General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsdont think the jackie robinson flap has anything to do w racism?
Last edited Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:31 AM - Edit history (1)
read the comments on this article, if you have a strong enough stomach.
this is the world we live in, peeps.
me? having kids, kids who played baseball, i know that parents try to get their kids on teams that are a good fit. i dont think for a minute that those parents and kids thought about anything but playing on a team that would be good for those kids. i have no idea what the teams they were supposed to play on were like, but in the world shown in these comments, i would be picky about who my kids played for if i were their parent. lines on a map v a good coach and a good team? yeah, aunt millie is on the right side of the line, we can use her address, hell yeah. i'm there. bfd about your map. bfd about your rules. i am a black mom of a black kid, and i can get them on jrw? i do whatever it takes. you think there werent white kids and parents in that district that did what they had to NOT play on the black kids team?
welcome to chicago.
fuck the maps. i would want my kid on that team. i would use aunt millie's address in a heart beat.
if you think there is something wrong with that, read the comments, and wake up to the world.
http://www.si.com/more-sports/2015/02/13/jackie-robinson-west-rahm-emanuel-championship-rings
and before anyone gets pissed at me for driveby posting, i am on my way to bed, but could not let this go by without posting.
i will check you in the morning.
try not to be jerks.
eta- please dont comment unless you look at the link. think about kids in that environment, then tell me you wouldnt want your black kid on an all black team.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)and they ahve four children together.
I think it was more over sour grapes at having lost 42-3.
But heck, the rules were broken, so thems the rules.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)...he's inoculated, I guess.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Like I said, sour grapes, but rules were broken.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)and what is the racial make up of his town?
maybe he is just a sore loser. or maybe that loss was especially bitter because it was a bunch of black kids. maybe he didnt notice so much, but maybe his team was super pissed and he got caught up in that.
till they check out the other teams, i am pissed.
how and why these kids ended up on this team needs to be looked at. as a parent, i would have been happy with the local team unless i had a reason. maybe it was strictly ambition. but in one of the most segregated cities in the country, i have to suspect that race is in the mix.
CatWoman
(79,302 posts)and the (white) sergeant in charge was married to a black woman.
Yet that sergeant was hardest and most racist towards the other blacks in the unit.
Sort of like a dog and cat growing up together.
That dog will protect that one cat but will chase down and try to kill every other cat in the neighborhood.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)doesnt mean you arent a racist. men like women to be "inferior" and controllable.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)And old HS classmate is married to a black woman and posts the most racist anti- Obama garbage.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)which was my daughter's experience. every time they disagreed on something it turned into slamming her race.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)and even if the coach is, personally, not, that doesnt mean that the team, as a whole, doesnt have a problem. i want to know why these parents wanted their kids on this team. surely then did not know they were going to win. they probably just wanted what they thought was best for the kids.
if i were the jrw coach, and someone came to me and said- i know xyz team is not gonna let my kid play, or i know my kid will be harassed, what coach wouldnt tell them to find an address that they could use?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)They don't get to break the rules just because they want to, and then act shocked and pissed because there are consequences.
When you cheat, you're accepting that chance that you'll get caught and be punished. I feel bad for the kids, but taking away their wins was the right call.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)what if there was a reason, a good reason, that they didnt want their kids to play on the other teams. people assume it is about winning. what if that is not the point at all? what if the other teams looked the other way for good reason?
i am looking at this as a parent whose kids played ball. there are some coaches you didnt want within 100 yards of your kid. and everybody knew it, including the other coaches.
i just really dont see why the parents have no say in where there kids play.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Teams, including parents, don't get to make up their own rules.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)they had a try-out day where they put you through various drills - and then some kids would make the majors and some the minors and the coaches of each league would get to draft players in some sort of lottery.
Usually we were on vacation during the try out day, so I was given the lowest ranking
Somehow I always ended up on the last place team. Once we got beat 18-0 and the paper recorded that I was the only person on my team to get a base hit. One year my team kept forfeiting by not having enough players at a bunch of games. So the team was broken up and we were sent to other teams. What team was I sent to? The team that USED to be 2nd to last place and was now last place now that my old team didn't exist.
But I think that was the year I pitched a winning game against the 2nd place Yankees. I was the 2nd relief pitcher, but got the win since we were losing when I came in.
brush
(53,843 posts)as hard as they did the African American team.
I'd be willing to be that if they did they'd find most of the other teams weren't entirely clean either.
The Jackie Robinson team was cleared twice by the Little League, twice.
Then the sore looser, 42 to 3 was it, told them to keep digging. Well I say dig on everyone else or it damn sure is racism.
I guarantee you fudging those boundary rules is not uncommon. Like the OP mentioned about the white parents who fudged boundary rules so their kids wouldn't have to play with the African American kids.
And don't you just hate sore losers. I read he even admitted that there were other teams that did it but they didn't win the championship.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)If not, there is no reason to investigate them.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)the team that complained admitted they did it too. and it is an open secret that this is common. so why just the black kids get nailed. should make you go hmmm. but, maybe you dont have a hmmmmer.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Do you have a link to back up your assertions?
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)to back up your own almighty self righteous assertions, accusations & judgements?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)I provided the links in response to your other post.
It's bordering on hilarious that some people just can't accept that this team cheated, even though I've heard of no one associated with this team denying that they cheated since the title was stripped.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)But it's absolutely hilarious that so many people can't accept the truth that this team was led by a group of adult cheaters.
Stripping the title isn't about race, it's about not allowing a team that didn't compete fairly to retain the title.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)of all anglo saxon kid players had been unknowingly manipulated by some greedy adults running an entertainment/sports corporate entity? would you strip away their title as well?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Do the same thing, and I'll say the same thing - strip the title.
The rightful champions, the team out in Las Vegas - if they're investigated and found to have cheated, I'd say strip it from them as well.
Because it isn't about race, it's about playing by the rules.
How about you? Would you favor stripping the title from an all white team under the same circumstances?
tblue37
(65,483 posts)I'd hmmmmer in the evening, all over this land!
Sorry, mopinko--I couldn't pass up the straight line--but I do agree with you on this issue!
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)said they did the same thing?
Thanks.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)One kid was recruited from Lynwood (45.4% black).
One from south Holland (50.8% black).
One from Dolton: (82.4% black)
What's more interesting is that, though these are areas with a near majority or more of black residents, they're not poor.
Dolton median household income is $48K and the poverty rate is <7% (lower than the US rate).
South Holland median household income is even higher, $60K, with a poverty rate of <5%.
Lynwood median household income = $59K, with a poverty rate of <6%.
US median household income 2012 = $51.9K. US Poverty rate = 14.5% (2013)
So it's looking more and more like good black players from wealthier largely black suburbs were recruited, to the detriment of the poorer black kids who actually lived in the southside.
and it's probably because suburban little league has the benefit of more adult involvement, more money for equipment, better facilities, etc. so all else being equal, suburban players are likely to be more skilled than poor urban kids.
Anyway, so far your story about black kids from white suburbs wanting to play with the southside cause they're afraid of racism isn't holding up very well.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Running up the score like that should not be done in Little League.
He's not a "sore loser".
But they broke the rules, or the coaches did at any rate.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)they called it on the slaughter rule.
brush
(53,843 posts)when games get out of hand?
I would think that the umps should have called a game like that.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)it's not up to the kids to go out there and not play their best.
i mean, wtf.
brush
(53,843 posts)who even admitted that other teams had fudged boundary issues but since they didn't get to the championship round it didn't matter.
Guess he couldn't stand to lose that bad even though the game went only TWO INNINGS.
Thanks for that info. I didn't know that the game was that short. Just think of the score if it had went the full 6 innings.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)why did they play the entire season and go through the finals and awards and trip to the white house - before the "scrutiny" was reported??????? it is about race. an all black team at the white house with a black president giving them special treatment ... some people can't stand for such a thing to happen.
brush
(53,843 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)all of the kids on the team fell within the boundaries. It was only when they returned after the LL World Series, and signs in far away suburbs were welcoming home their individual players that neighboring leagues realized that players had been pulled from within their boundaries. It was at that point that LL started digging into the matter and found that the boundary map submitted by JRW was invalid, as it had been redrawn to extend into other leagues' boundaries without the consent of those leagues.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)links to photos and statement of welcoming banners and parents, and boundary maps.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)If you're actually interested in reading the timeline, the link is below. It mentions the "public accolades" given to alleged out of boundary players, and also provides info on the falsified boundary maps.
http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20150211/roseland/jackie-robinson-west-timeline-key-dates-little-league-scandal
Dec. 16, 2014 DNAinfo Chicago's Mark Konkol reports that a suburban league has asked Little League International to review the eligibility of the players, arguing that public accolades offered to the players after the U.S. title exposed many didn't live in the narrow South Side boundaries from where the team is supposed to draw.
http://www.wbez.org/news/sports/gentrification-and-jackie-robinson-west-little-league-was-playing-field-ever-even-111564
But, amidst the excitement, there were signs that something was off, in some cases literal signs.
Like the one the mayor of south suburban Lynwood put outside village hall to celebrate the villages "own" Jackie Robinson West player. Or the congratulatory posts on social media from Illinois House Rep. Robin Kelly, calling out two players from South Holland and another from Dolton, all outside the city limits.
Since the title was stripped, I haven't see where anyone associated with JRW is denying that they broke the rules by expanding the boundaries without permission - have you?
The team was caught cheating, and they've had to pay the price. I see nothing wrong with that.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)thank you.
i agree with the rev. jesse jackson's defense of the team & their parents.
the team was not caught cheating. the team played the games. i refer to the kids. but go ahead and keep blaming the kids.
i stand with the team players and their parents.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Oh that's right, I didn't.
While the players didn't cheat, the adults did, which resulted in a team that would not have been able to compete, had the truth been known. No way a team that earned the title by being stacked with out of boundary players should be permitted to keep that title.
Stand with Rev. Jackson all you want - he's human, meaning he can be wrong too. And in this case, he is wrong, IMO. I hope LL International stands strong against these ridiculous charges of racism, and don't give the title back.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)that's my mountain.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)They broke the rules so, it is what it is.I think its more of a story because coaches and patents used kids to cheat.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)and the team was disqualified. I just hope the team that are now champions get the same treatment the other team got.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Thank you for being so forthcoming about your attitude towards the strict rules of Little League.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)suppose the parents and kids were the ones who sought out the team. does that change things?
suppose those kids had played in their designated team, and had suffered for their race. does that change things?
CANDO
(2,068 posts)Wondering why you keep pushing with fantasy racism where it doesn't exist. The adults cheated, end of story.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)lines on a map is why these kids lived where they did in the first place. the color line lives.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)were *black*, just like the kids in s-side Chicago. so I don't know why you're talking about color lines.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)team?
because what I read put it on the coaches, and how I interpreted it was that the suburbs are richer, thus the kids in sports get better/more consisten training and equipment, thus are more likely, all else being equal, to become better players.
It's not like those suburban kids couldn't have joined the little league teams in their own neighborhoods, so why would their parents be making special arrangements to join JRW?
JRWs title garnered national acclaim for the team due to the uniqueness of its rosteran all-black squad hailing from Chicago's embattled South Side. And it was the cityits athletes, community leaders, politicians, the mayor, the presidentthat embraced the team as a beacon of sorts.
Little Leagues investigation led it to conclude that JRW officials knowingly fielded players who lived outside the teams residential boundaries and then tried to cover up their deception, a violation of league rules. In effect, the claim is that JRW sought to field a superteam...
I grew up and played in JRW until I was 10 years old. Bill Haley ran a first-class organization. JRW has played an integral role in Rosemoors rebuilding. We were down to one team in 2011. JRW took us in and had interleague play with us. When Rosemoor went into the district tournament, Rosemoor wouldnt have been able to play....
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2362111-claims-of-hypocrisy-in-the-jackie-robinson-west-controversy
mopinko
(70,206 posts)towns in illinois. they werent from rich suburbs where they had opportunities.
that "superteam" shit may be the claim, but i have seen no evidence that it is the case.
and i doubt that the coaches are going to come out and say- well, we all knew coach soandso was a racist asshole, so when a kid came to us that should have played for him, we tried to find a way.
but this being chicago, i find my supposition more than just possible.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)than south side Chicago. some quite a bit wealthier.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6240814
PS Dolton, 82% black, has a median household income just shy of the US median. It's not 'poor' by any measure, in fact, it has a lower % of residents in poverty than the US average.
It has a higher median household income (by about $12K) and a lower poverty rate (6% v 16%) than the majority white town I live in.
Dolton's also wealthier than south side Chicago.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Well, when you break those rules you're cheating. See the problem?
CANDO
(2,068 posts)Just last summer also. Team from Georgia. Team had one black kid. I suppose that was racism also. It was a feel good story and some adults had to go and screw it up.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)different story. this has never happened before.
so....
CANDO
(2,068 posts)A team from the Phillipines had their LLWS title stripped due to putting together a national all star team. Definitely a boundaries issue such as what JRWLL violated. The other team to have their LLWS wins taken away was the team from Bronx, NY when it was discovered that Danny Almonte was actually 14 ysr old. He was sensational at the LLWS, pitching a perfect game. The team from Georgia last summer, which didn't make it to the LLWS, was stripped of it's GA state title for violating a teams rule for having no more than 8 of the 14 team members being 12 yrs old. They had 10 players on their roster as 12 yr olds, more than the max of 8. http://www.cbs46.com/story/26195315/peachtree-city-little-league-team-stripped-of-state-championship
I think going forward LL has to put in place better tools for local leagues and districts to utilize in regard to following these geographic boundaries. It is blatantly obvious that these adults from JRWLL violated the boundaries of their league and district. Too many people on here and elsewhere(Jessie Jackson) have reacted by accusing racism. Absolutely shameful and uncalled for. LL actually bent over backwards to try and look the other way initially, but when it became blatantly obvious, they had to act. Some of these kids lived up to 20 miles outside of their league's boundary. This is not a rural league, where you'd expect a somewhat large area. It was urban and suburban Chicago, where boundaries are much smaller due to larger population numbers.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)i want to know why they did that. racism is rampant here, especially some of these burbs. did those parents have past bad experiences? did their local team have a reputation for racism?
i think the racial layers run deep.
CANDO
(2,068 posts)This was the direct result of the actions taken by the adults. http://www.si.com/more-sports/2015/02/11/jackie-robinson-west-vacates-title-llws
"Jackie Robinson West, the United States champion at the 2014 Little League World Series, agreed to vacate its title after knowingly violating residency rules, Little League announced Wednesday. Little League Baseball opened an investigation to determine if the Chicago-based team used players that resided outside of the geographic area that it represents. An investigation showed that the team used an inaccurate boundary map and met with outside neighborhoods and districts in Illinois to recruit players to build a competitive team.
Little League Baseball said it was alerted of a potential problem back in September when a league official from a neighboring district in Illinois expressed concern about residency problems with Jackie Robinson West."
CANDO
(2,068 posts)All the information explained including a timeline.
A further comment from myself pertaining to the OP......You can't prejudice your view of the larger issue by taking into account the obvious assholes of the world making racist comments in the comments section after an article. LL baseball, nor the coaches of the other teams are not the people making the racist comments. Those people put in just as much effort as any other team to field a team. It is entirely reasonable for a coach to question the residency of his opponents when a town official from way outside this team's boundary was proudly proclaiming as their own, one of the players from JRW. That is what led to a more thorough investigation which turned up other players from outside the boundaries. It's understandable people are upset. Put the blame where it belongs, though. For those people upset for the JRW players...think how the players who lost to JRW must feel. They had their dreams compromised by a team who had ringers from outside their boundary. This was all brought about by the actions of 3-4 adults from JRWLL.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)that it is just as likely that the parents came to the coach and/or that playing on an all black team was a deciding factor for the parents.
but the bottom line is that obviously a parent was willing to drive 20 miles x 2 x how many games and practices so that their kids could play for this team and this coach.
i will stand by that until ALL the facts come out, including who approached who.
from what i have seen of the team, self esteem and pride, and escape from the world you see in those comments could well have been the actual motivation.
if it turns out that those kids who were out of the boundaries had experiences or reasons to believe they would face racism if they played on their assigned teams, will that change your defense of some lines on a map? maybe the other teams initially signed off because they didnt want those black kids on their team. what would you say then?
obviously, the other teams that were willing to support the changes to the map had a reason.
CANDO
(2,068 posts)Sad you're doing incalculable harm to the real fight against racism and bigotry by pushing this fantasy. Fight it where it exists for real. Creating it where it isn't is surely harmful to the cause.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)But the OP doesn't believe in following rules generally.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)lines on a map v children being cherished for who they are, and being affirmed? yeah, fuck your lines on a map.
and one of these kids became homeless during this time. what do you do with him? kick him off the team? quite possibly the best part of his life at the time?
ya, no.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)You don't believe in following rules in general, whether kids are involved or not.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)well isnt that special.
since i didnt break any rules, except to piss off the wrong people, maybe that's why i get it.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)No, not at all. I've read your posts about your legal issues as they unfolded.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)so......
my day in court will come. i will be sure to post about it for all my followers.
especially those that live in caves.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)And caves? I don't even know what that means.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)a team of ringers can play awesome together and that will be its own reward.
BUT if they want to win a Little League trophy, that trophy is given out to teams that win while following a set of rules and procedures.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Alerting. Personal attack.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)It didn't seem to bother the OP. LMAO.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)but i live here, and i know just how racist of a place this is.
till i hear otherwise from the parents, i am reserving judgement.
you, on the other hand, refuse to even consider that it could be racism at the root of this. says plenty about you.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)That seems to be what is wanted by your statement. The team deserved forfeiture and is not about race but rules you want to get rid of. Well the rules needed to be questioned before the season started.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)or else you misunderstood my reply. I'm in favor of the rule, and I think the parents and coaches cheated. In my opinion, the team deserved to have their title stripped, although it's sad for the kids.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Sorry about that. A heart for your trouble!
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)mopinko
(70,206 posts)is jump out from behind a tree and yell "boo"
get real. people worked around it, and gave these kids a chance.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)I've seen a whole lot of wild speculation about what COULD have happened and how this COULD be racism, so let me add this...
If this team had followed all the rules and lost in the finals to a white team that had recruited from outside it's district, would you feel exactly the same way about the rules (bfd)?
mopinko
(70,206 posts)white kids have choices. black kids dont. suburban kids have tons of choices, good programs, well funded facilities, lots of coaches.
these kids didnt. that is my whole point. it is my supposition that these kids ended up on this team because their options were constrained by their race. and by the racism that they would have faced on their "home" teams.
note i said supposition. but i know how lines on maps get drawn in chicago, and lines are about race.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)The first one is "why this is being investigated". Titles have been stripped before, although probably a lot less often than cheating actually happens. No one seems to be arguing they didn't do what they are being accused of, so you can't really argue they didn't do anything wrong. When someone makes cheating claims, what is Little League supposed to do, ignore it? As to why ALL teams aren't investigated, when people cheat and still lose, no one bothers to investigate. That's not just baseball, that's life in general.
The second one is "why did this happen in the first place". Why were the kids playing out of district? Was it because the coaches wanted to put together a winning team, or because several children living outside the district didn't like the coaches they would have played for in their own district and with no recruitment, all sought to play on this same other team? I've never seen a coach that didn't want to put together a winning team, but other than your comments about how racist a city Chicago is, and your speculation about how these kids MIGHT have not liked the situations they had in their own district, I haven't seen anything to indicate that this was actually the case. Maybe I missed it in all your comments, but if you want to continue to make that argument, you're going to need more than "well, it COULD have happened".
If another team had beat the Chicago team (and assuming they were following the rules) and it turns out THEY had recruited from outside the district, would you still think this was no big deal?
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Lets hope there aren't many parents like you on other teams.
What the fuck are you teaching your kids when you say, "I want you on this team, but you have to lie and tell them you're from this other neighborhood. M'kay son? You lie real good for mommy, k?"
Disgusting.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)if it means that my black son doesnt have to play for a racist coach.
CANDO
(2,068 posts)I've read many articles on this JRWLL situation, and nowhere have I seen anyone mention racist coaches. Can't you just stop with the faux racist accusations?
mopinko
(70,206 posts)maybe i know a little more about how things work around here than you. try that on for size.
those lines are not arbitrary. they are about white teams and black teams.
this is a frighteningly segregated city.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Why don't you provide something other than your own opinion, like some links to back up your accusations.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Rules? Fuck em.
Rules don't apply to you, if you claim racism.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)do what is right, not what you are told.
I think it was about cheating.
BubbaFett
(361 posts)to accept the consequences of actions.
Sometimes it just isn't everyone else's fault.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)till i hear about the choices those kids faced, i am not assuming it was all about winning.
i want to know why someone would drive 20 miles x a bazillion for their kid to play on that team. knowing my hometown, i cant believe that race and racism wasnt a factor.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Nice.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)yeah, fuck your lines on a map.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)because of the cheating? Don't you think they deserve what's right and best for them?
mopinko
(70,206 posts)there is absolutely no evidence that the actual abilities of these kids had anything to do with any of this.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)to do with it. They recruited good players, not just anyone who wanted to join. Duh.
ESPN notes that an investigation into the team by the organization found that Jackie Robinson West fielded a "superteam" by enlisting players who did not live within the geographical boundaries. Little League officials also found that maps were falsified to expand boundaries, which allowed players whose location made them ineligible to become eligible.
http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2015/02/jackie_robinson_west_team_stripped_of_little_league_title.html
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)There is no evidence that racism had anything to do with the cheating either, yet you keep claiming that's why the ineligible players were allowed on the team.
Why would the league manager go to the trouble to forge boundary maps if not to pack the team with better players?
mopinko
(70,206 posts)just as plausible as your assertion that they coaches just wanted to win.
read the comments. that is the world we live in. that is the world these kids live in. that is the world where "coloreds" stay on their own side of the lines.
why is it so hard to believe that those coaches didnt know/think that?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)are irrelevant to the cause of the cheating.
Response to mopinko (Reply #29)
Post removed
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)They don't allow for people to put together a team based on race... now that is super racist.
There should be a different set of rules maybe... like separate all the kids by race. Then we have the WLLWS (white little league world series), BLLWS (black little league world series), OLLWS (other little league world series). Then we can have "separate but equal" LLWS's...
Wait... this is starting to sound familiar. Didn't we used to do super screwed up crap like this, and then found it had super negative effects???
mopinko
(70,206 posts)if the kids and the parents knew the coaches of the assigned team were racists, would you tell them play for the racists or dont play at all?
lines on a map here mostly have to do with race.
CANDO
(2,068 posts)There are no allegations of racist coaches in this situation. Where are the mods? If I was on here being a racist, I'd get the boot. We have here someone hurling the race card in an egregious fashion with absolutely nothing to back it up with. As I said earlier, you are not helping to stamp out racism. You are hurting the cause.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)what i have to back it up is that i live here.
but sop for apologists. thanks. nice to know ya.
i see your colors, too.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)Other than you for the team that cheated, I mean.
romanic
(2,841 posts)The team cheated, they lost out in the end because they cheated.
Takket
(21,621 posts)That isn't racism, despite the fact that racists, who had nothing to do with the team or Little League in general, are having a field day with this story.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)i find it hard to believe that racism didnt rear it's ugly head until they won. this town is as full of racist as any town in mississippi.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)from the sound of things, it doesn't matter to you if the motive was race (which, NOTHING points to any suggestion that it is) ... to YOU the motive is race and that's all you'll believe.
sP
CANDO
(2,068 posts)If there was reverse racism, this poster would be a classic example. Seeing racism everywhere, hurling unfounded accusations of racism. Seems like a pathology to me.
Takket
(21,621 posts)and screaming racism every time something happens to a black or group of blacks makes it impossible to get justice for real racism. Boy who cried wolf...
mopinko
(70,206 posts)i will make a judgement then.
till then, i live here. i know what it is like.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)mopinko
(70,206 posts)i have not heard the coaches or the parents speak yet, just the league.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)petronius
(26,603 posts)this particular team was motivated by racism. And conversely, it seems quite reasonable that any winning team would be subject to scrutiny. When the investigation showed what it did, I think the league took the appropriate action. So no: absent evidence I do not believe that the report, investigation, and punishment were motivated by racism.
However, that does not imply that these kids were guilty of anything, nor that they failed to represent their city well. Everything I've seen suggests they were excellent ambassadors for Chicago. And I don't think their parents did anything wrong; certainly, giving one's kid the best possible opportunities is a standard parental motivation.
Further, I'm unsurprised that bigots and racist have come out of the virtual woodwork to spew bile about this story. But the behavior of these bottom-feeders does not retroactively affect the motivations and processes of the investigation itself.
It seems to me that a lot of these points get conflated in stories like this. However, it's logical, reasonable, and not contradictory to believe that 1) the investigation and sanction wasn't motivated by racism (absent evidence to the contrary), 2) the kids are innocent victims and all-around good eggs, and 3) racism is still a major thread in our society...
mopinko
(70,206 posts)(other title revocations were on much more solid ground) then, yeah, things that make you go hmmm. or should make you go hmmmm.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Why do you refuse to acknowledge the facts?
mopinko
(70,206 posts)until i know why those parents wanted so badly for their kids to play on this team, i am not satisfied.
if the team that they "should have" played on has a history of harassment or racial bias, i am with the parents who found a way to get their kids on jrw team.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)The boundaries were re-drawn, against LL rules, without permission of the leagues from which they were pulling players. What the parents wanted, what the coaches wanted, what the kids wanted - all 100% irrelevant. The boundaries were drawn, and when the team decided to redraw them in defiance of LL rules, they took the chance that they would be found out and face the consequences.
If the parents felt that their children faced racism on their local teams (an idea which seems to be a figment of your fertile imagination), the way to rectify that would have been to request formal redress through the league.
Not by cheating.
Good on LL for taking away the title.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)in YOUR fertile imagination. cuz entrenched racism always just goes poof when someone complains.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Have the families made such claims? Or are you just making it up?
mopinko
(70,206 posts)i know that maps are more than maps here. i know that there are 2 sides to any line drawn around here, and that race is behind them most of the time.
especially old lines.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)there have been no such claims, and you're just making it up.
Thanks for confirming my suspicions.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)like i said, i live here. i know the history behind those lines on a map, and they are AAALLLLL about race. period.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)being an apologist for following league rules v. cheating.
Thank you!
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)ancianita
(36,133 posts)the same fudged residence issues. Just a rumor that I'm trying to check out.
ancianita
(36,133 posts)BODY.
Now, regarding the racism. Just for the sake of argument...
What if there were absolutely no racial motives.
What if that dime was dropped from a love of rules, and the love of rightness.
If the adults made mistakes, there will still be no greater wrong than the wrong done to these children by waiting until after they've played their hearts out to right this broken rule.
No matter the enforcement timing -- no one can tell me that any rule is more important than these kids' love of the game and well-deserved title win.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)but living here, i just cant believe that race had NOTHING to do with it, from why those kids were on that team in the first place, to the way it all went down.
i mean, these complainers basically stalked those families to get their "evidence".
there are better ways to handle this.
ancianita
(36,133 posts)squashing any arguments based on that denial, is all.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Doesn't matter that the kids didn't do the cheating, cheating potentially contributed to their wins, so their wins should be forfeited.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)ancianita
(36,133 posts)would have lawyered up and cut a deal with the league to keep the title. The argument for the deal would have been along the lines of, "what's more important, thirteen kids who love baseball and only wanted to play their best (spirit of the law) or one rule (letter of the law)" -- and the whole thing would have blown over.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Ineligible players were playing on the team - there is no way to rectify that other than to take away their wins. They cheated against every single team they played. It's a shame that the kids have to pay for the adults cheating, but anything other than taking away their wins would be unfair to the teams they played while cheating.
ancianita
(36,133 posts)I live in the Chicago area. I kinda do have an idea. Speculation is credible based on official public history and local experience.
First you say the adults cheated, then you say "...anything other than taking away their wins would be unfair to the teams they played while cheating."
Be careful to write what you really think, so that I actually know what you think.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)But I'll say it again, lest there be any doubt.
Some of the adults in charge of this team cheated.
They forged boundary documents, and tried to get other leagues to go along with it.
They used those forged documents to put players on the team that should not have been there, i.e., they were ineligible to play for that team.
Those ineligible players played and contributed to the team's success.
All games with those ineligible players on the roster should be forfeited, including the LL World Series games, and brackets leading to the LL World Series.
The national title should be stripped from the team.
Is that clear enough?
ancianita
(36,133 posts)be retained. Period.
Am I clear enough?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Your stand is that cheating is just fine, and that the teams that were cheated should just accept it and move on.
ancianita
(36,133 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)But it doesn't matter - the team, which includes the adults, cheated, and in doing so, they robbed the teams they played of a fair chance to win.
What do those teams deserve, in your opinion?
ancianita
(36,133 posts)cuz that's how we roll here in chi. unfortunately.
i was very happy to hear that they HAD lawyered up. i hope someone is out there in vegas digging into public and non-public records and stalking kids around to make sure THEY are all on the up and up.
the fact that other coaches were willing to go along makes me think that there are a lot of open secrets here.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Let 'em waste their money - they can't force LL to give the title back. They can wear the fake rings that Rahm gives them, and they'll be just that...fake rings for a fake championship.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)theory.
According to ESPN, Jackie Robinson West isn't the first team to lose its Little League title. "In 1992, Little League baseball took away the title from Zamboanga, Philippines, and handed it to Long Beach, Calif., after Zamboanga used several players that lived outside its district or were over-age. In 2001, a team from the Bronx, N.Y., that finished third was forced to forfeit its games after pitcher Danny Almonte was revealed to be over-age," ESPN reports.
http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2015/02/jackie_robinson_west_team_stripped_of_little_league_title.html
mopinko
(70,206 posts)that was drawn based on race.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)And yes, they're the same thing - both are cheating.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)mopinko
(70,206 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)kcr
(15,320 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)"In 1992, Little League baseball took away the title from Zamboanga, Philippines, and handed it to Long Beach, Calif., after Zamboanga used several players that lived outside its district or were over-age. In 2001, a team from the Bronx, N.Y., that finished third was forced to forfeit its games after pitcher Danny Almonte was revealed to be over-age," ESPN reports.
http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2015/02/jackie_robinson_west_team_stripped_of_little_league_title.html
ancianita
(36,133 posts)I will always and forever hold all the league adults responsible for the children's Little League experience -- from parents on up to the head of the league.
Those adults who made those children stand up before the public and show the adult's guilt -- as if the players had any motives other than just wanting to play ball...
Those adults failed to show adult responsibility, which is a core failure of sportsmanship.
For those adults to regain their coaching status, they must stand before the children and say what they as leaders have learned from this. If they refuse and continue to put their preservation first, instead of the children's hearts and love of the game, they should not be trusted to run a team again.
That one adult who dropped a dime on this team and its adult leaders...
That adult is the dime dropper's fuckery, he is the kind of white person who pushes for the world of cold hearted hater's prejudice that loves to punish black children out of technical rightness. That prejudice, under cover of "following the rule" that are often rigged as strict for an out group and guidelines for an in group -- that prejudice covers for spiritual ill will. It isn't just hard hearted. It's spiritually the essence of evil.
All these kids wanted was to play ball the best they could.
Chicago should throw JRW a party at Grant Park. Again!
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)The person that pointed out the cheating is the one that's wrong? Not the cheaters themselves?
What you're saying is tantamount to saying that black teams can't win unless they're allowed to follow a different set of rules - do you really believe that?
ancianita
(36,133 posts)The cheaters themselves were the adults. Can you get that in your head? Those kids have no idea about the league rules; they just wanted to play ball. They're not criminals-in-training. They're kids! Kids!
The league is structured to arbitrarily allow or disallow team membership by residential boundaries, and local news has reported that it routinely turns a blind eye to all kinds of team composition because of family situations. The league leadership itself cheats.
Your words show that you simply want to drag these kids into their world of adult responsibility. That says a lot about you.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)I'm glad that LL vacated the championship, and I hope they don't develop jelly spine and give in to the whiners that think cheating is all well and good.
ancianita
(36,133 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)if it weren't so sad.
ancianita
(36,133 posts)I don't care what you think of me about this. But I will definitely remember your judgments if I ever see your posts again.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Let's just have allow a free for all.
And now that you've revealed a bit of your character, I could really care less what you think about me or my judgments.
ancianita
(36,133 posts)here, could you. You put words in my mouth and claim they "reveal" my character. You just think I'm arguing for any and all rules to be nice little guidelines.
In white leagues, and the white teams in this league, that's just what rules turn out to be. Hard and fast applications only go for the minority teams. Obama knew that, or he wouldn't have invited my precious, cheating kids to the White House. But you don't want to know what goes on in Chicago's little leagues, or how some adult went out of his way to rob them. You just want to judge someone who takes a clear side for the kids.
I'm done with you.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)And I didn't put any words in your mouth - you said it all yourself...the rules shouldn't apply in this case.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)lines are drawn here to exclude. that they are drawn be residence means they are drawn to keep black kids on one side and white kids on the other. that makes these teams de facto segregated.
so, a family manages to move up and out, but still faces racism every day. getting your kids where that is not part of their experience, at least while playing ball, is something i can relate to.
i'd bet pretty much any amount of money that a white kid in jrw territory would be welcomed w open arms if they wanted to play somewhere else. and nobody would make a peep.
care to wager that that is the story that will come out in the end?
bookmark this thread, put your money down.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)suburbs were recruited to a *black* team in a poorer area.
and it's not the first time the LL has take back a title for rules violations.
http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2015/02/jackie_robinson_west_team_stripped_of_little_league_title.html
mopinko
(70,206 posts)THAT i would not defend.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)except that all that has nothing to do with the present case, where *black* players from *black* suburbs were recruited to a *black* team in a poorer area.
and it's not the first time the LL has take back a title for rules violations. (and not just violations of the age rule, though that's all you acknowledged)
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Bit of a double standard, eh?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)I mean really, what if the older kids were small for their age and didn't feel comfortable playing ball with kids their own age? What if the other players in their age group or their coaches made fun of them because of their size?
As a parent, wouldn't it be my job to put them on a team that was a better fit? Where they felt comfortable and could enjoy just playing the game?
mopinko
(70,206 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)if they were a better fit for the team? If it's all about the kids being comfortable, why wouldn't you defend older players than are permitted?
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)mopinko
(70,206 posts)to keep black kids on one side and white kids on the other.
that's where these boundary lines were drawn.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)like yourself should know this.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)no. sure there are black burbs. one kid was from dolton, which is one of the poorest burbs in illinois.
i cant say for sure, but i doubt there is much in the way of organized sports there.
you are sort of making my point. this team was about pride and mentorship for black kids. black kids who didnt have a good team to play on, whether because their own hood was too poor to support one, or because they lived on the white side of the line, which happens, but is often not pleasant.
the white burbs have plenty of opportunities for organized sports. dolton, i think no.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)from Dolton was afraid of racism? or his area was too poor to support a team?
not sure what you're saying here. your story seems to keep changing.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)no, the dolton kid had crappy choices because dolton is poor and black.
race permeates this situation. that's what i am trying to say.
and btw, just because the kid was claimed as from dolton doesnt mean he was ineligible. if he went to a school in the district, he was eligible. maybe he comes from a divorce, and has a parent in the district.
hell, one of those kids was homeless for half the season. where are his boundaries?
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)wanted to play baseball, someone got screwed. probably poor black kids.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)but nowhere here have i argued that the team has to take all comers. they dont.
that is just dumb.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)outside their borders.
how far does that go. mopinko? could they recruit from outside Illinois, for example?
I don't think you know the first thing about little league.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)were recruited from, and your story about kids afraid of being harassed on all-white teams is a big *fail*, since all of the cities are 50% or more black, and relatively well-off besides.
the kids who got screwed were the poorer black kids from the south side. who didn't get to play because the coaches were too busy recruiting upper middle class black kids from the suburbs.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6240814
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)mopinko
(70,206 posts)my reading comprehension is fine, thanks.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Does your neck get sore, whiplashing from one position to another so fast like that?
Response to mopinko (Reply #99)
Post removed
kiva
(4,373 posts)owe to the team their group of ringers defeated in the championship? You know, that group of kids who didn't get to go to the White House and meet the president, and didn't get to go to Disney World, and didn't get all of the press? They are kids too, and kids who were cheated.
ancianita
(36,133 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)They should get everything that was given to the team that cheated their way to the championship.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)to build a 'superteam' by bending the rules?
mopinko
(70,206 posts)i dont believe them.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)you assume the kids were chosen for their abilities. you dont know that.
i know what chicago is like, i know what kids sports is like.
i think it is just as likely that the coaches took these kids because they knew what the other teams were like. i admit i dont. but i live here, i know the history of these lines on paper.
i see adults who put themselves on the line to give these kids a chance. why they did it has yet to be addressed. until then, i believe it is the word "ringers" that is an unsupported supposition.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)ESPN notes that an investigation into the team by the organization found that Jackie Robinson West fielded a "superteam" by enlisting players who did not live within the geographical boundaries. Little League officials also found that maps were falsified to expand boundaries, which allowed players whose location made them ineligible to become eligible.
http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2015/02/jackie_robinson_west_team_stripped_of_little_league_title.html
mopinko
(70,206 posts)evidence of the motivation of they adults has not been made public. they are just calling it a "super team" because of the result.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 16, 2015, 03:47 AM - Edit history (1)
I see, all you have is your opinion and secret mind-reading powers.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)and i know who is out there, and how those lines on the map came to be. because in chicago it is all about race, ANY TIME you draw a line on a map.
until someone has evidence to the contrary, i am going to choose to believe the best about the team, not the worst.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)mopinko
(70,206 posts)did i state otherwise?
kiva
(4,373 posts)and parents in Chicago conspired to field a winning team. You say you have no proof they didn't, but oddly enough the Little League organization itself found enough proof to take away their championship 'win'.
To recap, you believe:
That the fact that there was an investigation racist, even though the charges of cheating proved to be true.
That the removal of the title is about racism because that wouldn't happen to a non-black team, even though people have pointed to such instances.
That the coaches of the teams these kids should have played on must be racists because why else would parents drive to another area for their kid to play...ignoring the fact that many parents want their kids on the best team and are willing to do a lot more than drive a few miles to make it happen.
That the team they cheated out of a title - and yes, unless the other team was also fielding every great player in the greater Las Vegas area, they were cheated - don't deserve a damn thing because they aren't black.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)maybe ll knows something you dont about the make up of the other teams. they were fine until someone stalked they kids.
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)It's not supposed to be about winning at all costs and the rules be damned. It's supposed to be about learning about teamwork and giving one's best effort and learning to win and lose with pride and dignity and knowing that they played by the rules and gave their best. Those are the lessons that kids can learn in youth sports that will serve them well in Life.
What you're suggesting deprives kids of those lessons, which is a disservice to them, regardless of their race. What you're suggesting is wrong no matter who does it. Sadly, that's the lesson those poor, disappointed kids who played their hearts out were ultimately taught in this instance. Shame on the "adults".
mopinko
(70,206 posts)it is supposed to be about playing, about character. these kids showed enormous character.
but i think there are different rules for black kids and white kids. if somebody winked at the rules, i want to know why. you can say win at any cost. but you dont know that.
i know how those lines came to be. those lines arise from decades of bigotry. they are not random. they were drawn to keep the white kids on one side and the black kids on another.
the reason i point out the article is because i know that those are the kind of people on the other side of the fence when those kids play. there are the kind of people that you have to put up with if you choose to defy those lines on the map, and move to a "better" neighborhood. those kind of people drew the lines in the first place.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)mopinko
(70,206 posts)and neighborhood boundaries. and here, that is all about race.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)The leagues themselves draw the boundaries, in cooperation with surrounding leagues. No one outside of these teams & leagues themselves have anything to do with those boundaries.
The leaders at JRW expanded their boundaries into territory belonging to surrounding leagues WITHOUT seeking the necessary permission from those leagues to do so.
They got the district president to sign off on those changes, even though he KNEW that the surrounding leagues had not been consulted and certainly hadn't agreed to the changes. That district president, BTW, had been a long time league official with JRW.
The boundary map was submitted to LL International, without any notification that surrounding leagues had not agreed to the changes, and without the permission of the surrounding leagues.
Once JRW won the national title, they finally went to the surrounding leagues and asked them to agree to the falsified boundaries, which the leagues refused to do.
When the JRW team returned triumphantly to Chicago, it became apparent to other teams that players had been pulled from within THEIR boundaries without THEIR permission. The "welcome home hero" signs in far away suburbs was the dead giveaway.
As your central theme, you claim that this was a result of black kids not wanting to play for white racist coaches. If that's true, then why wouldn't the white racist coaches have simply agreed to the boundary changes? After all, in your narrative, why would a white racist coach want a black kid on his team?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Throd
(7,208 posts)mopinko
(70,206 posts)on and off the field. so, why would you think they had none?
Throd
(7,208 posts)I didn't. The adults who rigged the team and those who are too willing to excuse them are another matter.
treestar
(82,383 posts)To my utter surprise, people who lived in NJ were said to fake a Delaware address to send their kids to Delaware schools (didn't know the Del. schools were so much better that bringing them over the bridge was worth it, lol).
Pennsylvania is said to have even better schools. So if I can find a PA friend who will let me use their address, that's OK right?
dilby
(2,273 posts)so they could add the outside children? In my opinion that would be the real story, teams are limited to 14 children so if a kid was denied access to make room for a better player outside the little league team district that would be wrong on so many levels.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)team from south side Chicago, to make an 'underdog' story (and re-invigorate baseball for black youth, or so I've read -- the sport is getting whiter).
and since ghetto little league has less resources (coaching, equipment, attention) invested in it than suburban little league, it makes sense that stronger players would tend to be in the suburbs. and that's where they looked for the players. black players, but from better neighborhoods.
so it may very well be that kids who wanted to play didn't get to. or it might be that baseball just isn't very popular in south side Chicago and they couldn't field a team.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)suppose the kids were chosen based on the coaches decision about who most needed the guidance and opportunity that team sports is supposed to be about?
cuz that's how every volunteer kid's coach i know does it.
most of them are in it to make a difference for the kids on their team. not to win. and sure not to win at any cost.
dilby
(2,273 posts)They all had teams in their neighborhoods so if they needed guidance or opportunity it could have been found there.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)the more mopinko talks, the more she constructs a fantasy.
this team showed tremendous character. not win at all costs attitude. this reflected the coaches character.
if the the team that they should have played for was an all white team, would that matter to you?
dilby
(2,273 posts)If they were bringing in average players you may have a case. And yes if the team was all white I would have a problem with it. I would also have the same problem if they were all Jewish like me since it's cheating and wrong.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)srsly?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)The players should be within the boundaries. The valid boundaries, not the falsified boundaries that JRW played under.
One of the apparent out of boundary players was their primary home run hitter...do you really believe that winning had nothing to do with this?
You seem hell-bent on finding a racial aspect to this when it's been shown by the investigation that this was about winning, even if it meant cheating.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)it is just being assumed. i dont know what the coaches real motivations were. neither do you.
i'm just trying to posit what other motivations there might have been.
and since no players have been named, you dont know that that kid was one who was ineligible. even the kids who were "claimed" by their "home" towns are not necessarily ineligible. if they attended school within the boundaries, they were eligible. if their parents are divorced and one lives in the district, they are eligible.
that the team had good players proves nothing. of course they did, they are the champs.
i am hellbent on pointing out that race AND RACISM permeates everything here. we have no idea why things were done. or how it all came to happen.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)The boundaries themselves were FALSFIED - this has been verified by LL International. It doesn't matter if the suburban kids fell into the boundaries, because the boundaries themselves were invalid. That they falsified boundaries has not been disputed by JRW leadership since the title was stripped.
The mother of Pierce Jones, their star homerun hitter said that she drove an hour each way for practices - do you really think that she was inside of the valid boundaries that JRW was supposed to be playing under?
As for the coaches real motivations, it really doesn't matter - they cheated, period. And in doing so, they cost the kids the national title, which is as it should be. Players were on the team that shouldn't have been there, and when that happens, they shouldn't get to benefit from cheating.
And while you're certainly welcome to believe that we don't know why things were done, the LL investigation has shown how it came to happen - JRW submitted falsified boundaries to LL International.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)I mean the REAL sports parents, the ones who live vicariously through their children? They want their kids on a team that will win. They will drive their kids to and from practices, regardless of how far, to make sure the kids are on teams that will no only win, but blow their competition out of the water.
They want their kids to have all the privileges that our society confers on sports stars: glory, scholarships, multi-million dollar contracts, etc. None of that happens when a star athlete doesn't get noticed because he is on a mediocre team.
If you can show me one example of a kid on that team who had two left feet and struck out every time he/she was at bat, but whose initial coach showed up to the practices wearing a white robe, or who was intimidated by the white teammates' parents who drove cars with "Bruce Rauner for Governor" bumper stickers, then I will believe you.
But, I'm willing to bet that nearly every kid on that team is a star athlete.
A culture that idolizes star athletes is more to blame in this situation than racism.
mopinko
(70,206 posts)yes, i know them. cant say as i know any who are poor, tho.
and here in chicago, i wouldnt be the least bit surprised to find out that the coach had everything but the robe.
YarnAddict
(1,850 posts)if there were any kids on this team that couldn't hit a ball worth crap?
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)are not responsible and therefore should not be made to suffer the greatest punishment for purported false boundaries initiated by adults.
they played as a team and they won as a team. leave the kids out of the final decisions/fines, etc. those kids won the games fair and square as far as i am concerned. too bad for the butt hurt racists who just cannot handle the fact that a superior youth baseball team is composed of all african american children.
what burns me as that all of the accusations emerged AFTER the series and championship finals and trip to the white house. it just burns those racist eyeballs to see so many african american people in a celebratory photo taken at the whitehouse with president barack hussein obama.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)they didn't win "fair and square"
And seeing as I answered your question earlier, I'm curious as to whether you'll answer mine...
If this had been an all white team that had cheated by putting ineligible players on the team, and they had beat an all black team for the championship, would you still believe that the title shouldn't be stripped?
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)"cheated"
"ineligible"
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)They cheated because they had ineligible players - even the team leadership is not disputing that now.
And I fail to see how it is a biased question - perhaps you could explain?
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)i'm done tap dancing for you.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)If this were a white team, you would have no problem with stripping them of the title.
Funny that you would accuse me of bias LMAO.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)process led you to this erroneous conclusion? dude, do you even understand what social justice means?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)I'm of the opinion that someone that thinks cheating is just fine for one group but not for another is the narrow minded one.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)is incorrect. but, have a good weekend, anyway.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)It's been proven that they cheated.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)they played as a team. fairly & squarely. this is my last post to you.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)They did indeed play as a team, but they didn't win fairly and squarely. It wasn't their fault, but it doesn't change the fact that by having ineligible players, the team didn't win fairly and squarely.
Little League did the right thing in stripping the title - it wasn't fairly earned.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)That is a red flag to racism.
Some rules are rigorously enforced, others are not.
When rules (even good rules) seem to go unenforced upon white people, but are suddenly enforced with vigor upon black people, a fair person can see racism at work.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)It's unlikely that LL is going to look into potential rules violations - why would they? Hell, in this case, it took two separate investigations to finally get to the truth of what JRW leadership did.
If similar complaints are filed against white teams, and there are no vigorous investigations, then I agree, there is a racial aspect. But I've seen nothing to indicate that complaints were made against other teams and ignored. If such complaints have been filed and ignore, I'd very much like to read about them.