Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Since Roe v Wade is just a court ruling, to keep it from being tossed by the Supremes; (Original Post) CK_John Feb 2015 OP
As if the current Congress would do it. sakabatou Feb 2015 #1
There are several methods, none of which are easy but just getting a plan and CK_John Feb 2015 #6
I can't think of much that would meet requirements for an amendment these days. Hoyt Feb 2015 #2
11,539 amendments have been proposed since 1789. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2015 #3
This SCOTUS will never overturn it. Too much money in defending it. onehandle Feb 2015 #4
The bar is high for a constitutional amendment. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #5
Go around Congress start it by petition from the states. CK_John Feb 2015 #8
That is the worst possible idea. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #12
I don't think they're open on weekends jberryhill Feb 2015 #7
We couldn't get an Equal Rights Amendment passed, but you think we could get an abortion pnwmom Feb 2015 #9
But we got the amendment it just didn't get enough states and not enough time. CK_John Feb 2015 #10
Not getting enough states means we didn't get it. And I don't think we'd pnwmom Feb 2015 #11
I can't believe such a defeatist attitude. We deserve the government we get. CK_John Feb 2015 #13
The ERA was passed and sent to the states for ratification within 7 yrs but time CK_John Feb 2015 #14
Can't be done SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #15
If we don't try we will never know. CK_John Feb 2015 #16
We absolutely do know SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #17
Over a 15-20 yr period, Yes. CK_John Feb 2015 #18
In order to utilize a 15-20 year ratification period SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #19
At the rate states are eliminating any path to a legal abortion the public tide will shift CK_John Feb 2015 #20
Yeah, OK n/t SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #21

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
6. There are several methods, none of which are easy but just getting a plan and
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 09:44 PM
Feb 2015

starting the process will rattle the opposition and hopefully they will overreach and something could get done.

Do nothing gets nothing done.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
2. I can't think of much that would meet requirements for an amendment these days.
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 09:31 PM
Feb 2015

It's sad, but reality.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,740 posts)
3. 11,539 amendments have been proposed since 1789.
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 09:39 PM
Feb 2015

Of those, only 27 have been adopted and ratified. That's about .023%. I think the chance of any amendment succeeding these days falls into the category of "slim to none."

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
4. This SCOTUS will never overturn it. Too much money in defending it.
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 09:39 PM
Feb 2015

This SCOTUS is about nothing but money.

Fundies are suckers.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
5. The bar is high for a constitutional amendment.
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 09:42 PM
Feb 2015

You'll never get it out of Congress, let alone get it past 3/4 of the state legislatures.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
12. That is the worst possible idea.
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 10:45 PM
Feb 2015

A constitutional convention opens up it all.

They could decide to throw out the existing constitution and devise an entirely new document.

Dumbest idea ever. There's a reason there hasn;t been a state sponsored constitutional convention in 226 years.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
9. We couldn't get an Equal Rights Amendment passed, but you think we could get an abortion
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 10:08 PM
Feb 2015

amendment passed?

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
10. But we got the amendment it just didn't get enough states and not enough time.
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 10:22 PM
Feb 2015

We could use the ERA as a platform and add a phrase to add the right to body control.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
11. Not getting enough states means we didn't get it. And I don't think we'd
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 10:30 PM
Feb 2015

increase the odds by tacking on an abortion-related clause.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
17. We absolutely do know
Sun Feb 22, 2015, 12:59 PM
Feb 2015

38 states are required to ratify a Constitutional amendment. In 2013 alone, 22 states passed restrictions on abortion. Do you really believe that 10 of those states are going to suddenly change their minds, and agree to put Roe v. Wade into the Constitution?

No way.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
19. In order to utilize a 15-20 year ratification period
Sun Feb 22, 2015, 01:08 PM
Feb 2015

you would have to take the Congressional route, meaning you'll need 2/3 of the House and Senate to present the amendment to the states. Such a time period would automatically exclude the possibility of a ratifying convention.

Good luck with that.

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
20. At the rate states are eliminating any path to a legal abortion the public tide will shift
Sun Feb 22, 2015, 01:12 PM
Feb 2015

quickly. The name of the game is to be ready for it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Since Roe v Wade is just ...