Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 03:02 AM Feb 2015

Saudis Probably Funded 9/11 Hijackers, and the U.S. Won't Do Anything About it. Here's Why.

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/28455-focus-saudis-probably-funded-911-hijackers-and-the-us-wont-do-anything-about-it-heres-why-rsn

During the process of what Perkins called the “Saudi Arabian Money-Laundering Affair (SAMA),” the U.S. Treasury sent Perkins and his team of economists at the consulting firm Chas T. Main to Saudi Arabia. Perkins described his role in a 2004 interview with Democracy Now:

“We worked out this deal whereby the Royal House of Saud agreed to send most of their petro-dollars back to the United States and invest them in U.S. government securities. The Treasury Department would use the interest from these securities to hire U.S. companies to build Saudi Arabia — new cities, new infrastructure — which we've done. And the House of Saud would agree to maintain the price of oil within acceptable limits to us, which they’ve done all of these years, and we would agree to keep the House of Saud in power as long as they did this, which we’ve done …”


The U.S.’s tenuous relationship with Saudi royalty may be upended after recent allegations made by Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th 9/11 hijacker, that Saudi Arabia bankrolled Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda in the months leading up to 9/11. Lawyers for 9/11 victims are claiming that along with Moussaoui’s revelations about a Saudi embassy official discussing a plot to assassinate President Clinton while he was aboard Air Force One, new evidence will soon emerge in two forms: Declassification of the secret 28 pages of the 9/11 Commission Report that details Saudi Arabia’s involvement in the attacks, and 80,000 pages of an FBI probe into Saudi funding of 9/11 hijackers in Florida. A 2003 article in Vanity Fair speculated about the contents of the 9/11 Commission Report’s classified contents:

“According to news reports, the classified section charges that there were ties between the hijackers and two Saudis, Omar al-Bayoumi and Osama Bassnan, who had financial relationships with members of the Saudi government. Saudi officials deny that their government was in any way linked to the attacks. The Saudis have asked that the pages be declassified so they can refute them, but President Bush has refused.”


Moussaoui’s testimony is problematic for both the U.S. and Saudi governments. Ever since Richard Nixon was president, the Saudis have maintained a close relationship with every president who’s occupied the White House. They even used that access to fly out members of the Saudi royal family and the bin Laden family when the FAA grounded all commercial and private flights (including flights for both former president Bill Clinton and former vice president Al Gore). These flights were granted permission to leave, and despite the potential for the two dozen members of the bin Laden family aboard those flights to provide invaluable information about where Osama bin Laden was hiding or the depth of his network, those family members were never interviewed by the FBI.
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Saudis Probably Funded 9/11 Hijackers, and the U.S. Won't Do Anything About it. Here's Why. (Original Post) eridani Feb 2015 OP
Get thee to the Greatest Pages... n/t JimDandy Feb 2015 #1
All true, but there's also no other less objectionable group around to run Saudi Arabia bhikkhu Feb 2015 #2
You're actually saying that the House of Saud is the LEAST objectionable delrem Feb 2015 #5
If the House of Saud sabbat hunter Feb 2015 #15
Ah, I see. You have support for the House of Saud covered. delrem Feb 2015 #17
+1. bemildred Feb 2015 #18
The house of Saud sabbat hunter Feb 2015 #19
Iran is shia, wahabbi's are sunni. grahamhgreen Feb 2015 #20
I am well aware of that sabbat hunter Feb 2015 #22
In my view, if the Sauds were overthrown, they wouldn't quite be like Iran, grahamhgreen Feb 2015 #29
There's no need to overthrow anyone. CJCRANE Feb 2015 #23
I'm not so sure Waiting For Everyman Feb 2015 #3
it sure reallocated a ton of money in a big way... to - guess where = where? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #4
The motive was to start the War on Terror. delrem Feb 2015 #6
Bingo! Scuba Feb 2015 #14
Yup grahamhgreen Feb 2015 #21
Yep. Something had to replace the Soviet boogeyman, hifiguy Feb 2015 #25
interesting post.......... useful idiots and political game theory Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #8
A most interesting reply too, I Ching, Waiting For Everyman Feb 2015 #33
Another term used in intelligence..... SHEEP DIPPED Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #35
Love your post get the red out Feb 2015 #27
There are so many shoes left to drop. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2015 #32
I hope you are right get the red out Feb 2015 #34
I live in Kansas. Gas was scarce here in 1979, too, during the gas crisis. nt tblue37 Feb 2015 #30
I was referring to the one in the winter of 1973-74. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2015 #31
So, does DU owe some apologies? Blue State Bandit Feb 2015 #7
K&R RandiFan1290 Feb 2015 #9
I agree get the red out Feb 2015 #28
bbc Hijack 'suspects' alive and well Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #10
28 ways to help get the 28 pages de-classified nationalize the fed Feb 2015 #11
Thanks mang Jesus Malverde Feb 2015 #13
Holy cow Jesus Malverde Feb 2015 #12
one little correction to your story sabbat hunter Feb 2015 #16
You might find this Vanity Fair article of interest mnhtnbb Feb 2015 #26
airspace reopened sabbat hunter Feb 2015 #36
Saudi Arabia = hifiguy Feb 2015 #24

bhikkhu

(10,720 posts)
2. All true, but there's also no other less objectionable group around to run Saudi Arabia
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 04:26 AM
Feb 2015

...which is the kind of problem made obvious by Syria and other ME nations, and by Iraq, of course. Not that its our job to engineer the globe to our liking, but if it were our job the consensus lately is that we would fail, quickly and completely, regardless of the quality of our intentions.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
5. You're actually saying that the House of Saud is the LEAST objectionable
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 05:45 AM
Feb 2015

group to run the country?

You're actually saying that? As some kind of explanation, some kind of excuse?

sabbat hunter

(6,834 posts)
15. If the House of Saud
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 10:21 AM
Feb 2015

were to be overthrown, they would likely be replaced by wahhabist clerics. It would be like another Iran.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
17. Ah, I see. You have support for the House of Saud covered.
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 10:32 AM
Feb 2015

Because wahhabist clerics have little influence in subjugating the population right now.

Thanks for the information. Now I can sleep better at night, knowing that the House of Saud is protecting the people from Islamic fundamentalism.

sabbat hunter

(6,834 posts)
19. The house of Saud
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 10:51 AM
Feb 2015

control the wahhabist clerics right now, use them to control the population.

But things would be far worse if the Wahhabists were the ones in charge.

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
29. In my view, if the Sauds were overthrown, they wouldn't quite be like Iran,
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 02:16 AM
Feb 2015

they'd be more like, well, Saudi Arabia....

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
23. There's no need to overthrow anyone.
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 02:35 PM
Feb 2015

Why is everything these days about toppling other countries' governments?

There are other methods for dealing with international disputes.

(I'm replying to the general theme of this sub-thread).

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
3. I'm not so sure
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 04:28 AM
Feb 2015

that there isn't another hidden hand one step up the food chain, pulling the Saudi's strings too. For one thing, the Saudis didn't really have a good enough motive for taking down the WTCs, but some in the US certainly did. Also, I can't quite see the fact of Prescott Bush and friends financing and creating Hitler, as a one-time scheme that didn't pay off for them afterward. (I'm sure it did pay off, as planned, and not in an obvious, traceable way.)

Something just tells me, even if the Saudis get caught red-handed at this level, the endpoint of it comes back to the US and/or London, and the bankers.

Then too, I happen to know that the "gas crisis" was phony, because I happened to be driving across country at that time, and strangely enough... the crisis was almost entirely on the coasts in the big cities. There were long lines for gas in California, and I didn't encounter another one until I got back to Maryland. Prices weren't even terribly high in between. The weird thing was, that nobody was reporting that. It was obviously a fraud, but it sure reallocated a ton of money in a big way... out of the pockets of people who earned it, to -- guess where.

And presto! at roughly the same time, terrorism broke out as a new thing internationally, and never quite went away.

Anyway, you never know what will start the web unraveling. If this gets disclosed... let's just say I believe that every now and then, the human race gets lucky, and the balance gets evened up a bit.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
4. it sure reallocated a ton of money in a big way... to - guess where = where?
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 04:40 AM
Feb 2015

interesting post. I can't see that the Saudis had a good motive either, but who in the US did? I've wondered since the towers were associated with the rockefellers, if that played into it, but you think about this stuff too much and it'll drive you crazy.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
25. Yep. Something had to replace the Soviet boogeyman,
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 04:29 PM
Feb 2015

which dissolved, and this was it. The MIC needed a new boogeyman so they helped create it.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
8. interesting post.......... useful idiots and political game theory
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 06:50 AM
Feb 2015

In political jargon, useful idiot is a term for people perceived as propagandists for a cause whose goals they are not fully aware of, and who are used cynically by the leaders of the cause.

game theory gives people power. Whether people use game theory power for the common good or for selfish aims depends on individuals, their sense of ethics, and their belief systems.

Peter Nonacs acknowledges the evil possibilities of game theory knowledge when he writes, “Morally, of course, games can be tricky. Theory predicts that outcomes are often not to the betterment of the group or society.” Nonacs, Peter. “Cheating to Learn: How a UCLA professor gamed a game theory midterm.” April 22, 2013.

"A 'limited hangout' is spy jargon for a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting--sometimes even volunteering--some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further."


"All war is deception."
Sun Tzu, 500 BCE

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
35. Another term used in intelligence..... SHEEP DIPPED
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 09:12 AM
Feb 2015



SHEEP DIPPED





The phrase "sheep dipped," is more-or-less slang and not official terminology. It is commonly used in intelligence circles as a way of saying a person has been given an alternate identity. The paragraph quote below from THE SECRET TEAM, Chapter 7 Page 124, at the source so cited, although speaking specifically toward the Army and use of the phrase, is applicable generally and is about as close as you are going to find to a full scale definition:


"'Sheep-dipped' is an intricate Army-devised process by which a man who is in the service as a full career soldier or officer agrees to go through all the legal and official motions of resigning from the service. Then, rather than actually being released, his records are pulled from the Army personnel files and transferred to a special Army intelligence file. Substitute but nonetheless real-appearing records are then processed, and the man 'leaves' the service. He is encouraged to write to friends and give a cover reason why he got out. He goes to his bank and charge card services and changes his status to civilian, and does the hundreds of other official and personal things that any man would do if he really had gotten out of the service. Meanwhile, his real Army records are kept in secrecy, but not forgotten. If his contemporaries get promoted, he gets promoted. All of the things that can be done for his hidden records to keep him even with his peers are done. Some very real problems arise in the event he gets killed or captured as a prisoner. There are problems with insurance and with benefits his wife would receive had he remained in the service. At this point, sheep-dipping gets really complicated, and each case is handled quite separately." (source)



https://archive.org/stream/H.DuthelTheSecretTeam/TheSecretTeam#page/n0/mode/2up


some say Oswald was sheep dipped.

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
7. So, does DU owe some apologies?
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 06:22 AM
Feb 2015

I appreciate the great work done over the years by this site and it's admins, but if these 28 pages are released, I expect an apology for being made out to be a conspiracy nut, and forced to hold my tongue under threat of relegation to the dungeon, or tomestoned.

And I know I'm not the only one.

RandiFan1290

(6,239 posts)
9. K&R
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 07:00 AM
Feb 2015

You are 100% correct. If it weren't for the publicons coming out and demanding answers the threads and posts would still be locked and accused of being CT.

So sad that DU needed the publicons backing in order to talk about Saudi involvement but it does show that many "dems" allow the rightwing to lead them around by the nose.

get the red out

(13,468 posts)
28. I agree
Sun Feb 8, 2015, 06:00 PM
Feb 2015

I have never even pretended to consider thinking about such things our of fear. You are certainly NOT a nut.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
10. bbc Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 07:04 AM
Feb 2015

Sunday, 23 September, 2001, 12:30 GMT 13:30 UK
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well



Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.

The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.

Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.

His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world.


Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.

He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks on New York and Washington, and had been in Morocco when they happened. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities, according to Saudi press reports.

He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Daytona Beach in the United States, and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring.

But, he says, he left the United States in September last year, became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is currently on a further training course in Morocco.

Mistaken identity

Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of the Flight 11 hijack suspects, has also been quoted in Arab news reports.

Abdelaziz Al Omari
Abdelaziz Al Omari 'lost his passport in Denver'
He says he is an engineer with Saudi Telecoms, and that he lost his passport while studying in Denver.

Another man with exactly the same name surfaced on the pages of the English-language Arab News.

The second Abdulaziz Al Omari is a pilot for Saudi Arabian Airlines, the report says.

Meanwhile, Asharq Al Awsat newspaper, a London-based Arabic daily, says it has interviewed Saeed Alghamdi.


Khalid Al-Midhar may also be alive
He was listed by the FBI as a hijacker in the United flight that crashed in Pennsylvania.

And there are suggestions that another suspect, Khalid Al Midhar, may also be alive.

FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
11. 28 ways to help get the 28 pages de-classified
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 07:14 AM
Feb 2015

Whether you want to take your first step toward helping declassify the 28-page finding on foreign government assistance to the 9/11 hijackers, or you’re looking for even more ways to chip in than you already have, here are 28 ways you can help us build the movement.

1. Write to your representative or call them at 202-225-3121. Send a letter in minutes with our ready-to-print letters.

2. Write to the president or call the White House at 202-456-1111 and ask the president to keep his pledge to 9/11 families.

3 and 4. Write to your two senators or call them at 202-224-3121 to ask them to introduce legislation similar to H.Res.14. Here’s what to say.

5. Like 28Pages.org on Facebook.

6. Follow @28Pages on Twitter.

7. Contact your favorite reporter, columnist, TV host, blogger or podcaster and ask them to explore the issue.

8. Write a letter to the editor of your newspaper.

9-28: http://28pages.org/2014/08/28/28-ways-you-can-build-the-28-pages-movement/

28 Pages FAQ
http://28pages.org/faq/

For those that say this would hurt the 911 families:

Still Secret: 28 Pages That Could Change Our Understanding of 9/11

A bipartisan group of congressmen joined with 9/11 family members today to renew efforts to declassify 28 pages of a joint congressional inquiry into the worst terrorist attack against the United States.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/secret-28-pages-change-understanding-911/story?id=28061961

"If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear" - so the Proles are told


Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
13. Thanks mang
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 07:52 AM
Feb 2015

So many are hooked on the official conspiracy theory, that this came out of the caves of Afghanistan.

IF ever daylight and transperancy were needed this is the case.

sabbat hunter

(6,834 posts)
16. one little correction to your story
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 10:26 AM
Feb 2015

the bin laden family was not flown out until Sept 20th, which was AFTER US airspace was reopened.

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/flights.asp

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Saudis Probably Funded 9/...