Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

randys1

(16,286 posts)
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 02:06 PM Feb 2015

MW? Climate Change? Healthcare? Gay Rights? Both parties are the same, right?

I am reading about WI

GOD DAMN WISCONSIN , of all places is going with right to work laws!





Where do our potential Democratic Presidential candidates stand on these issues? (Can only find this on Hillary, need help on the other potential candidates)

http://www.ontheissues.org/hillary_clinton.htm

I dont know, to be honest, but I bet they differ from the fucking fascist prick asshole kochsucking motherphuckers who are destroying working people and the environment.

Ya think?


17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
1. Globalization, "free trade", corporate capture of government, fracking, education deform, austerity,
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 05:01 PM
Feb 2015

military interventionism, pushing the stupid and failed drug war, insourcing, looting the commons, reining in Wall St, disdain for workers, and it goes on and on both parties are dangerously off track sometimes in distinct ways and sometimes frighteningly similar fashions.

Same is though not the only relevant and important measure. Things can be quite distinct and still both be unacceptable.

A 50% is a 100% different than 25% and both are failing grades.

Hepatitis C and HIV aren't the same both can be deadly and neither are good.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
2. Even if the ONLY difference was one would appoint a Woman killing SC justice
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 05:10 PM
Feb 2015

and one wouldnt, anyone who would NOT vote to prevent that insanity really has a problem.

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
3. No, I refuse to endorse a path that leads to any such place where every election breaks
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 07:38 PM
Feb 2015

down to a cynical hostage taking by my own party that is a rolling surrender to protect that hostage.

The notion is beyond ridiculous, the hostage is dead as fried chicken anyway they won't survive all the rest of the damage inflicted.
Holding on to that one item or even a few isn't going to maintain a viable society and we cannot trick ourselves into accepting such a posture.

This mentality makes winning virtually impossible because you are always going to fold and whether you realize it or not are starting the game negotiating surrender and living on your knees.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
4. Then you are not directly effected by such an irresponsible decision I assume
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 07:40 PM
Feb 2015

There is a reason why the vast majority of minorities and Women who arent brainwashed are going to vote no matter who the nominee is.

Now, for those who are a minority who hold your view, I said a long time ago I cant walk in the shoes so I wont judge.

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
9. You assume and we know what they say about that and you assume wrong.
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 02:13 AM
Feb 2015

Brainwashed? Brainwashed by what and by whom?

Maybe it is bit bigoted to paint everyone into your little boxes. Maybe they don't punch us out in a factory and just like white folks we are not produced on a template.

Let tell me you something, lack of comprehensive vision is not a virtue but a deadly and exploitable flaw no matter how noble the intentions are and if you can't grasp what a wicked vise you are in pretty quickly with this logic then I don't know what to tell you.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
12. To quote the poster:
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 02:23 AM
Feb 2015

"This mentality makes winning virtually impossible because you are always going to fold and whether you realize it or not are starting the game negotiating surrender and living on your knees."

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
5. I grant you those points.
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 07:52 PM
Feb 2015

But the economic policy of the Turd Way Democrats is utterly indistinguishable from that of their best friends, the banksters and the plutocratic oligarchy. They may boil us frogs a little more slowly, but boil us they will. Make book on it.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
13. ....
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 02:24 AM
Feb 2015

"This mentality makes winning virtually impossible because you are always going to fold and whether you realize it or not are starting the game negotiating surrender and living on your knees."

"Please master, don't hurt us!!!"

pampango

(24,692 posts)
7. Republicans used to support unions and the EPA,
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 08:05 PM
Feb 2015

so on some ways the parties were more alike back then than they are now.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
14. Ike was a flaming liberal compared to most democrats today, let alone republicans.
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 02:25 AM
Feb 2015

what is it you found 'bad'?

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
10. It's the neoliberal economic policies
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 02:19 AM
Feb 2015

...that the powers that be in the Democratic party have greedily embraced.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
15. Right to fire? Wisconsin,
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 02:28 AM
Feb 2015

home of so much labor history. Unreal.

Yes, I too would like to know where democrats stand on this issue.

How did the legislature vote, vis a vis the parties?

Behind the Aegis

(53,987 posts)
16. As some have 'grasiously' pointed out, there are some "bad" commonalities...
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 02:48 AM
Feb 2015

...a truth they miss is which party members would be easier to get to change their positions? But it seems some are always striving for purity, but it keeps changing.

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
17. Based on? Seems the outcomes of the failed policies would change minds but all I see is double down
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 11:11 AM
Feb 2015

and relentless rationalizations.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MW? Climate Change? Healt...