General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnti-Choice Legislators Try to Force Wedge Between Reproductive, Disability Rights Activists
http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2015/01/16/anti-choice-legislators-try-force-wedge-reproductive-disability-rights-activists/Sen. Holdmans bill is a prime example of the way anti-choicers shape their message to appeal to those who might otherwise be opposed to anti-abortion effortsparticularly those in the Down syndrome community. The bill, SB 334, prohibits a person from performing an abortion if the person knows that the pregnant woman is seeking the abortion because of: (1) the sex of the fetus; or (2) a diagnosis or potential diagnosis of the fetus having Down syndrome or any other disability. It does not define other disability until toward the end of the bill, when it explains that could mean a physical disability, a mental disability or retardation, a physical disfigurement, scoliosis, dwarfism, Down syndrome, albinism, amelia, a physical or mental abnormality or disease....
Now, the authors of SB 334 are exploiting those good feelings, using faux advocacy for disability rightsand, with regard to the sex-selection aspect of the bill, gender equalityto try to restrict access to abortion. This reflects a broader trend among anti-choice groups, who frequently use the idea of people with Down syndrome being blessings, angels, and cute as reasons not to terminate. These are powerful, persuasive tools and an effective way to craft legislation designed to drive a wedge between communities.
Such bills seem even more underhanded when contrasted with those actually advocating for disability rights. Abortions based on prenatal diagnoses of Down syndrome are relatively common, at least as a subset of total pregnancies involving such a diagnosis; the most recent data suggests about 75 percent of all people who receive a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome choose to terminate the pregnancy. This high rate can be attributed to many factorsbut, as disability rights activists have found, too many health-care providers do offer women incorrect or out-of-date information about Down syndrome following a positive fetal diagnosis.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)expensive, hard on marriages, and hard on retirement plans. Options for assistance vary greatly from state to state. Living arrangements for disabled adults vary from state to state. I don't see them rushing out to adopt.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)People have been known to go to adoption agencies and demand a child with Down's. They won't settle for a typical child. This is because they've bought into that "angelic" BS the article goes into. You do not see this happening with, say, autism.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)They do when they discover that children with Down Syndrome have varying levels of ability and personality. The man with DS I met more recently does not have an "easy" disposition. In fact, he can be loud and obnoxious.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)if a test determines a serious issue.
Leaving financially struggling families with fewer options.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)dembotoz
(16,808 posts)so carry it to term but do not expect any help cause we are cutting ssi
lovely people
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Some us object to being called "vegetables".
B Calm
(28,762 posts)wavesofeuphoria
(525 posts)a woman's choice? Where do they get the idea that women do not have body autonomy?