General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHere is what I think should be done concerning ISIS, Boko Haram, and other horrible groups:
The USA should formally recognize the International Criminal Court and pledge to fully submit to it. Then pressure all its client states (Israel comes to mind) to do the same. If after this the ICC then chooses to press charges against leaders of ISIS, Boko Haram etc., I will not object to the use of force under such circumstances.
Until the day the USA formally recognizes the ICC and submits to it, I will view any military efforts of the USA outside of its borders as agenda driven and self-serving.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)the ICC a position above all National courts?
There isn't a country in the world that will submit to the ICC as a supreme court.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)No U.S. President or Congress will EVER allow the trial of American politicians by a foreign court for the actions they take in their official position.
msongs
(67,432 posts)Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)On the other hand, 42 UN members or observers have neither signed nor ratified the Rome Statute and these include the Vatican, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, China, Lebanon, Brunei, India.....all of these and more have never even signed on to the idea, much less ratified.
Might as well mention that.
on point
(2,506 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Yawn.
on point
(2,506 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)committed the supreme crime against the peace of invading and occupying Iraq, because each would have had to worry that he could become subject to ICC jurisdiction for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
IIRC, Bush prevented our joining the ICC in the spring or summer of 2001, mighty convenient as subsequent events demonstrated. Not CT exactly, save that the first thing one has to do if one is preparing to commit war crimes is to make sure that the relevant governing authorities lack jurisdiction.