Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Koch network’s 2016 spending goal: $889 million
The Koch brothers political operation intends to spend $889 million in the run-up to the 2016 elections, according to an attendee at the operations annual winter donor gathering in the California dessert.
The spending goal, shared with donors at a Monday morning session at the Rancho Mirage Ritz Carlton, reflects the sweeping ambition of a private conservative political network that in many ways has eclipsed the power of the official Republican Party.
Story Continued Below
The $889 million spending goal dwarfs the $404 million the Republican National Committee spent during the 2012 election and the $188 million it dropped during last years midterm campaign.
While the RNCs spending was supplemented by congressional campaign arms, part of the potency of the Koch operation is that it doesnt have to spread its cash across the entire GOP political landscape.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/koch-2016-spending-goal-114604.html#ixzz3PyJM0pWW
The spending goal, shared with donors at a Monday morning session at the Rancho Mirage Ritz Carlton, reflects the sweeping ambition of a private conservative political network that in many ways has eclipsed the power of the official Republican Party.
Story Continued Below
The $889 million spending goal dwarfs the $404 million the Republican National Committee spent during the 2012 election and the $188 million it dropped during last years midterm campaign.
While the RNCs spending was supplemented by congressional campaign arms, part of the potency of the Koch operation is that it doesnt have to spread its cash across the entire GOP political landscape.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/koch-2016-spending-goal-114604.html#ixzz3PyJM0pWW
I guess they are shopping for the the best gubmint money can buy.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 706 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Koch network’s 2016 spending goal: $889 million (Original Post)
srican69
Jan 2015
OP
Does it feel to you that the Koch's are creating a coup to overthrow our Government?
kimbutgar
Jan 2015
#2
Bandit
(21,475 posts)1. That is their 2014 Net Profit
kimbutgar
(21,161 posts)2. Does it feel to you that the Koch's are creating a coup to overthrow our Government?
Their actions sound kind of treasonous to me.
nruthie
(466 posts)3. They already have.
Except for the President, they pretty much have their team running the show right now. All they need to do now is select which buffoon they want to take their orders in the oval office. The coup happened with Citizens United.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)4. ...
Koch Industries hold leases on 1.1 million acres of oil land in Canada... wonder why the Republicans are pushing Keystone??
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)5. This stuff needs more press,
in saying that,we need people that can read. Looks like the Dems need to get the show on the road.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)6. That's gross.
We need to get money out of politics.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)7. Cheapskates. Isn't democracy worth at least a full billion?