General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsrandys1
(16,286 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)It is how we have public roads, social security, ACA, all examples of democratic socilaism
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I am a Democrat!
demwing
(16,916 posts)And never have been a member of the socialist party, Senator!
Wink,wink
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)I'll never be a member of the Socialist Party.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Who cares. Your knowledge is showing and I'm embarrassed for you. Move along, there's nothing here for you.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)So those promoting the third party here should care.
randys1
(16,286 posts)a vote for Hillary if she is the nominee...
come on...I argue with people who insist they arent voting for Hillary all the time
sheesh
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)people who say they wont vote for Hillary?
Autumn
(45,107 posts)out later when election season kicks in. It's not aimed at just you.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Are you suggesting that some here among us are... not human?
Autumn
(45,107 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I'm nailing a side of beef to the front door and sealing myself inside a cardboard box.
Autumn
(45,107 posts)I have the deluxe foil lined model.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Autumn
(45,107 posts)Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)You've turned them against you now. They will snark at you every chance they get now. You'll see, lol. There is plenty of room left under the bus.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)You're gonna need it come primary season.
demwing
(16,916 posts)YOU HAVE 20 SECONDS TO COMPLY!
Phlem
(6,323 posts)whateva.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I only ever see that term mentioned by the Far Lefties!
demwing
(16,916 posts)When you're in it, first rule is you don't talk about it.
Th difference is that in Fight Club, members kick each other's asses. A Third Wayer seems happy just to kick her OWN ass.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)the only ones that ever bring it up are Left Leaning Independents.....
Autumn
(45,107 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)when I am on a Democratic Forum and they cannot say they will vote for WHOMEVER WE select in a Primary Election....
Autumn
(45,107 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)besides....NO Independent is MY friend....
I came for the Democrats...
Autumn
(45,107 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)"LeftLeaningIndependentUnderground" right? Maybe you took a wrong turn at Albuquerque?
Autumn
(45,107 posts)Please help me find it. Please????
Oh wait never fucking mind.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice
And here all I found is "Democratic Underground is an online community where politically liberal people"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus
I can post here!!!!!!!! Yay ME!!!!!!
politically liberal people!!! That's me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
politically liberal people!!! That's me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
politically liberal people!!! That's me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
politically liberal people!!! That's me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Did you know Bernie Sanders is a "politically liberal people" JUST like me!!!!!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Bernie Sanders is ALSO not a Democrat!....Did YOU know that Aut?
But I BET you this....he is a Better Democrat than YOU...because he WILL commit to voting FOR whomever the Democratic Nominee is....even if it IS Hillary Clinton....How do you like THOSE apples?
Autumn
(45,107 posts)I hope you like some of them too. That will give us something in common to share.
Aurora Golden Gala, D'Arcy Spice,Shizuka, Silken, Irish Peach, Lobo, Grimes Golden, Tydeman's Early Worcester, Weirouge, and of course Zuccalmaglio'sReinette.
Now for baking, like pies, apple crisps and such I like to use Pink Lady, Granny Smith, Honeycrisp, Jazz, (which I personally have found is sometime hard to find) Red Delicious, Golden Delicious, McIntosh, Fuji, Gala, and of course Jonagold.
Have you ever had an Ard Cairn Russet apple? It's an old variety from Ireland and very reminiscent of a banana. Imagine that, an apple with a hint of banana flavor. There is also an apple called an Apricot Apple with an apricot flavor.
Did you know that the Cox's Orange Pippin is the finest dessert apple and get this, it was discovered as a chance seedling. Can you imagine that. Amazing isn't it. What if that little seedling had been thrown into the compost pile? Too horrible to contemplate.
So anyway I have shared my knowledge and love of apples just on the chance we can find common ground to grow and build a friendship.
I will admit I DO like Hillary. I like her so much that as a Grandmother I myself feel she will make a much better Grandmother than President, and I feel people should do what they can be good at. She was a great SOS wasn't she? Yay Hillary
Anything you want to share?
You are so right though my friend, Bernie is better than almost any democrat. He stands for the people and shares the best Democratic values. That's why most of the time he votes with the Democrats in the Senate. I have found when he votes against the Democrats in the Senate, they are not being very good Democrats. Now there's something else we have in common, Bernie is indeed a better Democrat than most democrats.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Autumn
(45,107 posts)Let's see here. Bernie? Check. Hillary? Check. Apples? Check. So difficult to get along with.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)just for starters...
and you do not have the market cornered on Liberal....there are LOTS of Liberal Democrats that are NOT left Leaning Independents....
and as I said...Bernie (your hero) is a better Democrat that YOU...because HE WILL vote for whomever the Democrats select in the Primary...INCLUDING Hillary Clinton
Autumn
(45,107 posts)good friends. We are on the same side after all.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and THAT "my friend" makes you NOT ONE!
and as I keep mentioning...even Bernie Sanders WILL vote for Hillary Clinton if she wins...
Autumn
(45,107 posts)Be reasonable, I implore you, I have answered every issue you have raised. I cannot see where I am the one in this friendship that is being unreasonable.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)if the answer is still no....they you are STILL not a Democrat....easy peasy...
(And I am NOT friends with DU members who will NOT make that commitment to OUR party)
Autumn
(45,107 posts)years I did indeed go to the DMV and change my party affiliation from Democrat to Unaffiliated right after the Omnibus bill was passed, as a form of protest you understand. I realized with a little help from you, that I am indeed a Left Leaning Independent. It was difficult to do but my resolve was strong. I had to chose Unaffiliated because alas, in my state we do not have an Independent party and I am not a Green. As I have explained to you my values are such that I cannot in good faith commit to an event that may not happen as I am not convinced that Hillary will indeed win the primary or that she will even run.
Peasy? Is that a GMO type of peas that you enjoy? If So, I am deeply sorry we can not find common ground there as I do not like peas at all and I will never accept that I must eat my peas. Apples yes, peas never.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)but the fact remains...YOU ARE NOT a Democrat if you cannot commit to voting for the winner of OUR Primary election....PERIOD...
Apples or peas have nothing to do with it...
Autumn
(45,107 posts)I cannot help but think that Bernie would be the best of Presidents and as you said he is a much better Democrat, in fact I will go so far as to say that he is better than most Democrats the way he stands with our President. So many of the democrats ran away from Obamas policies in the 2014 election but Bernie, Bernie and Liz stand with him. I will make a promise to you my friend , when OUR primary is over then I will commit my vote.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)like Bernie commit to voting for whomever wins the Democratic Primary election....even if it IS Hillary Clinton...just like Bernie will...OH and by the Way...when she does...Bernie WILL campaign to elect her!
Autumn
(45,107 posts)If only more democratic politicians did the same. Another area that we are in agreement on.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)why won't YOU do the right thing?
Autumn
(45,107 posts)friendship. I am not convinced Hillary will run. We will discuss this matter when Hillary wins the nomination. I would look like a fool if I committed my vote to someone who has not won the nomination and who very well might not even run.
But I'm not yet sure Bernie is supporting Hillary. How can he when Bernie is himself considering a run?
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)Dean Capone is listed on one site.
Democratic Socialism is what we partially have now, and is what we need much more of.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)would look very different in very bad ways
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)gets a bad name when it's carried to extremes.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)In case anyone is curious, I was juror #3.
* * * * *
Third party advocacy is specifically mentioned in DU's TOS. The poster is promoting a party that will be running against Democrats in 2016.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Jan 16, 2015, 04:10 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Directly violates DU TOS. Hide it and send to MIRT so the poster can go to SU.. Not the first time this poster has done this sort of thing.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Get a grip, alerter!
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: What the hell? If supporting unions is against the TOS (which the Socialist party does) then half, if not more of the people on DU would be banned.
This looks like an alert intended to shut down conversation and dialogue. Third-way bullshit, to be sure.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Read the TOS again: "During the ups-and-downs of politics and policy-making, it is perfectly normal to have mixed feelings about the Democratic officials we worked hard to help elect. When we are not in the heat of election season, members are permitted to post strong criticism or disappointment with our Democratic elected officials, or to express ambivalence about voting for them."
Post should stand.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Agree with alerter.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: you have got to be kidding me. An alert on this? Change the page or go to another website thin skin.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)I was #7
randys1
(16,286 posts)positions and not this specifically
Phlem
(6,323 posts)They don't speak for me or, I would venture, a lot of DU members. As a matter of fact there's one guy in this thread that feels compelled to let everyone know about it.
randys1
(16,286 posts)I am surprised by who it is that is attacking me
Phlem
(6,323 posts)yes and he seems to be following you is my point. I've had someone do that to me till I said something about it. But, if you don't mind listening to Gerbil speak following you around, then no worries for ya.
randys1
(16,286 posts)it was who was doing it that I got real confused for a minute
thanks, sorry
Phlem
(6,323 posts)False TOS Violation alerts piss me off
I invite everyone to check into our DU Populist Reform Group:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1277
We encourage the discussion of ways to make the Democratic Party more people powered!
Phlem
(6,323 posts)I know right? Heaven forbid we discuss things that might make it better for everyone.
randys1
(16,286 posts)i WAS merely trying to make a point about how we are ALL SOCIALISTS whether we know it or not, that we RELY on socialism in many ways already!
But I am sure whoever alerted on me had other reasons to do so, I am not popular with lots of people around here for a variety of reasons.
Rex
(65,616 posts)YEP. Teabaggers...funny how some have so much in common with the GOP.
randys1
(16,286 posts)and I assume they know Bernie is basically a socialist, or a Democratic Socialist like myself.
You see, this is where the Dem party needs to go, I posted the emblem mostly as a joke and to make a point, but I didnt get back to making the point before someone shit their pants, as you say
Rex
(65,616 posts)when they do that and I cringe when I see it here. YES, I do expect people to be a little more intellectually honest on sites like this! I should stop expecting that since it seems I am wrong.
Response to Rex (Reply #39)
Autumn This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Aerows (Reply #11)
MohRokTah This message was self-deleted by its author.
What the ever loving hell? Send randy to MIRT? Really?
Autumn
(45,107 posts)and going from thread to thread.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)I guess they are anxious for oathy pledgey time. Or something.
Autumn
(45,107 posts)He sure is going to be busy. he doesn't want those people to be able to post when the election season starts.
Ah, I love the festive preparations for the Purity True Blue season! Notes taken, log books updated, making lists....
It warms the heart, no?
Autumn
(45,107 posts)And I'm series!!!!
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)It truly is puzzling at this point, isn't it?
Autumn
(45,107 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)you're kidding, right?
Response to randys1 (Original post)
Post removed
branford
(4,462 posts)why are you posting on Democratic Underground, a site dedicated to the advancement of the interests, priorities and candidates of the Democratic Party?
The Democratic Party platform is most assuredly capitalist, and except for some vague language concerning uncontroversial matters like equality and opportunity, it looks very little like the "radical democracy" and "new social and economic order in which workers and consumers control production" espoused by the Socialist Party.
No, thank you. I'll keep my current Democratic Party, warts and all, and have absolutely no interest whatsoever in the Socialist Party.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)1% servitude and middle class killing policies?
Guess I need to change parties. How many more losses do you think the party can sustain before being completely wiped out or assimilated by the Republicans? You know that's what we promoted during the midterms right? Look we can be like them!!
Then we lost, and don't tell me because people didn't show up because they did, when you shit on your constituents what do you expect.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)You can't honestly be surprised that, yes, the point is that we're supposed to be Democrats, here.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Does that bother you that much?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Supporting em is, as far as I've always understood it, pretty much against the rules.
Does it bother me? No, but IMNSHO it should be taken over to discussionist, where the rules aren't what they are here. Unlike some folks, I don't have a gimungo problem with the fact that discussionist is more open than DU, but I recognize that the rules on DU are here for a reason.
Rex
(65,616 posts)people freak out over the word 'socialism'. It reminds me too much of Foxnews viewers. It's just a word FFS. However when election season roles around an someone here supports Greens over Hillary and they get the boot, I will understand why. Until then, everything is fair game.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)on who I'm hanging out with.
However there is a fundamental difference between the concepts or orientation and the specific PARTY.
The problem with the OP as I see it is the implied support of The Socialist Party as an entity. Not the word.
Rex
(65,616 posts)running for POTUS? I just cannot see getting mad about something that does not exist as a political entity or rival. Nor do the rules state that at this moment, you cannot support a third party. Come election season, yeah only support for the Democratic party. I get that, but we are not there yet, so the point is the OP CAN post what they did. Now.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)even though they're extremely conservative? I thought we were *Democrats*.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)the rest of the thing is completely made up, and pulled out of thin air.
So you think hair metal is making a comeback, huh?
Phlem
(6,323 posts)want to answer critical questions dodge them.
"So you think country is all that?"
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)although I suppose I'd need to see what specific policies you're on about, before I could give you a more specific answer, Jack.
As it is, there are leadership decisions in the DNC I disagree with- I think DWS has been a disaster, I'm not sure who the genius was who thought having someone out front arguing we need to put more cancer grannies in prison for pot smoking was a good idea when the tide is clearly heading towards legalization, etc.
But again.. none of this has anything to do with whether openly supporting different parties is okay on DU. It's not, it never has been.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Smells like socialism to me. And why do we support the TPP when we know it's going to kill jobs and the middle class? NAFTA was sold the same way. Do you not have any information about the 3rd way because if you did, we wouldn't be arguing, if your a liberal.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Also it's "you're", not "your".
Phlem
(6,323 posts)OK then,
the last argument of defense for some. I'm sure the poor really fucking care about the grammar police.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I bet you forgot that. But where would any of us be, without good skin?
Phlem
(6,323 posts)rebuttals. Hey my little girl just remember, when you argue specifics, do it in an aloof way cause that's how you win.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)You're having a conversation with someone entirely in your own head.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)and as such I must rectify it, OCD-style.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Don't use that one!
demwing
(16,916 posts)At least 90% of the time...
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)branford
(4,462 posts)particularly among core constituencies like white blue collar workers or those in the South. We have a big tent. Our Democratic Party platform is also not remotely as liberal as you appear to suggest.
We are all Democrats here, although you may not agree with or like your fellow members. However, neither you nor anyone else on DU can exclude anyone you deem insufficiently "pure."
In any event, if the Socialist Party meets your ideological needs and preferences far more than the Democratic Party, why are you here?
Response to branford (Reply #64)
Phlem This message was self-deleted by its author.
I said no talking points. But it doesn't matter anyways, I've the exact opposite of your tripe from DU members that say the party is more liberal than conservative. Oh wait, a liberal in the Democratic party is Pure?
I think you know where the conservative party is and it's not in the Democratic party.
Fascinating how simple facts can still escape Conservatives.
branford
(4,462 posts)More importantly, whether you (or I) like it or not, "Democrat" is not synonymous with "liberal." A great many moderates and some conservatives, many of whom vote, sadly unlike a lot of our peers, call our party home. These votes certainly count when determining our party platform and are necessary to win elections, particularly in red and purple states.
You can believe that less liberal Democrats are not real Democrats, ignore the actual party platform, or fail to acknowledge that a broad Democratic coalition is necessary to maintain a legislative majority, but it amounts to little more than griping.
Again, if the Socialist party truly represents your ideas and positions, why are you a Democrat? At least in the Socialist Party, you would not be angered and frustrated by the conservatives (who apparently are anyone who's not very liberal) you abhor.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)You can be done now, I've moved on.
branford
(4,462 posts)Democrats are in the minority in Congress.
I'm not so foolish to believe that the perfect is the enemy of the good. I'll take moderate Democrats and control of Congress over a far left minority. Passing some of the Democratic Party platform is better than none.
Do you honestly believe that more liberal candidates in areas like the South and many parts of the West and Midwest have a better chance of winning elections than their more moderate counterparts? States like North Carolina, Louisiana and South Dakota are not Vermont and Oregon.
Seems to me Alison Grimes and her love of guns didn't pull it through. Also why did progressive legislation do well in the midterms while while 3rd way moderates lose?
No talking points please.
branford
(4,462 posts)Are you actually claiming that where moderate Democrats lost, far more liberal Democrats would have achieved success? For instance, was Alison Grimes too conservative to win in Kentucky?
And enough with the "talking points" nonsense, particularly since you're the one repeatedly fulminating over the "3rd way and it's 1% servitude and middle class killing policies."
Phlem
(6,323 posts)If at first you don't succeed, repeat it over and over and over ad nauseum. Hey I know that from somewhere hmmmm......
Man it's truly like talking to a Republican around here with some members.
"3rd way and it's 1% servitude and middle class killing policies." This is fact chief no matter how you spin it.
And I'm not going to address anything that is complete ignorance.
Rex
(65,616 posts)This site is for liberal minded people, seems that is hard for some to grasp. Gee I wonder why.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Primaries or no.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Or it sure doesn't read that way to me.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I haven't actually read the rules in whatever, but there is no specific prohibition that I see.
I do know that if someone shows up advocating 3rd party, MIRT shows em the door pretty fast. But I stand corrected.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Nor one running against a Dem (districts without a Dem running are fine). Of course none of us should be endorsing the GOP...which nobody does that I am aware of.
randys1
(16,286 posts)party, so to act like that is silly.
And then to attack me this way, wow.
Maybe the mainstream of the Dem party isnt where an open minded person like me belongs
Rex
(65,616 posts)Yeah I know...it eats at me to watch supposedly smart people freak out like Foxnews viewers. Specially since there is NO socialist party running for office against either party!
Geez...maybe it is not SAFE to mention such words here. Maybe I was wrong and this site is not for 'like minded liberals'.
Marr
(20,317 posts)political continuum that is not their microscopic little political faction. It really seems more like they're rooting for a sports team rather than a broad sort of policy direction.
branford
(4,462 posts)However, this site is explicitly and unquestionably dedicated to advancing the Democratic Party, not "liberal minded people." By the terms of the site, moderate and even conservative Democrats are seemingly more welcome than those individuals seeking to actually advance the interests of an entirely different political party in competition with Democrats.
The Democratic Party platform that is clear and detailed. It is definitely nothing like that of the Socialist Party platform. Again, respectfully, if your beliefs primarily mirror the Socialist Party, demanding that the Democratic Party change to meet your preferences is superfluous and foolish, and somewhat disruptive to those here actually loyal to our party and platform.
Rex
(65,616 posts)go after them. The rules do state we are only to encourage voting for Dems during election season. Do you seriously think everyone here thinks just like you do? We have a diverse tent and some of those people are...gasp...socialists!
Sit down if that is a shock to your system, but it is true. I myself and a social democracy kind of guy.
branford
(4,462 posts)it's that you are advocating the Socialist Party at the expense of the Democratic Party on a website dedicated to advancing the interests and candidates of the Democratic Party.
You have nearly 50,000 posts, been a member since 2002, and have gone through numerous election cycles on DU. If the Socialist Party represents your beliefs and you support them, I'm curious why you would even want to be here?
I've been on DU for 13 years now. I remember DU's beginnings as a self-described "left-wing" message board, welcoming Democrats "and other" people of that left-wing persuasion. While the site has always been partisan, the focus of the TOS as far as partisan requirements go is on campaigns and elections. There has always been an obvious conflict between the two, since the party is clearly NOT left-wing.
Of course, when the party elected a D to the WH in '08, this site left behind being actually "underground" and became a lot more partisan, and a lot more centrist. The term "left-wing" was removed, and replaced with "liberal," which is more inclusive, as centrists, "new dems" and other 3rd wayers are NEO-liberal.
There are still some left-wing people around, and as long as they are not advocating a vote for a 3rd party in an election, they are still welcome.
branford
(4,462 posts)I certainly have no problem with socialists, although I do not consider myself one, and believe there is more than enough room in the Democrat Party for those who hold such beliefs.
However, the OP and much of the discussion concerned the Socialist Party, not socialists or socialism. Advocating for a different political party, particularly in the current partisan atmosphere where every vote counts and where we've just been relegated to minority status, is problematic, at best.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)and of course
(a personal favorite)
Yes.... we're talking about how we're on the wrong website.
herp derp derp
randys1
(16,286 posts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Supporting the guy is one thing, supporting a party that isn't the Democratic Party, something else.
If sanders runs for President with an (S) or anything but a (D) after his name, it will be against the rules to endorse him on DU.
demwing
(16,916 posts)because this is not that time
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And I have plenty of scoldings for later, no need to save.
demwing
(16,916 posts)tough nooggies boss
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I can sit here and mex my mixaphors all day, homes.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)MUAHAHAHAAAA
pintobean
(18,101 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)and derp it
No violation of the TOS here, just people talking about ways to be people powered Democrats
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)What-evurrrrrrr!
demwing
(16,916 posts)i pictured you with a mustache
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I'm well known about town for my wide selection of felt fedoras.
branford
(4,462 posts)(who I certainly will not link to or provide a logo) and our friendly neighborhood Communist Party.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)There's like that transcendental meditation party, too. And assorted UFO cultist parties, etc. Always good entertainment.
Matrosov
(1,098 posts)isobar
(188 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Don't get me started on DEMS complicity with the Bush crime regime, including torture, Too Big To Fail, the Surveillance State/Big Brother, deep cronyism, Catfood Commission, Trans Pacific Partnership, assault on public education and workers and workers unions, and DEMS uncanny ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
Other than all that...What's NOT to like?
mrmpa
(4,033 posts)in the Fall when I was 18 I would be voting for Jimmy Carter, I asked my Dad if I could register as a Socialist. My Dad a 15 year veteran of the Marine Corps and at all times a Union member, said "No". It wasn't because he was against socialism, but because I wouldn't be allowed to vote in primary elections.
Dad told me to vote my conscience and to make sure it was aligned with the Democratic Party. As I've gotten older, I think I have moved more to the left than where I was when I was 17. I am tired of the 1% taking from the 99%, I am tired of Congress members who "just don't get it". I am just plain tired.
It's just not the current 1% we should be worried about, but the children of these 1% and those moving into the 1%. By that I mean those who are in their 20's and who believe they are "entitled" mostly by their education. I meet many of them every week. I work for a ride sharing platform and give college students of a "prestigious" institution rides. You do not know how many of them at the end of their Junior year have a job ready for them when they graduate, and these jobs begin with 6 figures. I see their attitude emerging.
It is not the 1% who will change the world, but the rest of us by uniting.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)However, I have become more adept at expressing them, and I have been able to better understand where I stand.
I am deep left, liberal, progressive, and a democrat.
As a responsible Democrat, I will stand with the party.
As a deep lefty, I will try to be an anchor to keep the Democratic party representing the collective whole, not the selected some.
As a liberal, I will use words rather than force.
As a progressive, I will try to be educated, flexible, and inquisitive rather than dogmatic.
Speaking in a very broad terms.
In Europe there are a greater number of political parties; here we have split ourselves more broadly. Instead of coalitions with in government, our basic two party system is a de facto pre-governmental level coalition.
One of the strengths of the right is the ability to recognize they are a coalition and act together. This unification wields greater power than the sum of their parts.
Bust each other chops over the minor differences, we fail to act as a coalition and wield less influence than our number should be capable of.
Why don't we work to come together?
obxhead
(8,434 posts)Dino's will never get my support again, regardless of the greater evil.
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)the neo-liberal hornet's nest, lol.
Anansi1171
(793 posts)...for the culture of this nation.
I like the philosophical tenets of Geolibertarianism as promoting a kind of capitalism that is participatory and accounts for the value of environmental resources as commonwealth, not just private property or commodity.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geolibertarianism