Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,070 posts)
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:22 PM Jan 2015

New Congress Begins Anti-Environment Attack With ‘No More National Parks’ Bill

Maybe they're worrying about the wrong things? What a bunch of asshats.


http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/01/16/3612702/new-congress-no-more-national-parks-bill/

New Congress Begins Anti-Environment Attack With ‘No More National Parks’ Bill

by Claire Moser - Guest Contributor
Posted on January 16, 2015 at 2:01 pm


Earlier this week, Rep. Don Young (R-AK) introduced a bill to strip current and future presidents’ authority to designate national monuments, proposing an overhaul to a law that presidents have used for nearly a century to protect some of the country’s most iconic and treasured places.

The bill, introduced Tuesday, would amend the 1906 Antiquities Act to effectively block the President from designating any new national monuments without congressional approval and an extensive environmental review. Additionally, the bill would require the President to seek approval from nearby state governments for marine monument proposals.


“Americans value our National Parks and iconic areas like Grand Canyon and Statue of Liberty, but this legislation would attack the century-old law that has helped protect them,” said Alex Taurel, Deputy Legislative Director at the League of Conservation Voters. “By introducing this bill, Rep. Young has proven how out of step with the American people he truly is.”

Sixteen presidents, both Republicans and Democrats, have used the Antiquities Act to permanently protect public lands and historic sites since the Act’s passage in 1906. Some of America’s most beloved and iconic landmarks, like the Grand Tetons and Arches National Park, were originally protected as national monuments under the Act. President Obama recently used the Act for the 13th time in his presidency to protect the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument outside of Los Angeles.

Rep. Young, who has co-sponsored similar legislation in the past, is one of several other members of Congress who are fighting to gut the Antiquities Act and weaken protections on public lands, but who feature national monuments prominently on social media and their websites: the background of Rep. Young’s website currently features a stock photo of Denali National Park and Preserve, a portion of which was originally designated as a national monument by President Carter in 1978.

more...

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/01/16/3612702/new-congress-no-more-national-parks-bill/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

GitRDun

(1,846 posts)
1. Too funny!
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 06:30 PM
Jan 2015

It's really astonishing how these tin foil hats keep getting elected.

It does not speak well of the electorate that votes them in.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
3. Jobs ... Jobs ... Jobs ... good thing they are TOTALLY focused on JOBS
Fri Jan 16, 2015, 07:32 PM
Jan 2015
Democrats in the Senate are finally going to get to use their dry powder I think...
 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
7. yes. possibly some choice parks will be lost. not the well known ones, like grand canyon --
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 05:36 AM
Jan 2015

maybe just a few smaller, out of the way ones with lots of resources on them.

Maybe Olympic in my state, for example.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
11. I think this merely blocks the creation of new parks.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:55 PM
Jan 2015

I don't read it as threatening existing parks.

Per my comment in #10, though, if they get away with this then we can expect attacks on existing parks to be next. It would probably start with the grant of logging or mining concessions rather than outright sale.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
8. Yes, and I can understand the Prez honorably signing a bill with such a provision ...
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 07:25 AM
Jan 2015

... unlike the CROmnibus bill he signed in December.

It too was "must pass" but contained so much poison that he should have vetoed it and told the American people why, putting the blame on every Congress-critter who voted for it.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
10. If Obama gives even an inch, they'll come back for more.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:52 PM
Jan 2015

If he could accede to this one provision and thereby put an end to this kind of hostage-taking for the rest of his term, then, parks partisan though I am, I could grit my teeth and agree with you in excusing him this one capitulation.

During the next two years, though, there will be multiple "must-pass" bills. Every time the GOP succeeds in extorting some concession(s), it will embolden them to continue and even step up the process. Obama needs to start demanding a "clean bill" on continuing resolutions, debt ceiling bills, etc., and be very vigorous in following your suggestion about blaming the hostage-takers.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
13. He should have started demanding these "clean bills" a while ago. Seems obvious to me ....
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 01:28 PM
Jan 2015

... that he and other Dem leaders are complicit in this scam.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Congress Begins Anti-...