Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDavid Sirota: Should Rahm Emanuel Be Exempt From Ethics Laws?
from In These Times:
Should Rahm Emanuel Be Exempt From Ethics Laws?
Executives at firms managing Chicago pension money have made more than $600,000 in donations to the mayor, despite a city ordinanceand an executive order by Emanuel himselfrestricting contributions from city contractors.
BY DAVID SIROTA
On its face, Chicagos municipal pension system is an integral part of the Chicago city government. The system is included in the citys budget, it is directly funded by the city, and its various boards of trustees include city officials and mayoral appointees. Yet, when it comes to enforcing the citys anti-corruption laws in advance of the Chicagos closely watched 2015 municipal election, Mayor Rahm Emanuels administration is suddenly arguing that the pension funds are not part of the city government at all.
The counterintuitive declaration came last month from the mayor-appointed ethics commission, responding to Chicago aldermens request for an investigation of campaign contributions to Emanuel from the financial industry. The request followed disclosures that executives at firms managing Chicago pension money have made more than $600,000 worth of donations to Emanuel. The contributions flowed to the mayor despite a city ordinanceand an executive order by Emanuel himselfrestricting mayoral campaign contributions from city contractors.
Brushing off the lawmakers complaint about Emanuels donations from the financial industry, the mayors ethics commission issued a nonbinding legal opinion arguing that Chicago's pension systems are not agencies or departments of the city, and thus firms that contract with them are not doing or seeking to do business with the city. The commissions interpretation means financial firms business with Chicago pension funds should be considered exempt from city ethics laws.
With the aldermens complaint about campaign contributions generating headlines and potentially complicating Emanuels already tough race for re-election, the Emanuel-appointed commission was unusually frank about its motives: It said the release of its opinion was designed to attempt to ensure that no ethical clouds are hanging over any candidates head. ................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://inthesetimes.com/article/17530/rahm_emanuel_ethics_laws
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 694 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Sirota: Should Rahm Emanuel Be Exempt From Ethics Laws? (Original Post)
marmar
Jan 2015
OP
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)1. Quid pro quo
The commissions interpretation means financial firms business with Chicago pension funds should be considered exempt from city ethics laws.
Financial firms get big profits...
Mayor gets big donations.
Business as usual, right?
xchrom
(108,903 posts)2. du rec.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)3. Rahm was already subjected to an ethics investigation, but none were found.
Atman
(31,464 posts)5. Was just gonna say...
Wouldn't he need to have some ethics first?