Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mfcorey1

(11,001 posts)
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 07:06 AM Feb 2015

Banks May Have Overplayed Their Hand Fighting Wall Street Regulation

(Bloomberg) -- The financial industry is finding that winning in Washington comes at a cost.

Wall Street lobbied aggressively and succeeded late last year in persuading lawmakers to roll back rules for the $700 trillion derivatives market. Instead of generating momentum for further changes to the Dodd-Frank Act, the victory sparked a populist uprising among Democrats that’s had wide-ranging consequences, including stymieing less controversial requests from regional banks like Capital One Financial Corp.

“A short while ago there was bipartisan agreement on a number of common sense improvements,” said Rob Nichols, president of the Financial Services Forum that represents the chief executives of Wall Street’s biggest banks. “Unfortunately, that bipartisan agreement is gone.”

Financial companies and their employees spent $169 million on the November elections and had expectations that their bid to loosen regulations would get easier with Republicans in control of both the House and Senate. Now, there is second-guessing that banks overplayed their hand, according to lobbyists. The December win on swaps rules has become a rallying cry for Senator Elizabeth Warren, a frequent critic of Wall Street, and spurred repeated White House vows to defend Dodd-Frank.

The fallout has frustrated banks, which hope it’s temporary. Democrats who previously said they wanted to revise the law now won’t even discuss it. Republicans are altering their strategy for attacking Dodd-Frank. And lobbyists have been hindered in their efforts to persuade Senate Democrats to champion changes to financial rules.

A sign of the political headwinds has been regional banks’ difficulty winning bipartisan support for a bill that would free them from stringent oversight imposed on lenders with at least $50 billion of assets.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/banks-success-curbing-regulation-sparks-100000149.html

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Banks May Have Overplayed Their Hand Fighting Wall Street Regulation (Original Post) mfcorey1 Feb 2015 OP
Let's hope this is just the beginning.... daleanime Feb 2015 #1
Chump change Godot51 Feb 2015 #2
It sure is! burrowowl Feb 2015 #14
K&R nt myrna minx Feb 2015 #3
Oh, those poor 'regional' banks..... blackspade Feb 2015 #4
Break Up The Banks. nm rhett o rick Feb 2015 #5
Gotta love their use of language. staggerleem Feb 2015 #6
Sounds like "Wealth Re-Distribution" to me. bvar22 Feb 2015 #9
It really depends on which direction it is going^^^^^^ mikeysnot Feb 2015 #13
Oh, boo hoo. Control-Z Feb 2015 #7
You got it in a nutshell. AwakeAtLast Feb 2015 #12
Three words: local credit unions. salin Feb 2015 #8
This is another one of those things I have to see to believe. Octafish Feb 2015 #10
Me too. Enthusiast Feb 2015 #17
Don't worry, banksters. hifiguy Feb 2015 #11
Just what I was thinking. More common sense. Enthusiast Feb 2015 #18
“A short while ago there was bipartisan agreement on a number of common sense improvements,” rpannier Feb 2015 #15
K & R !!! WillyT Feb 2015 #16
 

staggerleem

(469 posts)
6. Gotta love their use of language.
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 02:55 PM
Feb 2015

Gutting regulations = "common sense improvements".

Allowing Wall Street to use FDIC-insured funds to play the market ponies is just "common sense" right? Because why should they take a chance on losing their lunch, when we've always been so willing to allow them to eat ours?

Actually, that's somewhat inaccurate - we don't just GIVE them our lunch. Their cronies in Congress figure out how to ladle heaps of goodies from our plates onto theirs with their left hands, while they wave the flag, the 2nd amendment, and the rest of the bill of rights in their right hands, shouting "FREEDOM!" all the while.

mikeysnot

(4,757 posts)
13. It really depends on which direction it is going^^^^^^
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 10:11 PM
Feb 2015

Up for the few, they are for it! Evenly for the many, against it.....

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
7. Oh, boo hoo.
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 03:53 PM
Feb 2015

In other words, with Citizens United, they thought they were buying themselves an election.

"Financial companies and their employees spent $169 million on the November elections and had expectations that their bid to loosen regulations would get easier with Republicans in control of both the House and Senate."

AwakeAtLast

(14,134 posts)
12. You got it in a nutshell.
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 09:43 PM
Feb 2015

Methinks some of them might have gotten taken. Couldn't have happened to nicer people!

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
10. This is another one of those things I have to see to believe.
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 07:26 PM
Feb 2015

The track record being cha-ching and all things Buy Partisan.

rpannier

(24,339 posts)
15. “A short while ago there was bipartisan agreement on a number of common sense improvements,”
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 01:06 AM
Feb 2015

common sense as define by bankers, charlatans and pirates

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Banks May Have Overplayed...