Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 09:47 AM Feb 2015

The Progressive: As Oscars Near, 'American Sniper' Draws Protest

http://www.progressive.org/news/2015/02/187994/oscars-near-american-sniper-draws-protest




This year’s Academy Award race for Best Picture is a classic Hollywood Left vs. Right contest, pitting a biopic about an American marksman against Selma, a film depicting Martin Luther King Jr.––an apostle of peace who was actually assassinated by an American sniper.

The pacifist organization CODEPINK took aim at American Sniper, protesting what’s being ballyhooed as the highest grossing U.S. war movie ever made, at a February 2 Directors Guild of America screening attended by director/producer Clint Eastwood and star/producer Bradley Cooper. Sniper, which has grossed more than $282 million in ticket sales, is an adaptation of Chris Kyle’s American Sniper: The Autobiography of the Most Lethal Sniper in U.S. Military History about the “legendary” Navy SEAL who shot 160-plus Iraqis; CODEPINK denounced the film as militaristic propaganda.

“It’s important for people of conscience to be critical of the ways Hollywood perpetuates war and racism, quite frankly, through film. . . which influences and reflects society,” said Sophia Armen, L.A. campaigner for CODEPINK Women for Peace.

The antiwar group identified American Sniper as “ahistorical and a narrative really quite similar, actually, to the narrative we were all too familiar with during the Bush era. . . The invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan really terrorized, more than stopped terror. The film completely absolves the U.S. of its many crimes in Iraq and perpetuates the American war mongering narrative. . . that’s really rooted in anti-Arab racism, which is quite apparent in the film,” stated Armen, a U.S.-born twenty-three-year-old of Armenian ancestry who participated in the demonstration on the Sunset Strip in front of the headquarters of the DGA, the trade association that represents movie and television directors.



Thank you Code Pink.
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Progressive: As Oscars Near, 'American Sniper' Draws Protest (Original Post) Scuba Feb 2015 OP
Thank you, Code Pink, LWolf Feb 2015 #1
'Sniper' was good but not worthy of any Oscars, imo (nt) bigwillq Feb 2015 #2
I don't think it will win yeoman6987 Feb 2015 #5
I strongly second your opinion, those are the contenders and my money is on Boyhood Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #7
Thanks! Heart for you friend! yeoman6987 Feb 2015 #9
I am rooting for Boyhood bigwillq Feb 2015 #11
Heart for you too! Enjoy your day! yeoman6987 Feb 2015 #14
Thank you! bigwillq Feb 2015 #15
Both very good. TDale313 Feb 2015 #26
K&R! marym625 Feb 2015 #3
Arabs and Muslims are the new Holocaust in the making. Stop it now. War is not glory. Fred Sanders Feb 2015 #4
The protest is nice, but the Best Picture race is not about Sniper or Selma, it's between 'Boyhood' Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #6
I agree. Kablooie Feb 2015 #17
Thank you, Code Pink. closeupready Feb 2015 #8
I'm rather fond of Bradley Cooper, but won't be seeing this film. Aldo Leopold Feb 2015 #10
If pornographic is the definition for sexual explicity randr Feb 2015 #12
I for one have not and will not give a wooden nickle to see that propaganda film. 2banon Feb 2015 #13
What 2banon said. I have Zero respect for that film, shooter and the entire story. BlueJazz Feb 2015 #20
I am disgusted how many people fell for that garbage Skittles Feb 2015 #23
k and r for codepink niyad Feb 2015 #16
Some of you miss the point . . FairWinds Feb 2015 #18
That is a very apt comparison that I had not considered BrotherIvan Feb 2015 #31
For the first time ever in my life, I am seriously liberalhistorian Feb 2015 #19
I have seen "American Sniper" and my reaction was different than I expected... Moostache Feb 2015 #21
"We have killed. We have stolen. We have plundered. We have exploited. We have tortured...." Scuba Feb 2015 #22
Very well put, and completely agree with your sentiments.. but I gotta ask one thing... 2banon Feb 2015 #25
Not really...I thought I would just flat out hate the film. Moostache Feb 2015 #29
K&R swilton Feb 2015 #24
If that abomination wins anything whatchamacallit Feb 2015 #27
As I said in another thread lordsummerisle Feb 2015 #28
They're dead on with this. Cha Feb 2015 #30
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
5. I don't think it will win
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:21 AM
Feb 2015

The ballots we nt out way before the movie hit the screen in all the theaters. I believe either Boyhood or Birdman will win....most likely Boyhood.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
26. Both very good.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:31 PM
Feb 2015

I'd be happy if either won. I try to see as many of the Oscar movies as I can. I skipped American Sniper.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
6. The protest is nice, but the Best Picture race is not about Sniper or Selma, it's between 'Boyhood'
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 10:26 AM
Feb 2015

and 'Birdman'. It will be one of those two films almost certainly.

Kablooie

(18,641 posts)
17. I agree.
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 12:29 PM
Feb 2015

both Selma and Sniper were well done as movies and deserve nominations but neither brought anything new to the craft of filmmaking while both Boyhood and Birdman had something fresh and special.
Personally I prefer Boyhood because I was more emotionally moved when it was over but I was impressed with Birdman.

In the end the Oscars not about the political content but the art of filmmaking.

randr

(12,417 posts)
12. If pornographic is the definition for sexual explicity
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:38 AM
Feb 2015

What is the word for immoral explicitness?
Graphic depictions of sexual acts are objectionable yet graphic images of wanton murder are entertainment?

 

FairWinds

(1,717 posts)
18. Some of you miss the point . .
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 12:40 PM
Feb 2015

"Sniper" is an evil work of propaganda - right up there with Leni Riefenstah's
"Triumph of the Will." Most importantly, Sniper re-writes and mangles history
from a far-right point of view. Just to give a single example, the Second
Battle of Falujah was a disgraceful war crime of epic proportions, not a place of US heroism.
It's very important that people speak out against it.
Thank you Code Pink.
Signed Veterans For Peace

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
31. That is a very apt comparison that I had not considered
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 04:46 AM
Feb 2015

And yes, it is selling the US war machine just as much as Triumph of the Will. For a movie to be made with US military gear, it must be signed off on by the very highest levels of the military. Their films are not only justification for war but recruitment propaganda.

liberalhistorian

(20,819 posts)
19. For the first time ever in my life, I am seriously
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 12:41 PM
Feb 2015

considering skipping the Oscars and it's not just because I live on a remote rural Indian reservation where I'm often culturally isolated and haven't been able to see any of the movies. I am utterly disgusted that that piece of shit movie glorifying war and our destructive racist role in it, and especially glorifying a hate-filled racist's gleeful killings, was given any attention at all, let alone being Oscar-nominated. I can't stand the thought of having to endure that kind of positive attention for it throughout the program. And yet if you say anything about it, you're "unpatriotic" and "anti-American". Bleh.

Moostache

(9,897 posts)
21. I have seen "American Sniper" and my reaction was different than I expected...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 01:34 PM
Feb 2015

I was genuinely pissed off at the end of the movie, but not because of the cardboard cut-out depiction of Chris Kyle as a cross between Rambo and Nathan Hale.

I was pissed off because for me the movie was a 2 hour internal reflection on just how many lies and financial agendas it took to have our soldiers in Iraq in the first place, year after year after year; and just how many guys went to that "war" - it was really an illegal invasion of aggression and an unpunished exploitation of the American AND Iraqi people by Bush's cabal of war criminals - thinking they were doing their duty when they were really doing the dirty work of homicidal greed monsters.

I believe that somewhere slightly more nuanced than Eastwood's ham-handed direction allowed is the story of truly heroic American soldiers who signed up to legitimately "protect our freedoms", the problem is that our politicians - and Democrats, who refused to shut down American governance in response to Bush's lies and crimes the way Republicans essentially shut down EVERYTHING after Obamacare passed, are equally guilty - are craven money and power whores who would do anything, say anything, sell-out anyone and literally kill anyone just to keep a seat at the fringes of the table of power.

I saw American Sniper and it caused me to internally reflect on what my country has become since 9/11/01 and I really don't like what I saw. We have killed. We have stolen. We have plundered. We have exploited. We have tortured. We have shirked all responsibility for holding the leaders responsible accountable to the rule of law.

If the use of the terminology "savages" is what makes people upset in this piece, then its my opinion they are as lacking in introspection as the Commander-in-Chimp himself.

See this movie, but look past the superficial and the button-pushing jingoism. Look inside yourself, and how living in this country, and knowing what we know now, about that entire escapade into Iraq, how can NONE OF THEM - Bush, Rice, Rumsfeld, Cheney, and more - how can NONE of them be held responsible for the carnage they wrought in the name of ideology?

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
22. "We have killed. We have stolen. We have plundered. We have exploited. We have tortured...."
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 03:08 PM
Feb 2015
We have killed. We have stolen. We have plundered. We have exploited. We have tortured. We have shirked all responsibility for holding the leaders responsible accountable to the rule of law.



Indeed.
 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
25. Very well put, and completely agree with your sentiments.. but I gotta ask one thing...
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:29 PM
Feb 2015

didn't you know before viewing this film you would experience exactly what you in fact experienced?

Moostache

(9,897 posts)
29. Not really...I thought I would just flat out hate the film.
Fri Feb 13, 2015, 12:19 AM
Feb 2015

The reaction was more introspection than I expected and a lot more empathy for the soldiers and victims of that monstrous crime instead of just revulsion at the patent jingoism of Eastwood's direction and Kyle's story.

I actually felt bad for Kyle as a dupe as well. Maybe it was just Cooper's performance, but I was thinking he would come across more like the yahoos in that old Charlie Sheen movie "Navy SEALS" and it didn't play that way for me.

lordsummerisle

(4,651 posts)
28. As I said in another thread
Thu Feb 12, 2015, 11:53 PM
Feb 2015

I had a completely different take on this, I saw it as an anti-war film. At the conclusion I thought what a terrible waste that all of these people died for nothing. Anyone thinking that we were in Iraq to avenge 9-11 was, at best, not at all paying attention. From Eastwood himself:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/26/clint-eastwood-american-sniper-anti-war_n_6547068.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Progressive: As Osca...