General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWH pushes public-private partnership f/ infrastructure investment
"The administration's idea is to combine some of the most attractive features of public-private partnerships with those of wholly public projects. Local governments would get a private equity partner willing to share the risk of a project, while the private sector would get access to low-interest loans. The program would require congressional approval, and some observers think it may have a good chance among lawmakers
because receipts from the federal excise tax on motor fuel have been inadequate.
More:
http://caf.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=XI9YWhN5qXVhsYBZ9R5PknDy1whHu3vW
djean111
(14,255 posts)Most likely any losses, as usual, will be socialized, and the profits will be privatized.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)under a Republican-controlled Congress. They'll then get the political credit for having done much-needed infrastructure repairs while the public gets higher costs.
djean111
(14,255 posts)wanted to do.
msongs
(67,433 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)"Private equity partners" wouldn't be needed if we just taxed corporations and wealth appropriately.
ananda
(28,873 posts)..