Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 11:25 PM Feb 2015

dont think the jackie robinson flap has anything to do w racism?

Last edited Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:31 AM - Edit history (1)

read the comments on this article, if you have a strong enough stomach.
this is the world we live in, peeps.

me? having kids, kids who played baseball, i know that parents try to get their kids on teams that are a good fit. i dont think for a minute that those parents and kids thought about anything but playing on a team that would be good for those kids. i have no idea what the teams they were supposed to play on were like, but in the world shown in these comments, i would be picky about who my kids played for if i were their parent. lines on a map v a good coach and a good team? yeah, aunt millie is on the right side of the line, we can use her address, hell yeah. i'm there. bfd about your map. bfd about your rules. i am a black mom of a black kid, and i can get them on jrw? i do whatever it takes. you think there werent white kids and parents in that district that did what they had to NOT play on the black kids team?
welcome to chicago.
fuck the maps. i would want my kid on that team. i would use aunt millie's address in a heart beat.
if you think there is something wrong with that, read the comments, and wake up to the world.

http://www.si.com/more-sports/2015/02/13/jackie-robinson-west-rahm-emanuel-championship-rings

and before anyone gets pissed at me for driveby posting, i am on my way to bed, but could not let this go by without posting.
i will check you in the morning.
try not to be jerks.


eta- please dont comment unless you look at the link. think about kids in that environment, then tell me you wouldnt want your black kid on an all black team.

241 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
dont think the jackie robinson flap has anything to do w racism? (Original Post) mopinko Feb 2015 OP
From what's been reported locally, the guy who reported them is married to an African American lady, MohRokTah Feb 2015 #1
So, some of his best friends are.... NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #2
It's tough to call racism when his four kids are black. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #4
how many black kids are on his team? mopinko Feb 2015 #13
my uncle told me this story about when he was in the Army CatWoman Feb 2015 #24
yeah. wanting a black women in your bed mopinko Feb 2015 #31
This is confirmed on my FB page frequently loyalsister Feb 2015 #94
i really hope he is not abusing his wife and kids hopemountain Feb 2015 #177
that's what i think also. mopinko Feb 2015 #16
Sorry, but fuck that notion SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #32
what if they believed the coaches that it was all cool? mopinko Feb 2015 #75
It doesn't matter what the reason was for the cheating SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #78
when I played, there was no choice hfojvt Feb 2015 #197
The thing about this is that they needed to scrutinize all the teams . . . brush Feb 2015 #8
unless they check out the other teams, i will continue to believe it is bias. mopinko Feb 2015 #12
Have allegations of cheating been made against the other teams? SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #33
actually, yes. mopinko Feb 2015 #127
When was the formal complaint filed against them? SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #128
and where are your links hopemountain Feb 2015 #193
Not my judgements, Little League's SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #199
laugh all you want. it is not hilarious. nt hopemountain Feb 2015 #200
It's not hilarious for the kids SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #201
so, what if a team hopemountain Feb 2015 #203
Make all of the players on this team white SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #206
If I hand a hmmmmer, I'd hmmmmer in the morning, tblue37 Feb 2015 #154
link to some confirmation? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #158
Do you have a link to where the complaining team SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #222
Here's some info for you: ND-Dem Feb 2015 #221
A lopsided score like that is unsportsmanlike alarimer Feb 2015 #161
oh bullshit. mopinko Feb 2015 #162
Isn't it up to the umpires to invoke the mercy rule . . . brush Feb 2015 #163
iirc, it went 2 innings. mopinko Feb 2015 #171
I agree. The other team manager was the sore loser . . . brush Feb 2015 #180
if all of the teams were equally "scrutinized" then hopemountain Feb 2015 #178
Bingo! I think you're on to something. nt brush Feb 2015 #179
Because according to the falsified boundary map submitted to LL International SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #191
links please. hopemountain Feb 2015 #194
I don't live there so I don't have pics of the signs SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #198
okay. hopemountain Feb 2015 #202
Where did I blame the kids? SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #205
you "hope"? hopemountain Feb 2015 #230
Yeah, the rules are rules...like "holding" in the NFL...you call it when you want to. nt kelliekat44 Feb 2015 #241
doubt it.. londie Feb 2015 #3
Nope, the coaches cheated Duckhunter935 Feb 2015 #5
"i would use aunt millie's address in a heart beat" Nye Bevan Feb 2015 #6
the focus has been on the coaches, insisting they sought out those kids. mopinko Feb 2015 #11
Grasping at straws doesn't change anything. CANDO Feb 2015 #34
because i live here. mopinko Feb 2015 #77
little league has lines on maps everywhere; and the players recruited from other league areas ND-Dem Feb 2015 #98
No to both questions n/t SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #36
changes nothing regardless of how the conspirators were introduced elehhhhna Feb 2015 #58
do you have any evidence that the (suburban) parents or kids sought to play for this (inner-city) ND-Dem Feb 2015 #88
the kids from the burbs were from a couple of the poorest mopinko Feb 2015 #214
what are these "poorest towns in chicago"? cause all that i'd discovered so far are wealthier ND-Dem Feb 2015 #224
"bfd about your rules" NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #7
Another team broke rules and lost their state championship CANDO Feb 2015 #9
iirc, the 2 other teams that were stripped found kids lying about their age. mopinko Feb 2015 #10
You're partially correct... CANDO Feb 2015 #14
nobody drives their kid 20 miles for no reason. mopinko Feb 2015 #15
Why can't people read up on the articles out there? CANDO Feb 2015 #17
Link directly to LLB press release CANDO Feb 2015 #18
nothing in that article refutes my supposition mopinko Feb 2015 #26
Well, good luck with your persecution complex. CANDO Feb 2015 #38
Exactly SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #40
i dont believe in blindly following the rules where children are involved. mopinko Feb 2015 #81
Based on posts you've made about your legal issues SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #83
oh, you did some digging did you? mopinko Feb 2015 #126
Digging? SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #130
well i still didnt break any laws. mopinko Feb 2015 #134
I think you probably overestimate those that follow you SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #135
if they don't like rules, then they can just get everyone together to play for fun CreekDog Feb 2015 #196
"the OP doesn't believe in following rules generally"? KamaAina Feb 2015 #204
Well bless your heart SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #207
i'm not persecuted. i'm white. mopinko Feb 2015 #73
Then lets throw out all rules. yeoman6987 Feb 2015 #112
I think you may be responding to the wrong person... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #116
You may be right. I don't know how that happened. yeoman6987 Feb 2015 #117
Thank you! NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #144
cause we all know all you have to do to get rid of racism mopinko Feb 2015 #133
Come on now, rules are only for some people. hughee99 Feb 2015 #192
yes. because mopinko Feb 2015 #210
There's two potential racial issues going on here... hughee99 Feb 2015 #217
So you're cool with cheating. That's as far as you have to go. "fuck the maps." X_Digger Feb 2015 #19
yes, i support ignoring lines on a map mopinko Feb 2015 #28
Where are you coming up with that? CANDO Feb 2015 #39
can you stop with the apologia? mopinko Feb 2015 #129
Can you stop with the baseless accusations? SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #132
Nice example you're setting for the kids. X_Digger Feb 2015 #140
thanks, i think so. mopinko Feb 2015 #172
No. cwydro Feb 2015 #20
I just see an appalling lack of responsibility and a constitutional inability BubbaFett Feb 2015 #21
and sometimes it is. mopinko Feb 2015 #29
So you're OK with cheating SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #37
cheating v giving my kids what they need? mopinko Feb 2015 #82
What about the teams that lost SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #84
they lost on the field. mopinko Feb 2015 #100
there's no evidence for your theory. There's evidence that the abilities of the kids had everything ND-Dem Feb 2015 #103
They lost to a team that had ineligible players SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #105
maybe because he knew what the kids would have to put up with on that "other" team. mopinko Feb 2015 #110
Comment in an online article SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #115
Post removed Post removed Feb 2015 #41
Those pesky rules GummyBearz Feb 2015 #22
not race. racism. mopinko Feb 2015 #27
But you are playing make believe now. CANDO Feb 2015 #44
i'm the racist now. mopinko Feb 2015 #92
Who is being an apologist? GummyBearz Feb 2015 #102
No I don't think it has anything to do with racism. romanic Feb 2015 #23
THey cheated, got caught, and lost thair title Takket Feb 2015 #25
what if racists were a factor? mopinko Feb 2015 #30
and what if it's not? ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2015 #43
You know? CANDO Feb 2015 #45
Exactly... Takket Feb 2015 #48
no, when i hear from the parents and coaches why they did it, mopinko Feb 2015 #71
An investigation has already determined 'why they did it'. To field a 'superteam' that would win ND-Dem Feb 2015 #107
rly? funny i hadnt heard that. mopinko Feb 2015 #131
the league is who conducts the investigation. the coaches and parents speak to the investigators. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #159
What about pete? he's white but they won't let him in the HOF. ileus Feb 2015 #35
I see no particular reason to conclude that the report and the investigation into petronius Feb 2015 #42
when it has basically never happened before, but happens to the first all black team mopinko Feb 2015 #46
This revocation is also on very solid ground SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #49
because i dont have them yet. mopinko Feb 2015 #53
It doesn't matter why they wanted them to play on this team SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #56
sure that could work mopinko Feb 2015 #85
What evidence do you have that these kids were facing racism in their own boundaries? SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #86
i live here. mopinko Feb 2015 #93
So in other words SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #97
and you are an apologist. mopinko Feb 2015 #101
I'll proudly wear the label of SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #106
she has no evidence. she made it up. because *she,* the white lady, "lives there". ND-Dem Feb 2015 #108
I heard two other all-black teams got hit, as well. But it didn't happen to all-white teams with ancianita Feb 2015 #52
Yep. Sure would. AND would take full adult responsibility to ensure residency rules apply to EVERY- ancianita Feb 2015 #47
thank you. mopinko Feb 2015 #50
Oh. Race did. We're swimming in the ocean of race prejudice in this country. I was just ancianita Feb 2015 #54
Cheating negates the "well-deserved" description SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #51
indeed... nt ProdigalJunkMail Feb 2015 #55
Nope. Kids don't get to suffer for the sins of the adults. Had it been a white team, the adults ancianita Feb 2015 #57
You actually have no idea what would have happened had it been a white team SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #60
I've worked with white and black parents & watched the double standards, 'playing stupid' stuff. ancianita Feb 2015 #62
I think I've been very clear in what I think SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #63
League positions should be stripped from the adults. The title itself was won by the kids and should ancianita Feb 2015 #65
You sure are SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #67
Adult cheating is never fine. Your position is that these kids cheated. Own it. ancianita Feb 2015 #69
I've never said the kids cheated SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #72
See post #59 and post #65. ancianita Feb 2015 #79
yup. mopinko Feb 2015 #89
Let 'em lawyer up SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #120
It's not the first time a LL title's been taken away for rules violations. So there goes that ND-Dem Feb 2015 #114
over age is waaaaay different from "wrong side of a line" mopinko Feb 2015 #124
You have provided no proof that the boundaries are drawn based on race SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #125
Reading is fundamental: "after Zamboanga used several players that lived outside its district" ND-Dem Feb 2015 #141
AND who were lying about their age. mopinko Feb 2015 #148
Reading is fundamental: "OR were over-age" ND-Dem Feb 2015 #149
It's only happened two other times in over 60 years n/t kcr Feb 2015 #153
if so, so? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #156
Jackie Robinson West isn't the first team to lose its Little League title. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #111
To anyone here who thinks the kids didn't play in good faith, I have this to say: ancianita Feb 2015 #59
Too funny SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #61
Yep. Funny it's already come out in local news that whites have done just that over the years. lol ancianita Feb 2015 #64
The team cheated SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #66
Your mind has cheated. ancianita Feb 2015 #68
Your attitude would be laughable SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #70
I'll err on the side of kids' team sports experiences over residence exclusions any day. ancianita Feb 2015 #74
The why have any rules at all? SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #76
This is how your mind cheats. You could care less about the residence exclusion rules noted ancianita Feb 2015 #87
I wonder if the President will invite the rightful championship team to the White House? SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #91
there were rules about black eating at lunch counters. should those be obeyed? mopinko Feb 2015 #99
except that all that has nothing to do with the present case, where *black* players from *black* ND-Dem Feb 2015 #118
over age kids is a whole different issue. mopinko Feb 2015 #137
strange how you manage to ignore most of the content of the post & focus on one tiny snip. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #139
Wait, what? I thought you said screw the rules where kids are concerned?!? X_Digger Feb 2015 #143
Just a bit SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #145
i said screw lines on a map. mopinko Feb 2015 #146
Why would you oppose letting older players play SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #147
age is just a line on a map. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #152
yeah, but that is not a line that was drawn mopinko Feb 2015 #170
Then why are the kids they recruited from the suburbs BLACK? Chicago has black suburbs. A resident ND-Dem Feb 2015 #181
did i say that? mopinko Feb 2015 #208
so there are no kids who want to play baseball on chicago's south side, and the black kid ND-Dem Feb 2015 #209
i dont know how many of them there are. mopinko Feb 2015 #211
well, the team only has 14 kids, i believe. so unless fewer than 14 kids on chicago's south side ND-Dem Feb 2015 #213
that is such complete bullshit i dont know where to start. mopinko Feb 2015 #215
so; they can pick and choose who they take, even to the extent of drawing talent from ND-Dem Feb 2015 #219
i dont think you know the first thing about segregation. mopinko Feb 2015 #220
non-seq, especially because i just tracked down some of the places the non-southside players ND-Dem Feb 2015 #223
"Zamboanga USED SEVERAL PLAYERS THAT LIVED OUTSIDE ITS DISTRICT OR were over-age" ND-Dem Feb 2015 #151
yeah. some kids were out of the district, and some were over age. mopinko Feb 2015 #173
Wait, so now you're cool with over-age kids? Thought that was a rule you wouldn't break.. X_Digger Feb 2015 #175
Post removed Post removed Feb 2015 #238
And what do those cheating adults in Chicago kiva Feb 2015 #80
You mean the kids who earned two runs in the game they lost? Please, tell me what they should get. ancianita Feb 2015 #90
If you're talking about the Las Vegas team SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #95
you mean the team that didn't have "ringers"? you mean the team that wasn't found to have attempted ND-Dem Feb 2015 #119
until they give that team the same scrutiny, mopinko Feb 2015 #138
the whole point of my thread is about this business of "ringers" mopinko Feb 2015 #104
That's what the investigation found. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #121
they have no way to know that. mopinko Feb 2015 #136
and you know that because.....? evidence? ND-Dem Feb 2015 #150
i have my opinion because i live here. and my kids played sports here. mopinko Feb 2015 #167
ok. it's your opinion, based on no evidence except the racism of chicago. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #168
that's right. mopinko Feb 2015 #169
So really there is no proof you will accept that these coaches kiva Feb 2015 #123
why were they cleared the first time? mopinko Feb 2015 #185
You seem to miss the point of youth sports altogether. WillowTree Feb 2015 #96
you miss the point of my whole argument. mopinko Feb 2015 #109
Do you even know who draws the boundary lines? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #142
they are based on municipal boundaries. mopinko Feb 2015 #189
No, they aren't SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #190
Well said n/t SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #113
Apparently for some, this isn't about the kids and building their character. Throd Feb 2015 #174
except that they showed exceptional character. mopinko Feb 2015 #184
Where did I say the players had no character? Throd Feb 2015 #186
Are you ok with this for school reasons? treestar Feb 2015 #122
Does anyone know if kids from the neighborhood did not make the team dilby Feb 2015 #155
my guess is that someone wanted to field an exceptional team, a winning low income black ND-Dem Feb 2015 #157
like the baake decision, you mean? mopinko Feb 2015 #166
Or more than likely the kids were chosen based on the ability to win. dilby Feb 2015 #176
and more poor kids and kids with special needs in the home district v. the suburbs too. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #182
really? mopinko Feb 2015 #183
The kids that they brought in were clearly allstars, that is a win at all costs attitude. dilby Feb 2015 #187
so, because the kid was good means nothing else matters? mopinko Feb 2015 #212
No, it wouldn't make any difference SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #188
no such thing has been proven. mopinko Feb 2015 #216
You just don't seem to get it SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #218
Have you ever known any "sports parents?" YarnAddict Feb 2015 #160
like i said, my kids played baseball. mopinko Feb 2015 #164
Do you know YarnAddict Feb 2015 #165
the "team, aka young players" hopemountain Feb 2015 #195
Seeing as they had ineligible players on the team SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #225
no, i will not answer your loaded & biased question hopemountain Feb 2015 #229
Neither of those terms is disputed SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #231
explain to you what i have already explained? hopemountain Feb 2015 #232
In other words SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #233
oh, so your narrow thinking hopemountain Feb 2015 #234
MY narrow thinking? SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #235
no. again, your opinion of what i "THINK cheating is" hopemountain Feb 2015 #236
It isn't a matter of opinion SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #237
the players did not cheat. hopemountain Feb 2015 #239
Some of the players were ineligible SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #240
When rules are selectively enforced in disproportiate harm to black people bluestateguy Feb 2015 #226
Unless someone files a complaint SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #227
thank you. mopinko Feb 2015 #228
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
1. From what's been reported locally, the guy who reported them is married to an African American lady,
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 11:27 PM
Feb 2015

and they ahve four children together.

I think it was more over sour grapes at having lost 42-3.

But heck, the rules were broken, so thems the rules.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
4. It's tough to call racism when his four kids are black.
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 11:38 PM
Feb 2015

Like I said, sour grapes, but rules were broken.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
13. how many black kids are on his team?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:29 AM
Feb 2015

and what is the racial make up of his town?
maybe he is just a sore loser. or maybe that loss was especially bitter because it was a bunch of black kids. maybe he didnt notice so much, but maybe his team was super pissed and he got caught up in that.

till they check out the other teams, i am pissed.
how and why these kids ended up on this team needs to be looked at. as a parent, i would have been happy with the local team unless i had a reason. maybe it was strictly ambition. but in one of the most segregated cities in the country, i have to suspect that race is in the mix.

CatWoman

(79,302 posts)
24. my uncle told me this story about when he was in the Army
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 07:42 PM
Feb 2015

and the (white) sergeant in charge was married to a black woman.

Yet that sergeant was hardest and most racist towards the other blacks in the unit.

Sort of like a dog and cat growing up together.

That dog will protect that one cat but will chase down and try to kill every other cat in the neighborhood.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
31. yeah. wanting a black women in your bed
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:15 PM
Feb 2015

doesnt mean you arent a racist. men like women to be "inferior" and controllable.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
94. This is confirmed on my FB page frequently
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:54 PM
Feb 2015

And old HS classmate is married to a black woman and posts the most racist anti- Obama garbage.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
177. i really hope he is not abusing his wife and kids
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 11:38 PM
Feb 2015

which was my daughter's experience. every time they disagreed on something it turned into slamming her race.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
16. that's what i think also.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:50 AM
Feb 2015

and even if the coach is, personally, not, that doesnt mean that the team, as a whole, doesnt have a problem. i want to know why these parents wanted their kids on this team. surely then did not know they were going to win. they probably just wanted what they thought was best for the kids.
if i were the jrw coach, and someone came to me and said- i know xyz team is not gonna let my kid play, or i know my kid will be harassed, what coach wouldnt tell them to find an address that they could use?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
32. Sorry, but fuck that notion
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:19 PM
Feb 2015

They don't get to break the rules just because they want to, and then act shocked and pissed because there are consequences.

When you cheat, you're accepting that chance that you'll get caught and be punished. I feel bad for the kids, but taking away their wins was the right call.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
75. what if they believed the coaches that it was all cool?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:39 PM
Feb 2015

what if there was a reason, a good reason, that they didnt want their kids to play on the other teams. people assume it is about winning. what if that is not the point at all? what if the other teams looked the other way for good reason?
i am looking at this as a parent whose kids played ball. there are some coaches you didnt want within 100 yards of your kid. and everybody knew it, including the other coaches.

i just really dont see why the parents have no say in where there kids play.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
78. It doesn't matter what the reason was for the cheating
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:40 PM
Feb 2015

Teams, including parents, don't get to make up their own rules.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
197. when I played, there was no choice
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 04:54 PM
Feb 2015

they had a try-out day where they put you through various drills - and then some kids would make the majors and some the minors and the coaches of each league would get to draft players in some sort of lottery.

Usually we were on vacation during the try out day, so I was given the lowest ranking

Somehow I always ended up on the last place team. Once we got beat 18-0 and the paper recorded that I was the only person on my team to get a base hit. One year my team kept forfeiting by not having enough players at a bunch of games. So the team was broken up and we were sent to other teams. What team was I sent to? The team that USED to be 2nd to last place and was now last place now that my old team didn't exist.

But I think that was the year I pitched a winning game against the 2nd place Yankees. I was the 2nd relief pitcher, but got the win since we were losing when I came in.

brush

(53,843 posts)
8. The thing about this is that they needed to scrutinize all the teams . . .
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 02:54 AM
Feb 2015

as hard as they did the African American team.

I'd be willing to be that if they did they'd find most of the other teams weren't entirely clean either.

The Jackie Robinson team was cleared twice by the Little League, twice.

Then the sore looser, 42 to 3 was it, told them to keep digging. Well I say dig on everyone else or it damn sure is racism.

I guarantee you fudging those boundary rules is not uncommon. Like the OP mentioned about the white parents who fudged boundary rules so their kids wouldn't have to play with the African American kids.

And don't you just hate sore losers. I read he even admitted that there were other teams that did it but they didn't win the championship.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
33. Have allegations of cheating been made against the other teams?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:20 PM
Feb 2015

If not, there is no reason to investigate them.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
127. actually, yes.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:05 PM
Feb 2015

the team that complained admitted they did it too. and it is an open secret that this is common. so why just the black kids get nailed. should make you go hmmm. but, maybe you dont have a hmmmmer.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
193. and where are your links
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 04:22 PM
Feb 2015

to back up your own almighty self righteous assertions, accusations & judgements?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
199. Not my judgements, Little League's
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 04:58 PM
Feb 2015

I provided the links in response to your other post.

It's bordering on hilarious that some people just can't accept that this team cheated, even though I've heard of no one associated with this team denying that they cheated since the title was stripped.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
201. It's not hilarious for the kids
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 05:05 PM
Feb 2015

But it's absolutely hilarious that so many people can't accept the truth that this team was led by a group of adult cheaters.

Stripping the title isn't about race, it's about not allowing a team that didn't compete fairly to retain the title.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
203. so, what if a team
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 05:11 PM
Feb 2015

of all anglo saxon kid players had been unknowingly manipulated by some greedy adults running an entertainment/sports corporate entity? would you strip away their title as well?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
206. Make all of the players on this team white
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 05:38 PM
Feb 2015

Do the same thing, and I'll say the same thing - strip the title.

The rightful champions, the team out in Las Vegas - if they're investigated and found to have cheated, I'd say strip it from them as well.

Because it isn't about race, it's about playing by the rules.

How about you? Would you favor stripping the title from an all white team under the same circumstances?

tblue37

(65,483 posts)
154. If I hand a hmmmmer, I'd hmmmmer in the morning,
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 01:20 AM
Feb 2015

I'd hmmmmer in the evening, all over this land!

Sorry, mopinko--I couldn't pass up the straight line--but I do agree with you on this issue!

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
221. Here's some info for you:
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:29 PM
Feb 2015

One kid was recruited from Lynwood (45.4% black).
One from south Holland (50.8% black).
One from Dolton: (82.4% black)

What's more interesting is that, though these are areas with a near majority or more of black residents, they're not poor.

Dolton median household income is $48K and the poverty rate is <7% (lower than the US rate).
South Holland median household income is even higher, $60K, with a poverty rate of <5%.
Lynwood median household income = $59K, with a poverty rate of <6%.

US median household income 2012 = $51.9K. US Poverty rate = 14.5% (2013)


So it's looking more and more like good black players from wealthier largely black suburbs were recruited, to the detriment of the poorer black kids who actually lived in the southside.

and it's probably because suburban little league has the benefit of more adult involvement, more money for equipment, better facilities, etc. so all else being equal, suburban players are likely to be more skilled than poor urban kids.

Anyway, so far your story about black kids from white suburbs wanting to play with the southside cause they're afraid of racism isn't holding up very well.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
161. A lopsided score like that is unsportsmanlike
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 09:49 AM
Feb 2015

Running up the score like that should not be done in Little League.

He's not a "sore loser".

But they broke the rules, or the coaches did at any rate.

brush

(53,843 posts)
163. Isn't it up to the umpires to invoke the mercy rule . . .
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 10:44 AM
Feb 2015

when games get out of hand?

I would think that the umps should have called a game like that.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
171. iirc, it went 2 innings.
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 10:01 PM
Feb 2015

it's not up to the kids to go out there and not play their best.
i mean, wtf.

brush

(53,843 posts)
180. I agree. The other team manager was the sore loser . . .
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 12:30 AM
Feb 2015

who even admitted that other teams had fudged boundary issues but since they didn't get to the championship round it didn't matter.

Guess he couldn't stand to lose that bad even though the game went only TWO INNINGS.

Thanks for that info. I didn't know that the game was that short. Just think of the score if it had went the full 6 innings.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
178. if all of the teams were equally "scrutinized" then
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 11:46 PM
Feb 2015

why did they play the entire season and go through the finals and awards and trip to the white house - before the "scrutiny" was reported??????? it is about race. an all black team at the white house with a black president giving them special treatment ... some people can't stand for such a thing to happen.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
191. Because according to the falsified boundary map submitted to LL International
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 01:33 PM
Feb 2015

all of the kids on the team fell within the boundaries. It was only when they returned after the LL World Series, and signs in far away suburbs were welcoming home their individual players that neighboring leagues realized that players had been pulled from within their boundaries. It was at that point that LL started digging into the matter and found that the boundary map submitted by JRW was invalid, as it had been redrawn to extend into other leagues' boundaries without the consent of those leagues.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
198. I don't live there so I don't have pics of the signs
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 04:56 PM
Feb 2015

If you're actually interested in reading the timeline, the link is below. It mentions the "public accolades" given to alleged out of boundary players, and also provides info on the falsified boundary maps.

http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20150211/roseland/jackie-robinson-west-timeline-key-dates-little-league-scandal

Dec. 16, 2014 — DNAinfo Chicago's Mark Konkol reports that a suburban league has asked Little League International to review the eligibility of the players, arguing that public accolades offered to the players after the U.S. title exposed many didn't live in the narrow South Side boundaries from where the team is supposed to draw.


http://www.wbez.org/news/sports/gentrification-and-jackie-robinson-west-little-league-was-playing-field-ever-even-111564

But, amidst the excitement, there were signs that something was off, in some cases literal signs.

Like the one the mayor of south suburban Lynwood put outside village hall to celebrate the village’s "own" Jackie Robinson West player. Or the congratulatory posts on social media from Illinois House Rep. Robin Kelly, calling out two players from South Holland and another from Dolton, all outside the city limits.


Since the title was stripped, I haven't see where anyone associated with JRW is denying that they broke the rules by expanding the boundaries without permission - have you?

The team was caught cheating, and they've had to pay the price. I see nothing wrong with that.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
202. okay.
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 05:09 PM
Feb 2015

thank you.
i agree with the rev. jesse jackson's defense of the team & their parents.
the team was not caught cheating. the team played the games. i refer to the kids. but go ahead and keep blaming the kids.
i stand with the team players and their parents.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
205. Where did I blame the kids?
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 05:34 PM
Feb 2015

Oh that's right, I didn't.

While the players didn't cheat, the adults did, which resulted in a team that would not have been able to compete, had the truth been known. No way a team that earned the title by being stacked with out of boundary players should be permitted to keep that title.

Stand with Rev. Jackson all you want - he's human, meaning he can be wrong too. And in this case, he is wrong, IMO. I hope LL International stands strong against these ridiculous charges of racism, and don't give the title back.

londie

(3 posts)
3. doubt it..
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 11:38 PM
Feb 2015

They broke the rules so, it is what it is.I think its more of a story because coaches and patents used kids to cheat.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
5. Nope, the coaches cheated
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 11:41 PM
Feb 2015

and the team was disqualified. I just hope the team that are now champions get the same treatment the other team got.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
6. "i would use aunt millie's address in a heart beat"
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 11:47 PM
Feb 2015

Thank you for being so forthcoming about your attitude towards the strict rules of Little League.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
11. the focus has been on the coaches, insisting they sought out those kids.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:18 AM
Feb 2015

suppose the parents and kids were the ones who sought out the team. does that change things?
suppose those kids had played in their designated team, and had suffered for their race. does that change things?

 

CANDO

(2,068 posts)
34. Grasping at straws doesn't change anything.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:20 PM
Feb 2015

Wondering why you keep pushing with fantasy racism where it doesn't exist. The adults cheated, end of story.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
77. because i live here.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:40 PM
Feb 2015

lines on a map is why these kids lived where they did in the first place. the color line lives.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
98. little league has lines on maps everywhere; and the players recruited from other league areas
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:01 PM
Feb 2015

were *black*, just like the kids in s-side Chicago. so I don't know why you're talking about color lines.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
88. do you have any evidence that the (suburban) parents or kids sought to play for this (inner-city)
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:50 PM
Feb 2015

team?

because what I read put it on the coaches, and how I interpreted it was that the suburbs are richer, thus the kids in sports get better/more consisten training and equipment, thus are more likely, all else being equal, to become better players.

It's not like those suburban kids couldn't have joined the little league teams in their own neighborhoods, so why would their parents be making special arrangements to join JRW?


JRW’s title garnered national acclaim for the team due to the uniqueness of its roster—an all-black squad hailing from Chicago's embattled South Side. And it was the city—its athletes, community leaders, politicians, the mayor, the president—that embraced the team as a beacon of sorts.

Little League’s investigation led it to conclude that JRW officials knowingly fielded players who lived outside the team’s residential boundaries and then tried to cover up their deception, a violation of league rules. In effect, the claim is that JRW sought to field a superteam...

“I grew up and played in JRW until I was 10 years old. Bill Haley ran a first-class organization. JRW has played an integral role in Rosemoor’s rebuilding. We were down to one team in 2011. JRW took us in and had interleague play with us. When Rosemoor went into the district tournament, Rosemoor wouldn’t have been able to play....


http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2362111-claims-of-hypocrisy-in-the-jackie-robinson-west-controversy





mopinko

(70,206 posts)
214. the kids from the burbs were from a couple of the poorest
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 09:38 PM
Feb 2015

towns in illinois. they werent from rich suburbs where they had opportunities.

that "superteam" shit may be the claim, but i have seen no evidence that it is the case.

and i doubt that the coaches are going to come out and say- well, we all knew coach soandso was a racist asshole, so when a kid came to us that should have played for him, we tried to find a way.
but this being chicago, i find my supposition more than just possible.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
224. what are these "poorest towns in chicago"? cause all that i'd discovered so far are wealthier
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:43 PM
Feb 2015

than south side Chicago. some quite a bit wealthier.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6240814

PS Dolton, 82% black, has a median household income just shy of the US median. It's not 'poor' by any measure, in fact, it has a lower % of residents in poverty than the US average.

It has a higher median household income (by about $12K) and a lower poverty rate (6% v 16%) than the majority white town I live in.

Dolton's also wealthier than south side Chicago.

 

CANDO

(2,068 posts)
9. Another team broke rules and lost their state championship
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 03:20 AM
Feb 2015

Just last summer also. Team from Georgia. Team had one black kid. I suppose that was racism also. It was a feel good story and some adults had to go and screw it up.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
10. iirc, the 2 other teams that were stripped found kids lying about their age.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:16 AM
Feb 2015

different story. this has never happened before.
so....

 

CANDO

(2,068 posts)
14. You're partially correct...
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:31 AM
Feb 2015

A team from the Phillipines had their LLWS title stripped due to putting together a national all star team. Definitely a boundaries issue such as what JRWLL violated. The other team to have their LLWS wins taken away was the team from Bronx, NY when it was discovered that Danny Almonte was actually 14 ysr old. He was sensational at the LLWS, pitching a perfect game. The team from Georgia last summer, which didn't make it to the LLWS, was stripped of it's GA state title for violating a teams rule for having no more than 8 of the 14 team members being 12 yrs old. They had 10 players on their roster as 12 yr olds, more than the max of 8. http://www.cbs46.com/story/26195315/peachtree-city-little-league-team-stripped-of-state-championship

I think going forward LL has to put in place better tools for local leagues and districts to utilize in regard to following these geographic boundaries. It is blatantly obvious that these adults from JRWLL violated the boundaries of their league and district. Too many people on here and elsewhere(Jessie Jackson) have reacted by accusing racism. Absolutely shameful and uncalled for. LL actually bent over backwards to try and look the other way initially, but when it became blatantly obvious, they had to act. Some of these kids lived up to 20 miles outside of their league's boundary. This is not a rural league, where you'd expect a somewhat large area. It was urban and suburban Chicago, where boundaries are much smaller due to larger population numbers.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
15. nobody drives their kid 20 miles for no reason.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:46 AM
Feb 2015

i want to know why they did that. racism is rampant here, especially some of these burbs. did those parents have past bad experiences? did their local team have a reputation for racism?

i think the racial layers run deep.

 

CANDO

(2,068 posts)
17. Why can't people read up on the articles out there?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 06:24 PM
Feb 2015

This was the direct result of the actions taken by the adults. http://www.si.com/more-sports/2015/02/11/jackie-robinson-west-vacates-title-llws
"Jackie Robinson West, the United States champion at the 2014 Little League World Series, agreed to vacate its title after knowingly violating residency rules, Little League announced Wednesday. Little League Baseball opened an investigation to determine if the Chicago-based team used players that resided outside of the geographic area that it represents. An investigation showed that the team used an inaccurate boundary map and met with outside neighborhoods and districts in Illinois to recruit players to build a competitive team.

Little League Baseball said it was alerted of a potential problem back in September when a league official from a neighboring district in Illinois expressed concern about residency problems with Jackie Robinson West."

 

CANDO

(2,068 posts)
18. Link directly to LLB press release
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 06:50 PM
Feb 2015
http://www.littleleague.org/media/llnewsarchive/2015/January-April/little-league-jrw-ruling.htm

All the information explained including a timeline.

A further comment from myself pertaining to the OP......You can't prejudice your view of the larger issue by taking into account the obvious assholes of the world making racist comments in the comments section after an article. LL baseball, nor the coaches of the other teams are not the people making the racist comments. Those people put in just as much effort as any other team to field a team. It is entirely reasonable for a coach to question the residency of his opponents when a town official from way outside this team's boundary was proudly proclaiming as their own, one of the players from JRW. That is what led to a more thorough investigation which turned up other players from outside the boundaries. It's understandable people are upset. Put the blame where it belongs, though. For those people upset for the JRW players...think how the players who lost to JRW must feel. They had their dreams compromised by a team who had ringers from outside their boundary. This was all brought about by the actions of 3-4 adults from JRWLL.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
26. nothing in that article refutes my supposition
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:03 PM
Feb 2015

that it is just as likely that the parents came to the coach and/or that playing on an all black team was a deciding factor for the parents.
but the bottom line is that obviously a parent was willing to drive 20 miles x 2 x how many games and practices so that their kids could play for this team and this coach.
i will stand by that until ALL the facts come out, including who approached who.
from what i have seen of the team, self esteem and pride, and escape from the world you see in those comments could well have been the actual motivation.

if it turns out that those kids who were out of the boundaries had experiences or reasons to believe they would face racism if they played on their assigned teams, will that change your defense of some lines on a map? maybe the other teams initially signed off because they didnt want those black kids on their team. what would you say then?
obviously, the other teams that were willing to support the changes to the map had a reason.

 

CANDO

(2,068 posts)
38. Well, good luck with your persecution complex.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:29 PM
Feb 2015

Sad you're doing incalculable harm to the real fight against racism and bigotry by pushing this fantasy. Fight it where it exists for real. Creating it where it isn't is surely harmful to the cause.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
81. i dont believe in blindly following the rules where children are involved.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:44 PM
Feb 2015

lines on a map v children being cherished for who they are, and being affirmed? yeah, fuck your lines on a map.
and one of these kids became homeless during this time. what do you do with him? kick him off the team? quite possibly the best part of his life at the time?
ya, no.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
83. Based on posts you've made about your legal issues
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:45 PM
Feb 2015

You don't believe in following rules in general, whether kids are involved or not.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
126. oh, you did some digging did you?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:04 PM
Feb 2015

well isnt that special.
since i didnt break any rules, except to piss off the wrong people, maybe that's why i get it.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
134. well i still didnt break any laws.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:12 PM
Feb 2015

so......
my day in court will come. i will be sure to post about it for all my followers.
especially those that live in caves.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
196. if they don't like rules, then they can just get everyone together to play for fun
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 04:33 PM
Feb 2015

a team of ringers can play awesome together and that will be its own reward.

BUT if they want to win a Little League trophy, that trophy is given out to teams that win while following a set of rules and procedures.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
73. i'm not persecuted. i'm white.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:35 PM
Feb 2015

but i live here, and i know just how racist of a place this is.
till i hear otherwise from the parents, i am reserving judgement.

you, on the other hand, refuse to even consider that it could be racism at the root of this. says plenty about you.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
112. Then lets throw out all rules.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:21 PM
Feb 2015

That seems to be what is wanted by your statement. The team deserved forfeiture and is not about race but rules you want to get rid of. Well the rules needed to be questioned before the season started.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
116. I think you may be responding to the wrong person...
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:24 PM
Feb 2015

or else you misunderstood my reply. I'm in favor of the rule, and I think the parents and coaches cheated. In my opinion, the team deserved to have their title stripped, although it's sad for the kids.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
133. cause we all know all you have to do to get rid of racism
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:10 PM
Feb 2015

is jump out from behind a tree and yell "boo"
get real. people worked around it, and gave these kids a chance.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
192. Come on now, rules are only for some people.
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 02:08 PM
Feb 2015

I've seen a whole lot of wild speculation about what COULD have happened and how this COULD be racism, so let me add this...

If this team had followed all the rules and lost in the finals to a white team that had recruited from outside it's district, would you feel exactly the same way about the rules (bfd)?

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
210. yes. because
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 09:26 PM
Feb 2015

white kids have choices. black kids dont. suburban kids have tons of choices, good programs, well funded facilities, lots of coaches.
these kids didnt. that is my whole point. it is my supposition that these kids ended up on this team because their options were constrained by their race. and by the racism that they would have faced on their "home" teams.
note i said supposition. but i know how lines on maps get drawn in chicago, and lines are about race.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
217. There's two potential racial issues going on here...
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 09:53 PM
Feb 2015

The first one is "why this is being investigated". Titles have been stripped before, although probably a lot less often than cheating actually happens. No one seems to be arguing they didn't do what they are being accused of, so you can't really argue they didn't do anything wrong. When someone makes cheating claims, what is Little League supposed to do, ignore it? As to why ALL teams aren't investigated, when people cheat and still lose, no one bothers to investigate. That's not just baseball, that's life in general.

The second one is "why did this happen in the first place". Why were the kids playing out of district? Was it because the coaches wanted to put together a winning team, or because several children living outside the district didn't like the coaches they would have played for in their own district and with no recruitment, all sought to play on this same other team? I've never seen a coach that didn't want to put together a winning team, but other than your comments about how racist a city Chicago is, and your speculation about how these kids MIGHT have not liked the situations they had in their own district, I haven't seen anything to indicate that this was actually the case. Maybe I missed it in all your comments, but if you want to continue to make that argument, you're going to need more than "well, it COULD have happened".

If another team had beat the Chicago team (and assuming they were following the rules) and it turns out THEY had recruited from outside the district, would you still think this was no big deal?

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
19. So you're cool with cheating. That's as far as you have to go. "fuck the maps."
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 06:53 PM
Feb 2015

Lets hope there aren't many parents like you on other teams.

What the fuck are you teaching your kids when you say, "I want you on this team, but you have to lie and tell them you're from this other neighborhood. M'kay son? You lie real good for mommy, k?"

Disgusting.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
28. yes, i support ignoring lines on a map
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:09 PM
Feb 2015

if it means that my black son doesnt have to play for a racist coach.

 

CANDO

(2,068 posts)
39. Where are you coming up with that?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:33 PM
Feb 2015

I've read many articles on this JRWLL situation, and nowhere have I seen anyone mention racist coaches. Can't you just stop with the faux racist accusations?

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
129. can you stop with the apologia?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:08 PM
Feb 2015

maybe i know a little more about how things work around here than you. try that on for size.
those lines are not arbitrary. they are about white teams and black teams.
this is a frighteningly segregated city.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
132. Can you stop with the baseless accusations?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:10 PM
Feb 2015

Why don't you provide something other than your own opinion, like some links to back up your accusations.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
140. Nice example you're setting for the kids.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:24 PM
Feb 2015

Rules? Fuck em.

Rules don't apply to you, if you claim racism.

 

BubbaFett

(361 posts)
21. I just see an appalling lack of responsibility and a constitutional inability
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 06:56 PM
Feb 2015

to accept the consequences of actions.

Sometimes it just isn't everyone else's fault.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
29. and sometimes it is.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:11 PM
Feb 2015

till i hear about the choices those kids faced, i am not assuming it was all about winning.
i want to know why someone would drive 20 miles x a bazillion for their kid to play on that team. knowing my hometown, i cant believe that race and racism wasnt a factor.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
84. What about the teams that lost
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:46 PM
Feb 2015

because of the cheating? Don't you think they deserve what's right and best for them?

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
100. they lost on the field.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:03 PM
Feb 2015

there is absolutely no evidence that the actual abilities of these kids had anything to do with any of this.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
103. there's no evidence for your theory. There's evidence that the abilities of the kids had everything
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:10 PM
Feb 2015

to do with it. They recruited good players, not just anyone who wanted to join. Duh.


The Jackie Robinson West Little League baseball team, the first all-African-American team to win the U.S. championship, have been stripped of their title after they violated a rule that does not allow teams to use players who don't live in the area the team represents...

ESPN notes that an investigation into the team by the organization found that Jackie Robinson West fielded a "superteam" by enlisting players who did not live within the geographical boundaries. Little League officials also found that maps were falsified to expand boundaries, which allowed players whose location made them ineligible to become eligible.

http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2015/02/jackie_robinson_west_team_stripped_of_little_league_title.html

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
105. They lost to a team that had ineligible players
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:11 PM
Feb 2015

There is no evidence that racism had anything to do with the cheating either, yet you keep claiming that's why the ineligible players were allowed on the team.

Why would the league manager go to the trouble to forge boundary maps if not to pack the team with better players?

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
110. maybe because he knew what the kids would have to put up with on that "other" team.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:20 PM
Feb 2015

just as plausible as your assertion that they coaches just wanted to win.

read the comments. that is the world we live in. that is the world these kids live in. that is the world where "coloreds" stay on their own side of the lines.
why is it so hard to believe that those coaches didnt know/think that?

Response to mopinko (Reply #29)

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
22. Those pesky rules
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 07:03 PM
Feb 2015

They don't allow for people to put together a team based on race... now that is super racist.

There should be a different set of rules maybe... like separate all the kids by race. Then we have the WLLWS (white little league world series), BLLWS (black little league world series), OLLWS (other little league world series). Then we can have "separate but equal" LLWS's...

Wait... this is starting to sound familiar. Didn't we used to do super screwed up crap like this, and then found it had super negative effects???

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
27. not race. racism.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:06 PM
Feb 2015

if the kids and the parents knew the coaches of the assigned team were racists, would you tell them play for the racists or dont play at all?

lines on a map here mostly have to do with race.

 

CANDO

(2,068 posts)
44. But you are playing make believe now.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:42 PM
Feb 2015

There are no allegations of racist coaches in this situation. Where are the mods? If I was on here being a racist, I'd get the boot. We have here someone hurling the race card in an egregious fashion with absolutely nothing to back it up with. As I said earlier, you are not helping to stamp out racism. You are hurting the cause.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
92. i'm the racist now.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:52 PM
Feb 2015

what i have to back it up is that i live here.
but sop for apologists. thanks. nice to know ya.
i see your colors, too.

romanic

(2,841 posts)
23. No I don't think it has anything to do with racism.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 07:34 PM
Feb 2015

The team cheated, they lost out in the end because they cheated.

Takket

(21,621 posts)
25. THey cheated, got caught, and lost thair title
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 07:57 PM
Feb 2015

That isn't racism, despite the fact that racists, who had nothing to do with the team or Little League in general, are having a field day with this story.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
30. what if racists were a factor?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:13 PM
Feb 2015

i find it hard to believe that racism didnt rear it's ugly head until they won. this town is as full of racist as any town in mississippi.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
43. and what if it's not?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:42 PM
Feb 2015

from the sound of things, it doesn't matter to you if the motive was race (which, NOTHING points to any suggestion that it is) ... to YOU the motive is race and that's all you'll believe.

sP

 

CANDO

(2,068 posts)
45. You know?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:47 PM
Feb 2015

If there was reverse racism, this poster would be a classic example. Seeing racism everywhere, hurling unfounded accusations of racism. Seems like a pathology to me.

Takket

(21,621 posts)
48. Exactly...
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:52 PM
Feb 2015

and screaming racism every time something happens to a black or group of blacks makes it impossible to get justice for real racism. Boy who cried wolf...

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
71. no, when i hear from the parents and coaches why they did it,
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:33 PM
Feb 2015

i will make a judgement then.
till then, i live here. i know what it is like.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
131. rly? funny i hadnt heard that.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:09 PM
Feb 2015

i have not heard the coaches or the parents speak yet, just the league.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
159. the league is who conducts the investigation. the coaches and parents speak to the investigators.
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 03:45 AM
Feb 2015

petronius

(26,603 posts)
42. I see no particular reason to conclude that the report and the investigation into
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:38 PM
Feb 2015

this particular team was motivated by racism. And conversely, it seems quite reasonable that any winning team would be subject to scrutiny. When the investigation showed what it did, I think the league took the appropriate action. So no: absent evidence I do not believe that the report, investigation, and punishment were motivated by racism.

However, that does not imply that these kids were guilty of anything, nor that they failed to represent their city well. Everything I've seen suggests they were excellent ambassadors for Chicago. And I don't think their parents did anything wrong; certainly, giving one's kid the best possible opportunities is a standard parental motivation.

Further, I'm unsurprised that bigots and racist have come out of the virtual woodwork to spew bile about this story. But the behavior of these bottom-feeders does not retroactively affect the motivations and processes of the investigation itself.

It seems to me that a lot of these points get conflated in stories like this. However, it's logical, reasonable, and not contradictory to believe that 1) the investigation and sanction wasn't motivated by racism (absent evidence to the contrary), 2) the kids are innocent victims and all-around good eggs, and 3) racism is still a major thread in our society...

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
46. when it has basically never happened before, but happens to the first all black team
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:48 PM
Feb 2015

(other title revocations were on much more solid ground) then, yeah, things that make you go hmmm. or should make you go hmmmm.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
53. because i dont have them yet.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:57 PM
Feb 2015

until i know why those parents wanted so badly for their kids to play on this team, i am not satisfied.
if the team that they "should have" played on has a history of harassment or racial bias, i am with the parents who found a way to get their kids on jrw team.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
56. It doesn't matter why they wanted them to play on this team
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:03 PM
Feb 2015

The boundaries were re-drawn, against LL rules, without permission of the leagues from which they were pulling players. What the parents wanted, what the coaches wanted, what the kids wanted - all 100% irrelevant. The boundaries were drawn, and when the team decided to redraw them in defiance of LL rules, they took the chance that they would be found out and face the consequences.

If the parents felt that their children faced racism on their local teams (an idea which seems to be a figment of your fertile imagination), the way to rectify that would have been to request formal redress through the league.

Not by cheating.

Good on LL for taking away the title.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
85. sure that could work
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:47 PM
Feb 2015

in YOUR fertile imagination. cuz entrenched racism always just goes poof when someone complains.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
86. What evidence do you have that these kids were facing racism in their own boundaries?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:49 PM
Feb 2015

Have the families made such claims? Or are you just making it up?

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
93. i live here.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:54 PM
Feb 2015

i know that maps are more than maps here. i know that there are 2 sides to any line drawn around here, and that race is behind them most of the time.
especially old lines.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
97. So in other words
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:56 PM
Feb 2015

there have been no such claims, and you're just making it up.

Thanks for confirming my suspicions.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
101. and you are an apologist.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:04 PM
Feb 2015

like i said, i live here. i know the history behind those lines on a map, and they are AAALLLLL about race. period.

ancianita

(36,133 posts)
52. I heard two other all-black teams got hit, as well. But it didn't happen to all-white teams with
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:56 PM
Feb 2015

the same fudged residence issues. Just a rumor that I'm trying to check out.

ancianita

(36,133 posts)
47. Yep. Sure would. AND would take full adult responsibility to ensure residency rules apply to EVERY-
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:52 PM
Feb 2015

BODY.

Now, regarding the racism. Just for the sake of argument...

What if there were absolutely no racial motives.

What if that dime was dropped from a love of rules, and the love of rightness.

If the adults made mistakes, there will still be no greater wrong than the wrong done to these children by waiting until after they've played their hearts out to right this broken rule.

No matter the enforcement timing -- no one can tell me that any rule is more important than these kids' love of the game and well-deserved title win.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
50. thank you.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:54 PM
Feb 2015

but living here, i just cant believe that race had NOTHING to do with it, from why those kids were on that team in the first place, to the way it all went down.
i mean, these complainers basically stalked those families to get their "evidence".
there are better ways to handle this.

ancianita

(36,133 posts)
54. Oh. Race did. We're swimming in the ocean of race prejudice in this country. I was just
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:57 PM
Feb 2015

squashing any arguments based on that denial, is all.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
51. Cheating negates the "well-deserved" description
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 08:55 PM
Feb 2015

Doesn't matter that the kids didn't do the cheating, cheating potentially contributed to their wins, so their wins should be forfeited.

ancianita

(36,133 posts)
57. Nope. Kids don't get to suffer for the sins of the adults. Had it been a white team, the adults
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:07 PM
Feb 2015

would have lawyered up and cut a deal with the league to keep the title. The argument for the deal would have been along the lines of, "what's more important, thirteen kids who love baseball and only wanted to play their best (spirit of the law) or one rule (letter of the law)" -- and the whole thing would have blown over.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
60. You actually have no idea what would have happened had it been a white team
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:13 PM
Feb 2015

Ineligible players were playing on the team - there is no way to rectify that other than to take away their wins. They cheated against every single team they played. It's a shame that the kids have to pay for the adults cheating, but anything other than taking away their wins would be unfair to the teams they played while cheating.

ancianita

(36,133 posts)
62. I've worked with white and black parents & watched the double standards, 'playing stupid' stuff.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:20 PM
Feb 2015

I live in the Chicago area. I kinda do have an idea. Speculation is credible based on official public history and local experience.

First you say the adults cheated, then you say "...anything other than taking away their wins would be unfair to the teams they played while cheating."

Be careful to write what you really think, so that I actually know what you think.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
63. I think I've been very clear in what I think
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:26 PM
Feb 2015

But I'll say it again, lest there be any doubt.

Some of the adults in charge of this team cheated.

They forged boundary documents, and tried to get other leagues to go along with it.

They used those forged documents to put players on the team that should not have been there, i.e., they were ineligible to play for that team.

Those ineligible players played and contributed to the team's success.

All games with those ineligible players on the roster should be forfeited, including the LL World Series games, and brackets leading to the LL World Series.

The national title should be stripped from the team.

Is that clear enough?

ancianita

(36,133 posts)
65. League positions should be stripped from the adults. The title itself was won by the kids and should
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:28 PM
Feb 2015

be retained. Period.

Am I clear enough?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
67. You sure are
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:31 PM
Feb 2015

Your stand is that cheating is just fine, and that the teams that were cheated should just accept it and move on.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
72. I've never said the kids cheated
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:35 PM
Feb 2015

But it doesn't matter - the team, which includes the adults, cheated, and in doing so, they robbed the teams they played of a fair chance to win.

What do those teams deserve, in your opinion?

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
89. yup.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:51 PM
Feb 2015

cuz that's how we roll here in chi. unfortunately.
i was very happy to hear that they HAD lawyered up. i hope someone is out there in vegas digging into public and non-public records and stalking kids around to make sure THEY are all on the up and up.

the fact that other coaches were willing to go along makes me think that there are a lot of open secrets here.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
120. Let 'em lawyer up
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:29 PM
Feb 2015

Let 'em waste their money - they can't force LL to give the title back. They can wear the fake rings that Rahm gives them, and they'll be just that...fake rings for a fake championship.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
114. It's not the first time a LL title's been taken away for rules violations. So there goes that
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:23 PM
Feb 2015

theory.


According to ESPN, Jackie Robinson West isn't the first team to lose its Little League title. "In 1992, Little League baseball took away the title from Zamboanga, Philippines, and handed it to Long Beach, Calif., after Zamboanga used several players that lived outside its district or were over-age. In 2001, a team from the Bronx, N.Y., that finished third was forced to forfeit its games after pitcher Danny Almonte was revealed to be over-age," ESPN reports.


http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2015/02/jackie_robinson_west_team_stripped_of_little_league_title.html

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
125. You have provided no proof that the boundaries are drawn based on race
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:04 PM
Feb 2015

And yes, they're the same thing - both are cheating.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
141. Reading is fundamental: "after Zamboanga used several players that lived outside its district"
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:26 PM
Feb 2015
 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
111. Jackie Robinson West isn't the first team to lose its Little League title.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:20 PM
Feb 2015

"In 1992, Little League baseball took away the title from Zamboanga, Philippines, and handed it to Long Beach, Calif., after Zamboanga used several players that lived outside its district or were over-age. In 2001, a team from the Bronx, N.Y., that finished third was forced to forfeit its games after pitcher Danny Almonte was revealed to be over-age," ESPN reports.

http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2015/02/jackie_robinson_west_team_stripped_of_little_league_title.html

ancianita

(36,133 posts)
59. To anyone here who thinks the kids didn't play in good faith, I have this to say:
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:12 PM
Feb 2015

I will always and forever hold all the league adults responsible for the children's Little League experience -- from parents on up to the head of the league.

Those adults who made those children stand up before the public and show the adult's guilt -- as if the players had any motives other than just wanting to play ball...

Those adults failed to show adult responsibility, which is a core failure of sportsmanship.

For those adults to regain their coaching status, they must stand before the children and say what they as leaders have learned from this. If they refuse and continue to put their preservation first, instead of the children's hearts and love of the game, they should not be trusted to run a team again.

That one adult who dropped a dime on this team and its adult leaders...

That adult is the dime dropper's fuckery, he is the kind of white person who pushes for the world of cold hearted hater's prejudice that loves to punish black children out of technical rightness. That prejudice, under cover of "following the rule" that are often rigged as strict for an out group and guidelines for an in group -- that prejudice covers for spiritual ill will. It isn't just hard hearted. It's spiritually the essence of evil.

All these kids wanted was to play ball the best they could.

Chicago should throw JRW a party at Grant Park. Again!

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
61. Too funny
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:16 PM
Feb 2015

The person that pointed out the cheating is the one that's wrong? Not the cheaters themselves?

What you're saying is tantamount to saying that black teams can't win unless they're allowed to follow a different set of rules - do you really believe that?

ancianita

(36,133 posts)
64. Yep. Funny it's already come out in local news that whites have done just that over the years. lol
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:27 PM
Feb 2015

The cheaters themselves were the adults. Can you get that in your head? Those kids have no idea about the league rules; they just wanted to play ball. They're not criminals-in-training. They're kids! Kids!

The league is structured to arbitrarily allow or disallow team membership by residential boundaries, and local news has reported that it routinely turns a blind eye to all kinds of team composition because of family situations. The league leadership itself cheats.

Your words show that you simply want to drag these kids into their world of adult responsibility. That says a lot about you.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
66. The team cheated
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:29 PM
Feb 2015

I'm glad that LL vacated the championship, and I hope they don't develop jelly spine and give in to the whiners that think cheating is all well and good.

ancianita

(36,133 posts)
74. I'll err on the side of kids' team sports experiences over residence exclusions any day.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:37 PM
Feb 2015

I don't care what you think of me about this. But I will definitely remember your judgments if I ever see your posts again.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
76. The why have any rules at all?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:39 PM
Feb 2015

Let's just have allow a free for all.

And now that you've revealed a bit of your character, I could really care less what you think about me or my judgments.

ancianita

(36,133 posts)
87. This is how your mind cheats. You could care less about the residence exclusion rules noted
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:49 PM
Feb 2015

here, could you. You put words in my mouth and claim they "reveal" my character. You just think I'm arguing for any and all rules to be nice little guidelines.

In white leagues, and the white teams in this league, that's just what rules turn out to be. Hard and fast applications only go for the minority teams. Obama knew that, or he wouldn't have invited my precious, cheating kids to the White House. But you don't want to know what goes on in Chicago's little leagues, or how some adult went out of his way to rob them. You just want to judge someone who takes a clear side for the kids.

I'm done with you.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
91. I wonder if the President will invite the rightful championship team to the White House?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:52 PM
Feb 2015


And I didn't put any words in your mouth - you said it all yourself...the rules shouldn't apply in this case.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
99. there were rules about black eating at lunch counters. should those be obeyed?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:02 PM
Feb 2015

lines are drawn here to exclude. that they are drawn be residence means they are drawn to keep black kids on one side and white kids on the other. that makes these teams de facto segregated.
so, a family manages to move up and out, but still faces racism every day. getting your kids where that is not part of their experience, at least while playing ball, is something i can relate to.

i'd bet pretty much any amount of money that a white kid in jrw territory would be welcomed w open arms if they wanted to play somewhere else. and nobody would make a peep.
care to wager that that is the story that will come out in the end?
bookmark this thread, put your money down.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
118. except that all that has nothing to do with the present case, where *black* players from *black*
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:27 PM
Feb 2015

suburbs were recruited to a *black* team in a poorer area.

and it's not the first time the LL has take back a title for rules violations.

According to ESPN, Jackie Robinson West isn't the first team to lose its Little League title. "In 1992, Little League baseball took away the title from Zamboanga, Philippines, and handed it to Long Beach, Calif., after Zamboanga used several players that lived outside its district or were over-age. In 2001, a team from the Bronx, N.Y., that finished third was forced to forfeit its games after pitcher Danny Almonte was revealed to be over-age," ESPN reports.

http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2015/02/jackie_robinson_west_team_stripped_of_little_league_title.html
 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
139. strange how you manage to ignore most of the content of the post & focus on one tiny snip.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:21 PM
Feb 2015

except that all that has nothing to do with the present case, where *black* players from *black* suburbs were recruited to a *black* team in a poorer area.

and it's not the first time the LL has take back a title for rules violations. (and not just violations of the age rule, though that's all you acknowledged)

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
143. Wait, what? I thought you said screw the rules where kids are concerned?!?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:38 PM
Feb 2015

Bit of a double standard, eh?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
145. Just a bit
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:42 PM
Feb 2015

I mean really, what if the older kids were small for their age and didn't feel comfortable playing ball with kids their own age? What if the other players in their age group or their coaches made fun of them because of their size?

As a parent, wouldn't it be my job to put them on a team that was a better fit? Where they felt comfortable and could enjoy just playing the game?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
147. Why would you oppose letting older players play
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:47 PM
Feb 2015

if they were a better fit for the team? If it's all about the kids being comfortable, why wouldn't you defend older players than are permitted?

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
170. yeah, but that is not a line that was drawn
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 09:59 PM
Feb 2015

to keep black kids on one side and white kids on the other.
that's where these boundary lines were drawn.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
181. Then why are the kids they recruited from the suburbs BLACK? Chicago has black suburbs. A resident
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 12:50 AM
Feb 2015

like yourself should know this.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
208. did i say that?
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 06:55 PM
Feb 2015

no. sure there are black burbs. one kid was from dolton, which is one of the poorest burbs in illinois.
i cant say for sure, but i doubt there is much in the way of organized sports there.

you are sort of making my point. this team was about pride and mentorship for black kids. black kids who didnt have a good team to play on, whether because their own hood was too poor to support one, or because they lived on the white side of the line, which happens, but is often not pleasant.

the white burbs have plenty of opportunities for organized sports. dolton, i think no.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
209. so there are no kids who want to play baseball on chicago's south side, and the black kid
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 09:16 PM
Feb 2015

from Dolton was afraid of racism? or his area was too poor to support a team?

not sure what you're saying here. your story seems to keep changing.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
211. i dont know how many of them there are.
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 09:30 PM
Feb 2015

no, the dolton kid had crappy choices because dolton is poor and black.
race permeates this situation. that's what i am trying to say.

and btw, just because the kid was claimed as from dolton doesnt mean he was ineligible. if he went to a school in the district, he was eligible. maybe he comes from a divorce, and has a parent in the district.

hell, one of those kids was homeless for half the season. where are his boundaries?

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
213. well, the team only has 14 kids, i believe. so unless fewer than 14 kids on chicago's south side
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 09:35 PM
Feb 2015

wanted to play baseball, someone got screwed. probably poor black kids.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
215. that is such complete bullshit i dont know where to start.
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 09:41 PM
Feb 2015

but nowhere here have i argued that the team has to take all comers. they dont.
that is just dumb.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
219. so; they can pick and choose who they take, even to the extent of drawing talent from
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:00 PM
Feb 2015

outside their borders.

how far does that go. mopinko? could they recruit from outside Illinois, for example?

I don't think you know the first thing about little league.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
223. non-seq, especially because i just tracked down some of the places the non-southside players
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:39 PM
Feb 2015

were recruited from, and your story about kids afraid of being harassed on all-white teams is a big *fail*, since all of the cities are 50% or more black, and relatively well-off besides.

the kids who got screwed were the poorer black kids from the south side. who didn't get to play because the coaches were too busy recruiting upper middle class black kids from the suburbs.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6240814

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
173. yeah. some kids were out of the district, and some were over age.
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 10:05 PM
Feb 2015

my reading comprehension is fine, thanks.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
175. Wait, so now you're cool with over-age kids? Thought that was a rule you wouldn't break..
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 10:29 PM
Feb 2015

Does your neck get sore, whiplashing from one position to another so fast like that?

Response to mopinko (Reply #99)

kiva

(4,373 posts)
80. And what do those cheating adults in Chicago
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:41 PM
Feb 2015

owe to the team their group of ringers defeated in the championship? You know, that group of kids who didn't get to go to the White House and meet the president, and didn't get to go to Disney World, and didn't get all of the press? They are kids too, and kids who were cheated.

ancianita

(36,133 posts)
90. You mean the kids who earned two runs in the game they lost? Please, tell me what they should get.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:51 PM
Feb 2015

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
95. If you're talking about the Las Vegas team
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:55 PM
Feb 2015

They should get everything that was given to the team that cheated their way to the championship.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
119. you mean the team that didn't have "ringers"? you mean the team that wasn't found to have attempted
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:29 PM
Feb 2015

to build a 'superteam' by bending the rules?

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
104. the whole point of my thread is about this business of "ringers"
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:11 PM
Feb 2015

you assume the kids were chosen for their abilities. you dont know that.
i know what chicago is like, i know what kids sports is like.
i think it is just as likely that the coaches took these kids because they knew what the other teams were like. i admit i dont. but i live here, i know the history of these lines on paper.
i see adults who put themselves on the line to give these kids a chance. why they did it has yet to be addressed. until then, i believe it is the word "ringers" that is an unsupported supposition.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
121. That's what the investigation found.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:30 PM
Feb 2015
ESPN notes that an investigation into the team by the organization found that Jackie Robinson West fielded a "superteam" by enlisting players who did not live within the geographical boundaries. Little League officials also found that maps were falsified to expand boundaries, which allowed players whose location made them ineligible to become eligible.

http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2015/02/jackie_robinson_west_team_stripped_of_little_league_title.html



mopinko

(70,206 posts)
136. they have no way to know that.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 11:15 PM
Feb 2015

evidence of the motivation of they adults has not been made public. they are just calling it a "super team" because of the result.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
150. and you know that because.....? evidence?
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 12:01 AM
Feb 2015

Last edited Mon Feb 16, 2015, 03:47 AM - Edit history (1)

I see, all you have is your opinion and secret mind-reading powers.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
167. i have my opinion because i live here. and my kids played sports here.
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 09:21 PM
Feb 2015

and i know who is out there, and how those lines on the map came to be. because in chicago it is all about race, ANY TIME you draw a line on a map.

until someone has evidence to the contrary, i am going to choose to believe the best about the team, not the worst.

kiva

(4,373 posts)
123. So really there is no proof you will accept that these coaches
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:58 PM
Feb 2015

and parents in Chicago conspired to field a winning team. You say you have no proof they didn't, but oddly enough the Little League organization itself found enough proof to take away their championship 'win'.

To recap, you believe:
That the fact that there was an investigation racist, even though the charges of cheating proved to be true.
That the removal of the title is about racism because that wouldn't happen to a non-black team, even though people have pointed to such instances.
That the coaches of the teams these kids should have played on must be racists because why else would parents drive to another area for their kid to play...ignoring the fact that many parents want their kids on the best team and are willing to do a lot more than drive a few miles to make it happen.
That the team they cheated out of a title - and yes, unless the other team was also fielding every great player in the greater Las Vegas area, they were cheated - don't deserve a damn thing because they aren't black.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
185. why were they cleared the first time?
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:11 AM
Feb 2015

maybe ll knows something you dont about the make up of the other teams. they were fine until someone stalked they kids.

WillowTree

(5,325 posts)
96. You seem to miss the point of youth sports altogether.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:56 PM
Feb 2015

It's not supposed to be about winning at all costs and the rules be damned. It's supposed to be about learning about teamwork and giving one's best effort and learning to win and lose with pride and dignity and knowing that they played by the rules and gave their best. Those are the lessons that kids can learn in youth sports that will serve them well in Life.

What you're suggesting deprives kids of those lessons, which is a disservice to them, regardless of their race. What you're suggesting is wrong no matter who does it. Sadly, that's the lesson those poor, disappointed kids who played their hearts out were ultimately taught in this instance. Shame on the "adults".

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
109. you miss the point of my whole argument.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:17 PM
Feb 2015

it is supposed to be about playing, about character. these kids showed enormous character.
but i think there are different rules for black kids and white kids. if somebody winked at the rules, i want to know why. you can say win at any cost. but you dont know that.

i know how those lines came to be. those lines arise from decades of bigotry. they are not random. they were drawn to keep the white kids on one side and the black kids on another.

the reason i point out the article is because i know that those are the kind of people on the other side of the fence when those kids play. there are the kind of people that you have to put up with if you choose to defy those lines on the map, and move to a "better" neighborhood. those kind of people drew the lines in the first place.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
189. they are based on municipal boundaries.
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 01:13 PM
Feb 2015

and neighborhood boundaries. and here, that is all about race.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
190. No, they aren't
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 01:29 PM
Feb 2015

The leagues themselves draw the boundaries, in cooperation with surrounding leagues. No one outside of these teams & leagues themselves have anything to do with those boundaries.

The leaders at JRW expanded their boundaries into territory belonging to surrounding leagues WITHOUT seeking the necessary permission from those leagues to do so.

They got the district president to sign off on those changes, even though he KNEW that the surrounding leagues had not been consulted and certainly hadn't agreed to the changes. That district president, BTW, had been a long time league official with JRW.

The boundary map was submitted to LL International, without any notification that surrounding leagues had not agreed to the changes, and without the permission of the surrounding leagues.

Once JRW won the national title, they finally went to the surrounding leagues and asked them to agree to the falsified boundaries, which the leagues refused to do.

When the JRW team returned triumphantly to Chicago, it became apparent to other teams that players had been pulled from within THEIR boundaries without THEIR permission. The "welcome home hero" signs in far away suburbs was the dead giveaway.

As your central theme, you claim that this was a result of black kids not wanting to play for white racist coaches. If that's true, then why wouldn't the white racist coaches have simply agreed to the boundary changes? After all, in your narrative, why would a white racist coach want a black kid on his team?



mopinko

(70,206 posts)
184. except that they showed exceptional character.
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:06 AM
Feb 2015

on and off the field. so, why would you think they had none?

Throd

(7,208 posts)
186. Where did I say the players had no character?
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 12:31 PM
Feb 2015

I didn't. The adults who rigged the team and those who are too willing to excuse them are another matter.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
122. Are you ok with this for school reasons?
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 10:31 PM
Feb 2015

To my utter surprise, people who lived in NJ were said to fake a Delaware address to send their kids to Delaware schools (didn't know the Del. schools were so much better that bringing them over the bridge was worth it, lol).

Pennsylvania is said to have even better schools. So if I can find a PA friend who will let me use their address, that's OK right?

dilby

(2,273 posts)
155. Does anyone know if kids from the neighborhood did not make the team
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 01:31 AM
Feb 2015

so they could add the outside children? In my opinion that would be the real story, teams are limited to 14 children so if a kid was denied access to make room for a better player outside the little league team district that would be wrong on so many levels.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
157. my guess is that someone wanted to field an exceptional team, a winning low income black
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 03:41 AM
Feb 2015

team from south side Chicago, to make an 'underdog' story (and re-invigorate baseball for black youth, or so I've read -- the sport is getting whiter).

and since ghetto little league has less resources (coaching, equipment, attention) invested in it than suburban little league, it makes sense that stronger players would tend to be in the suburbs. and that's where they looked for the players. black players, but from better neighborhoods.

so it may very well be that kids who wanted to play didn't get to. or it might be that baseball just isn't very popular in south side Chicago and they couldn't field a team.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
166. like the baake decision, you mean?
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 09:18 PM
Feb 2015

suppose the kids were chosen based on the coaches decision about who most needed the guidance and opportunity that team sports is supposed to be about?
cuz that's how every volunteer kid's coach i know does it.
most of them are in it to make a difference for the kids on their team. not to win. and sure not to win at any cost.

dilby

(2,273 posts)
176. Or more than likely the kids were chosen based on the ability to win.
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 10:36 PM
Feb 2015

They all had teams in their neighborhoods so if they needed guidance or opportunity it could have been found there.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
182. and more poor kids and kids with special needs in the home district v. the suburbs too.
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 12:52 AM
Feb 2015

the more mopinko talks, the more she constructs a fantasy.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
183. really?
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:04 AM
Feb 2015

this team showed tremendous character. not win at all costs attitude. this reflected the coaches character.
if the the team that they should have played for was an all white team, would that matter to you?

dilby

(2,273 posts)
187. The kids that they brought in were clearly allstars, that is a win at all costs attitude.
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 12:57 PM
Feb 2015

If they were bringing in average players you may have a case. And yes if the team was all white I would have a problem with it. I would also have the same problem if they were all Jewish like me since it's cheating and wrong.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
188. No, it wouldn't make any difference
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 01:06 PM
Feb 2015

The players should be within the boundaries. The valid boundaries, not the falsified boundaries that JRW played under.

One of the apparent out of boundary players was their primary home run hitter...do you really believe that winning had nothing to do with this?

You seem hell-bent on finding a racial aspect to this when it's been shown by the investigation that this was about winning, even if it meant cheating.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
216. no such thing has been proven.
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 09:47 PM
Feb 2015

it is just being assumed. i dont know what the coaches real motivations were. neither do you.
i'm just trying to posit what other motivations there might have been.

and since no players have been named, you dont know that that kid was one who was ineligible. even the kids who were "claimed" by their "home" towns are not necessarily ineligible. if they attended school within the boundaries, they were eligible. if their parents are divorced and one lives in the district, they are eligible.

that the team had good players proves nothing. of course they did, they are the champs.

i am hellbent on pointing out that race AND RACISM permeates everything here. we have no idea why things were done. or how it all came to happen.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
218. You just don't seem to get it
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 09:55 PM
Feb 2015

The boundaries themselves were FALSFIED - this has been verified by LL International. It doesn't matter if the suburban kids fell into the boundaries, because the boundaries themselves were invalid. That they falsified boundaries has not been disputed by JRW leadership since the title was stripped.

The mother of Pierce Jones, their star homerun hitter said that she drove an hour each way for practices - do you really think that she was inside of the valid boundaries that JRW was supposed to be playing under?

As for the coaches real motivations, it really doesn't matter - they cheated, period. And in doing so, they cost the kids the national title, which is as it should be. Players were on the team that shouldn't have been there, and when that happens, they shouldn't get to benefit from cheating.

And while you're certainly welcome to believe that we don't know why things were done, the LL investigation has shown how it came to happen - JRW submitted falsified boundaries to LL International.

 

YarnAddict

(1,850 posts)
160. Have you ever known any "sports parents?"
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 09:16 AM
Feb 2015

I mean the REAL sports parents, the ones who live vicariously through their children? They want their kids on a team that will win. They will drive their kids to and from practices, regardless of how far, to make sure the kids are on teams that will no only win, but blow their competition out of the water.

They want their kids to have all the privileges that our society confers on sports stars: glory, scholarships, multi-million dollar contracts, etc. None of that happens when a star athlete doesn't get noticed because he is on a mediocre team.

If you can show me one example of a kid on that team who had two left feet and struck out every time he/she was at bat, but whose initial coach showed up to the practices wearing a white robe, or who was intimidated by the white teammates' parents who drove cars with "Bruce Rauner for Governor" bumper stickers, then I will believe you.

But, I'm willing to bet that nearly every kid on that team is a star athlete.

A culture that idolizes star athletes is more to blame in this situation than racism.

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
164. like i said, my kids played baseball.
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 11:20 AM
Feb 2015

yes, i know them. cant say as i know any who are poor, tho.

and here in chicago, i wouldnt be the least bit surprised to find out that the coach had everything but the robe.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
195. the "team, aka young players"
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 04:28 PM
Feb 2015

are not responsible and therefore should not be made to suffer the greatest punishment for purported false boundaries initiated by adults.

they played as a team and they won as a team. leave the kids out of the final decisions/fines, etc. those kids won the games fair and square as far as i am concerned. too bad for the butt hurt racists who just cannot handle the fact that a superior youth baseball team is composed of all african american children.

what burns me as that all of the accusations emerged AFTER the series and championship finals and trip to the white house. it just burns those racist eyeballs to see so many african american people in a celebratory photo taken at the whitehouse with president barack hussein obama.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
225. Seeing as they had ineligible players on the team
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:44 PM
Feb 2015

they didn't win "fair and square"

And seeing as I answered your question earlier, I'm curious as to whether you'll answer mine...

If this had been an all white team that had cheated by putting ineligible players on the team, and they had beat an all black team for the championship, would you still believe that the title shouldn't be stripped?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
231. Neither of those terms is disputed
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 06:19 AM
Feb 2015

They cheated because they had ineligible players - even the team leadership is not disputing that now.

And I fail to see how it is a biased question - perhaps you could explain?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
233. In other words
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 09:43 PM
Feb 2015

If this were a white team, you would have no problem with stripping them of the title.

Funny that you would accuse me of bias LMAO.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
234. oh, so your narrow thinking
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 07:00 PM
Feb 2015

process led you to this erroneous conclusion? dude, do you even understand what social justice means?

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
235. MY narrow thinking?
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 07:03 PM
Feb 2015

I'm of the opinion that someone that thinks cheating is just fine for one group but not for another is the narrow minded one.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
240. Some of the players were ineligible
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 08:55 PM
Feb 2015

They did indeed play as a team, but they didn't win fairly and squarely. It wasn't their fault, but it doesn't change the fact that by having ineligible players, the team didn't win fairly and squarely.

Little League did the right thing in stripping the title - it wasn't fairly earned.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
226. When rules are selectively enforced in disproportiate harm to black people
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:53 PM
Feb 2015

That is a red flag to racism.

Some rules are rigorously enforced, others are not.

When rules (even good rules) seem to go unenforced upon white people, but are suddenly enforced with vigor upon black people, a fair person can see racism at work.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
227. Unless someone files a complaint
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:59 PM
Feb 2015

It's unlikely that LL is going to look into potential rules violations - why would they? Hell, in this case, it took two separate investigations to finally get to the truth of what JRW leadership did.

If similar complaints are filed against white teams, and there are no vigorous investigations, then I agree, there is a racial aspect. But I've seen nothing to indicate that complaints were made against other teams and ignored. If such complaints have been filed and ignore, I'd very much like to read about them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»dont think the jackie rob...