General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAfrican Americans are targeted by racist, white cops, routinely...Period
agreed?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I have never seen any DUer claim otherwise.
Response to randys1 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)So "almost all white" is stretching it a bit.
Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #13)
Name removed Message auto-removed
oberliner
(58,724 posts)As of the end of 2010, 53% of the entire 34,526-member police force were white and 47% were members of minority groups. Of 22,199 officers on patrol, 53% (11,717) were black, Latino (of any race), or Asian or Asian-American, and 47% (10,482) were non-Hispanic white. Of 5,177 detectives, 57% (2,953) were white and 43% (2,224) were people of color. Of 4,639 sergeants, 61% (2,841) were white and 39% (1,798) were minorities. Of 1,742 lieutenants, 76% (1,323) were white and 24% (419) were people of color. Of 432 captains, 82% (356) were white and 18% (76) were minorities. Of 10 chiefs, 7 were white and 3 were people of color. In 2002, whites accounted for 60% of members in the rank of police officer. Between 2002 and 2010, the number of minorities in top-tier positions in the force increased by about 4.5%.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_Police_Department#Demographics
Response to oberliner (Reply #16)
Name removed Message auto-removed
randys1
(16,286 posts)actually enforce the 2nd amendment the way it is written, removing ALL guns to regulated militias, then the cops wont have the excuse they now have to be armed to the teeth.
Would go a long way resolving the issues we have with them
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)On a roll today are we?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)But I do vehemently disagree with the OP that only whites can be racists, IMO, anyone can be a racist, white, black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.
Racism is not confined exclusively to white people.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)There are many forms of bigotry.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I focus on the power differential a bit more than you, but I agree on the vileness point. Very disordered thinking.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)But not just anyone, white, Black, Hispanic, Asian, etc., can be a racist ... the term has a specific meaning, that describes a specific form of bigotry.
Chemisse
(30,817 posts)But anybody can be racist. It is a general term.
However, it must be difficult, among minority groups, to distinguish racism from the anger, hurt and resentment that arises from being the target of racism.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Or More precise reporting/description of the phenomena?
But no ... even in as a general term, one cannot define a term away from its meaning.
Chemisse
(30,817 posts)But the word could be applied to any situation in which people of one race makes negative assumptions about another, and weave them into their culture so as to discriminate against that race.
For example, are blacks racist toward whites in South Africa? (I don't know, but it seems possible). How about Jews against Muslims - or vice versa?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)to distinguish racism and bigotry ... institutional/cultural power.
So ...
No, despite being in the numerical majority (and share in governance), Blacks in South Africa do not have the requisite institutional power to be racist towards white.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)Sure you can find individual examples of "racism" from others, but the problem of racism is much larger than individual actions. There is no systemic racism against whites. It does not exist.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)can be a victim of racism. Clearly the power differential makes a huge difference in terms of victimization.
But simply saying that one can not be racist if one is not white in the us makes no sense at all.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)If racism is power based victimization, who could a PoC, possibly victimize?
cbayer
(146,218 posts)You have made it into a verb, an action, not just a state. That flies in the face of ordinary usage. It doesn't matter what academics say if the general population is using the word in it's traditional sense. Perhaps we need a new word for the victimization part.
Who could a PoC possible victimize? Well, people of another color when they have the privilege, for example.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Black people can exercise?
cbayer
(146,218 posts)But there are other people of color. Asian-americans may have some institutional privilege in some communities. Surely you don't think that whites are the only group that ever has or exercises privilege.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and YES White Male privilege exists...
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)and I've never denied white male privilege exists.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)it's failing miserably.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)We weren't referring to you
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)since about the beginning of the 21st century, they have reported that the term (racism) has a specific meaning, that describes a specific form of bigotry.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)It's not confined exclusively to just one race and should be aggressively called out and shamed.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)the opinion of social scientists that conduct and publish peer reviewed research versus the opinion of an anonymous poster to a political message board.
randys1
(16,286 posts)they disagree...
For a very important reason, which may elude some
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)which may elude some?
randys1
(16,286 posts)in America and who doesnt and how important it is to understand that?
Really?
And why the distinction is SO important to NON white people?
And how racism effects their life all day every day and NEVER effects a white person at all?
Really?
You dont know how redlining was used against minorities and still is?
It isnt just the history of racism but the specifics of who is the victim and who is the perpetrator, you mean you/we still cant agree on who is the victim of racism in America and which race is the perpetrator?
Really?
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)anyone.
And don't give me that bullshit that white people don't experience racism, white people do experience racism, same as Asians, Hispanics, etc.
randys1
(16,286 posts)but not racism...
Racism is institutional, it is redlining, it is a history of lynching, not being allowed to vote, etc.
I am truly sorry that anyone is still confused about who has the power and who doesnt, truly saddened to hear that here of all places.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)What are you basing your opinion on? It clearly is not supported by 21st century academia.
Why should any place any more credence/validity in your opinion than we do in that of your average climate-change denier?
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Bing Dictionary
ra·cism
[ ráy sìzzəm ]
1.animosity toward other races: prejudice or animosity against people who belong to other races
2.belief in racial superiority: the belief that people of different races have different qualities and abilities, and that some races are inherently superior or inferior
Seems pretty damn clear to me. The definition pretty much says that anyone can be a racist, not just the white race.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)There are more informed opinions, and less informed opinions.
Your opinion is less informed because you are uninformed on the major discussions on this very topic over the last 30 years. The dictionaries lag behind the discussion, and to quote them is to be also be behind the discussion.
Sorry.
randys1
(16,286 posts)attitude continue
one might even examine one's attitude in the face of so many disagreeing with them
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)kwassa
(23,340 posts)You don't know what you don't know.
Study the literature.
(This will not happen, of course.)
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)doesn't mean you have won.
But I'll read the literature and go from there.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)kwassa
(23,340 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I'm still trying to understand why Stephen Hawkings won't discuss/debate my opinions on Theoretical Physics ... After all, all opinions are equally informed and I've watched 1,000s of episodes of Star Trek.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)study the phenomena and publish their observations to peer-reviewed journal ... and bing dictionary is NOT a peer-reviewed journal.
In case you missed this, here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11879749
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)and "debates" about trickle down ... too many think their opinion (or those of journalists) should carry the same weight as the opinion of the scientists that study the topic.
randys1
(16,286 posts)for being white.
I am tired of talking to them..
Ask them if they have any clue what that is versus something else...
What impresses the hell out of me is YOUR patience in dealing with this bullshit, and I am just making it worse by pointing out I think.
Response to GGJohn (Reply #27)
840high This message was self-deleted by its author.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)your definition of most liberals.
randys1
(16,286 posts)I said most, so 51% of DU would agree with my characterization for me to win
Care to wager?
Playing word games may be costly
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)I mean, after all, isn't that what most true liberals would do?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)it, ignore it, or make fun of it, you have chosen the last one i see.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Didn't you get the memo?
MineralMan
(146,333 posts)Did someone say otherwise, or are you just curious? Of course racist cops would target people of the race they don't like. Who do the non-racist cops target? Or are you saying that all cops are racists? Your question isn't clear, really.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)across the board. I think that is all the OP was saying.
Off duty, black cops in New York feel threat from fellow police (they experience racial profiling when they're off-duty)
Reuters interviewed 25 African American male officers on the NYPD, 15 of whom are retired and 10 of whom are still serving. All but one said that, when off duty and out of uniform, they had been victims of racial profiling, which refers to using race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed a crime.
The officers said this included being pulled over for no reason, having their heads slammed against their cars, getting guns brandished in their faces, being thrown into prison vans and experiencing stop and frisks while shopping. The majority of the officers said they had been pulled over multiple times while driving. Five had had guns pulled on them.
Desmond Blaize, who retired two years ago as a sergeant in the 41st Precinct in the Bronx, said he once got stopped while taking a jog through Brooklyns upmarket Prospect Park. "I had my ID on me so it didnt escalate," said Blaize, who has sued the department alleging he was racially harassed on the job. "But whats suspicious about a jogger? In jogging clothes?"
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/12/23/us-usa-police-nypd-race-insight-idUSKBN0K11EV20141223
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)why did I ask, I believe there are those here who dont believe that racism, whether by cops or not, is that big of a problem or not as big as some make it out to be.
I want them to come out in the open and say that so we can have that discussion.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)can and can not be called a racist in America could be easily circumvented by simply saying that the cops who can not be called bigots are too few and far between no matter what race that cop might be. Homophobic Cops are so common the word for 'cop' could just be 'homophobe'. And just so you know, sociologists say any old fucker can be a homophobe in America. Everybody qualifies.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)and you're flat out wrong, anyone can be a racist, it's not confined exclusively to the white race.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)can be racist in America?
That's a pretty extraordinary statement. On what do you base that?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)white males can be racist in the US.
There is plenty of racism to go around. The intense hostility between latinos and blacks in some communities is entirely racist.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Racism plays a role in privilege, but it also exists outside it.
To claim that white people are the only race capable of hating another race is, in itself, a racist claim. On DU, of all places!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)to be racist....you have to be in the position of power....
you are conflating prejudice with racism...
and are you trying to say I am racist towards White people?
"on DU of all places" indeed!
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Noun
racism (countable and uncountable, plural racisms)
The belief that each race has distinct and intrinsic attributes.
The belief that one race is superior to all others.
Prejudice or discrimination based upon race. ?[quotations ▼]
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King both spoke out against racism.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/racism
Now, if you want to argue nonsense, take it up with the dictionary.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)omg!
Let me guess....White male?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)But please, attack me personally for calling out your bullshit. So clever.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I think you are a bit confused about who dropped the bullshit in the room...
again...let me guess...White male amirite?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)You're really going down swinging, aren't you?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Much as you might like to, you don't get to make up your own definitions for words, and your claim that only whites can be racist in America would be laughable if it weren't so pitiful.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)as easy as shooting fish in a barrel!
Please enlighten us fellows and explain how "oppressed" you have been by other races and genders....
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)because THAT is the difference between YOU and those that have been....and who HAVE suffered because of racism. You are diminishing that suffering with this bullshit stance. There are none so blind....
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)If you have a certificate in mindreading, you need to seek a refund immediately.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)duh....you guys need every thing spelled out...see how that word victim goes with the term racism?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Nor did JohnGG, at least as far as I can tell. What I did say is that you're 100% wrong when you say only whites can be racists in America.
That's simply ludicrous.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...to know what racism is, or be the victim of it.
There are many different levels of racism. Sociologists only deal with institutions and groups, so their various definitions only apply to institutional racism. The 'only whites' definition is used by some sociologists when talking about institutional racism.
Psychology deals with individual racism, which many folks here pretend does not exist.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)If there IS racism...there ARE victims of it....those who are oppressed by racism...
Therefore, please explain to us how YOU are victimized and oppressed. Because I can guarantee...nearly EVERY woman...nearly EVERY Gay person...nearly EVERY person of color....can sure tell you about theirs..
but please continue Mr American....
(meanwhile none of you that responded seem to notice that it is predominantly,... by a longshot, White males that hold on to this position)
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...and has almost nothing to do with what I said. Try again.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)someone who is victimized by it. Its a very simple concept.....only someone who is or has NOT been effected by racism, sexism, or homophobia, would call it nonsense so.... why don't YOU try again?
Oh and YOU jumped into this conversation.....that is what WE were talking about...or are you admitting your only reason to post was to disrupt. If so that is kind of trollish....
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...one doesn't have to be 'oppressed', just victimized.
For example, if a white or black person calls a Hispanic person a 'spic' they are being racist and the person is a victim of their racism.
Hope that clears it up for you.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)how are YOU a victim? Please enlighten us...You seem to be arguing with the person who KNOWS it exists...it just doesn't exist for everyone....
In psychology, racism, sexism and other prejudices are often studied as individual beliefs which, although not necessarily oppressive in themselves, can lead to oppression if they are codified in law or become parts of a culture. By comparison, in sociology, these prejudices are often studied as being institutionalized systems of oppression in some societies. In sociology, the tools of oppression include a progression of denigration, dehumanization, and demonization; which often generate scapegoating, which is used to justify aggression against targeted groups and individuals.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...which is either beyond your comprehension, or you have an agenda.
See post #186 and have a good day!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Its YOU that has a comprehension problem...what part of ...."or become parts of a culture." do you not comprehend?
Are you denying that racism is part of our culture????
Obviously, if that is what you think then you are NOT oppressed or a victim of racism...or you would KNOW that is the case...
so one more time...please enlighten us how you have been victimized by racism?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Whatsoever and you know it. Obviously you have an agenda.
Have a nice evening!
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Once again, racists are not confined to just the white race, as the definition has been posted here,
Bing Dictionary
ra·cism
[ ráy sìzzəm ]
1.animosity toward other races: prejudice or animosity against people who belong to other races
2.belief in racial superiority: the belief that people of different races have different qualities and abilities, and that some races are inherently superior or inferior
You're entitled to your own opinions, but you're not entitled to your own facts.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)seriously???? You seriously ask this question on DEMOCRATIC Underground????
What difference does it make???? Only someone to whom it has never made difference to.... could even say such a thing! Wow just WOW!!!!!
Please for our amusement....describe for all the folks how you have been a "victim of racism" since you seem to speak like an authority on what is or isn't racist.....please enlighten the rest of us how you have been victimized by racism....since as you claim...everyone is racist...please give us an example of how racism as negatively impacted YOUR life!
Because the rest of us could sure as hell tell you!
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)I posted the definition of racism, them's the facts, not your opinion.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)just unpacking ridiculous loaded words, when you're not stuffing words in other's mouths.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)SO...in light of that....please explain to everyone how you are a victim of racism....because that is the result of what you said about it..everyone...so go on...tell us how...
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)My argument is that racists are not confined to just the white race, anyone, no matter what race, can be a racist.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)If you aren't then....ipso facto...you are not a victim...see racism requires a victim. Victims of racism have been or are being oppressed....that's how it works. Therefore your theory is bunk....
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)I never said I was a victim of racism, I said, and read carefully, that anyone can be a racist, no matter what race one is.
Get it now?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)You as a white guy...are not being oppressed...therefore...NO not everyone is...as you claim...because everyone ELSE is being....so no...this theory that racism is okay because "everybody is racist" doesn't hold a thumbful of water.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)I might be Asian, Hispanic, Samoan, Hawaiian, etc.
You're making assumptions without evidence..
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)you ignored it when asked directly several times....only a white guy would do that...everyone else would have responded to the charge already...instead of ignoring it..
btw thanks again for proving my point...
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)something, you leap to conclusions?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)its not a leap at all...besides you don't hear many non-white men holding to this position of yours....
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Gotta go round up the cows and put them in the barn out of the snow for the night.
Have a good nite.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...wish to define racism in a way that excludes themselves from the possibility of being racist. They do not like the dictionary definition, because it equally applies to everyone regardless of skin color.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)you haven't....
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)So because we're not "oppressed", we're racists?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)but you did call me one for pointing THAT out!
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)I called you out for what?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)counts too...
Please continue...Mr John
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)VanillaRhapsody is now in full-blown bully mode, and will only continue to attribute to you motives you don't have, words you didn't say, and actions you've never taken.
The goal is to shut down and denigrate anyone that doesn't march in lockstep with her own made up definitions. After a few posts, I start thinking about that old saying about wrestling with a pig in mud.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)I won't bother with this person anymore, we've made our points.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Big difference!
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)that "Nut's" definition of racism is closer to what social scientists have written on the phenomena than what you are arguing.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Racism can be exploited by power, to serve power's ends, but it doesn't need power to exist.
You have mentioned "social scientists" several times, but have not linked to any of them. I, on the other hand, have checked several dictionaries, and they all define "racism" as a prejudice against race. No mention of power at all. Just hate.
Please link to peer-reviewed science that proves only white people can hate someone based on their race. I'm willing to admit I'm wrong, if evidence exists.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)But they DO define and refine the terms within their fields of their study to more accurately reflect the observations of the phenomena. Right?
I have done exactly that ... any times over ... in threads that you have participated in.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11879749
Why should I do so, again? What will be different?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)How power uses racism to demonize certain people, and influence the thinking of others.
Of course people are going to respond to that, in environments where racism is being used as a tool to cause dissonance and control.
But it's still a tool. And we are on 100% agreement that we live in a society where racism is a most frequently used tool indeed! But in the larger picture, the word still means "prejudice based on race". I just don't understand why that is a contention.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)That is NOT how the term is currently being defined by those studying the phenomena. And, the "larger picture" definition, as you would have it, ignores what makes racism so invidious and entrenched in our society ... an unwillingness to address the status quo.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Some resist the new definitions in favor of something closer to the ordinary usage that is reflected in dictionary definitions. And no, just because they are social scientists, that doesn't make their definition better or more informed or intelligent. They aren't trying to capture ordinary usage. They are often stipulating a definition that they think will facilitate research on the topics that interest them.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Some scientists resist the new understanding of climate-change, as well.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)The arguments in favor of the new definitions are weak.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)And you base your "thoughts" on what? ... Certainly, not the weight of 20th century writing on the topic.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)The new definitions are problematic because either they define the relevant notion of power in an ad hoc way to get the result that only whites are racist, or they define it in a way that has the implication that in some "social microcosms" non-whites can have power over persons of other races that, if coupled with racial prejudice, can qualify them to be racist. You should read the literature on the issue instead of just being dogmatic about it. It is kind of interesting.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)where social scientist have published their works regarding the study of the topic of racism.
Funny ... I was thinking the same thing. The journal articles that I have cited were published from 2000 to the present ... when were your articles published?
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Ik, it doesn't count because the majority opinion is on your side.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Paper on L Blum's book.
He wants to change the language, but never seems to have bothered to ask any black people what they thought. He knows better than they do. I think I may read it just to see why white liberals feel comfortable deciding things for black people without giving us a Second thought.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I did google it, hoping to read more about it/excerpts from it; but, couldn't find much. I'm, particularly, interested in reading Chapter two.
I did how find the critique to which you link. Interesting reading.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I remain unconvinced of the workability of some of his proposals, and some of his positions. I think I would have to read it for myself to draw a proper conclusion. Something about it strikes me as arrogant. Changing race to racial group... The idea that using racist symbolism is not racist in and of itself. I disagree strongly. Using swastikas and confederate flags is just racist to me. I see a flag shirt, I walk the opposite direction.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)(for a second time) ... I agree, I must read the book, as well.
Levinson's critique, leads me to believe Blum's argument is self-serving, in that making the switch from "race" to "racialized groups", allows for Whataboutmeery, as it simultaneously acknowledges, and ignores, power differentials ... but more, the source of that power differential.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)A bit self serving.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)"One study conducted by a Brigham Young University economics professor showed that white NBA referees call more fouls on black players, and black referees call more fouls on white players."
That's racism.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)That some sociologists ascribe to. Sociology doesn't study individuals.
The claim that 'only people of a certain skin color can be racist' is itself racist, according to the dictionary definition of the word.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I don't think I understand why myself, I took it as bigoted is having prejudicials and the racism was discriminating in say housing for example.
But to me bigoted, racist I'm saying the same thing when I use those terms.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)The definition of racism is simple and has absolutely nothing to do with where you are on the power scale. The degree of harm one's racism my have the potential for causing may be related to one's position on the privilege ladder.
Racism is a form of bigotry. It is bigotry that is based on race.
Seems like flame bait to me.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I didn't agree with it myself just trying to explain prior claims
OK - I found an example
10. Racist = a function of power Bigot = a function of one person's attitudes
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11876879#post10
cbayer
(146,218 posts)to defend it at all.
The link just goes to the same member's post in which he presents his fabricated definition. This is apparently his own belief but does not have any basis in fact.
The thread it is in is really about how whites use accusations of racism against black people as a way of justifying their own behavior, which is really a different topic.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)the words "racist" "white" "only"
Or wait a minute -- I'm still confused because I'm reading the same way. I only typed terms in the search box because I have seen that argument here more than once. I just saw the "only white people can be racist" but didn't view the post above that or remember the post above that, but I probably shouldn't have assumed.
Oh now I get it. Shit, I linked to this own thread. I typed it in the above
I should have been more careful but I had no idea that was the same thread (It took me awhile to figure out "link goes to the same member's post" . But now your last paragraph is starting to confuse me. Anyways, search box again.
To say people of color can be racist, denies the power
imbalance inherent in racism. Certainly, people of color can
be and are prejudiced against white people. That was a part
of their societal conditioning. A person of color can act on
prejudices to insult or hurt a white person. But there is a
difference between being hurt and being oppressed. People
of color, as a social group, do not have the societal,
institutional power to oppress white people as a group.
An individual person of color abusing a white person
while clearly wrong, (no person should be insulted, hurt,
etc.) is acting out a personal racial prejudice, not racism.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11874524
I've seen the argument here before and explain what it is but I probably should have moved on to another post.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)underlies the hostility between blacks and latinos in some communities. Similar things can be seen between other racial groups as well - asians, middle easterners, people from India.
The argument being presented is that it's not racism unless there is a power differential. So if there is a power differential, say, between asians-americans and black americans in a community, then it would fit this definition of racism, right? And that right there would knock down the argument that only whites can be racist in the US.
While I understand the argument being made that whites can use accusations of racism in a very harmful and illegitimate way, I think the conclusion is bogus.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)neither possesses the institutional power to be racist toward the other.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)some non-white groups have privilege over other non-white groups and can exercise victimization.
This is an academic exercise in futility.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Where would this privilege be?
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)I think the idea is that if they badger anyone who disagrees with them enough, they will gain their silence and then define the word as they wish. I've seen it here at least a dozen times now.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)of the last 30 years.
Do you consider those arguing the science supported claims of climate-change to be "badgering" climate-change deniers?
Have you also seen the links to the peer-reviewed works that support the definition of the term that I, and others, are "badgering" you with?
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)You and I have discussed this before. You know as well as I do that the definition you espouse is far from universal, but you feel free to define it your own way. Frankly I don't care. I'll continue to define it the way almost everyone else does.
I stand by everything I wrote.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)that take the same position in the face of your science-based argument.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)But then you already knew that. You do know that not everyone is required to agree with you, right?
Seriously, it's okay. Define the term any way you want. I'll stick with the dictionary version.
Thanks kindly.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)Good luck trying to change the definition of a word that has been used in a certain way for a very long time.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)They need to find another word. Saying only white people can be racist is ludicrous.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)for a long time because some academicians have decided it means something different.
If you want to talk about the potential for victimization, I think there is a strong case to be made.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)... based on their observation(s) and evolving understanding of the subject matter?
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I understand that they are describing a phenomenon and that that phenomenon has merit. I think it is unfortunate that they have chosen to use a word for which people generally share a definition.
People understand bigotry to be a broad category which defines an unjustified dislike of groups of people based on a characteristic of those people.
Homophobia is bigotry based on sexual orientation.
Sexism is bigotry based on sex
Racism is bigotry based on race
The power that that bigotry has is related to the degree of privilege of those that hold it, I agree. You can be bigoted and not really be able to victimize anyone with it because you have no power.
I would be interested in looking at some of the articles that you are referring to. Are there particular google terms that would get me to them?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)arriving at common ground, as this is what the academicians are saying, i.e., it is the distinction between "racism" and "bigotry". This "racism = race-based bigotry + institutional/cultural power" definition "merely" describes a particular brand of bigotry, just as there is the distinction between "Lymphoblastic Leukemia" versus "Myeloid Leukemia" ... each are broadly, and generally, understood to be "cancer", despite their unique (and common) properties.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)In order to accommodate this new definition, do we now need a new word to replace what this previously meant?
The problem with the leukemia analogy is that bigotry covers many different things (sex, country of origin, etc), while racism is unique to race alone. Therefore the analogy would be that under the heading of cancer, there exists some that affect white blood cells. Then you can make the distinction between racism with power to victimize and racism without power to victimize, but one of those needs a new word, imo.
So, where can I look at the papers of these social scientists? Is there debate within the community about this or has it been generally accepted among peers?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Since your claim that only whites can be racist in America is laughable.
randys1
(16,286 posts)per the other poster...catch up, will ya...this old canard that anybody can be a racist is silly
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Much like VanilllaRhapsody, you seem to be under the impression that you get to make up your own definitions for words.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)I'd like you to make up some definitions for me too.
whathehell
(29,094 posts)I don't think so.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)but sociologists define it differently than bigotry. Anyone can be bigoted, but racism = bigotry + societal power, and only white people have that racial societal power. Like, if an African American person is bigoted against white people and doesn't hire you, the next place you go for an interview is likely to have a white person doing the hiring as most people in the US in the position to hire people are white, so the hurt to you is limited to that one job. But if a white person is bigoted against people of color and a person of color therefore doesn't get a job, then the next place they look, and at least most of the places they look, will probably also have white people doing the hiring. That discrimination doesn't just affect their ability to get one job, but to get any job at all. Whether you are part of the group that holds power makes a huge difference in how bigotry affects you, therefore sociologists define bigotry differently when it also involves that power differential, and in those cases only they call it "racism."
whathehell
(29,094 posts)It comes down to a kind of a "majority/minority" thing...What some might call the "macro" rather than
the "micro" view.
When you look at it from the vantage point of the society as a whole, it works, but what about the
many "micro environments", like a particular workplace, where, the "majority" person is in the
minority? I have been in that situation a number of times and have been treated with open
hostility for no reason other than my skin color.
One might call it 'bigotry', but it's definitely a bigotry based on race, so my point is,
.
that whether you call it "racism" or "racial bigotry" doesn't much matter as it feels
just as hurtful, frustrating and unfair whatever it's called..
I just wanted to add that this hasn't been the case for me in EVERY instance.
I've been the only white person in a couple of work/classroom situations where I've
I've been treated well, with not only fairness, but acceptance and friendliness
I guess it's just a question of the individuals involved,.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)with this interactive map.
Mesa PD 333.7 black rate 107.4 non-black rate
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/experiments/usatoday/2014/11/arrests-interactive/
SamKnause
(13,110 posts)by white cops.
randys1
(16,286 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)don't "agree with" or like, the way you make your statements. You remind me of my mother, who conditioned me to despise the making of a statement followed by the word "period."
In my mother's case, it meant, "I'm right, no arguing." It was probably frustrating for her to deal with my teen-aged self, I'm sure.
With adults, or even with kids when the adult doesn't want to deal honestly or completely wit a topic, it's a way to shut down conversation, to shut down debate, to be "right" by might rather than by evidence.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)onecaliberal
(32,902 posts)Although different races can also be racist.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)I would say that statement is sometimes true.
The poor are often targeted also because they're easy to get money out of.
The rich fight...or should I say "have money to fight"...and the cops know it.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)Right?
tavernier
(12,406 posts)or any other ethnic group, should the police stop arresting them?
Not being a smart ass... I think this is a question asked by many, especially people living in a high crime area.