It's a blow to those who refuse to take Warren at her word that she isn't running.

She doesn't have that kind of name recognition yet. She also understands that, although she's very popular in Massachusetts and in the Liberal blogosphere, she won't get that kind of love across a nation that's wary of anything progressive - because M$M, flushed with billions of dollars of lying ads, will tell them to be.

That would mean that we can see another Bush or 0.01%er in the White House - with a Republican House and perhaps even Senate. This would kill her Consumer Financial Protection Bureau even before it could really take off, and it would kill health care reform, most likely put two or even three more pro-corporate Republicans in SCOTUS, and more war in the M.E. It would stop job growth, perhaps even reverse the minimum wage hikes currently popular in States, and a Republican president and House will do everything they can to UNdo everything President Obama has worked so hard for to get through. I don't believe she'd want that kind of responsibility - or blame.

In the meantime, I'll not be holding my breath.

Since the repeal of Glass-Steagal, specializing in offshoring all kinds of Wealth Management:

http://financialservicesinc.ubs.com/revitalizingamerica/SenatorPhilGramm.html

Which, like all Buy-Partisanship, is good for the One Percent.

his economic policies are 1980's Republican and that in many ways Nixon was more liberal than he is?

Third Wayers are hilarious when they try to define "center-left".

Name recognition has nothing to do with it.

Name recognition has everything to do with it. You didn't think the majority of Americans voted for candidates based on politics and knowledge of their positions on issues, did you? Just look at how Duhbya damaged the Bush family name that Jebbie Bush gets beat by Mittney among registered Republicans, for chrissakes.

It certainly confirms what I have assumed all along.

without even mentioning that she was once a Republican. She really isn't running.

In that case, does that mean that Hillary is still pro-Iraq war.

Her two-decades old past only matters if she's seeking the nomination. She's not, so she doesn't go there.

And, Hillary isn't running either.

Senator Warren has said it over and over and over and over...

could've instead put all effort behind Sanders, since he hasn't totally ruled out running yet.

And most of them focus more on Hillary than warren

They aren't going anywhere but forward. It doesn't matter who is President (as we have seen) its what goes on ....out here in America on the ground that will make a difference.

Dean is, after all, from Vermont.

???
Made me laugh.

BTW: It is "Dr. Dean".

And he been saying so to ANYBODY that ask him. Hillary needs some good old fashion competition, beside ...I'm still not ready for her.

to throw up on Hillary