To behave in such a rational manner...as it is, not so much.

Wrongheaded, yes.

Criminal child neglect, not at all.

The real risk in not vaccinating healthy children is that they could expose immunocompromised children, babies, and unvaccinated pregnant women. Therefore, there is a social responsibility to vaccinate, but they are not neglecting their own healthy children.

Maybe. Maybe it depends on the circumstances--if I was quarantining my kid, and an unvaxxed Jehovah's Witness showed up at my door, was exposed to my kid and took it home--then maybe not.

...but neglect is the more correct word here.

I guess you see yourself as the final arbiter of how children should be raised.

Do you even have any kids?

make intelligent decisions on incredibly important public health issues, then maybe the decision needs to be made for them.

It is criminal child neglect, no different from a Jehovah's witness refusing a blood transfusion for their child.

but not children.

Statement on value?

Just because 100 people get the Measles isn't suddenly going to restore faith and trust in the medical community or the government.

In fact, what are the Freepers blaming? Obama, of course. They say if the borders were secure this wouldn't have happened.

the leading international reason for not vaccinating children. Such people had no faith in science to restore, they reject science in favor of faith. They reject the medical community. They always have. It is part of their religion, just as being anti gay is part of their religion. It's not that they 'lost faith in gay people' it's just that their religion teaches them to despise us. And vaccines. Go figure.

Child from being gay. Then their heads might explode while figuring out the "right" course of action.

Of course it wouldn't be enforceable but just hanging a sign out front would ensure that the company isn't liable for this or future outbreaks.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers, it's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]

I wonder if they could even do that. It would involve checking kids' vaccination records, which seems to be an invasion of medical privacy. And by having not medically trained people doing it and making judgments about whether they are enough just seems--wrong.

Something like "Vaccinations must be current unless determined otherwise by medical reasons." Short and simple, no checking, just a notice to give people cause to think. And for the un-vaccinated to maybe stay the hell away from Disneyland.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers, it's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]

it would be the same as it is now.

I don't know if their visitor count will suffer because of this but if I was a corporate board member, I'd at least be concerned that it might.

Telling anti-vaxers, in effect, that they're not welcome at DisneyLand might help make another outbreak less likely, it wouldn't be a certainty of anything.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers, it's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]

Measles, and Mumps and the Flu and the Chicken Pox can cause complications and problems. But the vast majority of the time, a person will recover without problems. So people do not have very much fear with these diseases.

This isn't Ebola we are dealing with here.