a Dem pickup.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)adigal
(7,581 posts)Groan.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)Stefanik is their new shiny thing.
adigal
(7,581 posts)First woman President on the Republican side. She has never really done anything at all, so there's very little dirt on her. No real job, no husband, no kids. Nothing. Lived off Mommy and Daddy, was supposedly a "manager" for their business. But she will show her true Tea Party crazy ass colors.
JI7
(89,252 posts)CK_John
(10,005 posts)EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)On Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:31 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Local upstate NY Congressman announced this is his last term, a self imposed term limit so that
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026048577
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Admitidly posting "GOP Buzz" and "GOP Rumors"on DU. This one is a little to knowledgable about the subject.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jan 6, 2015, 05:39 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: FFS
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Huh?
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Uh what? I make it a point to skim GOP sites, even Freep and WND, frequently...know thine enemy
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: to vs too much fail.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Jesus lord, if we're actually against posting speculation (which will be half the posts in GD in the coming year) GD is going to become a very lonely place.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Who cares?