Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,725 posts)
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 10:32 AM Feb 2015

First human head transplant could happen in two years

New Scientist:

IT'S heady stuff. The world's first attempt to transplant a human head will be launched this year at a surgical conference in the US. The move is a call to arms to get interested parties together to work towards the surgery.

The idea was first proposed in 2013 by Sergio Canavero of the Turin Advanced Neuromodulation Group in Italy. He wants to use the surgery to extend the lives of people whose muscles and nerves have degenerated or whose organs are riddled with cancer. Now he claims the major hurdles, such as fusing the spinal cord and preventing the body's immune system from rejecting the head, are surmountable, and the surgery could be ready as early as 2017.

Canavero plans to announce the project at the annual conference of the American Academy of Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgeons (AANOS) in Annapolis, Maryland, in June. Is society ready for such momentous surgery? And does the science even stand up?

The first attempt at a head transplant was carried out on a dog by Soviet surgeon Vladimir Demikhov in 1954. A puppy's head and forelegs were transplanted onto the back of a larger dog. Demikhov conducted several further attempts but the dogs only survived between two and six days.


Okay...where do you get the more functional body?
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
First human head transplant could happen in two years (Original Post) brooklynite Feb 2015 OP
Maybe Rosey Grier has room for another head? Cooley Hurd Feb 2015 #1
Here's the same thing, only different. longship Feb 2015 #8
Or there's always Futurama: Initech Feb 2015 #16
My guess is from a brain-dead but otherwise healthy individual. House of Roberts Feb 2015 #2
such as Sarah Palin? LiberalEsto Feb 2015 #3
Exactly. mmonk Feb 2015 #4
You're assuming she's healthy. House of Roberts Feb 2015 #14
Yeah, or someone just shot in the head and freshly dead? Reter Feb 2015 #6
There are a bunch of those in Congress right now. And Fox News. randome Feb 2015 #7
Instead of several people getting specific organs they need ... Bad Thoughts Feb 2015 #5
More importantly... sarisataka Feb 2015 #9
They've got this backwards jberryhill Feb 2015 #10
I anticipate a new entry in Urban Dictionary regarding this. randome Feb 2015 #11
If they can fuse spinal cord then why are people paralyized now? nt Logical Feb 2015 #12
Yeah, the unfortunate beneficiary of such a surgery would be quite paralyzed. Yo_Mama Feb 2015 #13
With medicine as well as tech in general, IDemo Feb 2015 #15

longship

(40,416 posts)
8. Here's the same thing, only different.
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 11:01 AM
Feb 2015


The advantage to this form is obvious. One can hold two Pan Galactic Gargle Blasters, one for each mouth, while simultaneously gesturing.

House of Roberts

(5,182 posts)
14. You're assuming she's healthy.
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 12:38 PM
Feb 2015

I would say being Sarah Palin would result in significant amounts of self-generated poison and bile, resulting in a very internally diseased vessel.

 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
6. Yeah, or someone just shot in the head and freshly dead?
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 10:52 AM
Feb 2015

Do you get a choice of what body to go in?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
7. There are a bunch of those in Congress right now. And Fox News.
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 10:55 AM
Feb 2015

We should secure the supply before they become extinct.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]If you think childhood is finished, you didn't do it right the first time.
Start over.
[/center][/font][hr]

Bad Thoughts

(2,531 posts)
5. Instead of several people getting specific organs they need ...
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 10:51 AM
Feb 2015

... only one rich guy is going to benefit from organ donations. Welcome luxury medicine.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
10. They've got this backwards
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 11:28 AM
Feb 2015

It's not a "body transplant for a head", it's a "head transplant for a body".

It makes the organ donor form a bit odd. You get the choice of donating your organs individually or just opting to receive head.
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
11. I anticipate a new entry in Urban Dictionary regarding this.
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 11:36 AM
Feb 2015

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
13. Yeah, the unfortunate beneficiary of such a surgery would be quite paralyzed.
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 11:52 AM
Feb 2015

I view this as science fiction, and I am not sure how it could pass any ethics review committee!!!

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
15. With medicine as well as tech in general,
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 12:59 PM
Feb 2015

Because something becomes achievable does not necessarily make it a good idea. This is an utterly ludicrous concept.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»First human head transpla...