General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRight-Wing Attorney Larry Klayman Will Use the Email Scandal to Bury the Clintons At Last
By Beth EthierConservative attorney-cum-activist Larry Klayman, whose accomplishments include throwing Obama impeachment parties that drew tens of people to the White House and filing a suit against Rachel Maddow for $50 million only to be ordered to pay her legal fees, is turning his focus back toward one of his favorite targets: the Clintons. Klayman has vowed that he will bring Hillary Clinton to justice for her use of a private email account while serving as secretary of state, an arrangement first reported this week in the New York Times.
An email sent from Klaymans organization Judicial Watch on Wednesday pledges hard-hitting legal action against Clinton, who will evidently soon be the subject of several court filings. Best to let them explain:
Larry Klayman, Esq., the founder of Judicial Watch and now Freedom Watch and a former federal prosecutor at the U.S. Department of Justice, announced today that he is filing motions for orders to show cause why Hillary Clinton and the Obama State Department should not be held in criminal contempt for lying to various courts (and obstructing justice) over their responses to FOIA Requests seeking records concerning Hillary Clinton's role as Secretary of State in releasing information about Israeli war plans and methods to eliminate the Iranian nuclear weapons of mass destruction programs and the decision-making process in her granting waivers to companies, countries and other interests. ...
Just yesterday, General David Petraeus agreed to a criminal plea deal over his alleged misuse of national security classified information. It is likely that Hillary Clinton's misuse rises to an even greater level of criminality.
The message goes on to detail Klaymans decades-long legal beef with the Clintons, including obstruction charges Klayman says Hillary should have faced for withholding documents he requested during the Starr investigation. Klayman claims she only escaped jail because a District of Columbia predominantly African-American Democrat jury would have never convicted her. At the time, Klayman also accused the Clintons of smearing his dead grandmothers name by way of a Newsweek article about a lawsuit Klayman filed against his mother.
In his more recent action against Rachel Maddow and MSNBC, Klayman claimed his client, heavy metal preacher Bradlee Dean, was defamed when Maddow accurately relayed a quote from Deans radio show in which he expressed support for laws overseas applying the death penalty for homosexuality. After Klayman sued Maddow and a handful of other journalists on Deans behalf, the case ended with a dismissal and an order for Klayman to pay more than $24,000 in legal fees. Klayman insisted he lost because of sexism and anti-Christian bias on the part of the female judge.
more
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/03/04/larry_klayman_conservative_attorney_intends_to_file_motions_to_hold_clinton.html?
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Can you imagine if a guy like this lived in a place like Somalia
Oh the ass kicking he would get, daily
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)If I started digging the Clintons' political grave every time one of these nincompoops said they were finished, I'd be eating fucking chop suey in China by now.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)Read more at http://www.snopes.com/food/origins/chopsuey.asp#2YIlWIyexTPEULyE.99
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I was just quoting her character.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)that would be wrong.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Oh how the mighty have fallen. Now he is nothing more than a celebrity circus act.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Let's face it, 'private email servers' are too boring a scandal. The vast majority of voters won't give a damn. It's great fun to discuss on a blog, but if it shifts votes when elections roll around, it's gonna be a tiny fraction of the overall vote.
pennylane100
(3,425 posts)I am no legal expert but I thought one needed standing in order to bring suit. If so, what exactly is his. Another problem for him might be the fact that what Hilary did, was legal at the time. The law that would have made her save any work related emails did not become law until after she resigned.
So go for it Larry, put every dime you have into it and hopefully you will lose it all.
dhill926
(16,346 posts)that is so against filing frivolous lawsuits?