Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sat Apr 28, 2012, 06:27 AM Apr 2012

Corporate Legal Rights Grow As Courts Block Pro-Consumer Class Action Suits

http://www.alternet.org/story/155179/corporate_legal_rights_grow_as_courts_block_pro-consumer_class_action_suits/

_640x597_310x220

One year after a U.S. Supreme Court decision gave corporations free rein to block class action lawsuits, judges have used the decision to prevent at least 76 potential class-action suits from going forward, a new report by Public Citizen and the National Association of Consumer Advocates (NACA) has found.

The report, “Justice Denied,” tracks the anti-consumer effects of AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, in which the Supreme Court ruled that corporations could block consumers’ rights to sue collectively—even in the 19 states that have laws protecting such rights.

What began as a dispute over $30 between Vincent and Liza Concepcion and AT&T has turned into a legal monster worth millions of dollars to corporate bottom lines. The corporate lawyers and the court put profits before people, and a year later, we are seeing the ripple effects, as people seeking fairness are losing their legal rights.

The report details three cases in which consumers have felt the direct impact of the ruling:

Class Actions Against Career Education Corporation (CEC). Before Concepcion, thousands of students collectively sued Career Education Corp., a company that owns a chain of for-profit culinary schools, for misrepresenting the potential earning power of its graduates. The misleading numbers enticed many students to enroll and thus take on debilitating student loans to finance their education. According to the lawsuits, students attending the schools typically emerged with debts in excess of $40,000 and were not able to obtain jobs that paid enough to provide a reasonable chance of repaying their loans. At the time of the lawsuits, CEC did not include a class-action ban in its contracts with students. The collective cases proceeded in court and resulted in payments of up to $20,000 per student. While these cases, filed before Concepcion, achieved a meaningful settlement, other cases are still pending. In a post-Concepcion era, however, students with similar collective claims may not be able to pursue redress because it would be too difficult to overcome the class-action ban the company now includes in its contracts.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Corporate Legal Rights Grow As Courts Block Pro-Consumer Class Action Suits (Original Post) xchrom Apr 2012 OP
Essentially, the Court just gave corporations the carte blanche to sell snake oil to everyone... MrScorpio Apr 2012 #1
A bunch of Conservative Dems Oromneya Apr 2012 #2
Umm, this was a Dancing Supreme decision and NOT legislative action. fasttense Apr 2012 #5
So if a corporation cheats a million customers out of $30 each, they can get away with it. tclambert Apr 2012 #3
The robber barons have made a asjr Apr 2012 #4
Our current US oligarchy is the definition of fascists, pure and simple. fasttense Apr 2012 #6
Benito Mussolini put it best panzerfaust Apr 2012 #7
DURec KG Apr 2012 #8

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
1. Essentially, the Court just gave corporations the carte blanche to sell snake oil to everyone...
Sat Apr 28, 2012, 06:40 AM
Apr 2012

While free from the threat of any repercussions.

Thank you, Republicans, for fucking us all over.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
5. Umm, this was a Dancing Supreme decision and NOT legislative action.
Sat Apr 28, 2012, 08:21 AM
Apr 2012

You know, that Kangaroo court that calls itself supreme. It's ruled by 5 idiots who are radical conservative activists. You know the clique in the supremes that includes Scalia, Roberts, Alito, Kennedy and buy-my-vote Thomas. The clique of black robed activist judges made the decision the remaining 4 members all dissented. So, there was NO bipartisan support. It was a decision based solely on conservative ideology and social darwinism.

tclambert

(11,087 posts)
3. So if a corporation cheats a million customers out of $30 each, they can get away with it.
Sat Apr 28, 2012, 07:04 AM
Apr 2012

Sure, each victim could sue for their $30, in theory. But of course no one will. They only way to stop such cheating was to allow the million victims to band together and make it one court case for $30,000,000.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
6. Our current US oligarchy is the definition of fascists, pure and simple.
Sat Apr 28, 2012, 08:27 AM
Apr 2012

Everyone avoids the word. Even Naomi Cline in her book the Shook Doctrine didn't identify this as fascism. But really when corporations are allowed to pillage and plunder citizens, with full support of the courts and federal government, what else could it be?

 

panzerfaust

(2,818 posts)
7. Benito Mussolini put it best
Sat Apr 28, 2012, 08:45 AM
Apr 2012

"Fascism is the fusion of Capital with the power of The State."



The quote is possibly apocryphal, yet it does succinctly summarize Ben's actions as the world's first fascist dictator.

Ben also, without question, observed (as he was taking personal freedom away) ...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Corporate Legal Rights Gr...