As though a non existent email scandal was more important that some serious global affairs.

The National Journal is a inside the beltway rag that self appointed members of the elite use to communicate with one another. It hardly is a periodical for the masses.

For another, she better get ready to handle far more heat and flames if she really wants to run. Which I begin to doubt.

Finally, if she does run, dealing with such attacks will only make her stronger. If she runs.

They have enough to do.

It got to the point where Skinner interjected that there were a lot worse Republicans and he wasn't deserving of such treatment.

with MoveOn.org

You guys crack me up. Conspiracies everywhere!

"Enough is enough."

Seems appropriate here.

And hosting it yourself at a private residence on private servers???

Well, that's just a whole different dimension.

We have had ours for 10 years and it has never been hacked and my husband is in the computer security biz so hackers would love to get to him and read his emails.

There are two sides to every email conversation and security at one end doesn't insure total security.

Ask your husband about that.

Honey pots.

I think that might be why you've never been hacked.

Many of the people who set up home servers aren't in the computer security biz, and don't know how to really button everything up tightly.

There are companies that do just that...............not the Geek Squad.

Here in flyover country, my home setup is more secure than those of most of the small businesses in town, and I'm not even a security guy. Sure, I had a masters in systems, but I spent my paid career in IT mostly doing coding and database, with only self-taught knowledge on security, mainly because I was the one making sure our servers met the standards for doing credit card work and passed the quarterly tests. Most people around here, for home or actual small businesses are just getting things set up by 'Geek Squad' equivalents. They're 'pros' only in that they get paid for their work, not because they're security specialists.

No? Your anecdote is irrelevant and in no way proves your claim that 'a private server is more secure'.
We've never been hacked therefore private servers are more secure than the State Department!

Why would I, as a Democrat, take anything these Republican shills have to "report" seriously again?

Again, National Journal is as reliably Republican as Breitbart - just not as in-your-face. Liberals know this. Why is it news to you?

[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesn’t always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one you’re already in.[/center][/font][hr]

What is this your third fucking post of the morning on this shit? We get it you're not a Hillary fan & no matter what occurs you will ensure that it appears to be the most horrible despicable thing ever to occur.

themselves for government correspondence perhaps.

I wonder if any Congress person used their smart phone to send personal email related to government business

If they want a witch hunt for Hillary, I suggest we do a witch hunt for everyone in government, and expose anyone who used a personal email account for government work.

I know that there a Congressional critters who use twitter accounts when they are working on their jobs, and frankly if a twitter account is allowed on a government computer wouldn't be a security breech?

1. The media is taking care of the story. Until the next so called scandal comes along. In a few days other information will surface -- predictable pattern.

2. Kerry is the first secretary of state to use a gov. email. So the 'shock' should include ALL previous SOS folk.

3. yawn.

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Treat your body like a machine. Your mind like a castle.[/center][/font][hr]

shocking that might explain this silence.

Members of Congress are not covered by any of this - they are free to simply DESTROY any and all of their correspondence while in office. They don't have to archive anything.

I think a major reform in 'transparency' and allowing sunshine into governmental actions would be to extend requirements similar to current requirements to all of Congress and their staffs. Maybe put a one year delay in allowing that info to be accessed by the public by FOIA.

.. that the broad details of the allegations made are true (which I believe they are and I also believe that is why no one approached wants to talk about it).

If a Republican did this you'd all be screaming bloody murder. But since it was "your" guy it's all smears, not important, government transparency is not possible, etc, etc, etc.

See why I don't trust the judgment of many people here? I want ACTUAL INTEGRITY in government not presumed integrity because it was someone on my team.

If you cheerleaders want to do some good, come up with a rationale that excuses this, stop trying to act like everything is lies only when its against your guy.

This isn't some made up smear by the RW, this is something that looks really bad because it is really bad.

No one is bothered by this except the Hillary haters.