Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWE HAVE A WIN! Net Neutrality: FCC Chairman Proposes To Reclassify Internet Like a Utility
?w=670&h=377&crop=1
Ted Johnson
Senior Editor
@tedstew
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler has proposed reclassifying the Internet as a Title II telecommunications service, a regulatory maneuver that will allow the agency to set robust rules of the road for the Internet, commonly known as net neutrality.
If the FCC votes for his proposal on Feb. 26, it would mean that Internet providers like Comcast and AT&T would be prohibited from blocking or throttling content, or from creating fast lanes or slow lanes in delivering traffic to the consumer. The rules would apply to wired and mobile broadband, a recognition of the evolution of consumer use of the Internet.
Using this authority, I am submitting to my colleagues the strongest open Internet protections ever proposed by the FCC, Wheeler wrote in an op ed posted on the Wired magazine website on Wednesday. My proposal assures the rights of Internet users to go where they want, when they want, and the rights of innovators to introduce new products without asking anyones permission.
While Wheelers proposal would reclassify Internet service, it also would place some limits on the scope of the FCCs oversight, restricting it from regulating rates, bundling practices and other powers that government entities exercise over utilities. The limitations known in regulatory jargon as forbearance are meant to respond to criticisms that such an approach would burden 21st century technology with 20th century regulation.
http://variety.com/2015/biz/news/net-neutrality-fcc-chairman-proposes-to-reclassify-internet-like-a-utility-1201422752/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 866 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WE HAVE A WIN! Net Neutrality: FCC Chairman Proposes To Reclassify Internet Like a Utility (Original Post)
Katashi_itto
Feb 2015
OP
Good news. Another area where Obama was going to sell us down the river, but didn't
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#3
I guess where we differ is I don't think he considers "the masses" as much as he
djean111
Feb 2015
#6
djean111
(14,255 posts)1. Uh-oh -
"restricting it from regulating rates, bundling practices and other powers that government entities exercise over utilities."
Not such a good thing, methinks.
Not such a good thing, methinks.
MADem
(135,425 posts)2. I think it's a good thing--they can't call shitty service "broadband" anymore. nt
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)3. Good news. Another area where Obama was going to sell us down the river, but didn't
djean111
(14,255 posts)4. You don't think the emails and calls and outrage had anything to do with it?
I do.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)5. I don't think he ever planned to screw the masses.
djean111
(14,255 posts)6. I guess where we differ is I don't think he considers "the masses" as much as he
considers political and corporate results/possible effects on contributions vs votes.
I do not think there is much of a "right" or "wrong" issue in Washington these days.
In this case, looks like the providers will be able to jack up rates at will, with no oversight.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)8. +1, but in some people's eyes he's doing this wrong too. nt
He as much as said so.
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)7. Does this mean that internet providers will have to provide
universal service? That is service to whoever, wherever, whenever.