Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 08:35 PM Feb 2015

Why can't SI focus on women for their athletic prowess instead of sexiness?

It should be about the grace, athleticism, strength and ability, right?






I know some will accuse me of trying to start a flame war or to titillate but watching this video all I could do was be impressed by the talent these young women possess.

Art comes in many forms.

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why can't SI focus on women for their athletic prowess instead of sexiness? (Original Post) Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2015 OP
It should be about whatever the readers want AgingAmerican Feb 2015 #1
I did this for five years. It WAS an artform and still is. bravenak Feb 2015 #2
"Takes skill." Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2015 #3
Hard as hell. bravenak Feb 2015 #8
Where's the tape? brer cat Feb 2015 #5
Too fat now. bravenak Feb 2015 #7
To us, you've still got it and you always will pinboy3niner Feb 2015 #9
My self esteem is a bloomin'!! bravenak Feb 2015 #11
If you don't have enough temptation, I recommend Tillamook mudslide ice cream Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #12
Ummmm. Don't tempt me. I've been back on chocodiles recently and they want an ice cream bath. bravenak Feb 2015 #14
Oh my God. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #19
I love Tillamook. So creamy. Their yogurt too.nt bravenak Feb 2015 #20
It's oregon, man Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #22
I'll find out how you did it as soon as this MJ is all legal and stuff. End of the month. bravenak Feb 2015 #24
Then again, intellectuals from Oregon are Salem seen pinboy3niner Feb 2015 #28
Ha! brer cat Feb 2015 #13
Raspberry danish twist!!! bravenak Feb 2015 #15
Those damn supermarkets keep putting it on sale on the endcaps pinboy3niner Feb 2015 #16
I bought a couple last week. 3 bucks each! Tried to resist. bravenak Feb 2015 #17
are they only reporting on the male dancers ? JI7 Feb 2015 #4
ESPN the magazine does a "body" issue bigwillq Feb 2015 #6
The photography in that thing is gorgeous. LeftyMom Feb 2015 #32
"If the liberal peen is keen, it must demean" Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #10
Y'know, as a heterosexual male, I'm far from immune to something like the Hannah Davis cover. nomorenomore08 Feb 2015 #21
I actually liked last year's cover better. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #23
"trying to shoehorn examples of one thing into broad, sweeping generalizations..." nomorenomore08 Feb 2015 #26
Again, I don't think that's what's actually going on. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #27
Yeah, I do think I was over-generalizing above. People may be somewhat impressionable nomorenomore08 Feb 2015 #29
I don't fantasize about being with SI swimsuit models, actually, in any way shape or form. Warren DeMontague Feb 2015 #30
"I don't respond well to anyone whose message is 'physical lust is wrong.'" nomorenomore08 Feb 2015 #35
Not mutually exclusive. But regardless, I see your point. nomorenomore08 Feb 2015 #18
Nothing wrong with them highlighting both. NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #25
The swimsuit issue is by far their best seller, so I thin SI knows what they are doing. Travis_0004 Feb 2015 #31
They do that, too, though women are still underrepresented on the cover for athleticism. MADem Feb 2015 #33
Great post. I agree they need to "do better" as far as spotlighting actual female athletes, but nomorenomore08 Feb 2015 #37
The Topmost Mallakhamb Players.. MicaelS Feb 2015 #34
Art or sex, both make $$$$$. Men buy SI to oogle women in almost no clothing. Rex Feb 2015 #36
I think they get by with the way they do that because Jamastiene Feb 2015 #38
 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
1. It should be about whatever the readers want
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 08:42 PM
Feb 2015

They are the ones who go out and buy it. If they don't want it, they won't buy it.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
2. I did this for five years. It WAS an artform and still is.
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 08:44 PM
Feb 2015

Not everybody can do it. I've seen people take falls that make them avoid the pole forever. Not me. Never. I could do a trick just using my armpit. Takes skill.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
3. "Takes skill."
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 08:49 PM
Feb 2015

And strength and stamina and grace and creativity. Personally, I know I could never do it but I am in awe.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
8. Hard as hell.
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 09:06 PM
Feb 2015

I got taught by a ballerina from Germany. I cried sometimes and fell, but I would get into the zone and time flew. I think about joining the classes in town, but I got lazy after my kids. Maybe this year.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
7. Too fat now.
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 09:05 PM
Feb 2015

Once I hit 150 I found myself slipping. into my Entemanns.

I think I can still do a few moves, no upside downs or helicopters, tho.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
12. If you don't have enough temptation, I recommend Tillamook mudslide ice cream
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 09:12 PM
Feb 2015

i'm pretty good and my sweet tooth is usally under control, but that stuff is like crack.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
14. Ummmm. Don't tempt me. I've been back on chocodiles recently and they want an ice cream bath.
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 09:16 PM
Feb 2015

I give up, really. As long as I can buy the same size I've been buying, I'm eating whatever I want. Caution to the wind!!

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
28. Then again, intellectuals from Oregon are Salem seen
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 10:16 PM
Feb 2015

Okay, I admit that I just had to stretch for it.

From a guy who lived in Portland for 7 years.

brer cat

(24,591 posts)
13. Ha!
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 09:13 PM
Feb 2015

I would never have been able to pole dance, but I sure know that slipping move into the Entemanns.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
15. Raspberry danish twist!!!
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 09:18 PM
Feb 2015

I was up to two a week. Had to calm down. Started yelling at my husband when he took a piece of MY CAKE!!! Poor guy.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
16. Those damn supermarkets keep putting it on sale on the endcaps
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 09:25 PM
Feb 2015

Evil bastards!

(That's my favorite, too. )

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
6. ESPN the magazine does a "body" issue
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 08:58 PM
Feb 2015

and features both men and women

http://espn.go.com/espn/bodyissue

FROM WIKI:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Body_Issue

In the bodies section athletes were featured on and off the field. Even a picture during a knee surgery was included. The "Bodies We Want" section was a feature of the best bodies in the world of sports all posed nude but with strategic coverage of private parts.[5] Another section showed the damage done to the human body in athletics such as Laird Hamilton's cracked heel and Torry Holt's crooked middle finger.[2] One action photo captured six members of Major League Soccer's D.C. United simulating a free kick defensive wall while covering their genitalia.[6]

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
21. Y'know, as a heterosexual male, I'm far from immune to something like the Hannah Davis cover.
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 09:33 PM
Feb 2015

I have the same "visceral" reaction to it that most guys probably do.

That said, I still think there are valid issues to be raised - like capitalist commodification of the human body, or the lack of balance (or nuance) in the way both sexes, but especially women, are portrayed by the media. So of course I'm going to look, and enjoy looking, but at the same time I'm not opposed to thinking more deeply about it.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
23. I actually liked last year's cover better.
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 09:42 PM
Feb 2015

I think Hannah Davis is too skinny for my taste, but I dont want to be accused of "judging".

We live in a capitalist society. Pretty much every transaction that involves cash, involves "commodification". And like it or not, sex sells, and for whatever reason statistically men seem more interested in buying magazines with scantly clad women, than vice versa.

But "the media" isnt a monolith, and part of the problem I have with these sorts of "exercises" around this stuff, is trying to shoehorn examples of one thing into broad, sweeping generalizations about the whole thing.

If all magazines were the annual SI swimsuit issue, all the time, it might "mean" something, but they aren't.

i actually know a great deal more about society and the actual issues facing people, versus these imaginary, invented ones- from real experience in the actual real world- but i keep my mouth shut about 95% of it, because .... why bother.

You don't have to be IBM's chess playing robot to see the way the game will play out 3 or 4 moves down.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
26. "trying to shoehorn examples of one thing into broad, sweeping generalizations..."
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 10:11 PM
Feb 2015

You do have a point there. Except that the SI swimsuit issue - which I couldn't care less about, generally - doesn't exist in a vacuum, nor does any other mass-produced image. I just hate to see people (not you personally) being such slaves to artificial images and constructed fantasies - at its worst, it resembles something out of "Videodrome."

"'The media' isn't a monolith."

True, though it can resemble one at times, when most of the content is generated by a handful of huge corporations.

I'm not saying suggestive (or more explicit) imagery is the problem, rather the unreal "reality" constituted by these images. Too many people are so caught up in that, that they can't see outside of it.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
27. Again, I don't think that's what's actually going on.
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 10:16 PM
Feb 2015

And in terms of seeing an awful lot of a certain way of thinking- I see an awful lot (at least around here) of this idea that the befuddled sheeple masses are brainwashed and being led around by their noses, save for us enlightened few who have seen through the matrix.

I don't buy it. I think we're all, to some degree, engaged in a dance with a mixture of personal/consensus reality both of our own and our cultural collective creation, but I also give people- all people- a lot more credit to think for themselves than these simplistic over-generalizations do.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
29. Yeah, I do think I was over-generalizing above. People may be somewhat impressionable
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 10:20 PM
Feb 2015

but they're not that stupid, by and large.

I'm not claiming to be one of the "enlightened few." Actually, a lot of what I've said in this discussion comes from my own experiences and observations. I myself have had to resist being sucked down the rabbit hole of idealized, unattainable fantasy - and this is a still-ongoing process, mind you.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
30. I don't fantasize about being with SI swimsuit models, actually, in any way shape or form.
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 10:34 PM
Feb 2015

I'm extremely happily married and the feeling is mutual- married to someone who likewise can appreciate, on a totally superficial level, that beefy alcede guy from True Blood...

nevertheless I remain reasonably certain that she wouldn't actually be interested in him, either. We're big, complex grown-ups who understand ourselves and each other, which is absolutely essential IMNSHO to a working, long-term relationship.

All that said, I don't respond well to anyone whose message is "physical lust is wrong"-- I don't care if they come equipped with a priest collar, or a PhD in sociology.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
35. "I don't respond well to anyone whose message is 'physical lust is wrong.'"
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 11:38 PM
Feb 2015

Nor do I - and it was never my intent to imply otherwise. I do find it interesting to pick apart, or deconstruct, some of this stuff, but that doesn't mean I think it's a "sin" (or whatever the secular equivalent would be).

And I'm not necessarily real big on the whole "lusting after celebrities" thing anyhow. I find some of the young women I know IRL just as attractive in their own way.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
18. Not mutually exclusive. But regardless, I see your point.
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 09:28 PM
Feb 2015

I think all anyone really wants is a more balanced representation of women in the media, which is certainly not too much to ask.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
25. Nothing wrong with them highlighting both.
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 10:10 PM
Feb 2015

In fact, Ronda Rousey is featured in a swimsuit in this edition, and she's one of the best athletes in America. I don't particularly care for MMA, but I've seen a few clips of her fighting.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
33. They do that, too, though women are still underrepresented on the cover for athleticism.
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 11:12 PM
Feb 2015

They need to do better. I read somewhere that women on the cover are under five percent of their total:









As for your post, they aren't putting pole dancers on the cover, so your post does seem a bit gratuitous. They are putting bikini models who display beauty and form--but generally, no records of athleticism-- on the cover, and they use the models to generate both newsstand and subscription sales to keep the franchise operating.

I don't understand why people get so upset/excited about this topic. Frankly, the whole "roll out" of who gets the cover of the magazine seems a bit forced. They tried to get people interested with 'painted on' bathing suits, and that ran out of fizz pretty quick, so then they went to "Oooh, look at these BEHINDS" and people went "Ooooh la la" or "Tut tut" and they, of course, knew they had to top themselves, so now they're showing the barest glimpse of pudenda, in order to get people interested.

Back in the Old Days, people cared about who Miss America was, and who the "Playmate of the Year" was, too. Now, no one gives a sorry crap. Why? Because it's all just stupid.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
37. Great post. I agree they need to "do better" as far as spotlighting actual female athletes, but
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 11:44 PM
Feb 2015

I do find the heated discussion over the "swimsuit issue" a tad absurd. Like I said, it's about balance - if SI presented a wider range of images of women, rather than just "sexy" ones, I don't think people would be so up in arms.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
36. Art or sex, both make $$$$$. Men buy SI to oogle women in almost no clothing.
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 11:41 PM
Feb 2015

Many cultures share similar traits throughout history;


Ancient Egyptian furry porn.


Roman orgies.


Viking women and the Sea Serpent.


Kinky Martian sex.


And of course Ron Jeremy.


I have no conclusion. Thank you for your time.




Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
38. I think they get by with the way they do that because
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 12:52 AM
Feb 2015

they were grandfathered in and slipped under the radar once people started pointing out sexism. That is just a guess.

I wish they would talk about a woman's athletic abilities and no concentrate on just looks good in a bikini. I would much rather see athletic women with 6 pack abs explaining how they did it and talking about the hard work it takes than just a skinny one in a bikini with nothing interesting to say.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why can't SI focus on wom...