General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChris Christie’s Jersey nightmare: Why his state hasn’t touched the economic recovery
http://www.salon.com/2015/01/13/chris_christies_jersey_nightmare_why_his_state_hasnt_touched_the_economic_recovery/Late in October of 2009, New Jersey gubernatorial candidate Chris Christie used the Ridgewood Moving Company in Mahwah to stage a campaign event headlined by former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani. The cavernous warehouse was packed floor to ceiling with shrink wrapped pallets holding the possessions of dozens of families leaving New Jersey. It vividly symbolized the thousands of Jersey households that made the same decision that year to pull up stakes in hopes of a brighter future anywhere else.
The site was a compelling backdrop for Christies core campaign message. He was the candidate most likely to staunch the trend that had become so pronounced since the states congressional delegation shrank from 15 seats in the 70s to 12. In his debating the incumbent Jon Corzine, he used the well documented Jersey diaspora, which separates grandparents from their grandchildren and parents from their children, like a rhetorical two-by-four.
People are leaving the state in droves, businesses are leaving this state in droves and taking their jobs with them. Thats why we have the worst unemployment rate in 33 years, Christie charged.
Scroll forward six years, as Gov. Christie is set to give his second state of the state in his second term, and the exodus continues and for good reason. According to United Van Lines annual analysis of national migration data, they booked 4,003 outbound moves from Jersey but posted only 2,169 incoming. 2014 was the fourth time in the last five years that New Jersey topped the nation for out migration according to United Van Lines.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)and property taxes are sheer murder.
New York's rebirth has probably sucked all the remaining air out of the room.
TheBlackAdder
(28,224 posts)There's only so long you can pull $32 BILLION out of a local state's economy - EACH AND EVERY YEAR - before that economy collapses.
NO other state sends anywhere near their state's annual budget to the Feds for redistribution.
===
While there is a lot of wealth in NJ, there is a highly disproportionate level of income inequality. Most of the wealthy are excluded from heavy taxes, causing this financial burden to fall on the middle class and lower-middle class. There are sporadic pockets in NJ that almost rival sections Mississippi.
The other problem is those with pensions, especially state pensions, are now forced to leave the state... taking their NJ pension money with them.
===
This either leaves people who are wealthy, those staying for employment, home state reasons, or those too poor to move left behind.
For all of the ribbing that NJ suffers, much like the benevolent relative who is mocked by those who enjoy his wealth, we are good sports about it. NJ has a lot to offer, but it's slowly sliding down into the abyss of poverty by this income disparity. Sections of this state, where the wealthy live, are isolated from the poorest areas. You have land barons who use farmland preservation (placing a few animals on the property or growing crops and then just tilling them under) as a means to pay $32 an acre property tax on a 200 acre estate. Meanwhile, the senior citizen on fixed income pays $8,000-12,000 a year in property tax for a small dilapidated cape cod in a run-down town, offering limited amenities or supportive services.
People in South Jersey see almost 80-90% of their state's tax dollars being sent out of the area to fund projects in North Jersey, leading to sections of South Jersey that will never escape a Second World status. That is why several decades ago, South Jersey narrowly lost a succession bid--most every governor hails from North Jersey and they treat SoJo as just an income source.
edhopper
(33,634 posts)one of the biggest public projects that would have been almost all Fed money adds to the imbalance and adds to the job loss.
Heck of a job Chrissy.
starroute
(12,977 posts)Traveling from New Jersey to New York City is about to get even harder.
The salty floodwaters of Superstorm Sandy caused so much damage to two train tunnels under the Hudson River that they must be closed for additional hours every week, which will mean fewer trains and longer waits for commuters, officials said. Already, the tunnels are closed for large portions of the weekends for repairs. Now, those closures will extend into the week.
And that work is just a stopgap because the 104-year-old tunnels will continue to deteriorate, said Stephen J. Gardner, an Amtrak spokesman. Eventually the tunnels must be closed for about a year apiece and completely rebuilt. That could come to pass within the next 20 years, officials have said.
Before that happens, Amtraks leaders hope to build two additional new tunnels capable of handling existing traffic. But those will cost in excess of $10 billion, and likely much more. New tunnels were being built, but the project was scrapped in October 2010 by Governor Christie, who cited potential cost overruns that would have to be borne by New Jersey taxpayers.
http://www.nj.com/traffic/index.ssf/2014/11/new_hudson_river_rail_tunnels_could_be_built_in_7.html
Amtrak officials are in a race against time to avoid a commuting nightmare if one of the existing 100-year old tunnels has to be closed for major repairs before new tunnels are built. Train traffic would slow to a trickle, from an average of 24 to 6 trains per hour if one of the existing tunnels had to be closed.
The regional economy could lose $100 million a day in economic activity, due to a shut down, Boardman said.
Beach Rat
(273 posts)Those two tunnels are the choke point for the entire northeast corridor. Without those tunnels no through trains go to NYC. Commuting would suck but there's ferries, cars and buses and PATH (unless Christie manages to sell it off). It would be a nightmare but some travel would continue. Take those tunnels out and passenger rail traffic between D.C. and Boston becomes non-existent. All so Christie could avoid paying for the Transportation Trust Fund. He builds a phoney image to run for president, we all suffer.
Laxman
(2,419 posts)and head to D.C.! N.J. has always been a tough place to live. It's expensive and crowded. But there were always a lot of great things that tipped the balance to make it a good place to live. Christie has directly targeted the environment, education and transportation. Some of the real quality of life elements that made the state great. Once you diminish these things, its just expensive and crowded. Idiots like Christie just don't understand what makes a good place to live. I've got a hint-it's not a low corporate tax rate.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)As a NYer I can attest to the flood of Jersey, Connecticut, and Pennsylvanians that commute to NYC for work.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)When enough voters understand this, it will begin to change.
Johonny
(20,895 posts)He cares about himself first and you... well, you might come 45th if your lucky.