Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 02:50 AM Jan 2015

Judge: Carlyle Group 'calling the shots' with Montana water company

Source: Missoulian

The Carlyle Group appeared to be "calling the shots" when it came to at least one proposed transaction with Mountain Water Co., Judge Karen Townsend said Thursday.

In Missoula County District Court, the judge heard global equity firm Carlyle's arguments that it should be dismissed from the eminent domain case the city filed against it and the water company.

Townsend did not issue a ruling Thursday.

... The eminent domain trial is set for March 18. In the end, the city aims to gain ownership of its drinking water system.

Read more: http://missoulian.com/news/local/judge-carlyle-calling-the-shots-with-mountain-water-co/article_3405a8d5-40d7-5d2d-aba5-b5144f74ee76.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge: Carlyle Group 'calling the shots' with Montana water company (Original Post) Newsjock Jan 2015 OP
evil stuff. NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #1
Thank you for posting this, Newsjock. FormerOstrich Jan 2015 #2
 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
1. evil stuff.
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 04:25 AM
Jan 2015

In Missoula County District Court, the judge heard global equity firm Carlyle's arguments that it should be dismissed from the eminent domain case the city filed against it and the water company...the judge quizzed lawyer Bill Mercer on his claim that Carlyle Infrastructure Partners should not be a defendant in the case. Carlyle earlier made a similar claim, and the judge ruled against it.

Mercer argued the city can't point to any property – "not a truck, not a pipe, nothing" – that Carlyle owns in Missoula. Rather, he said, Mountain Water is the named owner of the assets and water rights the city wants.

"If the city is successful, it would be Mountain that gets paid. Carlyle won't get paid anything," said Mercer, of Holland and Hart in Billings.

Said Townsend: "So Carlyle is not expecting to get any money for Mountain Water from the sale of this? Really?"

Carlyle has argued it should not be party to the lawsuit because it's not a property owner in Montana, but is instead an "upstream owner."

Mountain Water is owned by Park Water in California, and those utilities along with a third in California comprise Western Water Holdings of Carlyle Infrastructure.

In response to the judge, Mercer pointed to Mountain's parent company in California.

"Again, Park Water owns those three utilities. So if this condemnation was successful, then that money would go to Park," he said.

Said Townsend: "Then, it would go on up a line to you, right?"

Mercer stumbled in response, but he eventually agreed.

"It certainly, I'm not going to deny, it's sort of. Yeah, I mean, that's right. It's like any other corporate structure," Mercer said.

However, he reiterated the argument that an upstream, equity owner is distinct from a property owner.


The eminent domain trial is set for March 18. In the end, the city aims to gain ownership of its drinking water system.

FormerOstrich

(2,702 posts)
2. Thank you for posting this, Newsjock.
Fri Jan 9, 2015, 04:35 AM
Jan 2015

I wish I knew more about the details or had more time to find more of the details. Unfortunately, it seems my current employer thinks all my time belongs to them. But I digress...

The eminent domain trial is set for March 18. In the end, the city aims to gain ownership of its drinking water system.


I hope the city prevails. From what I read, I think the judge has Carlyle's number.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge: Carlyle Group 'cal...