General Discussion

global1

(25,270 posts) Tue Mar 3, 2015, 11:39 AM Mar 2015

So Who Thinks Bibi's Speech Today Will Get Excessive News Coverage?....

Don't Bibi and Boehner win on this? This story will dominate the news cycle for a couple of days. There will be all sorts of analysis of what Bibi says and in the end it might accomplish what they want - to kill the Iranian plan.

I just can't believe that more Dems won't boycott it.

The President and John Kerry are doing what is best and if this speech today sends some sort of negative message to Iran and kills this deal - it seems to me that this would put Israel in more peril.

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So Who Thinks Bibi's Speech Today Will Get Excessive News Coverage?.... (Original Post) global1 Mar 2015 OP

Yes it will get excessive coverage. I would like to think the Democrats attending it are doing so still_one Mar 2015 #1

The Oregonian hasn't fredamae Mar 2015 #2

still_one

(92,382 posts)

1. Yes it will get excessive coverage. I would like to think the Democrats attending it are doing so

Reply to global1 (Original post)

Tue Mar 3, 2015, 11:50 AM

Mar 2015

in order to rebuttal the involvement of a foreign government, ally or not, trying to dismantle negotiations between the U.S. and Iran.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)

2. The Oregonian hasn't

Reply to global1 (Original post)

Tue Mar 3, 2015, 01:02 PM

Mar 2015

mentioned it so far nor have they informed the public about our Dem senators - merkley/wyden-attending.

MSM....manipulating news you can't use.....will they take the "out of sight-out of mind" approach in hopes Americans Short term memory loss prevails once again-just like it did over the GOPShutdown?
God forbid Anyone should DARE mention how many Dems are In attendance and NO-I am Not going to accept the bs meme "we just wanted to hear what he had to say"...then why not tune in to CSPAN like the rest of the peons? Or?

This is very revealing, imo-about dems, their intent, their focus and who they support.

Reply to this discussion