General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge Threatens Military, Death, No Lawyer Allowed - for Jeffry Baron
Picture being born and then diagnosed at 2 years of age with Diabetes 1; which results in a prognosis of a life span that will end by age 5. You defy the ideas, beat the case, suffering much along the way and become an internet pioneer who made millions - all on your own. Then, one day, to handle a minor matter, you speak to an attorney and reveal your secret to success. That attorney at law in Dallas, Texas (Peter S. Vogel) then says he wants megabucks from you.
So a Fed Ct Judge (William Royal Ferguson Jr.) - Orders hat Vogel is a "Receiver" over Jeffry Baron and ALL his assets.
Now we will undoubtedly have the Laser Haas naysayers come out and bark all this is bull; but those are the same people (Progressive's purportedly) who argue that Mitt Romney didn't steal eToys, because Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs are good faith corporations.
You can't have a Receiver involved in Bankruptcy (the American Bar Association says so too); and you can't have a counsel that was to work for you, be appointed as Federal Receiver over you. It is an ethics breach screaming foul. As is the notion that there can be a federal receiver appointed over any person who doesn't owe the federal government anything; and has committed no crime.
Below you will see that the Judge threatened death, military/Marines and Jeff Baron was also banned from hiring counsel. Does that sound possible in America? --- By all means - see the proof of public docket records, for yourself.
Yours truly has worked with those who were assisting Jeffry Baron; and I've even posted many threads throughout the web realm. It was reported to me that there was a documentary already in the works. Though I found the trailer for such to be wanting, it was left to the professionals that had funding, time and skills.
Evidently that hasn't worked out so well and Jeffry Baron's mom (Donna) has asked for my help;
and I'm gladly giving to give it to them.
[br][hr][br]
[br]
[br]
[center][font size=5]Punishable by Lots of Dollars, Jail and even Death[/font][/center]
[br]
To get a clear picture of what is going on here, one needs only see the judge's words as transcribed. Though several websites have lost their linking, many still remain. Above is the picture of alleged bad faith parties, according to the LawInJustice.com website (here). There's also a Sodahead thread (here) detailing the issue of how the Dallas federal court enslaved Jeff Baron. It has the quote from the court case - verbatim,
stating;
So any failure to comply with that order is contempt, punishable by lots of dollars, punishable by possible jail, death.
MR BELL: And death?
Jeff Baron hired a counsel to stop the illegitimate Receivership over Jeff and his assets. The above quote can be verified by the Sodahead link to the LawInJustice.com website copy of the filed "Motion for Reconsideration". On page 13 of the PDF, you can find the quote as transcribed. It is better if you also see the court testimony to its power, as it threatens the menace Jeff Baron with military force of Navy, Army, Air Force and Navy (guess there's more than 1). As is upon page 13 of the Motion (here)
[br]
failure to comply with that order is contempt, punishable by lots of
dollars, punishable by possible jail, death.
MR. BELL: And death
(6/19/09 p 44)
------------------------------
THE COURT: They do and I have jurisdiction, too. So I'll tell you
what.... You want to challenge the court order, I have the marshals
behind me. I can come to your house, pick you up, put you in jail. I
can seize your property, do anything I need to do to enforce my
orders. I'm telling you don't screw with me. You are a fool, a fool, a
fool, a fool to screw with a federal judge, and if you don't understand
that, I can make you understand it. I have the force of the Navy,
Army, Marines and Navy behind me.
(6/19/09 p 49)
--------------------------------
{THE COURT:} We do have marshals that walk around here and people
that can take control if a judge is unable to convince people of the judge's jurisdiction.
(2/10/11 p 22)
[br]
[hr]
[br]
[center][font size=6]JUDGE - Lot of Money to be Had Here.[/font][/center]
[br]
Those are the exact words of the court presiding over the case and (illegally) appointing a federal receiver upon Jeffry Baron (click on direct title above and go to page 7). As the crooked justice goes for the jugular, there are so many more bad faith deeds we can tell you. For now, I'll leave you with the following items from the court's own words and a Youtube of Jeffry Baron's mom who asked for our help.
Federal Receivership's have become part of a tyrannical state of affairs in the United States. In most cases, it is a way of presuming guilt, prior to trial; and then seizing the assets to assure inadequate defense.
HOWEVER - in this case - I'm readily on board for the Baron's, simply because of Mr. Vogel being a potential counsel for Jeff Baron, who took private information under the guise of attorney client privilege and used it against Jeffry Baron,
as an Illegal Federal Receiver!
[br]
THE COURT: There is no question that's what
needs to be done. Apparently, there is a lot of money to
be had here. Let's not be greedy.
[br]
[hr][br]
It doesn't make any difference . This is qoinq on and on
and on until Mr. Baron has nothing . I mean actually
everything is depleted . I gather that Mr. Baron is worth
lots of money . But maybe we sell all the domain
names . We may sell of his stock . We may cash in all his
CO ' s, and we may seize all accounts .
[br][br]
[br]
therehegoes
(37 posts)Best of luck with your friend's situation
www.friscopaul.blogspot.com
Covers extensive Police, City Attorney, DA, Judge malfeasance
Please Share
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Unlike most of the world, I can assure you that I do comprehend the depths of depravity.
Let's talk!
therehegoes
(37 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I was just reading up on it a bit and there was a lot left with just one side's account. Just reading a few stories on it made me want to take a shower. Seems all sides of this are dirty.
It is fascinating though, like some courtroom tv drama. If this sort of thing interests you it's worth digging around google for more articles.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Explain - please?
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)and you FIND an article to disparage Jeffry Baron! (Like I didn't expect such would transpire).
Good luck with the disparage efforts (you're going to need it).
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Disparage efforts? I have never heard of the case before this and being a rational human being I looked up the story instead of just going by one side's version.
~shaking my head~
I have no dog in this fight, so you can find someone else to argue with.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)If you're looking for a cogent dialogue you'll have better luck using a Ouija board to surf the Creative Speculation forum.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)FSogol
(45,524 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Your (purported) evidence - is a news opinion.
If you have no dog in the fight - then why choose the side of the mongrels?
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)For one who has a sig line that states being a DU'r should be a doer....
you sure spend a whole lot of time - trying to nix one actually doing something.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I'm sorry you believe that the only people discussing a topic should be people who agree with you, but that is not the way things work.
There is nothing that anyone can post on DU which can "nix" anyone, anywhere from doing anything they'd like.
Mr. Baron spent more than a decade amassing income from a portfolio of tens of thousands of internet domain names which were typo's of well-known sites and trademarks. In parallel with that activity, he built a convoluted structure of companies and offshore trusts to protect the proceeds of that activity from a huge raft of civil judgments against him. One of the "officers" of a corporation purportedly responsible for some of his activities was a kid in Texas who had no idea how he'd been named as an officer of the corporation. He also engaged in a practice of delaying legal proceedings by hiring counsel, firing counsel, and then claiming he needed more time to find new counsel, which he would then likewise fire. His legal shenanigans are the stuff of legend.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Skipping over the core issues at hand (a pattern with your group).
Judge illegally appointed a Receiver
And NOT just ANY federal Receiver. Nope! ..This justice (stepping down from.the bench)...has to go and arrange a crony.
Not just ANY crony
But The One who also was given attorney client privileged information to become Jeff Baron,s counsel.
Instead....the stalwart violates ethics, The BAR Oath and Professional Rules of Conduct.
And all that is okay with you
Because Jeff Baron is a victim
And you (apparently ..empirically) ..demostrate disdain for victims
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)As for this one, I - Respectfully Request - that you redact this comment.
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/lawyers-lawfirms/attorney-client-privilege.html
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Were missed by ye....
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The Laser of Justice will zap you good.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)As for you counselor and your B buddy in that neck of the realm....I,ve lobbied that your banter stays put
As documentation empirical
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Pettiness... snides...
NEVER sticking to the facts; but picking apart good faith people and efforts from the cheap seats.
Like all those "wonder'var" peoples from TMZ...
[br][hr][br]
It's call ad hominem attacking and there's a pyramid of proof about the goof of it all.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Graham%27s_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement.svg
Again - the naysayers NEVER stick with the facts of the tyranny, cronyism and corruption alleged; they simply go for the jugular of the party bringing forth the message and KILL (nix) the conversation - WELL.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)is to (arbitrarily and capriciously) - engage in "Color of Law".
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Says the guy who starts his post off with this gem.
Said no one ever but you.
http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/type-1-diabetes/basics/complications/con-20019573
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Egnever
(21,506 posts)Complete made up hogwash and such a level of complete and utter bulshit I find it difficult to read anything else you wrote.
For the record My son was Diagnosed with type one at 6 months old. He has never once been in the hospital since his diagnosis and is now ten. Not one of the endocrinologists we have seen has ever predicted anything but a long happy life for him assuming he takes decent care of himself.
I will give you an a for effort in the attempt to pull at peoples heartstrings with bullshit but sadly I didnt get past that pantload to read anything else you wrote.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)It's hard to take a post seriously when it starts with nonsense like that.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)It strikes me quite strange that you would dare to make remarks of what another has gone through.
And the gall to disparage a case you know nothing about goes far beyond mind boggling.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)I will take you seriously. As long as you start your posts with complete falsehoods, I see no other choice but to write you off as a charlatan.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)The case is all facts ( though originally from another source) I spoke with the victim and his mother (also a victim)..today.
Though Jeff is fully grown up and he tried to be modest about his condition, his mother blurted out that hes in very bad shape.
Your efforts to assailt me...is a bad thing..
Because Jeff n his mom are reading this too.
I'm done with you and your fforts to bait..