Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 11:40 AM Apr 2012

Where No City Has Gone Before: San Francisco Will Be World's First Zero-Waste Town by 2020

I remember there was a fair amount of mocking about our "garbage police" and plastic bag nanny-ing but I am proud of my city and looking forward to the next steps.

Last month, the millionth ton of food scraps, coffee grounds and soiled paper from San Francisco’s mandatory composting program returned to residents’ dinner tables in the form of fresh, organic foods grown by local farmers using the city’s nutrient-rich compost as fertilizer. Coming on the heels of the city’s 2009 municipal ordinance requiring city-wide source separation of all organic materials, the first large-scale urban food waste and composting program in the country has not only helped reduce the city’s greenhouse gas emissions to nearly 12 percent below 1990 levels; it's also catapulted San Francisco to a staggering, nation-leading 78 percent waste diversion rate.

Just a few years ago, a zero-waste city was considered a futuristic scenario. Now, the city by the bay is on track to be the first and only North American city to achieve this impressive goal -- and it plans to get there by 2020.
For San Franciscans like myself, life without the “Fantastic Three” -- the simple, color-coded cart system consisting of a green composting, blue recycling and black, often smaller trash cart -- has become unthinkable. Putting banana peels and used tissues into an empty quart of ice-cream is part of our routine. Trips to cities without composting bins feel like visits to strange planets in distant galaxies. The fact that we could so quickly get used to skittle-sized garbage bags while our compost bags are bulging with leftovers speaks not only to a well-conceived program and the adaptability of San Francisco residents, but to the potential of reaching similar milestones anywhere else in the U.S or abroad.


More here: http://www.alternet.org/visions/155039/comments?page=entire
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Where No City Has Gone Before: San Francisco Will Be World's First Zero-Waste Town by 2020 (Original Post) Luminous Animal Apr 2012 OP
Damn you San Francisco & your Zero waste Values! xchrom Apr 2012 #1
Not to discount this at all, ParkieDem Apr 2012 #2
Fox Nation Sees Trash In San Francisco, Fabricates Entire Story To Blame Green Activists Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #3
I live in San Francisco -- Hell Hath No Fury Apr 2012 #4
Two things I will never be able to train myself out of. Throwing garbage away in the proper can, Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #5
Interesting enough, the grossly trashed park photos come from the Marina. Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #7
We definitely need more trash cans throughout the City - Hell Hath No Fury Apr 2012 #9
This effort of SF's rivals most European countries MrScorpio Apr 2012 #6
Construction Debris zipplewrath Apr 2012 #8
Everything goes to a main sorting facility. Hell Hath No Fury Apr 2012 #10
Here you go... Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #11
Great start zipplewrath Apr 2012 #12

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
3. Fox Nation Sees Trash In San Francisco, Fabricates Entire Story To Blame Green Activists
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 12:13 PM
Apr 2012
SFist's photos of a messier-than-usual aftermath at Fort Mason last Saturday got the right wingers frothing at the mouth, apparently. After the story was picked up by the Huffington Post, conservative bloggers from the Gateway Pundit and Fox Nation seized the opportunity to repurpose a couple photos along with an entirely fabricated story pinning the blame on Earth Day partiers and "Green Activists."

...

To set the record straight here, the people partying on Fort Mason Green last Saturday would hardly identify themselves as part of any particular group that promoted anything other than getting drunk on cheap beer. There was no organized Earth Day celebration, and (perhaps more to the point) the partying occurred on April 21st. Which would be the day before Earth Day, for those keeping score at home.


http://sfist.com/2012/04/24/fox_nation_sees_trash_in_san_franci.php
 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
4. I live in San Francisco --
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 12:20 PM
Apr 2012

and have seen firsthand the lack of concern about disposing of personal garbage in a proper way. There seems to be a generational thing going on with it -- I was taught to place my garbage in a city can or, if one was not available, keep it in my pocket until I could find one. The key word here being "taught". Also, I hate to say it, but I see a class divide on who uses the city cans vs. who just drops their shit on the sidewalk. I am a bit of a Litter Nazi and it makes me mental to see someone who is literally standing three feet from a city can but who finishes their chips and dumps the bag on the street.

But I am damned proud of our recycling record here.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
5. Two things I will never be able to train myself out of. Throwing garbage away in the proper can,
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 12:21 PM
Apr 2012

and turning out the lights when I leave a room.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
7. Interesting enough, the grossly trashed park photos come from the Marina.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 12:31 PM
Apr 2012

Dolores Park, which was filled with a couple of thousand people on Saturday (not Earth Day) had a minor trash problem by comparison. Gavin Newsom also contributed to the problem by removing city trash cans. What a maroon. Six trashcans were removed from the corners of 18th & Dolores to the corners of 18th & Mission. The city removed the trashcans at the corners of 15th & Church. Now people dump their trash where the cans used to be!

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
9. We definitely need more trash cans throughout the City -
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 01:10 PM
Apr 2012

and need them emptied more often. I constantly see cans that are overflowing -- people wanting to do the right thing but not getting the chance. I also think a public education push via area schools and local TV about littering would be well worth it. There are a multitude of schools in my neighborhood and I cannot believe what I see on the streets after they hit the local shops after 3:00pm -- it can be a disgusting mess. Add in our winds and garage is flying for blocks.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
8. Construction Debris
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 12:57 PM
Apr 2012

Back when I used to pay more attention to these things (I had a subscription to "Garbage Magazine&quot one of the tougher issues was construction debris. This was anything from drywall and lumber to asphalt and tar paper. It represented something like 33% by volume IIRC. I'm curious how SF is handling this stuff. Do they demand "on site" reclaimation? Do they have a special facility? There's a hundred years of old buildings filled with stuff one might not even be allowed to use anymore. I wish the article had gone into more detail about what was left in the "22%".

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
10. Everything goes to a main sorting facility.
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 01:20 PM
Apr 2012

Wood, concrete, glass, old paint, and piping are all reclaimed/recycled. Not sure about asphalt/tar paper. Many usable objects are pulled and cleaned up/recycled. Also there are onsite artists who pull from the piles to create amazing art. I live across the freeway from the sorting facility and spend a good amount of time there dropping off materials, so I get to see a lot. A lot of the 22% are things like styrofoam, film plastic, other plastics that are not recyclable by the City at this time.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
11. Here you go...
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 01:30 PM
Apr 2012
The City and County of San Francisco’s Construction and Demolition Debris Recovery Ordinance took effect in 2006. The ordinance applies to all construction projects, including new construction, remodels, tenant improvements, additions, repairs, and full and partial demolitions.

The program requires mixed construction and demolition debris to be transported off-site by a Registered Transporter.

Exemptions:

• Transporters hauling less than 1 cubic yard of material, using vehicles with no more than two axles (and no more than two tires per axle), who are removing materials that are source-separated on site
• Property owners removing waste materials with personal vehicles

Mixed construction and demolition debris must be taken to a Registered Facility that can divert at least 65% of the material.

Exemptions:

• Facilities processing ONLY clean material that is source-separated at the construction site

Before full demolitions, the permit applicant must submit a Demolition Debris Recovery Plan (DDRP) to the Department of the Environment for approval. This precedes the issuance of a Full Demolition Permit by the Department of Building Inspection. Ultimately the DDRP must demonstrate how a minimum of 65% of demolition material will be diverted from landfill.

Additional regulations require municipal construction or remodeling projects to prepare a Solid Waste Management Plan (prior to a project’s commencement), divert a minimum 75% from landfill, issue monthly diversion reports and prepare a final report.
Public Outreach & Education:

The City has begun reaching out to participants by visiting jobsites.

Outreach materials include handouts that are provided with every building permit issued by the Department of Building Inspection. The Department can also make presentations to applicable parties.
Legal Issues:

Enforcement is under authority of the Department of Building Inspection and the Department of the Environment. Penalties for non-compliance include fines up to $1000 a day for the first infringement, up to $5000 for a second infringement, and the possibility of jail for repeated violations.
Anticipated or Actual Outcomes

As of 2012, The Department of Building Inspection has approved 210 Demolition Debris Recovery Plans, which have achieved diversion rates of 65-99%. There are currently 315 registered transporters and 12 registered facilities throughout the region.

In the first year alone, registered facilities diverted an additional 26,000 tons of mixed debris, a 25% increase. Moreover, a local landfill accepted 13,000 fewer tons of material from San Francisco, a 15% decrease.


http://www.greencitiescalifornia.org/best-practice/construction-debris-recovery-san-francisco

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
12. Great start
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 01:46 PM
Apr 2012

I'd bet this could be easily a big part of the 22%. They don't really state if this stuff is by weight or volume, I'd guess weight (they keep quoting tons). Construction debris is VERY heavy. This suggests that although it is a big portion of the weight, it may be a small quantity of material. Makes it easier to sort through and elminate much of the 22%. And since much of it is either asphault or concrete, it can be recycled.

It really is amazing what they are accomplishing here. I hope they don't get overly focused on the "zero percent". They've gotten so low, really low, that they should probably start focusing more on the "most undesirable" content, rather than the heaviest or largest quantities.

I'm actually moved to contact our local city commish and see what we're doing in this vein.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Where No City Has Gone Be...