General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsScott Walker When Asked About Evolution: 'I'm Going To Punt On That'
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, a presumed 2016 Republican presidential contender, decided to dodge the question when asked Wednesday what he thought of the scientific theory of evolution, according to multiple reports.
Walker was posed the question during a visit to London, England, where he is visiting for four days as part of a Wisconsin trade delegation.
Matt Viser @mviser
Follow
Scott Walker is asked in London: Do you believe in evolution? Im going to punt on that one as well.
2:05 PM - 11 Feb 2015
Jessie Opoien @jessieopie
Follow
Scott Walker, asked in London if he's comfortable w/ the idea of evolution: "I'm going to punt on that one."
2:05 PM - 11 Feb 2015 Wisconsin, USA, United States
Philip Klein ✔ @philipaklein
Follow
Walker re: evolution: Im going to punt on that one as well. Thats a question a politician shouldnt be involved in one way or another."
2:07 PM - 11 Feb 2015
more
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/scott-walker-evolution-punting
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)riversedge
(70,311 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)And more pleasing to his God.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)the Christian right is on the other side.
Punting in this circumstance is the only option.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)If you openly say "God called upon me to run for high political office", why are religious belief questions never to be asked?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)that Hobbesian war of all against all Libertarian/Rand agenda gets pushed. And who knows what the beady-eyed shitweasel really "thinks." You can't run for national office as a Repuke if you say that you believe that evolution is correct, as it undoubtedly is.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)as long as it appealed to the teaparty or "the stupids"
Their agenda is so important, so detailed and planned out, they will do whatever it takes.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
pampango
(24,692 posts)OTOH, maybe they do it so much for so long that they start to believe it themselves.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Panich52
(5,829 posts)Savvy advisors cover a lot ot of pols' stupudity. Willful ignorance is rampant among Repubs.
TBF
(32,102 posts)Some of these guys are smart scumbags but Walker isn't even in that category. Dropped out of Marquette (and there's probably a story there as well). He's just a useful idiot for David Koch.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Are there any out there?
riversedge
(70,311 posts)His new handlers have him on a very tight leach!!
But not answering these type questions will only work against him! IMHO
Walker in London declines to talk about world affairs, evolution
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/walker-addresses-london-think-tank-wednesday-on-global-trade-b99443152z1-291532721.html
http://media.jrn.com/images/660*413/b99443152z.1_20150211135927_000_gfn9trga.1-1.jpg
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker leaves after a meeting with Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne at No 11 Downing Street on Wednesday.
Associated Press
In a speech short on policy and heavy on restraint, Gov. Scott Walker addressed Great Britain's most prominent think tank Wednesday, avoiding difficult foreign affairs questions while emphasizing the "special relationship" between the world's largest Anglophone countries.
The Republican governor sought in his speech to bolster his scant foreign policy credentials ahead of his likely presidential run even as he largely declined to tackle the toughest questions on international affairs and a variety of other subjects. In his last response, Walker declined to answer a question and follow-up from his interviewer about whether evolution was real, saying politicians were better off steering clear of that issue.
"I'm going to punt on that one as well," Walker said. "I'm here to talk about trade, not to pontificate about other things."
After Walker declined to state his views on evolution, the event's moderator, Justin Webb of BBC Radio 4, told him that he believed any British politician would answer such a question by making clear that he or she believed evolution was true. Walker's campaign spokeswoman had no immediate comment.
On international affairs questions, Walker largely answered by saying he subscribed to the "old-fashioned" approach of not criticizing the U.S. president or the host country while outside the United States.
"I just don't think you talk about foreign policy while you're on foreign soil," Walker said, adding later, "I don't think it's wise to undermine your own president" in such situations...........................
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)something like this:
You are asking to have your hand on the nuclear button, your job would have you responsible for lives, economies, societies, maybe ultimately the survival of human life itself, and you wont or cant admit the most basic, simple fact of human knowledge in fear of alienating people who are so stupid they would insist that you do?"
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)hue
(4,949 posts)aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)Are you comfortable with the idea that the Earth is only 6,000 years old?
Are you comfortable with the idea that co2 does not contribute to global warming to any extent?
Are you comfortable with the idea that the great flood found in Genesis was a true historical event where Noah saved two of every species?
Are you comfortable with the idea that a major conflagration in the middle east will signal the ultimate battle between good and evil where God will return to earth to judge humanity?
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)From what I've seen of the Kochs, they'll gladly let Walker feed the rightwing even when it's talking things they don't personally believe.
Scott Walker is the closest thing yet to Koch's directly controlling the marionette.
Cha
(297,728 posts)Johonny
(20,890 posts)I punt on the Theory of evolution is simply showing how not prime time he is. That's a wheel house type question. Got to hit those ones if you want to be president.
hue
(4,949 posts)Obviously the Brits realized they were speaking with an under educated, scripted mouth (no brain).
lark
(23,158 posts)1 - is he afraid that the fundamentalist won't support him if he believes in real science and facts?
2 - is he so lacking in intellect he just hasn't formed an opinion
3 - does he actually not believe in evolution, but doesn't want to sound stupid to those who do notice facts and who care about science
Either way, epic fail, he just looks really stupid on an international stage. Bet the journalists were snickering.
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)Well, now we know just how he would handle that "3 AM Phone Call".
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)why would it not work for Walker or Perry?
maybe Walker should start wearing glasses.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)but when a senate candidate in Kentucky hems and haws over whether she voted for PBO, it's national news...
murielm99
(30,765 posts)candidates going to England? What do they gain by it? The British don't like them all that much, and it provides numerous opportunities for them to show off their idiocy. It benefits us more than them.
The only punting he should be doing is on the Thames. Wouldn't it be fun if he fell in?
Mike Nelson
(9,968 posts)...Republican primary voters.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)And he cannot admit his opinion in public, about one of the basics of biology?
It is no wonder the world thinks we are stupid.
rpannier
(24,339 posts)he should have said I'm going to kick a field goal on 4th down from the 1
Bartlet
(172 posts)no one serious about running for President "punts" on a simple question like that. You are not ready for prime time Scotty.
red dog 1
(27,866 posts)and this is the guy now leading the GOP pack?
Unbelievable!