General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOh, THIS just happened to me on FB...
I posted this article, and a high school mate posted the response that follows (I should include that said respondent is a police officer and a body builder):
http://mic.com/articles/110352/a-shocking-thing-happened-when-tennessee-decided-to-drug-test-its-welfare-recipients
If you're developing your opinions from ridiculous articles like the one you posted LaydeeBug, shame on you. That article is absolutely bogus and it's obvious of what kind of person wrote it. As for facts, in my line of work, I often have come across people who were getting these funds. These people were drug users and dealers who have scammed the system. For 20 years, I've been dealing with these people, 1st hand. My opinions are based on 1st hand knowledge and facts, not some BS articles written by democrats or people afraid that the government is taking their rights away. With that said, I do believe that if tragic circumstances arise and good, normally hardworking people need assistance, we should help. I also believe there should be strict rules and guidelines as to who can get monetary assistance, how much and for how long. People should be looking for jobs wether it be mcdonalds or walmart, etc to make their own money (while looking for a better job) rather than taking it from the government and making a career of it. I do not consider the choice to use drugs and ruin your life to be one of those circumstances. I also don't believe you should be entitled to these funds because you can't keep your pants up and take care of the 6 kids you couldn't afford in the 1st place which is another big scam. As for homeless veterans... we should help them if they want it, but I will tell you that not all of them do. There are actually a lot of homeless people who choose that life. They have family and friends who want to take them in and help, but they refuse. I firmly believe people should be drug tested for employment purposes as well as collecting unemployment. I don't know what jobs you have refused drug tests for but for most of us, we would be fired and I agree with it! If you don't do drugs, you have nothing to worry about. If you do and know what could happen if caught, maybe it will help you make the better choice in life and not use drugs.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)a career of taking money from the government for bullying people.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)facts from the Department of Health and Human Services.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)However the response did not address the exceptionally low positive rate of the tests and the waste of tax payer money, but I guess they are okay with that.......
Warpy
(111,270 posts)because the cops ASSume that POC and the poor are lazy and criminal simply because they are POC and/or poor.
I hope this bastard is retired. I'd hate to think he's still on the street abusing people who are already being abused by poverty.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)I mean, I think it does, and I am not being a smarts. I am just trying to understand.
RKP5637
(67,110 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)more racist trash.
Gman
(24,780 posts)You sir, are THE problem.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,627 posts)Hard to believe, but your post was alerted upon. I was Juror #6.
Here are the results:
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sat Feb 21, 2015, 03:44 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Oh, THIS just happened to me on FB...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026258248
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
why do we need to read this right wing garbage here? hide this and send a lesson that DU doesn't need to read crap from wing-nuts on facebook.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Feb 21, 2015, 04:21 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Perfectly legitimate post. I've always welcomed the opportunity to sharpen my arguments at DU. Leave it.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alert fail
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Poster is just venting over a reply to her. Whatever. Leave it alone.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The alerter is out of his/her mind. DU DOES need to know what the other side is saying, why and where they are saying it, and digest that information. Then, take the facts and deal with them, take the raw emotion and channel it to good, and stop thinking that Democratic s**t doesn't stink as badly.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I disagree with the alerter. We need to be aware that these people exist and how they think. Trying to avoid them just allows them free rein to spout whatever garbage they wish. LaydeeBug is entirely entitled to post this. Let it stand.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)and they used to get away with that shit. After a while, people caught on to them though. I am relieved to see this was no exception.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)You are one of my all time favorite people, and we haven't even met.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,627 posts)I think you're very cool too!
DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)How do you know that?
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)and now he looks like he is going to POP .
DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)A major change in diet, combined with heavy weightlifting and good genes, can work wonders in a sufficiently young man's physique without the use of steroids.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Touchy subject for you huh?
DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)If you're implying that I take steroids, no. I don't.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)They get the very often and never have notice.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)sometimes cops make the best criminals.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Which sometimes has the effect of increasing aggression.
DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)Moreover, his response was calmly and literately expressed. It was not a rage-filled rant.
The problem I see in it is one common with the opinions of policeman: It reflects only his personal experience, not broad statistics. People in his position tend to generalize from their experiences, which of necessity involve the worst offenders among the group they're objecting to.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)You see the exact same talking points made over and over again. They are obviously getting a list of talking points from somewhere to "seed" everywhere they possibly can. Because they know NOTHING about how "public assistance" actually works.
They don't know that assistance is rarely delivered in "direct cash". They don't know that in many places it is in the form of a loan, not "free money" - even for disabled people. They don't know that in some places if you are able to work, you can only get assistance for rent (no direct cash to you) only 3 months out of a year, whether you can get a job or not. They don't know that assistance is a PITTANCE compared to what landlords actually charge for rent, so you are likely to lose your housing anyway. They don't know that social services is always screwing up at your expense, which also leads to homelessness. They don't know there is no subsidy for transportation, only partial subsidy for telephone and utility bills, and nothing to pay for basic necessities like hygiene products, toilet paper, light bulbs, over-the-counter medicine - anything that food stamps won't cover. All you can get from the government if you don't have a child is food stamps and "general assistance". The terms of "general assistance" are determined by the county you're in, but it's highly unlikely to be direct cash in you're pocket! If you see someone using an EBT card to extract cash, that's an arrangement to get their rent money because something was screwed up with social services that month. In my county social services recently gave people the option to receive the rent money directly and pay their landlords because their tendency to deduct from the rent check was threatening people's housing and made no sense. So people are receiving cash *as a pass-through* to their landlords.
There is nothing more stressful than trying to live months, and even years on end with no cash income. You have an incompetent social services system and constant "fraud" investigation and a disapproving public always watching you while you struggle to survive. On the other side you have the constant threat of homelessness as your landlord will be loathe to put up with these unstable conditions for long. You live month to month praying for things to change. Meanwhile your doctor advises you to reduce your amount of stress, and you get referred to a therapist for your anxiety and depression. Society gets billed for the doctor and the therapist.
It is a GOP fantasy that everyone has family waiting to offer them free room and board. It is a GOP fantasy that everyone "on welfare" has been doing drugs and now "the government" is giving them "free money" to "get away with stuff". Somewhere there is a GOP propagandist who has written up this propaganda piece and now distributes it as a specific list of talking points according to this Rovian Blogging Technique: https://www.facebook.com/notes/bruce-bacon/tactics-for-effective-conservative-blogging-by-karl-rove/10150706161713017
A few DU posts have shown that Tea Party social media training video where they teach people how to astroturf forums and comment sections. Well this particular LIE I have seen being spread over and over again: people on welfare are all lying alcoholics who rejected the chance to go live with family members and they get free money from welfare... This lie is seeded everywhere!
ROVIAN BLOGGING TECHNIQUE MEETS TEA PARTY SOCIAL MEDIA TRAINING!
I really wish this particular lie could be squashed somehow.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)ROVIAN BLOGGING TECHNIQUE MEETS TEA PARTY SOCIAL MEDIA TRAINING! <<<---- is absolutely amaze.
Perfect. OMG! I am bookmarking this. Thank you Thank you.
inanna
(3,547 posts)>> You live month to month praying for things to change. Meanwhile your doctor advises you to reduce your amount of stress, and you get referred to a therapist for your anxiety and depression. Society gets billed for the doctor and the therapist. <<
The "system" is a lot different where I live (in Canada). By and large, it is a much better system, but there are problems. The quote from your post (above) outlines one of them.
When one's basic cash flow for necessities is threatened (or severely restricted), there is no way one can live "stress" free. No, we certainly cannot expect to live our entire lives without worry, but being on the dole - for whatever reason - is by far one of the more stressful experiences a person could ever endure.
Thank you for your thoughts on this. They matter.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)hunter
(38,317 posts)I also think most cops are not qualified to carry guns, much less be cops.
This guy sounds like a loser who has no idea what actually causes the problems he sees in his work, and he doesn't want to know.
His mind is closed and locked down tight.
RKP5637
(67,110 posts)kydo
(2,679 posts)Fast story.
I do lots of volunteer work for my church. A few weeks back one of the ladies that works in the office, she is staff does the data and accounting, was assaulted on church property. The guy was arrested but made bail and he lives near the church. So a few days after the assault his picture his posted in the working sacristy with the email from the sheriff's office about the incident and a description of the guy and instructions to call 911 if you see him on church grounds.
That very morning this info is posted just about all the people that attend daily Mass came up to me and asked, "Is that the guy?" The "guy" they were referring too in no way resembles the person in the mug shot other then they were both black. For the record, several of the people that asked me if that was the guy were also black. The "guy" they thought was the mug shot guy, I kindly reminded them that he comes here every Thursday morning never comes in for Mass and as done this for years. He comes for food and clothes sometimes money. Several Deacons help him out. These people know that, one even said "yeah, I know he comes for the food but always tries to take too much."
Ugh!
These people are normal people yet very typical too. Not mean, but mostly meaning well. Mostly nice and kind. But damn they can be cold hearted souls. This man is homeless. I don't know his story. But I do know that this last Thursday it was freezing and when I saw him at Mass I spoke to him. He really needed a new pair of shoes, the ones he had on had holes in the soles. He told me he stops by here for food and sometimes help from one of the Deacons. Of course I already knew that, I am a nosy little person like the ministry of whisperers on Game of Thrones .
After words, he gets a ride from one of the ladies that comes to Mass to a homeless center type place. This lady does a lot of medical work for the homeless her and her husband. Anyway, I remembered I had a $20 on me, and since the Deacon didn't make it that morning, I slipped him the bill. I don't care what he does with it. And if I have cash on me again and he asks I'll probably give it to him. Oddly one of the scripture readings during that day was the one about if some one needs food, give them half of yours same with clothes etc. BTW and for the record, giving him money didn't make me feel like a better person and I never told anyone I did it until now. I just hope it made his day a little more easier.
It just irks me that people can be so mean. That and the way they quickly jumped to conclusions. These people really were ready to call the cops on him. It would have been really embarrassing if they had as he wasn't the mug shot guy.
But your old school mate thinks he his a good person and assumes everyone has had the same advantages as he and thinks like him. Very black and white, no room for grey or gray. While his post comes off as sane and rational it really is devoid of humanity. He talks a lot of politically correct rhetoric and that's it. A very shallow person. At least that's what I picked up from that post. I'd un-friend him.
d_r
(6,907 posts)"I also believe there should be strict rules and guidelines as to who can get monetary assistance, how much and for how long. "
He has been "dealing with these people" first hand for 20 years, and he doesn't know that TANF has time limits and work seeking rules.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)or some like these...
Temporary Cash Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
Temporary Cash Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) provides cash assistance to needy families with dependent children when available resources do not fully address the family's needs and while preparing program participants for independence through work. Adults with dependent children applying for or receiving TANF must meet financial and technical eligibility requirements. Conditions of eligibility include cooperation with child support, participation in work activities and compliance with substance abuse provisions. Earned and unearned income cannot exceed the benefit level paid for the assistance unit size and assets are limited to $2,000.00. Sanctions may be imposed for program noncompliance.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)....disgusting antisocial behavior that has to do with Corporations, Politicians and many other parts of the populace.
It's easy to see a UFO when you insist on seeing one.
spanone
(135,844 posts)Go Vols
(5,902 posts)"That's 37 people who should not be receiving taxpayer subsidies, because they are not behaving as they are supposed to," said state Rep. Glen Casada, a Republican from Franklin. "If the taxpayers are going to support you there are certain criteria you need to adhere to. This is a good use of taxpayer money."
http://www.wbir.com/story/news/politics/2015/02/08/drug-testing-of-welfare-applicants-yields-few-positives/23086333/
If its the number of people he doubts,heres a R from Franklin that agrees with the low number.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)"these people" - sums him up right there.
No need to take this opinion seriously except as to show bias in our law enforcement apparatus.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Those are the facts, are you saying these facts aren't true? Btw, how much did they waste on drug testing 16000+ people only to find 37?
Systematic Chaos
(8,601 posts)...constantly challenging the ideas and opinions I dared to express on my own goddamned Facebook wall, when I finally figured out how to put the guy on a "restricted" list and be done with it.
Now this guy, and one member of my extended family, both do not receive anything I post on my Facebook wall, unless I make a special effort to assure that they'll get it. Meanwhile, I see everything they post, and will like and reply to it as appropriate, so they don't know the difference. It just looks to them like I've taken a break from posting anything, whereas the rest of my Facebook friends continue to see my frequent sharing of both political and non-political articles.
It's much more effective than unfriending them. They can go on clutching all the mountains of pearls their special little hands can hold if they ever catch on, but without doing some detective work it's unlikely they ever will.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)As I said, that article is not a factual representation of what it's trying to prove. You can't tell me that in the whole state of Tennessee, only 16,000 people applied for some sort of monetary assistance. They name a specific "Families First" program which is probably just 1 program available. There are a lot more people applying for and receiving funds than that within the whole state. Those numbers are skewed and anyone with 1/2 a brain can see that. Then the article talks about a couple other states that have had similar results but does not give supportive facts. Believe what you want but that article is crap! As for facts....where I come from, 1st hand knowledge from actual observations and interviews with a large number of the very same people we are talking about over the course of 20 years is enough for me. I would rather spend the minimal money it costs for drug testing (Yeah, those costs are exaggerated by people like you too) than give away the amount of money we currently do to drug users and dealers scamming the system.