Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:47 AM Feb 2015

We can stop the neo-cons: Here’s what a truly progressive foreign policy would look like

http://www.salon.com/2015/02/15/we_can_stop_the_neo_cons_heres_what_a_truly_progressive_foreign_policy_would_look_like/



America is moving left, or at least to positions Republicans have spent a lifetime opposing. Notice the GOP’s awkward silence on what were so recently signature issues: immigration, minimum wage, even gay marriage and climate change. They want to gut bank reform and prolong the Cuban embargo. No one else does. They vote to repeal Obamacare but with less fanfare since most voters want to fix it, not kill it. All of their racial and sexual politics is now radioactive.

So why did Republicans just beat the tar out of Democrats? One reason is that both parties are so corrupt. This hurts Democrats more; everyone knows it’s in the Republican DNA to service the rich, so it seems less hypocritical when they do. Democrats should value their reputations more — but even if they did, Republicans would retain an advantage on two overriding issues.

The first is the deplorable condition of our democracy. Americans think their government is corrupt, expensive and ineffective — and that Democrats don’t get it. Republicans will never fix the government, but they won’t let it do anything either. When they fail to cut costs, they cut taxes anyway, so they win.

The second issue is national security. Here the Republican advantage is wholly undeserved. Their military adventures, driven by ideology, oil and that other fossil fuel, testosterone, put our government in hock, manufactured refugees by the millions and left tens of thousands dead. They tarnished not only America’s reputation but that of democracy itself.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We can stop the neo-cons: Here’s what a truly progressive foreign policy would look like (Original Post) xchrom Feb 2015 OP
"...that other fossil fuel, testosterone...." So true. truebluegreen Feb 2015 #1
neo-libs / neocons - two sides of the same coin. KG Feb 2015 #2
They almost seem like the same people! woo me with science Feb 2015 #3
I usually think of the neocon agenda as primarily foreign policy related and the neolib agenda as stillwaiting Feb 2015 #4
It is a nice foreign policy betterdemsonly Feb 2015 #5

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
3. They almost seem like the same people!
Reply to KG (Reply #2)
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 12:08 PM
Feb 2015


Oh wait....

In their own words. An "intellectual buyout" of the Democratic Party.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026216863

Hillary, DLC/Third Way, Neocons, PNAC, Etc.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026211673

When the DLC connections to the Koch Bros. became well known, they just rebranded the infiltration
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4165556

When you hear "Third Way", think INVESTMENT BANKERS
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024127432

GOP Donors and K Street Fuel Third Way’s Advice for the Democratic Party
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101680116

The Rightwing Koch Brothers fund the DLC
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x498414

Same companies behind the GOP are behind the DLC
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1481121









stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
4. I usually think of the neocon agenda as primarily foreign policy related and the neolib agenda as
Reply to KG (Reply #2)
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 12:51 PM
Feb 2015

primarily economic in nature. They clearly overlap, but their original intentions seem to stem from different arenas. They both love to ultimately give more power and wealth to rich people and multinational corporations though in the end.

Politicians can support both agendas, and in some cases they do.

 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
5. It is a nice foreign policy
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 04:20 PM
Feb 2015

but it isn't one any democratic candidate actually advocates. How does this proposal stop the neocons? There still in charge of both parties!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We can stop the neo-cons:...