Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
197 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
African Americans are targeted by racist, white cops, routinely...Period (Original Post) randys1 Jan 2015 OP
It is undeniable that some cops are racists. Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2015 #2
The NYPD is 51% white Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2015 #15
You are wrong oberliner Jan 2015 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2015 #19
The Mentality of all cops can be scary stuff, but we have to deal with the racism first, well randys1 Jan 2015 #22
Who else would racist, white cops target? GGJohn Jan 2015 #3
Probably gays and Jews. I have never seen a racist that loved Jews or Gays. Or women. bravenak Jan 2015 #24
Fair enough. GGJohn Jan 2015 #27
Understood. bravenak Jan 2015 #29
Bigots and racists are, IMO, equally vile and should be called out with every opportunity. eom GGJohn Jan 2015 #31
They are IMO equally vile and should be called out and shamed. bravenak Jan 2015 #38
I completely agree. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #64
Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #60
It has been used in a narrow way for a long time. Chemisse Jan 2015 #89
Narrow? ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #96
Narrow, as in its use is primarily to describe white bigotry against blacks, Hispanics, Jews, etc Chemisse Jan 2015 #99
You have pin-pointed what the social scientists use ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #104
But its effects are far different. NYC Liberal Jan 2015 #136
Good points. That probably explains some of the confusion over the term. arcane1 Jan 2015 #147
I could be persuaded of this if you were talking about who cbayer Jan 2015 #97
Now, that response makes no sense ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #137
Because I don't define racism as power based victimization. cbayer Jan 2015 #164
So where is this institutional privilege that ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #170
I did not make the case that that existed, although it may in small settings. cbayer Jan 2015 #173
Exactly. bravenak Jan 2015 #133
To be racist you have to be in a position of power.. VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #33
Bullshit, you don't need to be in any position of power to be a racist or a bigot, GGJohn Jan 2015 #39
Good luck! This poster is determined to smear as many DUers as possible today. arcane1 Jan 2015 #47
If that's the intention, GGJohn Jan 2015 #48
The phrase "crash and burn" comes to mind n/t arcane1 Jan 2015 #49
Crash and burn LOLLLLLLLL boy you have one hell of a funny definition of that... randys1 Jan 2015 #67
Just in case there is some confusion: arcane1 Jan 2015 #101
Social Scientist disagree with your opinion ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #63
It's all opinion and my opinion is that anyone can be a racist or bigot. GGJohn Jan 2015 #66
Yes, it's all opinion ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #88
YES, randys1 Jan 2015 #68
Well why don't you just enlighten us as to the important reason, GGJohn Jan 2015 #70
You really dont know? You dont know why and how racism works and who has that power randys1 Jan 2015 #77
Yes, again, racism isn't confined to one specific race, anyone can be a racist or a bigot, GGJohn Jan 2015 #83
It is impossible for a white person to experience racism in America, they can experience bigotry randys1 Jan 2015 #106
Bullshit. eom. GGJohn Jan 2015 #107
Haven't we had this dance before? ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #110
My opinion is just as valid as anyone else's. GGJohn Jan 2015 #111
Actually, no. All opinions are not equal. I know this is a shock. kwassa Jan 2015 #116
thank you...one has to ask why one would be so invested in demanding that one's outdated, wrong randys1 Jan 2015 #118
Sorry, but I disagree with your post. eom. GGJohn Jan 2015 #119
I win. You have no counter argument. kwassa Jan 2015 #121
Declaring a win, GGJohn Jan 2015 #123
Thank you. kwassa Jan 2015 #128
Flashback ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #132
I know. Here we go again. kwassa Jan 2015 #141
BTW ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #129
No,your opinion is NOT as valid as those of the academics that ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #124
And we get frustrated with climate change "debates" ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #103
You ask them the last time they were pulled over for being white, or followed around a store randys1 Jan 2015 #108
This message was self-deleted by its author 840high Jan 2015 #131
Is this Purity Test Sunday? cherokeeprogressive Jan 2015 #4
Seems to be. eom. GGJohn Jan 2015 #5
The difference is most liberals wouldnt consider that question a purity test. randys1 Jan 2015 #7
There it is again, GGJohn Jan 2015 #9
Yep, there it is again...Disagree? Do a poll, care to make a wager first? randys1 Jan 2015 #10
Sorry, not interested, but you're free to do one. GGJohn Jan 2015 #12
unless you claim to be one while simultaneously denying White male privilege..then you are not truly VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #34
Which I haven't done. eom. GGJohn Jan 2015 #37
Just a simple question, with a question mark at the end of it, you can either answer randys1 Jan 2015 #6
...Period pintobean Jan 2015 #8
Yes, second Sunday of January. NaturalHigh Jan 2015 #127
True enough, but why ask this question? MineralMan Jan 2015 #11
Cops profile, African-Americans are stopped, arrested, sentenced longer JonLP24 Jan 2015 #18
plus one Liberal_in_LA Jan 2015 #25
I dont need to say racist and white together as only white people can be racist in America, but to randys1 Jan 2015 #20
Since the subject is cops, let me add that experience would indicate that the semantics of who Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #23
Racism is a huge problem, no matter who or where it rears it's ugly head, GGJohn Jan 2015 #28
Not according to those that study and publish their observations to peer=reviewed journals. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #138
Am I reading this correctly? Did you say that only white people cbayer Jan 2015 #30
White males specifically....White Male Privilege is a thing... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #35
Well, of course it is a thing, but that doesn't mean that only cbayer Jan 2015 #40
White Privilege and racism are not the exact same thing arcane1 Jan 2015 #42
Uh what?? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #43
I was referring to your statement, not you as a person. Try to read better next time. arcane1 Jan 2015 #44
I don't need to look it up....I just read ^^^ more of it!!! VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #45
I said take it up with the dictionary. Their definition trumps your fabricated one. arcane1 Jan 2015 #46
right yeah...MY "bullshit"... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #50
The dictionary is wrong? And your made-up definition is the right one? You're still at this?? arcane1 Jan 2015 #51
You are incredibly fact-challenged today SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #52
Let me guess....you too! VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #61
When did I say that I was oppressed? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #71
Don't you love words being stuffed in your mouth? eom. GGJohn Jan 2015 #74
When were you oppressed GGJohn? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #78
When did GGJohn say he had been oppressed? SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #81
that is what determines what IS racism....you cannot be a victim...if you are NOT oppressed.... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #82
I never said I was a victim of racism SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #86
One doesn't have to be oppressed AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #184
Oh really? Then if there is no victim...how can there be racism... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #187
Your reply is a bunch of nonsense AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #190
No its not...it is perfectly clear....for there to be such a thing as "racism"....there has to be VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #191
But to be a victim AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #192
WTF does that have to do with any thing.... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #193
It defines what I said originally AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #194
No it doesn't that's hogwash! VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #195
Nothing you say has anything to do with my comments AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #197
What fucking difference does that make? GGJohn Jan 2015 #84
What difference does it make???? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #87
And again, stuffing words into other mouths. GGJohn Jan 2015 #90
No...just unpacking your ridiculous loaded words... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #91
That's all you've been doing throughout this thread, GGJohn Jan 2015 #93
again....you have to have suffered oppression to be a victim of racism or sexism.... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #98
What? GGJohn Jan 2015 #100
and my question to you is....HOW are YOU oppressed? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #105
Now you're not making any fucking sense. GGJohn Jan 2015 #109
I make plenty of sense... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #112
What leads you to believe I'm white? GGJohn Jan 2015 #113
You haven't denied it so far...and I have made the claim over and over... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #114
And I haven't confirmed it either, so because someone doesn't confirm or deny GGJohn Jan 2015 #115
and I explained that.... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #117
Ahh, so you've interviewed every non white citizen in the US. GGJohn Jan 2015 #120
do I have to interview every person of color to know that they are? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #122
I think you'd be surprised. GGJohn Jan 2015 #125
No I don't think so..... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #126
Some folks here AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #186
and thanks...YOU just proved my point! VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #75
Wait! Wut? GGJohn Jan 2015 #79
No your not a victim of racism....because you are not nor have you been oppressed... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #80
Wait. Wut? GGJohn Jan 2015 #85
Go on....please describe how you have been victimized by racism or sexism....since I take it that VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #92
I wouldn't bother SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #94
You're right. GGJohn Jan 2015 #95
Does Wiki trump the peer-reviewed work of social scientists? n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #140
I understand institutionalized racism, but this nut wanted to argue over the definition of the word. arcane1 Jan 2015 #142
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #143
Social scientists do not write dictionaries. arcane1 Jan 2015 #145
True ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #149
Look, we're on the same side here, but that link was about Institutionalized racism arcane1 Jan 2015 #150
Because ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #153
Social scientists disagree on whether "racism" should be defined in the way you favor. Vattel Jan 2015 #157
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #158
I think the ones who deny that blacks can be racist are more like the climate change deniers. Vattel Jan 2015 #160
LOL...Of course you do ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #162
Um, I base my conclusions on my evaluation of the arguments. What do you base yours on? Vattel Jan 2015 #163
I base my thoughts on what has been written in peer reviewed journals ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #168
Try L. Blum's 2002 book: I'm not a racist, but … The moral quandary of race. (Cornell Univ. Press) Vattel Jan 2015 #169
Hmm. bravenak Jan 2015 #177
I was unfamiliar with Blum's work ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #180
Just finished it up. bravenak Jan 2015 #181
I just read the critique ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #182
Exactly what I was thinking. bravenak Jan 2015 #183
From your CNN link: arcane1 Jan 2015 #152
Sigh ... Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #154
He is referring to the definition AgingAmerican Jan 2015 #196
It is based on a power argument JonLP24 Jan 2015 #55
I have never heard this, but I think it's a baseless argument. cbayer Jan 2015 #56
I wouldn't be the best person to describe their argument JonLP24 Jan 2015 #57
I am sorry that I was not clear. I did not think you were trying cbayer Jan 2015 #59
Oops -- I completely misread that JonLP24 Jan 2015 #65
So, I brought up the example above of the intense racism that cbayer Jan 2015 #69
What you are describing is the intense bigotry between the Black and Latino communities ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #144
Not buying it. There are many examples of communities where cbayer Jan 2015 #167
Institutional privilege? ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #172
There is a concerted effort by some to redefine racism. NaturalHigh Jan 2015 #134
Yes, but it is based in what social scientists have been writing for the better part ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #146
I've seen what you have posted. NaturalHigh Jan 2015 #148
And what is your response to climate-change deniers ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #151
Social science and climate science are hardly the same thing. NaturalHigh Jan 2015 #155
Okay ... sighhh. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #156
They need to find another word. cbayer Jan 2015 #165
The peer-reviewed writing of social scientists. 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #139
Well, that's an academic exercise in futility. cbayer Jan 2015 #166
Because???? n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #171
Because you are attempting to redefine a term that has been in use cbayer Jan 2015 #174
Isn't that what academicians do ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #175
They do it but not always successfully. cbayer Jan 2015 #176
This makes me think we are headed to ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #178
So what do you call bigotry based on race where there is no institutional power? cbayer Jan 2015 #179
Yes, because no Hispanic cop could ever possibly hate black people. arcane1 Jan 2015 #36
Or a black cop. I've actually seen that too. bravenak Jan 2015 #41
I recommend you look up the definition of the word racist SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #53
racism = bigotry + societal power, and only white people have that racial societal power randys1 Jan 2015 #62
Like I said, look up the definition of the word racist SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2015 #72
Only in your mind. eom. GGJohn Jan 2015 #76
If you're taking requests... NaturalHigh Jan 2015 #130
"Only white people can be racist in America'?...Even on a one to one level? whathehell Jan 2015 #54
It depends on how you define racism gollygee Jan 2015 #58
I understand that theory. I think it's called "structural racism" whathehell Jan 2015 #102
Agree - you can check the arrest rates in a police department near you JonLP24 Jan 2015 #14
African American cops are targeted SamKnause Jan 2015 #17
That too randys1 Jan 2015 #21
I agree with the statement to some degree, but LWolf Jan 2015 #26
Agred. It's definitely not a good way to generate a discussion. arcane1 Jan 2015 #32
That all depends on what your intentions are. cbayer Jan 2015 #73
Yes true. onecaliberal Jan 2015 #135
"African Americans are targeted by racist, white cops, routinely...Period" BlueJazz Jan 2015 #159
I don't see how that can be denied. nt Live and Learn Jan 2015 #161
They are after all.... KKKops. Stellar Jan 2015 #185
But if a majority of crime in a city is committed by an African American tavernier Jan 2015 #188
There isnt a straw-man big enough for that ridiculous question randys1 Jan 2015 #189

Response to randys1 (Original post)

Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #13)

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
16. You are wrong
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:23 PM
Jan 2015

As of the end of 2010, 53% of the entire 34,526-member police force were white and 47% were members of minority groups. Of 22,199 officers on patrol, 53% (11,717) were black, Latino (of any race), or Asian or Asian-American, and 47% (10,482) were non-Hispanic white. Of 5,177 detectives, 57% (2,953) were white and 43% (2,224) were people of color. Of 4,639 sergeants, 61% (2,841) were white and 39% (1,798) were minorities. Of 1,742 lieutenants, 76% (1,323) were white and 24% (419) were people of color. Of 432 captains, 82% (356) were white and 18% (76) were minorities. Of 10 chiefs, 7 were white and 3 were people of color. In 2002, whites accounted for 60% of members in the rank of police officer. Between 2002 and 2010, the number of minorities in top-tier positions in the force increased by about 4.5%.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_Police_Department#Demographics

Response to oberliner (Reply #16)

randys1

(16,286 posts)
22. The Mentality of all cops can be scary stuff, but we have to deal with the racism first, well
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:33 PM
Jan 2015

actually enforce the 2nd amendment the way it is written, removing ALL guns to regulated militias, then the cops wont have the excuse they now have to be armed to the teeth.

Would go a long way resolving the issues we have with them

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
27. Fair enough.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:45 PM
Jan 2015

But I do vehemently disagree with the OP that only whites can be racists, IMO, anyone can be a racist, white, black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.
Racism is not confined exclusively to white people.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
38. They are IMO equally vile and should be called out and shamed.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:57 PM
Jan 2015

I focus on the power differential a bit more than you, but I agree on the vileness point. Very disordered thinking.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
60. Yes ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:12 PM
Jan 2015
There are many forms of bigotry.


But not just anyone, white, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc., can be a racist ... the term has a specific meaning, that describes a specific form of bigotry.

Chemisse

(30,817 posts)
89. It has been used in a narrow way for a long time.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:43 PM
Jan 2015

But anybody can be racist. It is a general term.

However, it must be difficult, among minority groups, to distinguish racism from the anger, hurt and resentment that arises from being the target of racism.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
96. Narrow? ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:51 PM
Jan 2015
It has been used in a narrow way for a long time. But anybody can be racist. It is a general term.


Or More precise reporting/description of the phenomena?

But no ... even in as a general term, one cannot define a term away from its meaning.

Chemisse

(30,817 posts)
99. Narrow, as in its use is primarily to describe white bigotry against blacks, Hispanics, Jews, etc
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:00 PM
Jan 2015

But the word could be applied to any situation in which people of one race makes negative assumptions about another, and weave them into their culture so as to discriminate against that race.

For example, are blacks racist toward whites in South Africa? (I don't know, but it seems possible). How about Jews against Muslims - or vice versa?

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
104. You have pin-pointed what the social scientists use ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:17 PM
Jan 2015

to distinguish racism and bigotry ... institutional/cultural power.

So ...

are blacks racist toward whites in South Africa? (I don't know, but it seems possible).


No, despite being in the numerical majority (and share in governance), Blacks in South Africa do not have the requisite institutional power to be racist towards white.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
136. But its effects are far different.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 09:19 PM
Jan 2015

Sure you can find individual examples of "racism" from others, but the problem of racism is much larger than individual actions. There is no systemic racism against whites. It does not exist.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
97. I could be persuaded of this if you were talking about who
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:54 PM
Jan 2015

can be a victim of racism. Clearly the power differential makes a huge difference in terms of victimization.

But simply saying that one can not be racist if one is not white in the us makes no sense at all.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
137. Now, that response makes no sense ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 09:20 PM
Jan 2015

If racism is power based victimization, who could a PoC, possibly victimize?

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
164. Because I don't define racism as power based victimization.
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 11:02 AM
Jan 2015

You have made it into a verb, an action, not just a state. That flies in the face of ordinary usage. It doesn't matter what academics say if the general population is using the word in it's traditional sense. Perhaps we need a new word for the victimization part.

Who could a PoC possible victimize? Well, people of another color when they have the privilege, for example.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
173. I did not make the case that that existed, although it may in small settings.
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 12:37 PM
Jan 2015

But there are other people of color. Asian-americans may have some institutional privilege in some communities. Surely you don't think that whites are the only group that ever has or exercises privilege.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
39. Bullshit, you don't need to be in any position of power to be a racist or a bigot,
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:59 PM
Jan 2015

and I've never denied white male privilege exists.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
63. Social Scientist disagree with your opinion ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:16 PM
Jan 2015

since about the beginning of the 21st century, they have reported that the term (racism) has a specific meaning, that describes a specific form of bigotry.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
66. It's all opinion and my opinion is that anyone can be a racist or bigot.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:18 PM
Jan 2015

It's not confined exclusively to just one race and should be aggressively called out and shamed.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
88. Yes, it's all opinion ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:43 PM
Jan 2015

the opinion of social scientists that conduct and publish peer reviewed research versus the opinion of an anonymous poster to a political message board.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
77. You really dont know? You dont know why and how racism works and who has that power
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:31 PM
Jan 2015

in America and who doesnt and how important it is to understand that?

Really?


And why the distinction is SO important to NON white people?

And how racism effects their life all day every day and NEVER effects a white person at all?

Really?

You dont know how redlining was used against minorities and still is?

It isnt just the history of racism but the specifics of who is the victim and who is the perpetrator, you mean you/we still cant agree on who is the victim of racism in America and which race is the perpetrator?

Really?

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
83. Yes, again, racism isn't confined to one specific race, anyone can be a racist or a bigot,
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:35 PM
Jan 2015

anyone.
And don't give me that bullshit that white people don't experience racism, white people do experience racism, same as Asians, Hispanics, etc.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
106. It is impossible for a white person to experience racism in America, they can experience bigotry
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:24 PM
Jan 2015

but not racism...

Racism is institutional, it is redlining, it is a history of lynching, not being allowed to vote, etc.

I am truly sorry that anyone is still confused about who has the power and who doesnt, truly saddened to hear that here of all places.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
110. Haven't we had this dance before? ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:29 PM
Jan 2015

What are you basing your opinion on? It clearly is not supported by 21st century academia.

Why should any place any more credence/validity in your opinion than we do in that of your average climate-change denier?

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
111. My opinion is just as valid as anyone else's.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:32 PM
Jan 2015
Definition of racism (n)

Bing Dictionary
ra·cism
[ ráy sìzzəm ]


1.animosity toward other races: prejudice or animosity against people who belong to other races
2.belief in racial superiority: the belief that people of different races have different qualities and abilities, and that some races are inherently superior or inferior


Seems pretty damn clear to me. The definition pretty much says that anyone can be a racist, not just the white race.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
116. Actually, no. All opinions are not equal. I know this is a shock.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:39 PM
Jan 2015

There are more informed opinions, and less informed opinions.

Your opinion is less informed because you are uninformed on the major discussions on this very topic over the last 30 years. The dictionaries lag behind the discussion, and to quote them is to be also be behind the discussion.

Sorry.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
118. thank you...one has to ask why one would be so invested in demanding that one's outdated, wrong
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:42 PM
Jan 2015

attitude continue

one might even examine one's attitude in the face of so many disagreeing with them

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
121. I win. You have no counter argument.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:45 PM
Jan 2015

You don't know what you don't know.

Study the literature.

(This will not happen, of course.)

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
129. BTW ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:59 PM
Jan 2015

I'm still trying to understand why Stephen Hawkings won't discuss/debate my opinions on Theoretical Physics ... After all, all opinions are equally informed and I've watched 1,000s of episodes of Star Trek.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
124. No,your opinion is NOT as valid as those of the academics that ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:49 PM
Jan 2015

study the phenomena and publish their observations to peer-reviewed journal ... and bing dictionary is NOT a peer-reviewed journal.

In case you missed this, here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/11879749

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
103. And we get frustrated with climate change "debates" ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:11 PM
Jan 2015

and "debates" about trickle down ... too many think their opinion (or those of journalists) should carry the same weight as the opinion of the scientists that study the topic.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
108. You ask them the last time they were pulled over for being white, or followed around a store
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:25 PM
Jan 2015

for being white.

I am tired of talking to them..

Ask them if they have any clue what that is versus something else...

What impresses the hell out of me is YOUR patience in dealing with this bullshit, and I am just making it worse by pointing out I think.

Response to GGJohn (Reply #27)

randys1

(16,286 posts)
10. Yep, there it is again...Disagree? Do a poll, care to make a wager first?
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:08 PM
Jan 2015

I said most, so 51% of DU would agree with my characterization for me to win


Care to wager?

Playing word games may be costly

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
12. Sorry, not interested, but you're free to do one.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:10 PM
Jan 2015

I mean, after all, isn't that what most true liberals would do?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
34. unless you claim to be one while simultaneously denying White male privilege..then you are not truly
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:55 PM
Jan 2015

randys1

(16,286 posts)
6. Just a simple question, with a question mark at the end of it, you can either answer
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:05 PM
Jan 2015

it, ignore it, or make fun of it, you have chosen the last one i see.

MineralMan

(146,333 posts)
11. True enough, but why ask this question?
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:10 PM
Jan 2015

Did someone say otherwise, or are you just curious? Of course racist cops would target people of the race they don't like. Who do the non-racist cops target? Or are you saying that all cops are racists? Your question isn't clear, really.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
18. Cops profile, African-Americans are stopped, arrested, sentenced longer
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:25 PM
Jan 2015

across the board. I think that is all the OP was saying.


Off duty, black cops in New York feel threat from fellow police (they experience racial profiling when they're off-duty)

Reuters interviewed 25 African American male officers on the NYPD, 15 of whom are retired and 10 of whom are still serving. All but one said that, when off duty and out of uniform, they had been victims of racial profiling, which refers to using race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed a crime.

The officers said this included being pulled over for no reason, having their heads slammed against their cars, getting guns brandished in their faces, being thrown into prison vans and experiencing stop and frisks while shopping. The majority of the officers said they had been pulled over multiple times while driving. Five had had guns pulled on them.

Desmond Blaize, who retired two years ago as a sergeant in the 41st Precinct in the Bronx, said he once got stopped while taking a jog through Brooklyn’s upmarket Prospect Park. "I had my ID on me so it didn’t escalate," said Blaize, who has sued the department alleging he was racially harassed on the job. "But what’s suspicious about a jogger? In jogging clothes?"
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/12/23/us-usa-police-nypd-race-insight-idUSKBN0K11EV20141223

randys1

(16,286 posts)
20. I dont need to say racist and white together as only white people can be racist in America, but to
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:29 PM
Jan 2015

why did I ask, I believe there are those here who dont believe that racism, whether by cops or not, is that big of a problem or not as big as some make it out to be.

I want them to come out in the open and say that so we can have that discussion.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
23. Since the subject is cops, let me add that experience would indicate that the semantics of who
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:29 PM
Jan 2015

can and can not be called a racist in America could be easily circumvented by simply saying that the cops who can not be called bigots are too few and far between no matter what race that cop might be. Homophobic Cops are so common the word for 'cop' could just be 'homophobe'. And just so you know, sociologists say any old fucker can be a homophobe in America. Everybody qualifies.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
28. Racism is a huge problem, no matter who or where it rears it's ugly head,
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:48 PM
Jan 2015

and you're flat out wrong, anyone can be a racist, it's not confined exclusively to the white race.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
30. Am I reading this correctly? Did you say that only white people
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:51 PM
Jan 2015

can be racist in America?

That's a pretty extraordinary statement. On what do you base that?

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
40. Well, of course it is a thing, but that doesn't mean that only
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 05:05 PM
Jan 2015

white males can be racist in the US.

There is plenty of racism to go around. The intense hostility between latinos and blacks in some communities is entirely racist.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
42. White Privilege and racism are not the exact same thing
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 05:18 PM
Jan 2015

Racism plays a role in privilege, but it also exists outside it.

To claim that white people are the only race capable of hating another race is, in itself, a racist claim. On DU, of all places!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
43. Uh what??
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 05:47 PM
Jan 2015

to be racist....you have to be in the position of power....

you are conflating prejudice with racism...

and are you trying to say I am racist towards White people?



"on DU of all places" indeed!

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
44. I was referring to your statement, not you as a person. Try to read better next time.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 05:55 PM
Jan 2015

Noun

racism (countable and uncountable, plural racisms)

The belief that each race has distinct and intrinsic attributes.
The belief that one race is superior to all others.
Prejudice or discrimination based upon race. ?[quotations ▼]

Malcolm X and Martin Luther King both spoke out against racism.


http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/racism

Now, if you want to argue nonsense, take it up with the dictionary.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
46. I said take it up with the dictionary. Their definition trumps your fabricated one.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 06:02 PM
Jan 2015

But please, attack me personally for calling out your bullshit. So clever.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
50. right yeah...MY "bullshit"...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 06:22 PM
Jan 2015

I think you are a bit confused about who dropped the bullshit in the room...

again...let me guess...White male amirite?

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
51. The dictionary is wrong? And your made-up definition is the right one? You're still at this??
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 06:26 PM
Jan 2015

You're really going down swinging, aren't you?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
52. You are incredibly fact-challenged today
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 06:28 PM
Jan 2015

Much as you might like to, you don't get to make up your own definitions for words, and your claim that only whites can be racist in America would be laughable if it weren't so pitiful.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
61. Let me guess....you too!
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:16 PM
Jan 2015

as easy as shooting fish in a barrel!

Please enlighten us fellows and explain how "oppressed" you have been by other races and genders....

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
78. When were you oppressed GGJohn?
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:31 PM
Jan 2015

because THAT is the difference between YOU and those that have been....and who HAVE suffered because of racism. You are diminishing that suffering with this bullshit stance. There are none so blind....

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
81. When did GGJohn say he had been oppressed?
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:34 PM
Jan 2015

If you have a certificate in mindreading, you need to seek a refund immediately.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
82. that is what determines what IS racism....you cannot be a victim...if you are NOT oppressed....
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:35 PM
Jan 2015

duh....you guys need every thing spelled out...see how that word victim goes with the term racism?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
86. I never said I was a victim of racism
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:42 PM
Jan 2015

Nor did JohnGG, at least as far as I can tell. What I did say is that you're 100% wrong when you say only whites can be racists in America.

That's simply ludicrous.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
184. One doesn't have to be oppressed
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 06:51 PM
Jan 2015

...to know what racism is, or be the victim of it.

There are many different levels of racism. Sociologists only deal with institutions and groups, so their various definitions only apply to institutional racism. The 'only whites' definition is used by some sociologists when talking about institutional racism.

Psychology deals with individual racism, which many folks here pretend does not exist.



 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
187. Oh really? Then if there is no victim...how can there be racism...
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 07:18 PM
Jan 2015

If there IS racism...there ARE victims of it....those who are oppressed by racism...

Therefore, please explain to us how YOU are victimized and oppressed. Because I can guarantee...nearly EVERY woman...nearly EVERY Gay person...nearly EVERY person of color....can sure tell you about theirs..

but please continue Mr American....

(meanwhile none of you that responded seem to notice that it is predominantly,... by a longshot, White males that hold on to this position)

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
191. No its not...it is perfectly clear....for there to be such a thing as "racism"....there has to be
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 08:10 PM
Jan 2015

someone who is victimized by it. Its a very simple concept.....only someone who is or has NOT been effected by racism, sexism, or homophobia, would call it nonsense so.... why don't YOU try again?

Oh and YOU jumped into this conversation.....that is what WE were talking about...or are you admitting your only reason to post was to disrupt. If so that is kind of trollish....

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
192. But to be a victim
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 08:40 PM
Jan 2015

...one doesn't have to be 'oppressed', just victimized.

For example, if a white or black person calls a Hispanic person a 'spic' they are being racist and the person is a victim of their racism.

Hope that clears it up for you.




 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
193. WTF does that have to do with any thing....
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 09:26 PM
Jan 2015

how are YOU a victim? Please enlighten us...You seem to be arguing with the person who KNOWS it exists...it just doesn't exist for everyone....

In psychology, racism, sexism and other prejudices are often studied as individual beliefs which, although not necessarily oppressive in themselves, can lead to oppression if they are codified in law or become parts of a culture. By comparison, in sociology, these prejudices are often studied as being institutionalized systems of oppression in some societies. In sociology, the tools of oppression include a progression of denigration, dehumanization, and demonization; which often generate scapegoating, which is used to justify aggression against targeted groups and individuals.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
194. It defines what I said originally
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 09:45 PM
Jan 2015

...which is either beyond your comprehension, or you have an agenda.

See post #186 and have a good day!



 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
195. No it doesn't that's hogwash!
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 10:02 PM
Jan 2015

Its YOU that has a comprehension problem...what part of ...."or become parts of a culture." do you not comprehend?

Are you denying that racism is part of our culture????

Obviously, if that is what you think then you are NOT oppressed or a victim of racism...or you would KNOW that is the case...

so one more time...please enlighten us how you have been victimized by racism?

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
197. Nothing you say has anything to do with my comments
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 10:26 PM
Jan 2015

Whatsoever and you know it. Obviously you have an agenda.

Have a nice evening!

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
84. What fucking difference does that make?
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:40 PM
Jan 2015

Once again, racists are not confined to just the white race, as the definition has been posted here,

Definition of racism (n)

Bing Dictionary
ra·cism
[ ráy sìzzəm ]


1.animosity toward other races: prejudice or animosity against people who belong to other races

2.belief in racial superiority: the belief that people of different races have different qualities and abilities, and that some races are inherently superior or inferior


You're entitled to your own opinions, but you're not entitled to your own facts.
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
87. What difference does it make????
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:42 PM
Jan 2015

seriously???? You seriously ask this question on DEMOCRATIC Underground????

What difference does it make???? Only someone to whom it has never made difference to.... could even say such a thing! Wow just WOW!!!!!



Please for our amusement....describe for all the folks how you have been a "victim of racism" since you seem to speak like an authority on what is or isn't racist.....please enlighten the rest of us how you have been victimized by racism....since as you claim...everyone is racist...please give us an example of how racism as negatively impacted YOUR life!


Because the rest of us could sure as hell tell you!

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
90. And again, stuffing words into other mouths.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:45 PM
Jan 2015

I posted the definition of racism, them's the facts, not your opinion.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
93. That's all you've been doing throughout this thread,
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:48 PM
Jan 2015

just unpacking ridiculous loaded words, when you're not stuffing words in other's mouths.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
98. again....you have to have suffered oppression to be a victim of racism or sexism....
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:57 PM
Jan 2015

SO...in light of that....please explain to everyone how you are a victim of racism....because that is the result of what you said about it..everyone...so go on...tell us how...

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
100. What?
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:00 PM
Jan 2015

My argument is that racists are not confined to just the white race, anyone, no matter what race, can be a racist.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
105. and my question to you is....HOW are YOU oppressed?
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:22 PM
Jan 2015

If you aren't then....ipso facto...you are not a victim...see racism requires a victim. Victims of racism have been or are being oppressed....that's how it works. Therefore your theory is bunk....

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
109. Now you're not making any fucking sense.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:27 PM
Jan 2015

I never said I was a victim of racism, I said, and read carefully, that anyone can be a racist, no matter what race one is.
Get it now?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
112. I make plenty of sense...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:34 PM
Jan 2015

You as a white guy...are not being oppressed...therefore...NO not everyone is...as you claim...because everyone ELSE is being....so no...this theory that racism is okay because "everybody is racist" doesn't hold a thumbful of water.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
113. What leads you to believe I'm white?
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:36 PM
Jan 2015

I might be Asian, Hispanic, Samoan, Hawaiian, etc.
You're making assumptions without evidence..

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
114. You haven't denied it so far...and I have made the claim over and over...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:38 PM
Jan 2015

you ignored it when asked directly several times....only a white guy would do that...everyone else would have responded to the charge already...instead of ignoring it..



btw thanks again for proving my point...

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
115. And I haven't confirmed it either, so because someone doesn't confirm or deny
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:39 PM
Jan 2015

something, you leap to conclusions?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
117. and I explained that....
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:40 PM
Jan 2015

its not a leap at all...besides you don't hear many non-white men holding to this position of yours....

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
125. I think you'd be surprised.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:49 PM
Jan 2015

Gotta go round up the cows and put them in the barn out of the snow for the night.
Have a good nite.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
186. Some folks here
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 07:03 PM
Jan 2015

...wish to define racism in a way that excludes themselves from the possibility of being racist. They do not like the dictionary definition, because it equally applies to everyone regardless of skin color.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
80. No your not a victim of racism....because you are not nor have you been oppressed...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:33 PM
Jan 2015

but you did call me one for pointing THAT out!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
92. Go on....please describe how you have been victimized by racism or sexism....since I take it that
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:47 PM
Jan 2015

counts too...

Please continue...Mr John

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
94. I wouldn't bother
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:48 PM
Jan 2015

VanillaRhapsody is now in full-blown bully mode, and will only continue to attribute to you motives you don't have, words you didn't say, and actions you've never taken.

The goal is to shut down and denigrate anyone that doesn't march in lockstep with her own made up definitions. After a few posts, I start thinking about that old saying about wrestling with a pig in mud.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
142. I understand institutionalized racism, but this nut wanted to argue over the definition of the word.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 10:13 PM
Jan 2015

Big difference!

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
143. Well ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 10:16 PM
Jan 2015

that "Nut's" definition of racism is closer to what social scientists have written on the phenomena than what you are arguing.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
145. Social scientists do not write dictionaries.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 10:21 PM
Jan 2015

Racism can be exploited by power, to serve power's ends, but it doesn't need power to exist.

You have mentioned "social scientists" several times, but have not linked to any of them. I, on the other hand, have checked several dictionaries, and they all define "racism" as a prejudice against race. No mention of power at all. Just hate.

Please link to peer-reviewed science that proves only white people can hate someone based on their race. I'm willing to admit I'm wrong, if evidence exists.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
149. True ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 10:36 PM
Jan 2015
Social scientists do not write dictionaries.


But they DO define and refine the terms within their fields of their study to more accurately reflect the observations of the phenomena. Right?

Please link to peer-reviewed science that proves only white people can hate someone based on their race. I'm willing to admit I'm wrong, if evidence exists.


I have done exactly that ... any times over ... in threads that you have participated in.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/11879749

Why should I do so, again? What will be different?
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
150. Look, we're on the same side here, but that link was about Institutionalized racism
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 10:46 PM
Jan 2015

How power uses racism to demonize certain people, and influence the thinking of others.

Of course people are going to respond to that, in environments where racism is being used as a tool to cause dissonance and control.

But it's still a tool. And we are on 100% agreement that we live in a society where racism is a most frequently used tool indeed! But in the larger picture, the word still means "prejudice based on race". I just don't understand why that is a contention.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
153. Because ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 10:58 PM
Jan 2015
But in the larger picture, the word still means "prejudice based on race". I just don't understand why that is a contention.


That is NOT how the term is currently being defined by those studying the phenomena. And, the "larger picture" definition, as you would have it, ignores what makes racism so invidious and entrenched in our society ... an unwillingness to address the status quo.
 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
157. Social scientists disagree on whether "racism" should be defined in the way you favor.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 11:14 PM
Jan 2015

Some resist the new definitions in favor of something closer to the ordinary usage that is reflected in dictionary definitions. And no, just because they are social scientists, that doesn't make their definition better or more informed or intelligent. They aren't trying to capture ordinary usage. They are often stipulating a definition that they think will facilitate research on the topics that interest them.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
160. I think the ones who deny that blacks can be racist are more like the climate change deniers.
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 07:36 AM
Jan 2015

The arguments in favor of the new definitions are weak.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
162. LOL...Of course you do ...
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 08:21 AM
Jan 2015

And you base your "thoughts" on what? ... Certainly, not the weight of 20th century writing on the topic.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
163. Um, I base my conclusions on my evaluation of the arguments. What do you base yours on?
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 09:47 AM
Jan 2015

The new definitions are problematic because either they define the relevant notion of power in an ad hoc way to get the result that only whites are racist, or they define it in a way that has the implication that in some "social microcosms" non-whites can have power over persons of other races that, if coupled with racial prejudice, can qualify them to be racist. You should read the literature on the issue instead of just being dogmatic about it. It is kind of interesting.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
168. I base my thoughts on what has been written in peer reviewed journals ...
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 11:23 AM
Jan 2015

where social scientist have published their works regarding the study of the topic of racism.

You should read the literature on the issue instead of just being dogmatic about it.


Funny ... I was thinking the same thing. The journal articles that I have cited were published from 2000 to the present ... when were your articles published?
 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
169. Try L. Blum's 2002 book: I'm not a racist, but … The moral quandary of race. (Cornell Univ. Press)
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 11:39 AM
Jan 2015

Ik, it doesn't count because the majority opinion is on your side.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
177. Hmm.
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 01:40 PM
Jan 2015
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/10860769/Language%20of%20Race.pdf?sequence=1

Paper on L Blum's book.
He wants to change the language, but never seems to have bothered to ask any black people what they thought. He knows better than they do. I think I may read it just to see why white liberals feel comfortable deciding things for black people without giving us a Second thought.
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
180. I was unfamiliar with Blum's work ...
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 02:23 PM
Jan 2015

I did google it, hoping to read more about it/excerpts from it; but, couldn't find much. I'm, particularly, interested in reading Chapter two.

I did how find the critique to which you link. Interesting reading.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
181. Just finished it up.
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 02:31 PM
Jan 2015

I remain unconvinced of the workability of some of his proposals, and some of his positions. I think I would have to read it for myself to draw a proper conclusion. Something about it strikes me as arrogant. Changing race to racial group... The idea that using racist symbolism is not racist in and of itself. I disagree strongly. Using swastikas and confederate flags is just racist to me. I see a flag shirt, I walk the opposite direction.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
182. I just read the critique ...
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 02:46 PM
Jan 2015

(for a second time) ... I agree, I must read the book, as well.

Levinson's critique, leads me to believe Blum's argument is self-serving, in that making the switch from "race" to "racialized groups", allows for Whataboutmeery, as it simultaneously acknowledges, and ignores, power differentials ... but more, the source of that power differential.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
152. From your CNN link:
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 10:53 PM
Jan 2015

"One study conducted by a Brigham Young University economics professor showed that white NBA referees call more fouls on black players, and black referees call more fouls on white players."

That's racism.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
196. He is referring to the definition
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 10:23 PM
Jan 2015

That some sociologists ascribe to. Sociology doesn't study individuals.

The claim that 'only people of a certain skin color can be racist' is itself racist, according to the dictionary definition of the word.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
55. It is based on a power argument
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 06:34 PM
Jan 2015

I don't think I understand why myself, I took it as bigoted is having prejudicials and the racism was discriminating in say housing for example.

But to me bigoted, racist I'm saying the same thing when I use those terms.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
56. I have never heard this, but I think it's a baseless argument.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 06:39 PM
Jan 2015

The definition of racism is simple and has absolutely nothing to do with where you are on the power scale. The degree of harm one's racism my have the potential for causing may be related to one's position on the privilege ladder.

Racism is a form of bigotry. It is bigotry that is based on race.

Seems like flame bait to me.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
57. I wouldn't be the best person to describe their argument
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 06:48 PM
Jan 2015

I didn't agree with it myself just trying to explain prior claims

OK - I found an example

10. Racist = a function of power Bigot = a function of one person's attitudes
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11876879#post10

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
59. I am sorry that I was not clear. I did not think you were trying
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:03 PM
Jan 2015

to defend it at all.

The link just goes to the same member's post in which he presents his fabricated definition. This is apparently his own belief but does not have any basis in fact.

The thread it is in is really about how whites use accusations of racism against black people as a way of justifying their own behavior, which is really a different topic.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
65. Oops -- I completely misread that
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:17 PM
Jan 2015

the words "racist" "white" "only"

Or wait a minute -- I'm still confused because I'm reading the same way. I only typed terms in the search box because I have seen that argument here more than once. I just saw the "only white people can be racist" but didn't view the post above that or remember the post above that, but I probably shouldn't have assumed.

Oh now I get it. Shit, I linked to this own thread. I typed it in the above

I should have been more careful but I had no idea that was the same thread (It took me awhile to figure out "link goes to the same member's post&quot . But now your last paragraph is starting to confuse me. Anyways, search box again.

To say people of color can be racist, denies the power
imbalance inherent in racism. Certainly, people of color can
be and are prejudiced against white people. That was a part
of their societal conditioning. A person of color can act on
prejudices to insult or hurt a white person. But there is a
difference between being hurt and being oppressed. People
of color, as a social group, do not have the societal,
institutional power to oppress white people as a group.
An individual person of color abusing a white person
– while clearly wrong, (no person should be insulted, hurt,
etc.) is acting out a personal racial prejudice, not racism.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/11874524

I've seen the argument here before and explain what it is but I probably should have moved on to another post.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
69. So, I brought up the example above of the intense racism that
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:25 PM
Jan 2015

underlies the hostility between blacks and latinos in some communities. Similar things can be seen between other racial groups as well - asians, middle easterners, people from India.

The argument being presented is that it's not racism unless there is a power differential. So if there is a power differential, say, between asians-americans and black americans in a community, then it would fit this definition of racism, right? And that right there would knock down the argument that only whites can be racist in the US.

While I understand the argument being made that whites can use accusations of racism in a very harmful and illegitimate way, I think the conclusion is bogus.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
144. What you are describing is the intense bigotry between the Black and Latino communities ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 10:21 PM
Jan 2015

neither possesses the institutional power to be racist toward the other.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
167. Not buying it. There are many examples of communities where
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 11:06 AM
Jan 2015

some non-white groups have privilege over other non-white groups and can exercise victimization.

This is an academic exercise in futility.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
134. There is a concerted effort by some to redefine racism.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 09:14 PM
Jan 2015

I think the idea is that if they badger anyone who disagrees with them enough, they will gain their silence and then define the word as they wish. I've seen it here at least a dozen times now.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
146. Yes, but it is based in what social scientists have been writing for the better part ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 10:27 PM
Jan 2015

of the last 30 years.

I think the idea is that if they badger anyone who disagrees with them enough, they will gain their silence and then define the word as they wish.


Do you consider those arguing the science supported claims of climate-change to be "badgering" climate-change deniers?

I've seen it here at least a dozen times now.


Have you also seen the links to the peer-reviewed works that support the definition of the term that I, and others, are "badgering" you with?

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
148. I've seen what you have posted.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 10:32 PM
Jan 2015

You and I have discussed this before. You know as well as I do that the definition you espouse is far from universal, but you feel free to define it your own way. Frankly I don't care. I'll continue to define it the way almost everyone else does.

I stand by everything I wrote.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
151. And what is your response to climate-change deniers ...
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 10:51 PM
Jan 2015

that take the same position in the face of your science-based argument.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
155. Social science and climate science are hardly the same thing.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 11:10 PM
Jan 2015

But then you already knew that. You do know that not everyone is required to agree with you, right?

Seriously, it's okay. Define the term any way you want. I'll stick with the dictionary version.

Thanks kindly.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
165. They need to find another word.
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 11:03 AM
Jan 2015

Good luck trying to change the definition of a word that has been used in a certain way for a very long time.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
166. Well, that's an academic exercise in futility.
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 11:04 AM
Jan 2015

They need to find another word. Saying only white people can be racist is ludicrous.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
174. Because you are attempting to redefine a term that has been in use
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 12:40 PM
Jan 2015

for a long time because some academicians have decided it means something different.

If you want to talk about the potential for victimization, I think there is a strong case to be made.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
175. Isn't that what academicians do ...
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 01:30 PM
Jan 2015
for a long time because some academicians have decided it means something different.


... based on their observation(s) and evolving understanding of the subject matter?

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
176. They do it but not always successfully.
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 01:39 PM
Jan 2015

I understand that they are describing a phenomenon and that that phenomenon has merit. I think it is unfortunate that they have chosen to use a word for which people generally share a definition.

People understand bigotry to be a broad category which defines an unjustified dislike of groups of people based on a characteristic of those people.

Homophobia is bigotry based on sexual orientation.
Sexism is bigotry based on sex
Racism is bigotry based on race

The power that that bigotry has is related to the degree of privilege of those that hold it, I agree. You can be bigoted and not really be able to victimize anyone with it because you have no power.

I would be interested in looking at some of the articles that you are referring to. Are there particular google terms that would get me to them?

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
178. This makes me think we are headed to ...
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 02:04 PM
Jan 2015
The power that that bigotry has is related to the degree of privilege of those that hold it, I agree. You can be bigoted and not really be able to victimize anyone with it because you have no power.


arriving at common ground, as this is what the academicians are saying, i.e., it is the distinction between "racism" and "bigotry". This "racism = race-based bigotry + institutional/cultural power" definition "merely" describes a particular brand of bigotry, just as there is the distinction between "Lymphoblastic Leukemia" versus "Myeloid Leukemia" ... each are broadly, and generally, understood to be "cancer", despite their unique (and common) properties.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
179. So what do you call bigotry based on race where there is no institutional power?
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 02:17 PM
Jan 2015

In order to accommodate this new definition, do we now need a new word to replace what this previously meant?

The problem with the leukemia analogy is that bigotry covers many different things (sex, country of origin, etc), while racism is unique to race alone. Therefore the analogy would be that under the heading of cancer, there exists some that affect white blood cells. Then you can make the distinction between racism with power to victimize and racism without power to victimize, but one of those needs a new word, imo.

So, where can I look at the papers of these social scientists? Is there debate within the community about this or has it been generally accepted among peers?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
53. I recommend you look up the definition of the word racist
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 06:30 PM
Jan 2015

Since your claim that only whites can be racist in America is laughable.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
62. racism = bigotry + societal power, and only white people have that racial societal power
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:16 PM
Jan 2015

per the other poster...catch up, will ya...this old canard that anybody can be a racist is silly

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
72. Like I said, look up the definition of the word racist
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 07:28 PM
Jan 2015

Much like VanilllaRhapsody, you seem to be under the impression that you get to make up your own definitions for words.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
58. It depends on how you define racism
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 06:56 PM
Jan 2015

but sociologists define it differently than bigotry. Anyone can be bigoted, but racism = bigotry + societal power, and only white people have that racial societal power. Like, if an African American person is bigoted against white people and doesn't hire you, the next place you go for an interview is likely to have a white person doing the hiring as most people in the US in the position to hire people are white, so the hurt to you is limited to that one job. But if a white person is bigoted against people of color and a person of color therefore doesn't get a job, then the next place they look, and at least most of the places they look, will probably also have white people doing the hiring. That discrimination doesn't just affect their ability to get one job, but to get any job at all. Whether you are part of the group that holds power makes a huge difference in how bigotry affects you, therefore sociologists define bigotry differently when it also involves that power differential, and in those cases only they call it "racism."

whathehell

(29,094 posts)
102. I understand that theory. I think it's called "structural racism"
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 08:03 PM
Jan 2015

It comes down to a kind of a "majority/minority" thing...What some might call the "macro" rather than

the "micro" view.

When you look at it from the vantage point of the society as a whole, it works, but what about the

many "micro environments", like a particular workplace, where, the "majority" person is in the

minority? I have been in that situation a number of times and have been treated with open

hostility for no reason other than my skin color.

One might call it 'bigotry', but it's definitely a bigotry based on race, so my point is,
.
that whether you call it "racism" or "racial bigotry" doesn't much matter as it feels

just as hurtful, frustrating and unfair whatever it's called..

I just wanted to add that this hasn't been the case for me in EVERY instance.

I've been the only white person in a couple of work/classroom situations where I've

I've been treated well, with not only fairness, but acceptance and friendliness

I guess it's just a question of the individuals involved,.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
26. I agree with the statement to some degree, but
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 04:42 PM
Jan 2015

don't "agree with" or like, the way you make your statements. You remind me of my mother, who conditioned me to despise the making of a statement followed by the word "period."

In my mother's case, it meant, "I'm right, no arguing." It was probably frustrating for her to deal with my teen-aged self, I'm sure.

With adults, or even with kids when the adult doesn't want to deal honestly or completely wit a topic, it's a way to shut down conversation, to shut down debate, to be "right" by might rather than by evidence.

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
159. "African Americans are targeted by racist, white cops, routinely...Period"
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 11:41 PM
Jan 2015

I would say that statement is sometimes true.
The poor are often targeted also because they're easy to get money out of.
The rich fight...or should I say "have money to fight"...and the cops know it.

tavernier

(12,406 posts)
188. But if a majority of crime in a city is committed by an African American
Mon Jan 12, 2015, 07:33 PM
Jan 2015

or any other ethnic group, should the police stop arresting them?

Not being a smart ass... I think this is a question asked by many, especially people living in a high crime area.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»African Americans are tar...