Fournier has been a Bushie for many years.

Jeb is his 'new' assignment and he was put at National Journal to target moderate voters for Jeb.

Mainly because he has been doing it from publications considered to be non biased. He finds a way to describe any action by Dems as sinister while finding ways to take sinister actions by Bushies and cast them as benign.

Disgusting Bushbot, he was (and is).

Also, Media Matters for America is one of the best, if not the BEST, source for news in the United States. We get fed propaganda day in, day out, but MMfA separates the wheat from the chaff each and every time. Naysayers call MMfA "a liberal blog" but in all truth, based on their reporting and catching the subtle pieces of propaganda woven into news, MMfA is the premier watchdog of U.S. news propaganda that we're fed on a daily basis from all U.S. media, in print, broadcast, cable, and radio airwaves.

He looks like the guy who forecloses on granny.

This shit is disgusting.

They can watch their hero's hold a press conference here: http://benghazi.house.gov/

through their teeth about Benghazi since it happened.

Why should anyone watch his presser?

The presser isn't about Benghazi.

"Watch press conference with Chairman Gowdy and Members of the Select Committee on Secretary Clinton Emails"

This is where the committee on Benghazi has gone. I thought this was well know at this point.

Gowdy is being full of shit about everything - and he knows it.

I am not impressed with your urging to spread Mr FullOfCrap.

who think he's their warrior god. He never met a talking point from Moonie News he didn't repeat.

He has plenty of people drooling.

.

It is also clear you didn't know "everything" as you claim. Your reply to me is clear proof of that. I find that when people claim to know everything about something or someone, that they actually know very little. I am also not the one spreading his crap. It is all of those drooling over the right winger and the "email scandal" who are propping him up. It could be no more clear you weren't aware of "everything."

.

This place makes me scratch my head at times.

horrible people who dare to have different opinions?

From day one around here, or so I thought.

or right-winger false flag operatives?

Do you have a schedule I could print out? Thanks.

...backed by the biggest donors, and invented the concept of following right-wingers' lead.

Your post indicates a lack of critical thinking skill.

It's much easier to be spoon-fed what to think, isn't it?

And there is no history of this poster attacking other DUers for holding differing opinions.

And the post is entirely about journalism, which is why the post title ends with "DU's newest hero"

Red baiting, are we, seems illiberal.

The Russian word only has one M. The term also predates communism, though mostly as "police captain" as opposed to a party official.

In any case, you make a lot of posts that attempt to limit the allowable opinions on DU. I'd suggest we would be better off actually discussing these differences instead of tossing overboard people who do not agree with you.

You might find out interesting things. Like apparently Clinton's email system was actually horribly insecure. They never replaced the factory default encryption key. So anyone could decrypt everything going to or from her email.

Also, there's a typosquatter at clintonmail.com (No "e" in front of "mail&quot . No information available about who this is, but the domain was registered not long after the real one. You can't typosquat a .gov address, because only the US government can give those out.

Now, the guy is a right-wing hack. And he left out the important detail that the regulations he claims Clinton violated did not exist until she left office.

But hosting your own email as SoS is a really, really bad idea. Doubly so if you're as much of a scandal target as Clinton.

That's the part that still knocks me out, too. I mean, this is a no-brainer. Even if we put laws and rules completely aside, it just looks awful and suspicious.

How could Hillary Clinton, a person who has had a front row seat for a whole series of scandals, both real and manufactured, a person whom the whole world knows will be running for President in one year against a party that lives and breathes manufactured scandals, possibly do something so stupid?

Even if her defenders are 100% correct and she was not trying to hide information from the public/future investigative bodies, the action still speaks of either deep arrogance or utter incompetence.

At least based on the security of her server.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-04/clinton-s-e-mail-system-built-for-privacy-though-not-security

They left the "factory default" encryption key in place. Anyone who wanted to read everything to or from her server had an almost-open door.

Doesn't mean I have to give them cyber blow jobs either.

so then that person is labeled as the "hero" of their perceived enemies?

DemocratSinceBirth