General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Koch brothers just kicked mass transit in the face
The Koch brothers just kicked mass transit in the face
?w=1024&h=576&crop=1
A coalition of conservative pressure groups has defeated any hope that congressional Republicans would back a gas tax increase to fund our nations transportation. A higher gas tax is badly needed. The gas tax has not been raised since 1993, even to keep pace with inflation. As Americans drive less and vehicles become more efficient, gas tax revenue falls. Meanwhile, our infrastructure crumbles.
But last Wednesday, some 50 anti-government groups, including Koch brothers front group Americans for Prosperity (AFP) and other recipients of the Kochs largesse such as Freedom Partners, sent a letter to Congress calling on it to oppose any increase in the federal gasoline tax. Among their chief complaints, Washington continues to spend federal dollars on projects that have nothing to do with roads like bike paths and transit.
Its part of the right-wing and Koch networks coordinated national attack on transit. As Streetsblogs Angie Schmitt has reported, the Kochs are going after transit in local referenda. Local AFP chapters have been leading the charge against transit expansions in regions like Indianapolis and Nashville. Last month, Urban Milwaukee reported AFP is trying to block a streetcar project. And Randall OToole, the anti-transit flunky at the Koch-funded Cato Institute, is arguing against a new line on D.C.s metro that would link the urbanizing inner-ring Maryland suburbs.
The Kochs make their money largely in fossil fuels. They, and other backers of conservative pressure groups, oppose the gas tax because they see it as a disincentive for driving. The Kochs especially hate public transportation because it gives their consumers an alternative to driving. Taxing emissions is the way to recover some of those costs from the polluters themselves. Taxing just gasoline is a poor substitute for taxing CO2, but its a start. The gas tax should be set high enough to bring in more revenue than we need for highway construction and maintenance, because it should also give us money to compensate for the cost of car pollution. That extra revenue should go toward programs that liberate us from dependence on cars, like mass transit. Without an adequate gas tax, were all subsidizing driving, first by paying for the roads with general tax revenues and then again by sticking society with the health care and lost business costs from smog and climate change.
. . . .
http://grist.org/climate-energy/the-koch-brothers-just-kicked-mass-transit-in-the-face/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Daily%2520Feb%25204%2520%255BA%255D&utm_campaign=daily&utm_content=A
pansypoo53219
(20,995 posts)now people in cars think they are rich. beware. we're getting close to guillotines.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)And they won't be happy until we don't. It really is that simple.
Initech
(100,102 posts)They're destroying the planet for nothing more than money.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)dilby
(2,273 posts)The tax should be applied to property taxes and business taxes since everyone benefits from public roads, not just people who drive. I don't own a car or drive but I do have UPS at my house 2 times a week for deliveries. I also use the public roads for my bike plus take public transit. I should be paying for these luxuries just like everyone else should be not just those who own a vehicle.
Amishman
(5,559 posts)As you said, everyone benefits from it. I would guess that there are more people who drive than there are property/business owners. If the idea is for everyone to pay their fair share, then that would have the burden placed even more unevenly. Unfortunately, I cannot think off the top of my head of a way to have everyone contribute without being a flat or regressive tax.
dilby
(2,273 posts)Even if you rent the owner of the property passes that cost off to you in your rental fees.