General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSince Roe v Wade is just a court ruling, to keep it from being tossed by the Supremes;
it is time to amend the constitution and make it permanent.
sakabatou
(42,159 posts)CK_John
(10,005 posts)starting the process will rattle the opposition and hopefully they will overreach and something could get done.
Do nothing gets nothing done.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)It's sad, but reality.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,740 posts)Of those, only 27 have been adopted and ratified. That's about .023%. I think the chance of any amendment succeeding these days falls into the category of "slim to none."
onehandle
(51,122 posts)This SCOTUS is about nothing but money.
Fundies are suckers.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)You'll never get it out of Congress, let alone get it past 3/4 of the state legislatures.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)A constitutional convention opens up it all.
They could decide to throw out the existing constitution and devise an entirely new document.
Dumbest idea ever. There's a reason there hasn;t been a state sponsored constitutional convention in 226 years.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Can it wait until Monday?
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)amendment passed?
CK_John
(10,005 posts)We could use the ERA as a platform and add a phrase to add the right to body control.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)increase the odds by tacking on an abortion-related clause.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)CK_John
(10,005 posts)ran out.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Even with a state convention...especially with a state convention.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)38 states are required to ratify a Constitutional amendment. In 2013 alone, 22 states passed restrictions on abortion. Do you really believe that 10 of those states are going to suddenly change their minds, and agree to put Roe v. Wade into the Constitution?
No way.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)you would have to take the Congressional route, meaning you'll need 2/3 of the House and Senate to present the amendment to the states. Such a time period would automatically exclude the possibility of a ratifying convention.
Good luck with that.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)quickly. The name of the game is to be ready for it.