Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 10:19 PM Feb 2015

Why don't Beltway Dems defend the idea that higher education is a social good in and of itself?

Why have so many of our party's leaders bought unquestioningly into the GOP notion that "college is just to learn enough to get a job, dammit-not for any of that 'opening your mind' or 'gaining insight and awareness' crap!"?

Frankly, I think a lot of our party's more "moderate" figures would be just fine with the equivalent of Scott Walker's efforts to crush "The Wisconsin Idea".

Is there any reason for our party's strategists to assume that the majority of the American people hate the idea of university education as anything other than "white-collar trade school"?

And is there any reason to assume that it's going to actually serve the greater good for colleges to exist for no other reason than to pass on "job skills"?

Really makes no sense that OUR party's leaders seem to be trying to out "anti-intellectual" the far right.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. Hear, Hear!
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 10:22 PM
Feb 2015

I was one of those oddballs who entered a five year program just because I was interested in the field.

Never intended to become a practicing architect, just loved the discipline of it.

We are presently torturing students and parents and teachers with a conviction that everyone who doesn't go to college is a failure.

As long as we hold to this false value, we'll be condemning graduates to debt and disappointment, even as we lower the self-esteem and status of those who don't particularly see college as a useful endeavor.

What a fucked up world.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
2. Also, we are dismissing and dissing everyone who doesn't go to college
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 10:25 PM
Feb 2015

Solely for the purpose of "getting a job".

It doesn't even make good politics for Democrats to do this, since people who hate the idea of everyone getting the chance to have a life of the mind are never going to vote for any Democratic candidate anyway. We don't get the "I hate people who think too much" voters...and we shouldn't TRY to get them.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
6. Not sure it started even with him.
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 10:28 PM
Feb 2015

El Perro grande was never a big defender of higher education for higher education's sake-at least not when he was president and it actually mattered.

You'd think they'd remember that we do better as a party when the country values education and praises people who try to grow a soul.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
4. the anti-intellectual bias you speak of might explain
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 10:27 PM
Feb 2015

why so many white Americans hate President Obama. He sounds like a typical college educated smart guy talking down to "real Americans" like George Bush and Sarah Palin. He actually sounds like English is his first language.

Some studies show that approximately 40% of Americans are functionally illiterate. That 40% could include the people who cannot identify the current Vice-President, the people who think the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence are communist documents, and the people who feel that Jesus gave this country to white people to establish a white Christian theocracy.

My view.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
5. Excellent questions. Maybe they are just pandering to voters.
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 10:28 PM
Feb 2015

Or maybe it is because most of them aren't very bright or don't have much intellectual curiosity themselves.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
7. Most Educational Programs as we knew were
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 10:37 PM
Feb 2015

developed at the state level and were tweeked to produce the outstanding results they did. Remember this,most of our so Dems in D.C. come from Ivy League Schools. In saying that,Elitism runs rampant against Midwest School Systems. Let the Ego's roar seems to be there motto. Arnie Duncan is a example of what I refer to. Met this guy years back at a School Educators and concerned parents round table. What a total condescending asshole. That is being polite. At the time he was promoting his so called Core Curricula Project,did not go to well for the Duncan,did not hear or see anyone willing to even bit that farce of a program.

elleng

(130,974 posts)
8. They seem to take little or no issue with repugs' anti-education meme,
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 10:46 PM
Feb 2015

and it's a BIG problem. (Includes current administration's miserable education 'secretary,' and apparent point of view.)

LINDA DARLING-HAMMOND SHOULD have been Secretary.

Darling-Hammond, a professor of education at Stanford University, was an adviser to President Barack Obama during his first presidential campaign. She helped craft his education program and was considered an early candidate for education secretary (the position went to Arne Duncan). One of the pre-eminent authorities on education, she has advocated for school restructuring, education equity and improvement in teacher development.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
9. The economics make it a tough sell. Few have 100 grand noble ambition funds sitting around
Sat Feb 21, 2015, 10:58 PM
Feb 2015

something of that kind of cost absolutely must have nitty-gritty practical application and that mentality transfers to their broader view when it is the state or the nation's millions and billions.

These are folks that can be sold on outsourcing their own jobs, starving people, and allowing bridges to fall down.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
12. Your post makes the case for making university education or nearly-free for all.
Sun Feb 22, 2015, 12:54 AM
Feb 2015

Not for hostility to education for education's sake.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
14. I'm not hostile, I'm saying it is a tough sell. Yes, it does make the case but not to anyone who
Sun Feb 22, 2015, 02:04 AM
Feb 2015

doesn't already agree with that sentiment.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
15. I wasn't saying you personally were hostile.
Sun Feb 22, 2015, 02:10 AM
Feb 2015

More that what you describe in that post could actually be used to make a case for a radical policy, rather than the essentially conservative "education is just get a job" thing-if only our party's leaders had the stones to make it(and also to make the case that education for education's sake is something that everyone could take part in, rather than having to be reserved for an elite).

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
13. I'd say thanks for that, but I've done nothing to deserve any passive-aggression or dismissiveness
Sun Feb 22, 2015, 12:56 AM
Feb 2015

from you.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
16. Because flooding the market with college graduates lowers current graduates' wages
Sun Feb 22, 2015, 02:15 AM
Feb 2015

Educating the labor force doesn't (beyond certain marginal threshholds) change the jobs available. When we train more engineers, engineers make less, because there's only X amount of engineering people will pay to have done.

In terms of the idea of education preparing students to live as free citizens in a Republic, I'm afraid that ship sailed with Dewey's reforms.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why don't Beltway Dems de...