Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueStater

(7,596 posts)
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 06:52 PM Feb 2015

Scott Walker pressed for specifics at Club meeting

Scott Walker pressed for specifics at Club meeting

By James Hohmann

2/28/15 1:37 PM EST

PALM BEACH, Fla. — Two days after provocatively suggesting that standing up to organized labor in Wisconsin has prepared him to fight terrorists overseas as president, Scott Walker told a crowd of conservative donors on Saturday that “the most significant foreign policy decision” of his lifetime was when Ronald Reagan fired 11,000 air traffic controllers.

Walker, who became a national figure by picking his own fight with public-employee unions, was responding to tough questions about his economic plans and national security chops at the Club for Growth’s annual meeting here.

“Candidly, I think foreign policy is something that’s not just about having a PhD or talking to PhDs. It’s about leadership,” he said. “I would contend the most significant foreign policy decision in my lifetime was made by a president who was previously a governor. A president who made a decision that wasn’t even about foreign policy. It was in August of 1981, when Ronald Reagan fired the air traffic controllers.”

Frayda Levin, a member of the Club for Growth’s board of directors who was moderating a question-and-answer session, told Walker that he left donors unimpressed at a meeting in New York earlier this month. That private session came one day after another controversial Walker event where Rudy Giuliani declared that President Barack Obama does not love America.

More: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/02/scott-walker-club-for-growth-meeting-2015-115617.html

This guy is practically Palin-level of stupid. How did this fucking bonehead win three times in Wisconsin?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scott Walker pressed for specifics at Club meeting (Original Post) BlueStater Feb 2015 OP
Bonehead voters identify with him. nt valerief Feb 2015 #1
Air traffic controllers and foreign policy, hmmmm GusBob Feb 2015 #2
First someone might want to explain the meaning of the word 'specifics' to Walker. Siwsan Feb 2015 #3
Wait, did he just imply ... surrealAmerican Feb 2015 #4
ELECTORAL FRAUD? malaise Feb 2015 #5
Tail gunner Joe won elections in WI. Downwinder Feb 2015 #6
John Birch, Tail-gunner/failed chicken farmer Joe all strong in Outagamie County HereSince1628 Feb 2015 #8
"dwellers on the other side of the stream." Downwinder Feb 2015 #9
Yeah….. WTF Wisconsin? world wide wally Feb 2015 #7
well it wasn't for lack of trying...we had good, one very near record voter turnouts HereSince1628 Feb 2015 #10
apparently he thinks ignoring ISIS will work. pansypoo53219 Feb 2015 #11

Siwsan

(26,298 posts)
3. First someone might want to explain the meaning of the word 'specifics' to Walker.
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 06:57 PM
Feb 2015

He's definitely not the brightest bulb in the chandelier.

surrealAmerican

(11,364 posts)
4. Wait, did he just imply ...
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 06:57 PM
Feb 2015

... that he will fire the terrorists?
... and replace them with non-union terrorists?
... all because he doesn't have or know anybody with a PhD?

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
8. John Birch, Tail-gunner/failed chicken farmer Joe all strong in Outagamie County
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 07:32 PM
Feb 2015

A region of the state that remains teahadi red

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
10. well it wasn't for lack of trying...we had good, one very near record voter turnouts
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 08:00 PM
Feb 2015
1st time off-year election (as WI gov elections always are) lower turnout among some WI dems. His opposing candidate was Mayor of Milwaukee and former congressman Barrett. There is strong anti-Milwaukee sentiments in much of WI it plays variously as urban vs rural, welfare vs anti-welfare, and some but much less flat out racism. Western and se WI voters didn't turnout...

The election went 52% Walker, 46.3 Barrett the difference was 6 percent but represents a swing of only 3% would have taken it the other way.

Recall/Special elections that took place was unfortunately a rerun of the 2010 election. Exactly the same candidates, the ACT 10 tyranny amd anti-unionism were the central issues behind the recall.

The rerun/recall election was held in June, not during the general election. This hurt Dems as dem voter turnout drops for non general elections and (on edit) that date was targeted to cage college and university student voters who would between home and college residences without time to change registrations.

VOter turnout was good. It was very good for the Teaparty which was very highly motivated by conservative talk radio and supported by out of state Koch money.

One more SE WI county went for Barrett The result was 53.1 Walker to 46.3 for Barrett. Pretty much exactly the same as the earlier election.

The 2014 election Walker ran against a candidate from the WI Dem right. For many years a DC lobbyist, then an executive in her family business...where she ended up painted with supporting the off-shoring of jobs that occurred at Trek bicycles. She was painted as a corpo-dem

Voter turnout in this election was 2nd highest in the nation for that off-year. Dem turnout was better in Western and Central WI. Again SE Wisconsin turnout wasn't strong for Dems. Dems voting INCREASED over previous elections but the increase wasn't great enough

Overall the election results were 52.3 for Walker and 46.6 Mary Burke DOES THAT LOOK FAMILIAR? It's pretty much exactly the same as the previous Walker elections. Again the difference would have been overcome with a 3% swing.


So. The lesson here is the state is closely divided, but the teahad has the upper hand. WIDem isn't running candidates with charisma or message that motivates voters. THe dem base IS voting and increasing voting and is still getting beaten. Money, Media, lack of motivating message or commanding personality are all factors
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scott Walker pressed for ...